By Gazette Staff
August 29th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
 Saturday schedule for September 1st.
On Monday, September 1, GO Transit will be running a Saturday schedule.
Customers are encouraged to check schedules and plan their trip before travelling.
To make the most of your travel, take advantage of the $10 GO holiday/weekend pass.
You can take GO wherever you want, on Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays.
Riders can also transfer for free with One Fare between GO Transit and most local transit systems, including the TTC.
By Gazette Staff
August 25th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
We received a note from a Gazette reader about traffic congestion during the weekend. Drivers inched along Lakeshore Road from Martha in the east to Mapleview in the west..
The side streets that flowed into Lakeshore were more stop than start.
The disruption is the result of road closures related to the maintenance work being done on the xxx lanes BETTER
Dennis Hewko, a North Shore Boulevard East resident wrote us: .
Dear Sir or Madam
I am a resident of Burlington and I lover the downtown and waterfront access and this summer on weekends when the Skyway Bridge is closed southbound for repairs the Downtown Core of Burlington specifically Northshore and Lakeshore become congested as commuters on the QEW try to bypass the traffic congestion by using side roads and thus also congest all the side streets in Burlington.
There is a very simple solution, close the access ramps to the QEW southbound from Lakeshore and Northshore and then commuters will not use these core arteries feeding downtown Burlington. This was actually done once this summer but for some reason it has not been done since.
I sent a letter to the Mayor and the response, which you can see below is very disappointing as the Mayor offloads this issue saying this is the MTO’s decision to control the access ramps ! I fully understand who is officially responsible for closing these access ramps but the City of Burlington needs to have an open dialogue with the MTO and being advocating for these ramps to be closes when they close southbound lanes to ensure that the City of Burlington does not become gridlocked.
Below is my letter to the Mayor, their response and my response.
Dennis Hewko,
 Transportation issued notices, often as late as the day before, and once on the day of the closures.
Hewko to the Mayor:
So once again the residents of Burlington were stuck in a traffic gridlock as the MTO closed down 2 lanes on the sky way bridge for repair work on the weekend and the City of Burlington Failed to communicate with the MTO to have the access ramps from North Shore and Lakeshore to QEW South bound closed so that commuters would not try to use these roads as by pass roads for the QEW back up.
So disappointing that such an easy solution as closing these access ramps can enable the citizens of Burlington to have access to the down town core and enjoy the water front, restaurants and shops instead citizens are forced to stay in their homes unless they want to sit in a traffic gridlock for hours
Disappointed Citizen: Dennis Hewko, North Shore Boulevard East
Mayors Office responded:
Thank you for reaching out to share your perspective. I brought your email to the Mayor’s attention and she certainly understands the disruption caused by ongoing construction on provincially owned highways.
I wanted to make sure my previous response was received as it clarifies the jurisdiction of closing highway on/off ramps. The City’s Transportation team communicate with the Ministry of Transportation and provide their input on projects that affect Burlington. If you would like to advocate to the Ministry of Transportation separately on this item, you could reach out to the Hon. Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria.
Kind regards and a lovely rest of your day and week.
Hannelie van Niekerk | Executive Administrator: Office of Mayor Marianne Meed Ward | City of Burlington
Hewko responds:
The Mayor offloads this issue saying this is the MTO’s decision to control the access ramps ! I fully understand who is officially responsible for closing these access ramps but the City of Burlington needs to have an open dialogue with the MTO and begin advocating for these ramps to be closed when they close southbound lanes to ensure that the City of Burlington does not become gridlocked.
Mayor
The City’s Transportation team communicate with the Ministry of Transportation and provides their input on projects that affect Burlington. If you would like to advocate to the Ministry of Transportation separately on this item, you could reach out to the Hon. Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria.
 Photographed at the AMO conference. Third from the right: Hon. Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria, Ministor of Transportation; far left Burlington MPP Natalie Pierre.
HEWKO TO THE Mayor – AFTER she responded to him
Thank you for your response, I did get your last response suggesting that I reach out to the MTO which I find very disappointing. As a citizen of Burlington we elect officials who then hire and oversee administrative staff to advocate on the behalf of citizens of Burlington to ensure that Citizens best interests are being looked after. So I am expecting the City of Burlington elected officials to ensure that the City Traffic department has developed an open communication channel with the MTO and that they are taking the necessary action to ensure that when the MTO does lane closures that the impact is minimized on the citizens of Burlington and specifically access to the downtown core of Burlington. This is EASILY done by closing the south bound access from Lake Shore and North Shore when southbound EW lanes are closed on the Skyway Bridge. ( This was done for 1 weekend ) This then ensures that commuters are not using the City of Burlington streets to bypass the QEW resulting in traffic jams in the downtown core of Burlington and roads leading to the downtown core ie) Lake Shore and North Shore, making transiting in the City impossible.
Please ask that a line of communication is established with the MTO and if the Traffic Department is unable to achieve an agreement with the MTO on closing QEW southbound access from Lakeshore and North Shore when the Sky Way Bridge south bound lanes are closed, that the elected City Officials take this on with the Provincial Government so this can be achieved. At the end of the day all these decisions are being made by people and we need to ensure that the best decisions are being made as the impact of poor decisions makes Burlington unlivable during these Sky Way Bridge South Bound Lane Closures.
Mayor Meed Ward issued a report on what she and four members of Council managed to achieve at the AMO conference that took place earlier in the month:
Met with the Minister of Transportation, the Honourable Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria
Burlington Skyway Bridge
-
-
- Ministry of Transportation (MTO) officials recognized the ongoing need for careful coordination with City of Burlington to communicate and ease local traffic impacts. Next steps will include more communication from the MTO to drivers and looking at additional mitigation measures during Burlington Skyway Bridge lane closures. This will work towards the City’s goal to minimize spillover impacts during necessary maintenance.
What does that mean? The deck of the bridge has to be maintained- better notice would help.
What it comes down to is poor, very poor communication from the Ministry of Transportation. The city just repeats what MTO puts out.
By Gazette Staff
August 22nd, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
City of Burlington’s mayor, some councillors and staff recently attended the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) 2025 Annual General Meeting and Conference in Ottawa to meet with provincial government leaders. The City delegation, led by Mayor Marianne Meed Ward, sought to advance Burlington’s top strategic priorities, such as environmental sustainability, economic health and housing, with provincial leaders to encouraging outcomes.
Look on it as a report card on what City Councillors (not all of them) and the Mayor achieved while in Ottawa
Burlington representatives met with government officials including cabinet ministers, MPPs and industry contributors to discuss and advocate for housing affordability; protecting local greenspaces; providing predictable infrastructure and transit funding to municipalities; local economic growth and skills development.
Strategic discussions took place with:
- Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Honourable Rob Flack
- Minister of Transportation, the Honourable Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria
- Minister of Energy and Mines, the Honourable Stephen Lecce
- Minister of Natural Resources, the Honourable Mike Harris
- Minister of Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security, the Honourable Nolan Quinn
- Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Finance, M.P.P. Michelle Cooper
Outcomes from these delegation meetings include:
Burlington Skyway Bridge
- Ministry of Transportation (MTO) officials recognized the ongoing need for careful coordination with City of Burlington to communicate and ease local traffic impacts. Next steps will include more communication from the MTO to drivers and looking at additional mitigation measures during Burlington Skyway Bridge lane closures. This will work towards the City’s goal to minimize spillover impacts during necessary maintenance.
What does that mean? The deck of the bridge has to be maintained- better notice would help.
Address housing affordability and homelessness
- Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) confirmed that the review of City of Burlington’s Official Plan Amendment No. 2 will soon be complete that will enable the advancement of several key housing development approval improvements including the adoption of a Community Permitting and Planning System (CPPS) that would simplify multiple pre-application documents into a single application. This will enable the City to prepare a CPP Bylaw for the City’s three MTSAs.
That had to be done – did it mean a trip to Ottawa to meet with the Minister when all the other municipalities wanted to meet with the man.
Protecting local greenspaces
-
- Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) staff engaged in strategic dialogue with the Burlington delegation around advancing the options to protect areas around Mount Nemo and the Niagara Escarpment. This significant Burlington greenspace could be protected by using provincial land designations that would prohibit or limit certain types of land uses and aggregate extractions. Burlington requested that the province redesignate the lands at Mount Nemo as Escarpment Natural and Escarpment Protection to ensure the long-term viability of our local ecosystems.
Very important – no mention of what the city got in the way of response.
Mohawk College expansion to Burlington
-
- Ministry of Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security (MCURES) officials discussed the college’s planned healthcare-focused campus expansion into the City of Burlington with Burlington’s delegation and Mohawk College President, Paul Armstrong. Moving forward, MCURES remains strategically engaged with the college and the City in the planning process for this transformative investment to advance skills development and grow Ontario’s economy.
Now this one made sense. It was a place where all the people involved were in the room; City people, Ministry people, and people from Mohawk College. Hopefully there was enough time to cover all the bases.
Electricity Infrastructure
-
- The Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) team engaged in a lengthy discussion with Burlington delegates to better understand local energy infrastructure challenges and its impacts on municipal housing starts. The group engaged in conversations with City staff about the actions and investments required to support Burlington and its development partners in unlocking further housing potential through electricity infrastructure. They came to a mutual recognition that additional provincial resources may be required to advance prospective projects, particularly in Burlington’s Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs).
I was with them on this one until the word “may” was used.
Strengthening the Municipal-Provincial Fiscal Relationship to Protect Our Communities
- Ministry of Finance (MOF) officials recognized the challenging impacts that current economic conditions are having on municipalities and provided assurances that municipalities will be eligible for future components of the province’s $5B Building Ontario Fund so planned municipal priority projects can proceed on time and on budget.
The Burlington delegation, Ward 1 Councillor Kelvin Galbraith, Ward 3 Councillor Rory Nisan, Ward 5 Councillor Paul Sharman; Ward 6 Councillor Angelo Bentivegna; CAO Curt Benson; Head of Corporate Affairs, Leah Bortolotti and Corporate Strategic Leads of Government Relations, Jayson Doll and Paul Szachlewicz, participated in strategic meetings and conference programming relevant to Burlington’s Strategic Plan priorities.
Municipalities are creatures of the province. Expecting the province to give up very much of the power they have is unrealistic. But they will continue to press for more.
Mayor Meed Ward serves as the Chair of Ontario’s Big City Mayors (OBCM) and led OBCM’s discussions with:
- Deputy Premier, and Minister of Health, the Honourable Sylvia Jones
- Minister of Finance, the Honourable Peter Bethlenfalvy
- Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Honourable Rob Flack
- Minister of Infrastructure, the Honourable Kinga Surma
- Attorney General, the Honourable Doug Downey
- Solicitor General, the Honourable Michael Kerzner
- Associate Attorney General, the Honourable Michael Tibollo
- Associate Minister of Mental Health and Addictions, the Honourable Vijay Thanigasalam
The Province of Ontario Government made these announcements responding directly to key municipal priorities for AMO members:
- The Municipal Housing Infrastructure Program (MHIP) will invest an additional $1.6 billion to speed up construction on homes and critical infrastructure. This investment nearly doubles the Municipal Housing Infrastructure Program (MHIP) to $4 billion, building on the province’s most recent $400 million increase in the 2025 provincial budget and giving municipalities and Indigenous communities the resources to build roads, bridges and water systems for new housing.
- The new Capital Funding Program (CFP) will build more long-term care homes faster, especially in regions like the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) and northern Ontario impacted by labour shortages, supply chain constraints and other challenges. This new funding model is part of the government’s plan to protect Ontario by creating good jobs and building for the future, while making sure seniors get the quality of care and quality of life they need and deserve.
- The province’s $1.2B Building Faster Fund (BFF) eligibility criteria will be amended to better reflect current market conditions and the efforts of local municipalities to achieve provincially mandated housing starts. The BFF provides $400 million in annual funding for three years (2024-26) to municipalities that are on target to meet provincial housing targets by 2031. Municipalities that reach 80 per cent of their annual target each year become eligible for funding based on their share of the overall goal of 1.5 million homes. Municipalities that exceed their target receive a bonus on top of their allocation.
The City of Burlington will continue to advocate to all levels of government to advance the strategic priorities of Council and looks forward to future opportunities to engage with both federal and provincial officials.
Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) is a non-profit organization representing most of Ontario’s municipal governments. AMO supports and enhances strong and effective municipal government in Ontario and promotes the value of municipal government as a vital and essential component of Ontario and Canada’s political systems. Each year, Burlington leads a delegation to the conference and arranges meetings with key ministries and Members of Cabinet, and opposition party leaders to discuss and advocate for the City’s top priorities.
This year’s conference had over 3,000 attendees in Ottawa for three days of education, delegation meetings and networking opportunities.
 From left to right: Burlington Ward 5 Councillor Paul Sharman, Mohawk College President, Paul Armstrong, Burlington Ward 6 Councillor, Angelo Bentivegna, Burlington Mayor Marianne Meed Ward, and Burlington Chief Administrative Officer, Curt Benson, at the Rogers Centre in Ottawa for the 2025 AMO Conference.
By Gazette Staff
August 21st, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
 Changes have been made on some departure times. Check the schedule for lines you travel on.
Metrolinx has made some changes to its schedule
With the start of school around the corner, they are sharing service updates that include new GO Transit options, returning school service, and schedule changes on some routes.
Starting Tuesday, September 2nd, they are adjusting train service to better reflect actual travel times. Some trains on the Lakeshore West line will depart a few minutes earlier or later. Customers are encouraged to check the schedules before travelling.
As the summer winds down, seasonal GO Bus service to Canada’s Wonderland, Toronto Zoo and route 17B (University of Waterloo/Burlington GO) will wrap up for the year.
The last day for these services will be Sunday, August 24th.
GO is also taking students back to school. As in previous years, GO Bus service to post-secondary schools will be reinstated starting on Saturday, August 30th, with new additional express trips:
Route 15A –McMaster / Burlington
By Gazette Staff
August 19th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
Vital Signs, a report on the health of the community prepared by the Burlington Community Foundation will be released on September 16, followed by a panel discussion.
Vital Signs is Canada’s most extensive community-driven data program, led by Community Foundations of Canada and implemented by Community Foundations locally.
The report data, collected in partnership with Leger, presents a timely snapshot of how Burlington residents are feeling about, and engaged with, their community. We will discuss areas where our community is strong and where there are opportunities to grow.
This report, which will be the first Vital Signs Report BCF has released since 2017, is meant to serve as an important community resource to help inform decision-making, enliven conversations and spark civic engagement.
There is no cost to confirm your ticket. Click on “Burlington’s Vital Signs 2025 Launch” to reserve your spot. The event runs from 10:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.; free parking is available on site.
 Foundation CEO Megan Tregunno
Location: Art Gallery of Burlington (Shoreline/Rotary Room), 1333 Lakeshore Rd., Burlington, ON L7S 1A9
Foundation CEO Megan Tregunno will host a panel discussion with community leaders and subject experts about vital issues facing Burlington.
We look forward to hearing your thoughts and ideas on how we can continue to create collective action to strengthen our city.
Click HERE to get your free ticket.
Related news story:
Vital signs report 2017
By Gazette Staff
August 16th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
A group of eight people head for Ottawa to take part in the Annual General Meeting of the Association of Municipalities in Ontario.
City of Burlington’s Mayor Marianne Meed Ward, some Councillors and staff will attend the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) 2025 Annual General Meeting and Conference next week in Ottawa. From Aug. 17 to 20, the Mayor will lead a delegation from the City to advocate for Burlington’s priorities with government officials, including cabinet ministers, MPPs and industry stakeholders. Key discussion topics will include:
- traffic delays on the Burlington Skyway Bridge
- Not much the province can do – the bridge has to be repaired and maintained.
- the Mohawk College expansion in Burlington
- That planning for that initiative is well underway.
- expanded electricity infrastructure in Burlington to support growth around Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs)
- Vital – Burlington Hydro hasn’t said much publicly about just what they have in the way of capacity
- establishing provincial policies to support Burlington’s Community Planning Permit System (CPPS)
-
 Jamie Tellier explains to residents at a public meeting what the development is all about.
- Provincial land designations to protect Mount Nemo.
- Make sure whatever protection is needed is rock solid.
- Provincial support to advocate for financial coordination between all three levels of government
Burlington representatives will advocate for housing affordability, protecting local greenspaces; providing predictable infrastructure and transit funding to municipalities; local economic growth and skills development.
Individual meetings are scheduled with cabinet ministers and representatives from the Ministries of:
 [⚠️ Suspicious Content] Head of Corporate Affairs, Leah Bortolotti Municipal Affairs and Housing
- Finance
- Transportation
- Natural Resources
- Energy and Mines
- Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security
The Burlington delegation accompanying Mayor Marianne Meed Ward includes Ward 3 Councillor Rory Nisan; Ward 5 Councillor Paul Sharman; Ward 6 Councillor Angelo Bentivegna; CAO Curt Benson; Head of Corporate Affairs, Leah Bortolotti and Corporate Strategic Leads of Government Relations, Jayson Doll and Paul Szachlewicz to engage in strategic discussions with members of the provincial government and other key municipal stakeholders.
By Gazette Staff
August 16th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
Social media has given people an opportunity to say what they think on major community issues.
A Burlington resident who lives in a Lakeshore Road condo that over looks Spencer Smith Park posted a question on Facebook about funding the Sound of Music.
Here are some of the responses:
Candy Multamaki
Charge $5 per person for entry. Small enough to be affordable but enough to help with costs.
Dave Gionet
Try reaching out to streamers on X/Twitter. A lot of people on there don’t mind contributing to events they can stream with their proceeds. Try reaching out to schools for garbage pick up or minor volunteer work because students need to have so much community service hours put in. My parents did this for students when they were running a walk-a-thon in Hamilton for a bunch of years.
Samantha Maddison
For me it is about accessibility. It just isn’t feasible with a walker or wheelchair. I too would pay for more appealing line up with accessible ease. In this changing climate cooling areas and stations would be welcomed.
Kim Lalonde
Bring back street closings and street festivals, was just talking to a,retailer on Brant Street who did half in sales compared to last year. The street festival part of Sound of Music was the best.
Laura Wayne
I attended a symposium this year that discussed the future of music venues, large and small, in Toronto. Two of the key things that were noted by the presenters / experts are that too many people put their noses up at the thought of paying a cover fee to enter the venues when live music is being performed. As well, that alcohol sales are way down due to the cost to the consumer and cannabis now being legalized (and not for sale at the venue). I for one have no issue paying a reasonable cover charge when I know music I am interested in listening to is being performed. I do not have a solution to propose, but those are two of many issues that were discussed.
Kurt Sorensen
Partner with Rotary and merge with Ribfest, perhaps without the ribs and let the focus be local music with miscellaneous food options.
Mark Langlois
I was at the free kitchener Blues fest over the weekend. Looks like that event is thriving. Might be worth organizers to reach out to other successful events to see what they do differently.
Donna Dmd
It was better when it first started. Closing the streets & having various types of music in different areas.
Go local. Get back to basics. Not every band needs to be a head liner.
Get a good fundraiser. There are numerous businesses in Burlington.
Ditch the fence, that is suffocating & hard to get out.
Find a better park, with parking.
Keep it free – by donating at entrance with whatever one can afford. $1.00 / $2.00 etc…
Joseph Whiteman
Im on the charge bandwagon, wouldn’t go higher then 20.00. That’s what the biggest Canadian festival charged, the sars benefit cost. Also, When I was there this year. I was also sad seeing no street festival. Maybe that could come back as well. Music wise it hasn’t been too bad, but putting all music in one place with the two stages, with staggered times. This would cut some cost.
Alisha Mcmaster
Do what Oakville used to do. Charge a small fee for a weekend pass but allow the pass to give access to public transit to get down there as well. Anything on the side streets remain free but anyone wanting to go get in on the actual concerts have to pay.
Jimbo Jones
How about moving from Burlington to Hamilton
Top fan
Ted Bullock
What happened to Tim Hortons as a sponso
Susan Lord
It’s got to crowded. I used to enjoy it.
Rebecca Bowen
Absolutely start selling tickets/wristbands ($10 per person for a weekend of fun, will add up on your end). Oakville used to have the Waterfront festival. You purchase a button and with that came your entrance and free bus transportation all weekend. People will pay. I respect that you hold so high being a free festival, but free is in the past (unfortunately). SOM is Burlington. People will pay. Good luck!
Broad range of views . Are the Sound of Music people listening?
By Pepper Parr
August 13th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
The City of Burlington invites residents to its fifth annual Food for Feedback event on Saturday, Sept. 13, from noon to 4 p.m. at Central Park (2299 New St.).
This popular community event offers residents a unique opportunity to enjoy a free meal in exchange for sharing their thoughts on City projects and initiatives, while supplies last. It’s a chance to have your voice heard while connecting with neighbours, Council and City staff in a relaxed, family-friendly setting.
 Line-ups at Food Truck Stattions
Mayor Marianne Meed Ward, members of Council, City staff, and representatives from advisory committees will be on site to listen, engage, and gather valuable feedback that helps shape the future of Burlington.
 Council members set up their tents at the 2022 event. Not all participated.
The free drop-in event features 35 booths and five food trucks. There is a reserved area called the ‘Kidz Zone’ where children can have fun while family members provide feedback on City projects.
Feedback collected at the event is used to help the City continue to improve programs, services and initiatives.
If it rains, the event will move to the Burlington Seniors’ Centre.
I have one question for the Mayor and Councillor Kearns, who laud the event in their comments below:
Will you name one thing that you learned as a result of the surveys you did that was used to change a city program? Just the one thing.
This year, the City will be seeking feedback and sharing information on topics including:
- Burlington Transit
-
 The different colours meant absolutely nothing. If you thought the focus on Heritage issues changed – do let us know. The programs put on during the recent Heritage were not only disappointing but dismal as well.
Vision 2050
- Culture Plan
- New Zoning Bylaw Project
- 2026 Budget
- Recreation
- Parks
- Official Plan, and more!
Mayor Marianne Meed Ward: “Food for Feedback is a great way for the City and residents to connect directly in a relaxed and welcoming setting, and to share your perspectives on the City’s priorities. Your input matters—it helps guide the direction of our city, from how we build and move around, to property development, budgeting, and how we engage with the community. I’ll have a booth at the event and invite you to stop by and share what’s on your mind. Come out, grab a bite, and let’s talk about Burlington’s future—together.”
Lisa Kearns, Deputy Mayor of Community Engagement & Partnerships: “Your voice is vital to shaping Burlington’s future. The Food for Feedback event is a cornerstone of our commitment to community engagement, providing a platform for residents to share insights that directly influence our planning, investments, and connections. Join us in this meaningful initiative—your feedback drives impactful results and strengthens our shared vision for the community.”
By Pepper Parr
August 3rd, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
OPINION
When Curt Benson woke up this morning, he was the city’s Chief Administrative Officer (CAO); his predecessor was off to Queen’s Park.
The CAO is the only person hired by a City Council. His job is to be the administrator that includes the running of the city on a day to day basis. He is served by a number of Commissioners who are responsible for specific areas, legal, planning, finance, parks, recreation, city services and transit. There are others
The biggest part of the job is setting the tone, creating the kind of administration that the CAO believes will best serve the people who pay the taxes that fund the operation.
 Curt Benson was trained as a planner.
Curt Benson was trained as a planner. The decisions planners make last for a long time. Once a new road is built, it can’t be taken away. Once a major development is approved, the buildings can’t be torn down because people don’t like it.
Administrators on the other hand can often change a decision they made six months ago, realizing it isn’t working.
Benson brings a planners perspective to the job he has at least until the election in 2026.
What can we expect of him? Other than his inner voice – who will he listen to?
What does he have in the way of values?
He served the Region of Halton very well when he worked there as the planning chief.
Burlington was lucky to get him when planning was devolved to the municipal level.
He has been very good at ensuring the city got everything it could get in the way of housing development funding from the federal and provincial governments. He works well with developers but has never been described as a planner that works for developers. The two need each other and to date, at least in Burlington, there has never been any doubt as to where Curt Benson stands.
Benson doesn’t fudge his answers. Pretty straight.
As a planner, he knows that the work he does is being done to make lives better for the people who live in the housing developments his department approved and saw through to their completion.
Tough to say at this point how he will serve as an administrator. He will hire new people. Will he choose to find a way to send some of the people currently on staff to something more fitting to their skill set?
 Curt Benson: Photograph provided by the city along with the announcement of his appointment as CAO.
Hard as well to say how tough he is.
How would he have handled the allocation of swimming pool space to the swimming clubs? As the CAO he would not have been at the table, but he would have signed off on whatever the negotiators came back with.
How close will he adhere to the principles of accountability and transparency?
Curt Benson has an opportunity to nudge staff into being more accountable and a lot more transparent. One of the departments that needs the most help is the communications and public engagement group currently under the direction of Jacqueline Johnson, Commissioner of Community Services, which includes the Community Relations and Engagement people who are responsible for the city brand d and reputation management. Their roles include:
Developing and implementing public engagement programs
Developing a variety of communications materials, including print, web, video and social media
Media relations
 City Solicitor Blake Hurley.
The group struck out when it came to explaining to media and the public just what happened. Obfuscation and deflection were the rule of the game this time around. Reprehensible and just plan embarrassing; a failure at every level For the first time in my 12 years of covering city hall, I learn that people who are directly involved are told to refer people to city hall if they are asked any questions. The clubs should have told the city to stuff it. So much for brand reputation.
Benson is now in a position to tell staff that this is not the way he wants his staff to be doing business. That might mean reigning in the City Solicitor, who is believed to have led most of the negotiations with the swimming clubs. He would have certainly signed off on whatever was negotiated.
The city needs a CAO that has little time for lip service, genuinely wants an engaged community, is prepared to spend the time needed to educate the public and realizes that he needs media as much as they need him.
Let’s see how Curt Benson measures up. I think the guy has got it in him.
By Gazette Staff
August 1st, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
Burlington isn’t exactly jumping this long weekend.
However, the Toronto Caribbean Carnival will be taking place in Toronto, bringing with it an array of vibrant festivities located just steps away from the Exhibition GO Station.
On August 2, GO Transit is increasing train service along Lakeshore West to help you get to and from the Grand Parade.
Lakeshore West:
- NEW 10:32 a.m., 12:02 p.m., 12:32 p.m., 2:02 p.m., and 2:38 p.m. train trips departing Union Station to Exhibition GO.
- NEW train trip departing 5:28 p.m. from Exhibition GO to Union Station.
 The colour and the extravagance is stunning. You’ll never regret watching the event.
While most of the parade is free to watch, you can save 20% off with PRESTO Perks on ALL Caribbean Carnival ticketed events.
Customers can also take advantage of our $10 weekend day online passes that allow you to GO wherever you want, plus kids 12 and under can ride the GO for free! Riders can also transfer for free with One Fare between GO Transit and TTC.
This year will mark the 58th anniversary of the Caribbean Carnival, an annual celebration of Caribbean culture and traditions, with more than one million participants expected to attend this year. Learn more about taking GO Transit to this year’s Toronto Caribbean Carnival HERE.
By Gazette Staff
July 23, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
 Freeze non-union pay for 2026 and 2027, prioritizing fiscal discipline while protecting service delivery.
Thomas Duffries chose to send his delegation on the 2026 budget to City Council rather than delegate in person and be on hand to answer any questions Councillors might have.
The delegation was exceptional in its understanding of numerous funding plans available to the city.
- Employee Compensation and Well-being
- Freeze non-union pay for 2026 and 2027, prioritizing fiscal discipline while protecting service delivery.
- Enhance employee wellness:
o Expanded mental health and well-being supports.
o Begin phased implementation of a 4-day workweek.
o Increase starting vacation entitlement to three weeks, with accelerated progression timelines.
- Transit Service Enhancements
- Add 16 transit drivers in 2026, no new buses, funded through increased ridership and reduced overtime.
- The proposed amount does not help Burlington achieve its now expired Transit Plan. While Burlington Transit has made terrific gains in its ridership, it has not completed its goals of improving service. This amount will help achieve the goals set out in the plan.
Council should ask that Staff develop a Service Plan for 2026 consisting of options that will range from increasing service with 5 Operators, 8 Operators and 16 Operators. These Service Plan options should be developed and presented to Council during Budget 2026 and refined for implementation in June 2026. Handi Van service should not be expanded at this time.
- Free transit initiatives:
 Free transit and shuttles
o Free Summer transit for students to be permanently funded
o Free Christmas and March Break transit, funded through the Youth Initiatives
Reserve as a pilot pending results from Summer ridership.
o Free transit and shuttles during Sound of Music Festival and RibFest, and free transit on Canada Day and New Year’s Eve, funded potentially through the
Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT) and sponsorships.
- Pilot renewable diesel transition for transit and fleet vehicles to advance climate targets.
- Infrastructure and Environmental Investments
- Increase the Infrastructure Renewal Levy to 3% gradually from 2026-3031, strengthening funding for critical asset renewal and resiliency.
- Use the Infrastructure Renewal levy to support:
o The Multiyear Community Investment Fund.
o Immediate expansion of the tree replacement program, increasing the planting/replacement ratio to 3:1, strengthening Burlington’s climate adaptation and urban canopy goals.
- Dedicate MAT revenues to develop a Sport Tourism, Development, and Infrastructure
Strategy, enhancing economic activity and community health.
▪ This strategy should be used to attract more sport events and tourism in Burlington but also develop the infrastructure needed. This strategy should specifically look at developing a 50m Pool, Indoor Soccer facility and
other sport infrastructure located at Sherwood Forest Park.
- Explore Sustainability-as-a-Service models to advance Net Zero goals, leveraging private-sector partnerships for building retrofits, fleet electrification, and green infrastructure.
- Use the Green Initiatives Reserve to fund:
o The next Climate Action and Resilience Plan.
o Wind Study
o Biodiversity Strategy, to enhance local ecosystems.
o Feasibility study on implementing District Energy, supporting low-carbon community-scale heating and cooling.
- Increase funding for new community gardens, advancing local food security and
neighbourhood connection.
- Explore opportunities to increase naturalized areas, reducing maintenance costs and improving climate and ecological resilience.
- Downtown and Mobility Strategies
strategy for the Downtown.
- Use parking revenues to fund the next Downtown Burlington Master Plan, ensuring vibrancy and economic vitality.
- Increase Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) cameras to 8, enhancing road safety and
advancing Vision Zero goals.
- Accelerate the Mainway Grade Separation Project to 2026, beginning planning and early
design to improve safety, reduce delays and unlock a important economic corridor.
- Initiate a Rail Crossing Planning Project, covering Mainway and all crossings in the
Integrated Mobility Plan, prioritizing safety and future grade separations.
- Implement ward-based Vision Zero community safety plans, modeled on Sheldon Creek:
o Develop tailored local traffic safety and speed management plans in each ward.
o Engage residents, schools, and stakeholders in co-design.
o Include data-driven traffic calming, safe crossings, neighborhood design
improvements, and targeted education campaigns.
- Organizational Capacity and Customer Service
- Extend the HERO coordinator contract for two additional years, enhancing customer
service capacity.
- Add a Sport Tourism Coordinator, funded via MAT, to drive sport event attraction and strategy implementation.
- Add a TDM Coordinator, to lead TDM strategy rollout and active transportation initiatives.
- Youth and Community Development
- Initiate a new Youth Strategy, funded through the Youth Initiatives Reserve, to engage youth, support leadership development, and improve access to programs and services.
- Revenue Generation and Long-term Sustainability
- Launch a sponsorship and advertising review, to expand non-tax revenue streams.
- Conduct a feasibility study on a potential Stormwater Fee, integrated into the Stormwater
Management Plan, to secure sustainable funding for climate resilience infrastructure.
- Service Review, Transformation, and Civic Engagement
-
 Launch, with resident involvement, a transparent Service Review and Transformation Committee.
o Capital projects, with funding status and readiness to advance.
Conclusion
The 2026 budget proposal is a robust, strategic roadmap that balances Burlington’s immediate service needs with long-term goals for sustainability, safety, community vibrancy, and organizational transformation. Through increased infrastructure investment, enhanced mobility and climate action, support for youth and neighborhoods, and new engagement initiatives, Burlington will continue to lead as a resilient, inclusive, and future-ready city.
By Gazette Staff
July 9th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
EV chargers on the streets of Burlington.
A Level 1 EV charger is a basic, portable charging device that comes standard with most electric vehicles (EVs) and plugs into a regular 120-volt household outlet. It’s the slowest charging option, adding only a few miles of range per hour of charging.
A Level 2 EV charger is a type of electric vehicle charging station that uses a 240-volt outlet, similar to those used for electric ovens or clothes dryers. It offers significantly faster charging speeds compared to a Level 1 charger, typically adding 20-40 miles of range per hour. Level 2 chargers are commonly found in homes, workplaces, and public charging locations
A Level 3 EV charger, also known as a DC fast charger, is a high-powered charging station that delivers electricity directly to an electric vehicle’s battery using direct current (DC) at high voltages (typically 480 volts or higher). This allows for significantly faster charging times compared to Level 1 and Level 2 AC chargers, adding up to 250 km of range per hour of charging.
Option 1 – Business as Usual – Continue to offer free charging at City owned chargers.
Option 2 – Charge an hourly fee for the City’s charging stations.
Option 3 – Free charging for the first four hours for Level 2 EV charging stations
 EV chargers were installed at the parking lot south of city hall for Councillors.
EV Charging Fee Options
Three fee options are presented for consideration for City owned EV charging stations. As noted, several municipalities, institutions and businesses have begun to implement a staged charging model by charging a higher hourly rate after a four-hour period to motivate drivers to move their vehicles, generate parking turnover and improve availability of charging stations.
Staff have incorporated this approach into Options 2 and 3.
Option 1 – Business as Usual – Continue to offer free charging at City owned chargers.
There is no change to the operation of City owned EV charging stations where no fees will be introduced.
Benefits: EV owners continue to enjoy free charging at destinations with City owned chargers.
Considerations: The City is currently not recovering any of the costs of owning and operating the EV charging network. Costs are continuing to grow annually. Free charging is resulting in less parking turnover in downtown EV charging stalls. Free charging at City chargers may discourage nearby businesses to install charging stations for the public. There is a sentiment among some residents that providing ‘free’ EV charging is not equitable for those who drive traditional vehicles.
Option 2 – Charge an hourly fee for the City’s charging stations.
Introduce an hourly charging rate at City owned EV charging stations. The proposed rate for Level 2 chargers is $2.00/hour for the first four hours and $5.00/hour thereafter. The proposed rate for Level 3 chargers is $10.00/hour.
Benefits: The revenue collected is projected to partially cover the cost of electricity required to charge vehicles. The supplementary higher rate after four hours of charging is meant to incentivize drivers to move their vehicles after charging. The private sector may also be more inclined to install charging stations on private property as they will no longer be competing with free charging.
Considerations: Introducing a fee may be unpopular with some EV drivers who have become accustomed to free charging. A communication campaign will be required to provide EV drivers adequate notice. The City‘s EV chargers are capable of warning drivers of the increasing charge rate after four hours via email and/or text. In addition, a portion of the EV charging fee (10%) will be paid to ChargePoint to cover their administrative costs.
Option 3 – Free charging for the first four hours for Level 2 EV charging stations
Maintain free charging for the first four hours at City owned Level 2 EV charging stations.
Introduce an hourly charging rate of $5.00 after the fourth hour. Note: this option is not recommended for the Level 3 EV chargers due to their higher operating and replacement costs.
Benefits: This option provides an interim fee structure to transition the public to Option 2 in the future.
Considerations: Charging an hourly fee after the first four hours will help incentivize drivers to move their vehicles after charging, improving parking turnover and increasing the availability of chargers. This option provides some cost recovery for the City for EV charging operations.
Recommendation Details
Approve Option 2 included in the Electric Vehicle Charging Policy and Fee Options report PWS-02-05 to implement a $2.00/hour fee for City owned Level 2 electric vehicle chargers for the first four hours of charging, increasing to $5.00/hour for subsequent charging time;
Approve a fee of $10.00/hour for City owned Level 3 (fast) electric vehicle chargers;
Report back with the necessary amendments to the Rates and Fees bylaw as well as the Parking and Idling bylaw for approval by City Council to implement the fees at a future date; and
Approve the EV Chargers on City Property corporate policy attached as Appendix A to the Electric Vehicle Charging Policy and Fee Options report PWS-02-05.
Staff recommended Option 2 which was to implement a $2.00/hour fee for city owned Level 2 electric vehicle chargers for the first four hours of charging, increasing to $5.00/hour for subsequent charging time, and a fee of $10.00/hour for city owned Level 3 (fast) electric vehicle chargers.
They were to report back to Council by Q4 2025 with the necessary amendments to the Rates and Fees By-law as well as the Parking and Idling By-law for approval by City Council to implement the fees at a future date.
Since adopting its 2014 Community Energy Plan, Burlington has significantly expanded EV charging infrastructure through public and private investment, supporting its goal of becoming a net carbon neutral community by 2050.
Staff found most Ontario municipalities charge $1–$3/hour for Level 2 EV charging, some increase rates after initial hours, and a few offer free charging with parking fees.
To help manage the increasing inventory of City owned EV charging stations, staff have developed an Electric Vehicle Charging Policy to provide guidance on the operation, maintenance, monitoring and reporting of the chargers.
Implications:
The City is facing rising costs for maintenance, repairs, and electricity as its electric vehicle charging infrastructure expands and utilization increases.
Background
In 2014, City Council approved a Community Energy Plan for Burlington that included an action to support electric mobility:
Monitor the electric vehicle market and investigate the feasibility of electric vehicle charging stations at City facilities, including downtown parking lots.
Supporting electric mobility was further strengthened in the 2020 Climate Action Plan where it was identified as a key program area to help achieve the target to be a net carbon neutral community by 2050.
Since the approval of the Community Energy Plan, the City, institutions and private businesses have actively invested in charging infrastructure to help support the adoption of electric vehicles in Burlington as summarized here:
In 2015, two charging stations (four charging heads) were installed for public use in the City’s parking garage.
 City staff member explaining the EV charger plans to Council.
In 2018, the City was successful in obtaining funding from the provincial Workplace EV Charging Inventive Program for 10 charging stations (20 charging heads) in downtown parking lots and the Roads, Parks and Forestry Operations Centre (restricted to staff use during weekday working hours).
In 2022, funding was approved by The Atmospheric Fund to support eight charging stations (16 charging heads) for community centre facilities.
Also in 2022, Natural Resources Canada reconsidered a previously denied application, approving funding for 11 charging stations (22 charging heads) plus two Level 3 charging heads, the only Level 3 chargers in our inventory.
The City now has 46 charging stations (88 charging heads) in operation on municipal property with 38 charging stations being available to the public either 24 hours per day or on evenings and weekends, depending on the parking lot. Four additional charging stations (eight charging heads) will be installed in 2025.
From 2021 to 2024, City owned charging stations saw an increase in electrical utilization (kilowatt hours) by nearly 400%. In the same period the number of unique vehicles plugged into the City’s chargers increased by 250% to 4,230. Institutions and private sector entities have also installed publicly available EV chargers. From 2022 to 2025, the total number of publicly available charging stations in Burlington, including City owned chargers, increased by 46%, from 114 to 166.
Industry Scan
Staff reviewed online data for municipal charging fees in 18 municipalities located in southwestern/central Ontario.
Twelve municipalities (67%) charge an hourly charging fee, ranging from $1.00 – $3.00 per hour (for Level 2 chargers). Seven out of 12 (58%) charge in the range of $1.50 – $2.00 per hour.
Five municipalities out of 18 have implemented a secondary charge, meaning a higher hourly rate is applied following a certain number of hours of either free or a lower hourly rate.
Four municipalities offer free charging (but parking fees apply where applicable).
Operational and Lifecycle Costs
The cost of ownership of the City EV charging infrastructure has increased since the inception of the program. The annual cost is approximately $80,000 to operate, which covers electricity, licensing fees (cloud plan), maintenance/repairs and replacements. This does not include staff time required to operate and maintain the stations.
The current asset value of the City’s charging infrastructure is estimated at $1,300,000. The cost of installing a new Level 2 charging station is budgeted at $25,000. The costs for a Level 3 charging station are higher at $50,000, although this could vary depending on the capacity of the Level 3 charger. The costs to repair stations range from $1,000 to $7,000 depending on the severity of the repair.
In 2022, the responsibility to install, operate, maintain and monitor the charging stations was consolidated under the Energy and Emissions staff team. As the EV charging inventory continues to grow, so has the time required to manage the inventory under the existing staff complement.
Downtown Economic Development
One of the impacts of offering free charging at the City’s EV charging stations that is highlighted in the City’s charging data is the disincentive to move a vehicle even after it’s fully charged. Data from the City’s downtown charging stations indicates that vehicles are left plugged in beyond the four-hour maximum time. There is a four-hour limit for charging in the Parking Bylaw but given the level of construction activity in the downtown as well as overall officer capacity, this is currently enforced on a complaint basis.
The City is currently undertaking the Downtown Parking Study. The study will highlight that increasing vehicle turnover is correlated with increasing patronage to downtown businesses and optimizing vehicle turnover will be a recommended objective of any future changes to the Parking and Idling Bylaw. Introducing an EV charging fee is anticipated to improve availability at the City’s EV chargers by motivating drivers to move their vehicle and avoid unnecessary fees.
Achieving Climate Action Objectives
City Council has supported free EV charging at City owned chargers to incentivize EV ownership in Burlington, to help reduce emissions and work towards the target to be a net carbon neutral community by 2050. Staff have been tracking EV ownership data published by the Ministry of Transportation. Since 2019, ownership of battery electric vehicles (full electric) in Burlington has increased by almost 500%. Local EV test drive events with Plug’n Drive have also helped to promote the benefits of electric mobility.
Public Feedback/Opinion
Sustainability staff have been engaging the public to prioritize action areas for the new updated Climate Action Plan to be presented to City Council in Q3 2025. Support for City owned EV charging stations is low compared to other areas such as walking/cycling, transit, the Better Homes Burlington concierge service and sustainable new buildings. Providing free charging is seen to serve a small part of the opulation who can afford electric vehicles and, therefore, is not seen to be equitable.
To help manage the increasing inventory of City owned EV charging stations, staff have developed an EV Chargers on City Property corporate policy (refer to Appendix A) to provide guidance on the operation, maintenance, monitoring and reporting of the chargers. In addition, as reported in the 2023 report on Electric Mobility (EICS-16-23), staff have been assessing options to implement charging fees for the City’s charging stations to help recover costs.
Recommendation Details
Approve Option 2 included in the Electric Vehicle Charging Policy and Fee Options report PWS-02-05 to implement a $2.00/hour fee for City owned Level 2 electric vehicle chargers for the first four hours of charging, increasing to $5.00/hour for subsequent charging time;
Approve a fee of $10.00/hour for City owned Level 3 (fast) electric vehicle chargers;
Report back with the necessary amendments to the Rates and Fees bylaw as well as the Parking and Idling bylaw for approval by City Council to implement the fees at a future date; and
Approve the EV Chargers on City Property corporate policy attached as Appendix A to the Electric Vehicle Charging Policy and Fee Options report PWS-02-05.
Key Dates & Milestones
Pending approval of the recommended option:
Report to amend the Rates and Fees bylaw as well as the Parking and Idling Bylaw: September 2025
Communications campaign to advise EV charging rates: September 2025
Implementation date for introduction of hourly charging fee pending approval: October 2025
Update report one year after implementation: October 2026
Implications
Staff will monitor the rates of usage of the EV charging stations and cost recovery from charging fees and report back in a year from the date of implementation to recommend any necessary changes.
A communications plan will be developed and implemented to engage the community and EV drivers on the new fees, in advance of being introduced.
It is estimated that just over 500 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions have been saved through the utilization of the City’s EV charging stations.
We will circle back later today and report on how Councillors responded to the recommendation and what they sent to the June 15th Council meeting.
By Daniel Foch
July 5th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
From Mississauga to Scarborough, Hamilton to downtown Toronto, the very people who keep our cities functioning are being priced out of them.
The nurse can’t afford the city she heals. The teacher can’t afford the city she inspires. The tradesman can’t afford the city he builds.
If that doesn’t sound like a crisis, you’re not paying attention.
We’re witnessing an exodus in real time, one not driven by aspiration, but by survival. From Mississauga to Scarborough, Hamilton to downtown Toronto, the very people who keep our cities functioning are being priced out of them. And with every essential worker who leaves or breaks under the burden of housing costs, the ripple effects compound: fewer services, longer wait times, rising costs, and fraying social cohesion.
In the US, they call this a demand for “workforce housing” — why don’t we have the same term here?
A recent report by the Boston Consulting Group in collaboration with CivicAction describes the situation as an economic emergency that is quietly eroding the GTA’s foundation by pushing out the workers who hold it together.
This is no longer just a housing issue. It’s a labour issue, a health issue, an education issue, and an economic emergency. We are hollowing out our urban core, and in doing so, we’re corroding the country’s ability to function.
The Working-Class Squeeze is Now a Middle-Class Crisis
The report reveals a hard truth. Nearly one in every two households (see the chart below) in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) earns between $40,000 and $125,000 a year and, increasingly, they can’t afford to live where they work.
These people are not luxury seekers. They are the lifeblood of the region, early childhood educators, nurses, tradespeople, social workers, artists, retail staff. The very people a city depends on are making impossible choices: spending more than 30% of their income on rent, commuting two hours each way, or turning to food banks and public assistance, all while holding full-time jobs.
Even more worrying? Many can’t handle a $500 emergency. In one of the wealthiest regions in North America, over half of new food bank users in Toronto are from working households.

The True Cost of Unaffordability is Much Greater Than Rent
When we think about housing unaffordability, we tend to think in personal terms: missed dreams, cramped spaces, the heartbreak of being locked out. But those personal consequences scale quickly and dangerously.
Businesses are struggling to attract and retain talent. In response, some have begun offering wage premiums, costing an estimated $2.8 billion annually in extra payroll. But even that isn’t always enough. Nurses, for example, earn only a 3% premium on average, far below the 12–17% needed just to match the cost of living.
Our public systems are buckling. Financially stretched households spend less on preventive health. People experiencing housing instability visit emergency rooms 20% more often. Kids from housing-insecure families are nearly 30% more likely to fall behind in school. And in abusive households 79% of victims say high housing costs are a barrier to leaving.
This is what collapse looks like: not sudden, but cumulative.


Why the Market Alone Won’t Fix This
Let’s be clear on one thing. This isn’t just a supply issue. It’s a system failure.
- Zoning paralysis: In the GTA, 70% of land is zoned exclusively for single-family homes, locking out density and affordability by design.
- Approval gridlock: A new housing project in Toronto can take 20 months to get approved, four times longer than in Calgary.
- Misaligned incentives: Over half of Toronto’s new condo units between 2018 and 2022 were studios or one-bedrooms. Just 4% had three bedrooms.
- Funding black holes: Nearly 45% of housing projects are stuck at the feasibility stage, unable to secure the capital to break ground.
- Labour and material shortages: Construction costs have outpaced inflation, and over 93,000 construction jobs remain unfilled. Ironically, many workers can’t afford to live near the very sites they’re meant to build.
When so many inputs are broken, no amount of “build more” rhetoric will do the trick.
We Don’t Need to Reinvent the Wheel, We Just Need to Act Boldly
Other cities/countries have cracked this code. They didn’t wait for the private market to solve the crisis. They acted, and they acted together.
- Vienna houses over 50% of its population in publicly owned or co-op units, with rents 20% below market.
- Singapore built its way to affordability by integrating housing with transit and infrastructure, successfully putting 80% of its citizens in public units.
- Sweden uses prefab housing for 84% of detached homes, dramatically cutting construction time and cost.
- Portland rezoned for mixed-use and density and linked it with transit investment, creating livable, walkable neighbourhoods at scale.
The GTHA has made some moves, like approving Hamilton’s Light Rail Transit and exploring prefab, but we remain leagues behind.
What We Need Now Is a Four-Part Playbook
While no single policy can solve the problem alone, a focused, multi-pronged strategy can lay the groundwork for meaningful progress. Drawing from global best practices and tailored to the GTA’s unique context, here are four foundational actions that must be prioritized, starting now:
- Prioritize workforce housing
- Public housing should serve not just the poorest, but also the people who power our region. Essential workers deserve access to affordable homes near where they work.
- Unblock approvals and rezone with courage
- Create fast-track pathways for developments that meet affordability criteria. Rezone low-density neighbourhoods near transit into vibrant, mid-rise communities.
- Rethink financing
- Expand tools like social impact bonds and revolving housing funds. De-risk early-stage capital to unlock stalled developments — especially for non-profits.
- Align planning with purpose
- Bring housing, transit, jobs, and services into the same conversation. Target underused land near employment hubs for affordable, mixed-income communities.
The Time for Talk Is Over
Toronto is often described as a world-class city. But a world-class city doesn’t push its teachers to the margins, force its construction workers to commute from hours away, or make its nurses line up at food banks.
We are at a crossroads. Either we confront this housing crisis with bold, coordinated, cross-sector action, or we resign ourselves to an unraveling urban future marked by inequality, inefficiency, and fragility.
Let’s choose to build, not just homes, but the kind of region where people can live, thrive, and belong.
Daniel Foch is the Chief Real Estate Officer at Valery.ca, Host of Canada’s #1 real estate podcast, and Head Coach at realist.ca.
Originally published in Storeys – the most-read real estate news site in Canada.
By Gazette Staff
June 30th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON

The City is aware of recent media stories and public comments about the outcome of our competitive bid process for youth aquatics services. There has been some confusion and misinformation shared, and now that the contract is finalized, we can provide more clarity.
Since 2020, the City has allocated pool time for competitive swim programs through a formal procurement process. This approach follows our procurement by-law and the Municipal Act. It helps ensure we get the best value for residents and that all qualified swim clubs have an equal opportunity to apply.
Procurement processes are used by the City to purchase a wide range of services and supplies – from playground equipment to transit vehicles to aquatics programming. The process is designed to be fair, competitive, and accountable to the public. Rules are in place to make sure everyone is treated equally, including restrictions on political involvement, lobbying, and sharing bid details while the process is underway.
Now that the process is complete, we can confirm submissions from the Burlington Aquatic Devilrays (BAD) and Golden Horseshoe Aquatic Club (GHAC) were received for the 2025 – 2030 youth competitive aquatics contract. Both organizations also submitted bids for the 2020 – 2025 contract, with the same rules in place, including the submission of a certificate of incorporation as a Non-Profit or Not-for-Profit organization. In 2020, the contract was awarded to BAD. This year, the fact that BAD was the current provider did not play a role in the evaluation of new proposals.
As part of the evaluation criteria, the RFP required all applicants to demonstrate that at least 85% of their registrants live in Burlington. This is to make sure that Burlington residents benefit directly from the pool time the City provides. GHAC met all the requirements of the proposal, including this residency threshold, and has been awarded the contract.
As BAD has shared publicly, their bid was disqualified because it was missing some of the required information – in particular, a certificate of incorporation as a Non-Profit or Not-for-Profit organization. Under the bid process rules, City staff are not allowed to overlook missing mandatory requirements or allow submission after the RFP closing date. This protects the fairness of the process.
We understand this outcome is disappointing for BAD and its members. BAD submitted a formal request for review, and that process confirmed the decision was made according to our policies and procedures.
We value the role that all local swim clubs play in our community and will continue working with BAD to explore options for accessing pool time through our regular allocation process.
Our focus remains on making sure Burlington residents have access to high-quality programs and fair use of City facilities. We appreciate everyone’s contributions to building a strong aquatics community here in Burlington.
By Gazette Staff
June 30th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
Metrolinx is reminding everyone to plan ahead and take the GO to festivities safely and seamlessly as communities across the region get ready to celebrate Canada’s 158th birthday,
Customers can take advantage of the $10 online holiday/weekend day passes that allow you to GO wherever you want. Riders can also transfer for free with One Fare between GO Transit and most local transit systems, including the TTC.
 To commemorate Canada’s birthday, Metrolinx is rolling out a special custom wrapped Canada Day themed double decker GO Bus and GO Train.
On Tuesday, July 1, GO Transit will run on a Saturday schedule. Customers are encouraged to check schedules before travelling.
By Pepper Parr
June 20th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
City CEO Hassaan Basit has made a practice of updating Council on what he and city staff have been doing.
The report this month was almost missed when the Mayor skipped through the agenda a little too quickly and had to be reminded by the Clerk that the CEO had things to say.
CEO Basit:
I’ll start off with something you know, the senior team continues to reposition people and redefine jobs and offer more support for leadership and accountability, and we launched our Leaders Forum that which brought together 150 supervisors and managers for a hands on session focused on building trust and living our core values. Those really were the objectives that you have to start with. These facilitated conversations aren’t just about leadership theory; they actually give our leaders real tools and networks to support their teams and strengthen our culture.
We’re going to continue to invest in their development, continue to foster connections across departments, because that’s what’s really needed, and we’re making sure that people serving Burlington are even better equipped to listen, collaborate and deliver the services our residents deserve.
 CEO Basit: The campaign is working to unlock more of the missing middle housing right within our neighborhoods.
Switching very quickly, we had our touch a truck session event held by public works. Burlington Transit took part in the event and welcomed over 1100 visitors to showcase how public transit keeps our community moving.
 503 free Presto cards distributed
Councilor Nisan mentioned youth and transit ridership and incentives during Youth Week, which was May 1 to the 11th. Recreation, culture and transit team teamed up to remove a key barrier access to rides and distributed 503 free Presto cards and that means hundreds more young people can attend camps and activities without having to worry about fares.
An update from the Burlington fire team that participated on June 5th and 6th in the vehicle rescue regional extraction event in Markham. They competed in both limited, where you don’t use hydraulic tools, and unlimited, where I presume you use hydraulic tools. Burlington placed top of the charts in both events. That expertise translates directly in the faster, more effective response when every second counts in a roadside emergency. Just like to congratulate the fire team, the training they received, the support they have and the commitment they have.
 CEO Basit: “…important to continue to train staff so we can extract more value from these systems.“
In late May, our finance team hosted work day training session covering procurement and accounting and budget best practices. Why I mention that is because we buy a lot of these tools. We’re upgrading. We’ve been investing in it, and it’s equally important to continue to train staff so we can extract more value from these systems. 150 staff participated in that exercise, and we’re going to continue to do that.
We wrapped up phase one of our community trail strategy engagement with impressive participation, over 200 survey responses, lots of comments and lots of attendees in person at two public meetings. I think this is a fantastic opportunity for the city to start to collect feedback, which will guide our trail planning so future paths truly reflect how residents want to walk, bike and explore Burlington screen spaces.
Speaking of transportation, our comms team and traffic teams partnered to keep motorists as best informed as they could about overlapping closures at the Skyway bridge and at Burloak. We really , really appreciate the advocacy from your office and from council to the province as well to always encourage them to be proactive in working with us when serious disruptions are anticipated.
 CEO Basit: Each of these initiatives, whether it’s developing our leaders, engaging in the community, delivering critical services, illustrates the focus that the city and the staff have on collaboration, innovation, putting residents first.
We will continue to take a proactive approach across the summer, not just with these closures, but also to make sure all the events that we host and are so proud of you know, are supported on development and growth management.
To support our housing targets, we’ve launched additional residential unit known as ARU an incentive program, and a lot of communication tools, FAQs, digital displays, newsletters, Google ads have been put in place.
The campaign is working to unlock more of the missing middle housing right within our neighborhoods. Each of these initiatives, whether it’s developing our leaders, engaging in the community, delivering critical services, illustrates the focus that the city and the staff have on collaboration, innovation, putting residents first. So with that, thank you.
By Staff
June 18th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
Paige Maylott’s award-winning book, My Body is Distant, is an electrifying and vulnerable memoir that invites readers into an intimate conversation about our digital and physical selves, gender, and belonging. Maylott writes about her life—both virtual and IRL—as she explores her authentic self and sexuality through dream-like virtual worlds. As she discovers the person she is meant to be, Paige contends with a cancer diagnosis and an imploding marriage while struggling to convert an online love story into reality. When a humiliation at work provides the necessary push to transition, Paige finds the freedom to explore her new self.
Part coming-out story of a trans woman and part heartfelt romance, My Body Is Distant follows Paige from a childhood obsession with the 1980s game Zork, through a health crisis and divorce, to an ultimately affirming experience and self-love.
Paige Maylott is a Hamiltonian author, gamer, and accessibility specialist. Her memoir, My Body is Distant examines gender transition, critical illness, and digital identity. This work earned the 2024 Hamilton Literary Award for Non-Fiction, the Gold IPPY Award for LGBTQ+ Non-Fiction, a spot on the Rakuten Kobo shortlist, and was one of Hamilton Review of Books’ Best Books of 2023. Praised by CBC Books, Publishers Weekly, Open Book, and the Whistler Writers Festival, among others. When not writing, Paige collects retro video games and blasts 80s hair metal—because sometimes the best plot twist is a guitar solo.
Takes place on June 30th, 7:00 to 8:00 pm at the Central Library on New Street
At publication, there were just 12 seats available for this event.
To REGISTER click HERE
Presented in partnership with ECW Press.
Borrow My Body is Distant from our collection
Accessibility
If you need an accessibility accommodation during this program, please register early so we can confirm arrangements a few days before your visit.
By Jessica Bell
June 16th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
Donald Trump’s escalating trade war and threats to our economy should be a wake-up call for Ontario’s Conservative government to bring a robust economic plan that puts Ontario and Canada first. Doug Ford didn’t give us that.
Ontarians want to do their part and support our country and province, and we need to make it easy for them to do so. But instead of a real strategy, the Conservatives proposed to recognize the last Friday of each June as “Buy Ontario, Buy Canadian Day.”
 Jessica Bell is the MPP for University–Rosedale and the NDP’s finance critic.
Every day should be “Buy Ontario, Buy Canadian Day,” not just one day. That’s why the Ontario NDP introduced a law to mandate the labelling of Canadian-made products, including food, so Ontarians can visit the supermarket and choose to buy Canadian products, supporting local businesses and local job creation. The Conservatives put politics ahead of patriotism and voted our motion down.
The moment we are in calls for unity of purpose, to take good ideas from all sides of the political spectrum, so we can put our province first.
What a missed opportunity. According to Bank of Montreal economist Robert Kavcic, even a modest shift in consumer spending toward Canadian goods could add $10 billion in value to the economy alone.
This legislative session, Ontario should have flexed its hefty purchasing muscle and made firm commitments to buy, build and invest in local projects, products and services.
Ontario is investing $200 billion in infrastructure projects, including hospitals, highways, transit, schools and child-care spots. These investments should be allocated to public agencies, and Ontario and Canadian businesses first, not foreign companies. The government should also mandate conditions to maximize these investments, such as requiring projects to use resources from our most trade-impacted sectors, such as steel, aluminum and lumber.
Ensuring more government dollars go to Canadian and Ontario businesses and workers has huge economic value. Every year, the Ontario government buys $29 billion in goods and services, but only $3 billion goes to Ontario-based businesses. That number should be much higher.
Over the past few months, trade associations, unions and businesses have been providing examples to the government on how exactly Ontario can support specific workers, public institutions and business sectors.
The Ontario Federation of Agriculture recommended Ontario require institutions, like schools, hospitals and prisons, to prioritize buying locally grown food because it would help Ontario farms and strengthen local supply chains.
What the Conservatives have proposed instead is a new $35-million Ontario grape program to encourage wine producers to use Ontario-grown grapes. While support for our wine sector is welcome, our entire agricultural sector needs support to withstand the impact of the tariff war, not just the wine sector.
Canada’s largest private sector union, Unifor, joined our call for governments to harness our lumber resources and build affordable housing to fix our national housing crisis. This plan should include manufacturing housing in Ontario factories to create jobs, speed up housing construction and lower construction costs.
Unifor also called on Ontario to contract with Canadian companies to build new transit lines and increase the Canadian-content requirements for municipal and provincial purchases of streetcars, subway cars and buses, especially electric vehicles. Ontario has transit vehicle manufacturing plants in Thunder Bay and Kingston that are operating below capacity.
In Ontario, the standard requirement is that transit vehicles purchased with provincial funding must have at least 25 per cent Canadian content. The Conservatives relaxed this rule and allowed the massive Ontario Line subway project to be built by a U.S. company that was given the flexibility to meet a lower Canadian-content requirement of 10 per cent. That wasn’t a good move then, and it looks even worse now.
Ontarians want the Ontario government to have their back during this economically challenging time. Strong “buy local” and “build local” policies will help Ontario keep jobs in our province, keep small- and medium-sized businesses afloat, and help trade-impacted industries, like our manufacturing sector, weather Trump’s economic storm. What are we waiting for?
Jessica Bell is the MPP for University–Rosedale and the NDP’s finance critic.
By Pepper Parr
June 9th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
The discussion was related to the development planned for 2083 Lakeshore Road. This is the property that is currently the parking lot opposite Emmas Back Porch.
 Second from the left – front row.
 Entrance on the south side facing the lake.
Mayor Marianne Meed Ward made the following comment:
“Thank you, Chair. I will be brief. I will not be supporting the recommendation, although I do want to thank staff for all their work on this and the applicants for for all of their work trying to get to some consensus on the few items that were outstanding.
“I think this is overdevelopment for this area. I believe that for a very long time, this will create a canyon of towers on both sides of a very narrow road, Old Lakeshore Road, right in proximity to our waterfront. I understand that there may be folks who think that the ship has sailed on this issue, but I am not going to give it any wind.
“I believe that this is not the right development here. My vision for downtown is not to see this type of height and density; it better belongs at the Major Transit Service Areas (MTSA) locations- where we have now shifted our urban growth center to.
“I maintain that vision. I will stand by that vision. I will fight that vision and I will continue to be consistent in what I think the downtown should be.
Councillor Kearns followed the Mayor with her comment – a tad cheeky. She has been smacking the Mayor more often these days.
 The captain here said Kearns
“The captain here, through the chair, the ship has sailed, and here’s why. I went through this planning file with deep scrutiny, and I think that the commissioner can attest, we spent about an hour reviewing some of my initial questions, and I circulated many to staff in advance as well.
Here’s what I was looking for. I was looking for a defensible way out of this particular application, recognizing the contextual area in which it’s been landed. That’s why I referenced the provincial planning policy statement. I referenced the MTSA justification, the UGC.
“I asked how that could still hold. I asked about the leading policy context, and I asked about how a proposed scale intensification of the surrounding area affected the staff recommendation for approval before us today. And I was satisfied with those answers.
“I asked what would preclude the proposal to range from 10 to 15 storeys, and was met with an appropriate answer that was steeped in that planning, planning policy context. I went back to the concept plan. I checked the amenity spaces to see if there was any gapping, on mixed use, on amenities, on parking and any of those types of things, and I was remiss to not find any.
“That is why it is a complete report. I asked questions about the floor area ratio to see if it was outside an acceptable standard. And really it is 1.11 to 1.16, which is just a shortening of the parcel, but the same calculation holds the instruction to refer this file to staff to continue working on it, resulting in essentially immaterial changes – they are immaterial and almost imperceptible to the built form context and to the neighbouring areas.
 “I don’t work on my personal opinions in this role. I work on expert, technical staff, recommendations and reports and supporting policy pieces. That is why I have been led to a supportive position on this file.”
“I talked deeply about the infrastructure, and I worked with the regional commissioners as well at the region about the holding zone placed in regards to junction street wastewater pumping station.
“I also consulted with the applicant on if they were satisfied that they could make efforts to release that holding zone as well. I asked questions of finance. Sorry, maybe not finance, but to finance through the Commissioner on how it may or may not affect DCS. And I asked questions of the region on how a holding zone would affect things like site plan, occupancy, etc. I worked very hard on behalf of the community to scrutinize this particular file and the place that I continue to land, although maybe outside of my personal opinions.
“I don’t work on my personal opinions in this role. I work on expert, technical staff, recommendations and reports and supporting policy pieces. That is why I have been led to a supportive position on this file.
“I would like to have a very different vision. I would like to have a completely different context. But the reality is, is that that is not where we sit today, and we would be leading ourselves to a tribunal if we failed to approve this development. I can’t speak about that, because that’s a legislative process; it would be extremely difficult to go against staff, technical experts.”
Councillor Nissan was up next:
“My personal point of view, and that which I brought forward, was not supporting tall buildings that were too high and in the wrong places. And at the time, what was going on in the football would have been the wrong place for such a tall building. Unfortunately, through OLT decisions, primarily, it has become clear, as demonstrated through the presentation, that the reality on the ground is not what I came for, not what I would like it to be, but we need to be real and be grounded in and what’s actually occurring.
 Councillor Nisan: “The context has shifted.”
“In addition, we have a housing crisis in our province, including in Burlington. We have a staff. We have staff supporting it with their best expert advice, and they haven’t supported every development downtown, far from it. I think of the Waterfront Hotel development, where we were successful, but unfortunately being surrounded by buildings of a similar height.
“It is a reality. The context has shifted, as noted in the report. This will not in my opinion, be something we will be able to prevent this. Furthermore, we need the units, every extra unit in our community has an impact on supply, which is the only real way that we’re going to have more affordable housing is by increasing supply.
“So it would be one thing if staff weren’t supporting it be one thing if the immediate context were different. We fought those battles with success at the Waterfront Hotel, but not so much elsewhere. So indeed, the ship has sailed on this location. But we need to also ensure that we have enough housing for the next generations in our community, and whatever the cost of these units are, the supply is, what will having supplies? What will make that happen? So I will be supporting this.”
Some observations: If Councillor Nisan thinks the development is going to include affordable housing, one has to wonder how much he knows about the developments he is approving.
It was quite clear that the Mayor and Councillor Kearns were going to have a go at each other. What is motivating Kearns? She likes the look of the bling the Mayor has when she puts on the chain of office.
Expect to see more of this kind of behaviour.
 Mayor Med Ward: “I maintain that vision. I will stand by that vision. I will fight that vision and I will continue to be consistent in what I think the downtown should be”,
For Meed Ward to issue the declarative statements –“ I maintain that vision. I will stand by that vision. I will fight that vision and I will continue to be consistent in what I think the downtown should be”, – has to be seen as a little on the self serving side. Back in 2010 she got herself elected on a Save the Waterfront platform. A little late in the game to bring back that vision.
By Staff
June 6th, 2025
BURLINGTON, ON
Part 1 of a 2-part news feature.
 David Barker delegating before City Council.
The following is a copy of a letter Burlington resident David Barker sent Mayor Meed Ward and the six members of Council. Barker reports that of the six members of council, only the Mayor responded. Barker was miffed.
“Mayor, Members of Council
There has been a lot of discussion in online forums, such as on Reddit and the Burlington Gazette, discussing the horrendous traffic snarls that have occurred over the last few weeks in the city south of the QEW.
There’s absolutely no doubt the daily clogged traffic along Lakeshore Road, New Street and to an extent Fairview Street is currently being exacerbated by the expansion of restaurant patios onto the roadway taking away driving lanes, and by the ongoing roadworks on the Skyway Bridge. In addition, recently there have been traffic accidents on the bridge which have caused even greater congestion.
The discussion in the forums has focused on two areas. The first being where and how to find notifications of planned roadworks and closures in the area. And the second on what remedies there might be to reduce the large volume of transient commuter traffic flowing through the downtown as a shortcut to the bridge.
I personally have and continue to champion the pedestrianization of the downtown, including the Lakeshore Road / Brant Street intersection. This would make Spencer Smith Park and the downtown core one unified pedestrian-friendly destination. Pedestrianization of city centers has become a growing trend in North America mirroring city centers across Europe. Many people throw up, and excuse the pun, roadblocks to implementing pedestrianized areas. The common misconception is that making an area pedestrianized means no vehicular traffic access.
 The QEW was, at one time a two-lane highway. Time caught up with the road – managing how it is used is something that time has yet to catch up with.
Obviously vehicles need to access because residents who live in the pedestrianized area have vehicles, and because of course businesses need supply access. Additionally of course first responders need to be able to access to and transit across the pedestrianized area. I appreciate this is a longer-term goal and so does not have an immediate impact to reduce or eliminate downtown traffic congestion.
One contributor to the forums has suggested a very simple traffic management solution that is currently used in Toronto
Should you be traveling west along Lakeshore Boulevard during the afternoon and evening rush hours you will find you are unable to access the on-ramp to the Gardiner Expressway at Lakeshore/Jameson because it is closed by the Province/police during that period. Traffic is steered down Lakeshore Boulevard to join the Gardiner at the South Kingsway on-ramp.
The suggestion being made in the forums is to close the Northshore Boulevard on-ramp to the Niagara bound QEW on the Burlington side of the bridge during evening rush hours. And similarly close the Toronto bound QEW off-ramp to Northshore Boulevard during morning rush hours
By closing these two QEW ramps during the rush hours vehicles will no longer have a shortcut through the downtown to their destination. Those vehicles will have to stay on the the QEW where they belong.
Obviously, to implement these closures, the City would need the assistance and approval of the Provincial government.
I urge Council to give this serious and urgent consideration. Whilst the current situation is allowed to continue residents are faced with either stagnant traffic sitting idling outside their properties or their residential streets becoming less safe due to the increased volume and speed of the vehicles cutting through.”
A surprise to us – Barker got a detailed response.
Link to the response HERE
|
|