By Eric Stern
June 19th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
Many Burlington residents have joined the “STOP the 2025 Burlington Property Tax Increases”. They see 8.9% as the number being used by the Finance department as they prepare the 2024-2025 budget.
Those opposed to tax increases use Next Door, a social media platform where they exchange ideas and register their concerns. It is a different kind of citizen engagement.
 Eric Stern
If you are interested in joining the group follow the link HERE
One Next Door member, Lynn K., shared an email she wrote to “the office of the mayor” along with the response from Hannelie van Niekerk who is part of the four member team in the Mayor’s office.
Here are a few quotes from Lynn’s email to the city.
“Do you care about what you are doing to the personal financial hardships of the residents in your wards?”
“The 2024 tax increase was a slap in the face with broken promises and outright lies, spinning the numbers hoping nobody would notice the real increase.”
“As a retired career banker of almost 40 years, I have worked through every phase of the inflation/recession cycle.”
The paragraphs below, set out in bold typeface are from Hannelie van Niekerk on behalf of the mayor:
“It is important to clarify that the percentages for the years mentioned were not tax increases, but instead changes in the budget – net of all revenues. The 10.2% quoted below is, again, not the tax increase for 2024, but the budget increase. The City’s impact on your overall 2024 tax bill was 4.99%, which were added on top of the Halton Region and Education contributions to total the overall 6.58%.”
As we all know the M-Municipal line on our “final” June 2024 tax bill went up 10.21%. My tax bill, and I’m sure yours as well, went up 7.07% in total after including the other increases (Halton Region and Halton Police and the Boards of Education).
 Mayor Meed Ward in her City Hall office.
The Office of the Mayor has omitted the Halton Police tax increase so the information provided on the overall increase is simply wrong. In my opinion, there is a strong argument to say that calling a 10.21% budget increase a 4.99% tax impact involves some magical thinking. Of course, Hannelie did use the word “impact” and, according to the city’s integrity commissioner, that makes these statements ok.
“Every year, the Mayor does a line by line review of the suggested budget proposed by staff, to see where possible cuts or improvements can be made to the City’s portion of the final tax bill. In 2024, this brought the tax percentage down with 1%. For the 2024 budget, the Mayor and Council brought forward 62 proposed amendments to the budget – a culmination of cuts, neutral motions, and additions. A total of 27 were approved that brought the tax impact for the City portion of the property tax bill to the above mentioned 4.99%.”
I looked at the mayor’s budget as soon as it was released. I did the reverse calculations and determined the budget was increasing by 10.21%. I went on record and delegated on this subject on Nov. 2, 2023, Lori Jivan (Coordinator of Budgets and Policy) confirmed the 10.21% budget increase. The M-Municapl line on my June 2024 final tax bill, and other people’s bills, went up 10.21%. All of the voting our councillors did had no impact on the tax change but they did provide a wonderful show for us to watch on the live-stream.
“Finally, I wanted to mention that Burlington’s tax rate has been below the average increase, compared to municipalities in the area. Please visit this link to read more, click on the Staff Presentation link and refer to page 34 for more details.”
The link takes you to the mayor’s personal website. The chart shows tax rates for a bungalow from hand-picked communities.
“Below average increase” with emphasis on the word increase, the chart does not show increases but tax burdens. The paragraph is worded to give the impression that Burlington has below-average increases when in reality Burlington is increasing its budget by some of the largest percentages in Ontario.
“Regarding new staff: there were not 111 new hires. A number of these positions were existing positions that were vacant due to staff changes/promotions, etc. Only 30 new positions were funded in the budget, including new bylaw officers, transit drivers, community centre operators.”
Page 726 of the “2024 Financial Needs and Multi-Year Forecast” available on the city’s website, a document which some residents refer to as war and peace, shows 68 new full-time and 3.4 new part-time positions were added from 2022. Considering that the tax percentage started at 10.21% in the strong mayor’s budget document and ended at 10.21% on my tax bill, how are we expected to believe the number of hires was reduced? The 111 number comes from the “2025 financial needs and multi-year forecast” available on the city’s website that states:
“A significant risk to the corporation is the attraction and retention of talent and this reality has been a focus in 2024 where to date we have already hired 111 staff and currently have 57 unfilled vacancies.”
 The data shown came from the City Finance department.
I know I have become a broken record, 10.21%, 10.21% – I remain stunned that the city can’t own up to its significant tax increases using plain language. I am bothered as well with the practice used in the Office of the Mayor that has staff passing along prepared statements.
Related news articles:
The tax increases
More on tax increases
By Eric Stern
June 14th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
Just say no to spending.
When it comes to the budgeting process at city hall a good analogy would be to compare the budget to a key lime pie.
Politicians dole out pieces of the pie based on their vision and community needs. Parks need a medium-sized slice, transit needs a big slice. The pie is only so big. You can increase the size of the pie by increasing taxes. In most jurisdictions, sadly not Burlington, making the pie bigger becomes a challenge. People tend not to like tax increases.
In Burlington, our elected politicians have a different approach.
Expanding the pie is easy, the city puts out confusing communications about the tax rate increase, then increases taxes by as much as they ”need”. Mayor Meed Ward has already started filling her social media releases with “information”, using the term loosely, on the 2025 budget.
“Staff are predicting a total tax increase of 5.5%, of which the City’s portion would be 4.5%”
The city finance department’s presentation to the city council on Monday, June 10th, 2024, a scant five days ago, included the numbers the mayor is quoting but also clearly stated the city budget needs to increase by 8.9%.
During the June 10 and 11 “Committee of the Whole” meeting, our council unanimously voted to accept the city’s staff recommendation of an 8.9% increase for 2025.
This council was elected in 2022. Set out below are the increases each year along with the increases as a Cumulative number.
| Time Frame |
Increase |
Cumulative Increase |
| 2022 – 2023 |
15.57% |
15.59% |
| 2023 – 2024 |
10.21% |
27.39% |
| 2024 – 2025 |
8.9% (proposed) |
38.72% |
If this increase goes through the result will be for every $100 in property taxes you paid in 2022 look forward to paying $138.72 in 2025.
Has the council adopted the motto “never say no” to additional spending? Has this council taken the position that when you need to hand out more money you simply make the pie bigger?
Two recent delegations made it very clear that there is a very unhappy public out there.
 But eventually, when you have an economy like this, they start to understand, because they’re on a fixed budget, somebody lost their job, they might be getting older, and all of a sudden, 10.21% resonates. “It’s resonating in Millcroft. Let me tell you, it’s resonating in 14 holes. It’s resonating at pickleball. I’m coming here today, and I guess I timed it right, because I had some time and the budget was on the agenda today.
 The end result was that the 10.2% increase remained the same despite the cost savings motions that were passed. It was clear to me that there was absolutely no intent in trying to reduce resident’s property taxes despite the public outcry for prudence.
Council operates in a vacuum. People who want something attend council meetings and delegate. Much of what our councillors see is a constant stream of people coming to meetings holding out tin cups.
Policies are in place to make it easier to say no, for example, the Community Development Fund and its fee waiver policy.
This policy states one-time multi-year (up to 3 years) funding is available for non-profits. Another policy for charities allows them to claim back 40% of their property taxes (annually).
Some examples from 2024 delegations.
Burlington Green, a registered charity, received $62,000 for yet-to-be-defined work that Burlington Green will perform for the city. This funding has been built into the city budget and is now an annual expense.
Team Burlington, a non-profit, funded by for-profit businesses, received a 20% rent reduction. Team Burlington consists of The Burlington Chamber of Commerce, the Burlington Downtown Business Association, Tourism Burlington and the Economic Development Corporation. This rent reduction, if approved, will be built into the budget and become an annual expense. Team Burlington’s financial statements have been published in the Gazette. The limited publicly available information makes it impossible to determine where the Chamber spends its money, why the Chamber needs assistance, or why our council agreed to assist.
Is it time for the city council to stop building spending commitments into the budget and start saying no?
Recent delegations:
Doreen Sebben
Lydia Thomas
By Pepper Parr
May 28th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
Jennifer Keesmaat took to the stage last night and stood for more than an hour as she spoke to a very close to packed house audience there to hear what the former City of Toronto Chief Planner had to say about creating a Livable, Walkable community.
 Livable and walk-able or ride your bike, – with twenty coffee shops in the immediate area.
She did not disappoint. Labelling the presentation: Dream the Dream, she told the audience that Canada was on the edge of creating a different way of living as communities.
The full presentation will be available on a Facebook page – the Mayor’s office hasn’t said yet just which Face book page will be used.
Getting the event onto the stage of the Performing Arts Centre was not a slam dunk. Some of the Mayor’s Council colleagues were not prepared to give the Mayor all that much in the way of support; they did in the end endorse what Mayor Meed Ward was setting out to do.
Meed Ward labelled the series of speakers as ‘Innovation to Action’ events; a dynamic series aimed at inspiring positive change and practical solutions within our city through innovative approaches and tangible actions.
 The number of people gathered in the lobby was on the sparse side – but the main theatre was very close to full.
A part of what was planned included “sales tables” that were set out in the lobby. That part of the event was not packed; those who participated represented both city departments, not for profit groups and some private sector participants.
Far too much time was spent on introductions, do we really have to give members of Council recognition and having them stand up and wave? Speaking of politicians: there were just three members of Council in the audience: Shawna Stolte, Lisa Kearns and Rory Nisan chose not to attend. Hopefully they will watch the webcast – there was a lot to be learned.
Dream the Dream to Keesmatt meant having the conversation, which for her meant learning to use land differently. Will Rogers got it right when he said: “Buy land. They ain’t making any more of the stuff.”
 How do you change minds – “have the conversation”
The governments of the country Keesmaat explained own a lot of land and they have to begin to make it available for housing. The big issues for Keesmaat was – what kind of housing and who is it going to be for – which brought her back to “the conversation”.
Keesmatt spoke of two “realms”: the private realm and the public realm and gave examples of how she defined the two.
The public realm would be the large back yard in which she played catch with her father when she grew up in Hamilton. The public realm is the superb park just around the corner from where she now lives in Toronto.
Intensification is going to mean fewer homes with large back yards however that intensification will mean large, well fitted out public parks where Keesmaat suggested there will be groups of people who may not know each other all that well playing softball.
Keesmatt asked: How do you change minds – “have the conversation” and added that younger people don’t want the suburban environment they may have been raised in – they want to be in communities where there are twenty coffee shops within walking distance and all kinds of public amenities where they can gather.
 There will be more public realm in the society Jennifer Keesmaat describes.
Keesmaat said the change that is going to have to take place will require all levels of government to be aligned – and pointed out that “we aren’t there yet”. She continued saying “we are at the beginning of doing things a lot differently – the young people don’t want what their parents have.
“There is uncertainty” said Keesmatt, “that is part of social change.
John Lorinc, a Toronto based writer said “… many people associate Keesmaat with a vaguely daring sort of star power and her relentless public advocacy of the sorts of progressive planning policies that have, in recent years, become the coin of the realm in that profession.
“But the real capstone of Keesmaat’s tenure is a far more technical and sprawling project that aims to do nothing less than give the city the capacity to bring some sanity and proactive planning to the raging speculative fever that has gripped the downtown for over a decade.” This is the Keesmatt people in Burlington heard last night.
 Keesmaat with a vaguely daring sort of star power and her relentless public advocacy.
It was very difficult to take notes in a darkened theatre and I’m limited as to how much I can remember. But as I listened I wondered how many people from the city planning department are in the audience and how will they react to what Keesmaat had to say?
It would be interesting to do a group interview and hear what they thought – the city communications department doesn’t go along with that kind of journalism.
The audience was made up for the most part of older people – evident from the applause Mayor Meed Ward got when she mentioned that Burlington transit was now free for seniors.
My sense was that Keesmatt created a sense of excitement with the changes that are going to take place. Mayor Meed Ward got it right when she invited her to be the first of her ‘Innovation to Action’ series.
Kudos to her on the first one.
By Plan B
May 22, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
After 10 days of OLT hearings held from April 29th to May 17th, including examinations and cross-examinations of ten expert witnesses, supported by 7000 pages of testimonies replete with projections and schematics and layers & layers of policies, it comes down to this; a decision by one OLT Member to either Reject Vrancor’s appeal of Burlington’s refusal decision of their application (i.e. “No”), or to Approve it with Conditions (i.e. “Yes, but”)
Are you still tracking on these double negatives with us? Okay!
 The most recent design has the two towers a little further apart and no bridge between the buildings.
We at Citizens’ PLAN B monitored most of the proceedings and are optimistic that the OLT will decide “No”. Why?
The arguments brought forward by the City of Burlington and The Pearle Hotel were superior, and presented in a compelling fashion, such as:
-
 Different views of the lake from various locations in the Pearle Hotel.
Proposed conveyance of land remnants unacceptable to the City as useful Parkland
- Wind impact fails Burlington’s comfort and safety guidelines
- All transitions of the site to the Park are imposed on City property
- Traffic related to service vehicles, and hotel guests drop off/ pickup & otherwise searching for parking spots has not been accommodated
- Lake views, particularly from The Pearle have not been preserved, as is possible
In our opinion, there are far too many shortfalls, inconsistencies and outright problems with this Application for the OLT to approve it.
- The lawyers & expert witnesses for Vrancor were less balanced in their positions and thereby less credible.
- Their lawyers dwelt on narrow legal issues, cherry-picking from often inconsistent old and new City, Regional & Provincial guidelines and policies to make their arguments
- They took a “so what?” approach to the Urban Growth Centre and the Major Transit Station Areas no longer being downtown, replacing it with a one-dimensional “Intensification First” mantra
- Most of their Expert witnesses appeared to “oversell” their positions
 Renderings of what the streetscape along Lakeshore could look like,
At the hearing, Vrancor effectively signalled their intention to seek an alternate “Yes, but” ruling. By this, we mean that the OLT would support the Appeal, on the condition that there were Holding Provisions that Darko Vranich, owner of the property, would have to resolve with the City and The Pearle before the Appeal was decided; all outstanding issues would have to have been settled. We consider a “Yes, but” decision to be problematic, given the extent of the resultant changes that would likely be required to the design and Vrancor’s historical intransigence and that this Application’s approval is just too important to Burlington to be negotiated behind “closed doors”.
We therefore strongly support a “No” decision, accompanied by OLT guidance to the Applicant on preparing a new & improved design, worthy of a speedy approval by City planners.
The OLT is expected to rule in 4+ months.
Stay tuned!
By Staff
May 14th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON

The plan for a new look for Civic Square has three options labelled canopies, atrium and portals.
Each option has different features.
 What you get and what you don’t get with each of the options.
Getting to the point where a recommendation could be put before Council Staff met with groups that had a stake in the land.
Detailed graphics of each option are set out below.
Option 1 Canopies:

Existing split entries maintained, primary focal point provided at Brant Street and James Street intersection, secondary focal point provided at Elgin Street façade. Covered canopies direct visitors to the entries. Three exterior rooms created to support programming. Existing parking area reduced. Landscaped transition between Civic Square and 400 Brant Street (private). All internal stairs, ramps, barriers removed.
Option 2 Atrium
Consolidated entry created at proposed atrium feature. Focal point provided at Brant Street and James Street intersection. Covered canopies provided along building façade. Secondary shade element provided adjacent to 400 Brant Street. Three exterior rooms created to support programming. Existing parking area reduced. Partial landscaped transition between Civic Square and 400 Brant Street (private). All internal stairs, ramps, barriers removed.
Option 3 Portals

Consolidated entry created at proposed entry vestibule. Primary focal point provided at Brant Street and James Street intersection (dual height, freestanding structures). Secondary focal point provided at Elgin Street façade. Building walls exposed / visible. Two exterior rooms created to support programming. Existing parking maintained with minor reduction in area around focal point. Partial landscaped transition between Civic Square and 400 Brant Street (private). All internal stairs, ramps, barriers removed.
We will report tomorrow on how Council reacted to the Staff report.
They did promise that there would be all kinds of citizen engagement. Expect the city to put out a survey asking for public input.
By Staff
May 13th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
Is summer here yet? How do you know?
Because starting on the 18th – you will have to pay for parking at the Beachway.
The City is expecting more visitors to its popular Beachway Park – they will have to pay for parking; including the overflow lot at Lakeshore Road and Willow Avenue.
 Summer in the City
Fees will be charged from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on weekends and holidays until the last weekend in September: Sunday, Sept. 22, 2024.
Parking fees can be paid using the HONK mobile app. Visitors do not have to download the app but can scan the QR code on parking lot signage to pay for parking.
Weekend and holiday parking is available for an hourly rate of $2.50 or a daily flat rate of $20. There is a transaction fee of $0.35 for each payment. Dashboard tickets are not needed as every payment is linked to a license plate number.
Halton residents have 10 days of free parking per year at Beachway Park.
Residents should wait to fill out the parking exemption form once they’ve arrived at the beach and parked in a legal parking spot. The exemption doesn’t guarantee a spot, but it does give residents parking for the day at no charge.
 With this much beach – you know there is going to be a significant need for parking.
There is no charge for parking in most municipal lots in Downtown Burlington on weekends and holidays. Beachway visitors are encouraged to extend their walk or use the drop-off zone, park for free in the downtown and meet their party at the beach. Consider taking Burlington Transit, cycling, walking or rolling to the beach and leave the car at home.
Illegally parked vehicles will be issued tickets and/or towed. Drivers are reminded not to park illegally, especially on Lakeshore Road shoulders and the grass boulevard over the pipeline: they will be towed.
Charging for parking has improved parking and traffic flow since it was introduced in 2021. If you are planning to visit the Beachway, plan ahead and prepare to park in another location if the lots are full. Please make sure you are parked in a legal parking spot. City bylaw officers must ticket and tow those parked illegally to help manage parking and traffic flow. Most importantly, this keeps everyone safe.
There is also an overflow lot west of the Beachway. It has 30 more parking spots in an unsurfaced lot. Visitors using this overflow lot need to pay for parking and the fees are the same as the Beachway lots.”
By Staff
May 12th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
This year marks the 30th anniversary of the Mountsberg Raptor Centre; they officially opened on June 3, 1994, as both an education centre and a bird of prey rehabilitation hospital.
On June 1, 2024, from 11:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. visitors are invited to join in commemorating the 30th anniversary of the Raptor Centre. The Pride in Nature Birds of All Feathers celebration will be happening at the same time. Park visitors can enjoy a slice of cake with the Animal Care team, meet roving birds of prey, say hello to the resident raptors, take a photo at the Birds of ALL Feathers photo station, check out the bio-artifact display, and pre-register to participate in the Talons and Tailfeathers educational program.

When the Raptor Centre first opened, it featured educational displays and a theatre where public and school programs were hosted. The theatre had a one-way viewing window that allowed guests to see into the raptor hospital and follow the birds’ rehabilitation journey. Birds that had been injured and were deemed non-releasable were housed in enclosures along a trail for guests to view.
Amendments to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act in 2000 changed the laws surrounding the keeping of wildlife in captivity and the regulations surrounding rehabilitation. It was at this time that the raptor hospital closed, and the Raptor Centre transitioned to being a dedicated educational facility.
Over the years, the Raptor Centre has grown and changed as more was learned about how to provide the best quality of life for birds of prey in human care. Where once the centre only housed permanently injured birds, it now houses a mixture of both non-releasable birds and birds that were raised in human care. The number one priority of the centre is to provide the highest level of welfare possible for every bird that comes to call the centre home. The centre now houses 35 birds, representing 21 different species. Many of the birds at the centre interact with the public through educational programs—from curriculum-based school programs to small group immersive experiences.
 Turkey vulture using its massive wing span to float while to looks for the next meal.
“The raptors in our care are truly remarkable to meet up-close,” said Craig Machan, Director, Parks & Operations at Conservation Halton. “Just as remarkable is our Animal Care team that looks after the birds’ training and overall well being 365 days of the year. Through this team’s expertise and dedicated care, our raptors can live long, fulfilling lives while engaging and inspiring the thousands of individuals who pass through the Raptor Centre’s doors.”
Thirty years ago, the Raptor Centre was made possible by a donation from Ms. Marguerite Gray, a descendant of the Cameron family who once owned the Mountsberg Conservation Area property. Upon opening, the centre was named the Douglas G. Cockburn Centre for Birds of Prey, in honour of Ms. Gray’s brother. Today, the Conservation Halton Foundation helps support the Raptor Centre with donations made through the Adopt-a-Raptor program. By symbolically adopting one of our featured raptors, the community can help to provide birds with a wholesome diet, veterinary care, training, enrichment, and more.
 Staff working with an owl – notice the thick leather glove worn by the trainer.
While celebrating 30 years of working with birds that needed special care what doesn’t get mentioned is the superb program offered.
Watching staff work with the birds to that are caring for is a real treat. They are fed raw meat from the hands of a trained staff is exciting. A bird will be let go to fly around and then when it sees the food in the hands of the trainer they swoop in for the food. It is really exciting – Not to be missed.
Non-members of the Conservation authority have to pay a gate fee in addition to the Raptor Encounter fee. worth every penny
Address:- 2596 Britannia Rd, Burlington, ON L7P 0G3
By Staff
May 1st, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
Ontario Exploring Options to Reduce Electricity Rates for Public EV Chargers. New electricity rate would help get chargers built in more communities across the province
Ontario’s Minister of Energy, Todd Smith, has asked the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) to explore options for an Electric Vehicle Charger Discount Electricity Rate as the province continues to support the adoption of electric vehicles (EV). A new rate would reduce the cost of electricity for public EV chargers in areas where demand for the service is only beginning to emerge, making charging infrastructure more economical in more communities and giving Ontario drivers the confidence they need to transition to electric vehicles.
“With more than 150,000 electric vehicles already on the roads in Ontario, we’re continuing to look at new ways to increase the number of public chargers – including reducing electricity rates for chargers in areas where electric vehicle usage is just beginning to emerge,” said Minister Smith. “This is another step we are taking to give drivers in every part of our province, including rural Ontario, the confidence to transition to electric vehicles, and take advantage of our growing, world-class clean grid.”
 The new normal for parking lots. Another place to spend
Under existing rules, public EV charging stations in areas with low EV adoption rates can be expensive to operate as they experience sharp peaks in demand when an EV is charged, but they still incur costs when they are not used for most of the day. Electric vehicle charging stations predicted to have low utilization are either not built or operate at a loss, giving rise to charging accessibility concerns.
A new electricity rate would support electric vehicle adoption across the province by reducing the electricity costs for charging infrastructure where demand is only beginning to emerge, making them more economical. Starting this month, the Ontario Energy Board will conduct public consultations on a new Electric Vehicle Charger Discount Rate with the intent of making the new rate available to public EV charging providers by January 1, 2026.
“We’re making it easier to own an EV by filling gaps in public charging infrastructure,” said Prabmeet Sarkaria, Minister of Transportation. “Today’s announcement highlights important work to support EV uptake outside of large urban centres and transition Ontario to a sustainable, low-carbon transportation system.”
This initiative is part of the government’s larger plan to support the adoption of electric vehicles and make EV charging infrastructure more accessible, which includes:
-
-
- The EV ChargeON program – a $91 million investment to support the installation of public EV chargers outside of Ontario’s large urban centres, including at community hubs, Ontario’s highway rest areas, carpool parking lots and Ontario Parks.
- The new Ultra-Low Overnight price plan, which allows customers who use more electricity at night, including those charging their EV, to save up to $90 per year by shifting demand to the ultra-low overnight rate period when province wide electricity demand is lower.
- Making it more convenient for electric vehicle owners to travel the province with EV fast chargers now installed at all 20 renovated EnRoute stations along the province’s busiest highways, the 400 and 401.
“With $43 billion in new electric vehicle and EV battery manufacturing investments in Ontario’s auto sector over the last several years, our government is working to improve access to public charging infrastructure to support drivers who are making the transition to electric vehicles,” said Vic Fedeli, Minister of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade. “Making electricity rates more affordable, especially in areas with emerging EV demand will be integral as we continue to build a fully integrated end-to-end EV supply chain across our province.”
 Fast EV charging stations at EnRoute stops on 400 level highways.
The initiative also builds on the government’s Driving Prosperity: The Future of Ontario’s Automotive Sector plan to create a domestic EV battery ecosystem in the province and position Ontario as a North American automotive innovation hub by working to support the continued transition to electric, low carbon, connected and autonomous vehicles.
“This rate aims to fairly allocate costs and better support the efficient integration of EVs in Ontario,” said Susanna Zagar, CEO of the OEB. “This is another way the OEB is enabling and advancing Ontario’s clean energy advantage. We look forward to hearing from electricity distributors, EV charging service providers and other stakeholders to inform this work as we strive to solve energy challenges effectively and meet the demands of the energy transition.”
Quick Facts
- The new retail transmission service rate, if approved, would be available to public EV charging stations with low utilization, between 50kW and 4,999 kW.
- If approved by the Ontario Energy Board, local distribution companies would begin offering the rate to public EV charging providers beginning January 1, 2026.
- As of March 2024, there are more than 150,000 EVs registered in Ontario, including both battery-electric vehicles (BEV) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV). By 2030, there are expected to be more than one million EVs on the road in Ontario.
By Pepper Parr
April 29th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
The Ontario Land Tribunal has started the 2020 Lakeshore Road development appeal to a city decision to to approve the redevelopment of the Waterfront Hotel.
Many thought the city had put that development proposal behind them when the then Minister of Municipal Affairs agreed that the Urban Growth boundary be moved north which took the re-development of the hotel off the table because it was no longer within the Urban Growth boundary.
 Darko Vranich – making a big bet before the Ontario Land Tribunal
Darko Vranich, head of the corporation that owns the property has decided he will put his case to the Tribunal nevertheless.
 Chris Barnett representing the city at OLT appeal hearing
Chris Barnett, a lawyer representing the city summed up what the hearing is about when he spoke at length about the Urban Growth Centre – what the boundaries are now and why they were changed.
“There was an indication that it was a major transit station area. And that meant that the greatest height and the greatest density was directed by policy to the downtown area as being an urban growth center and the city
“Over the course of a number of years the city undertook detailed studies for the downtown area to examine where and how the greatest height and density ought to be directed. And the conclusion of that work was that the urban growth center and the major transit station area identification should not be in the downtown, but rather should be further north around the Burlington GO Station. And that’s ultimately the decision that the city made about where its greatest height and density should be focused.
“But of course, that wasn’t the city’s final decision to make. The city doesn’t have the ability to make those determinations.
“Both the Region of Halton as the upper tier municipality, which at the time and for some weeks to come will continue to have the ability to make decisions on amendments to the city of Burlington official plan as well as the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, which was the approval authority for the Official Plan Amendment, which moved the urban growth center and approved amendments to the regional Official Plan in what’s known as ROPA 48. The Urban Growth Centre boundaries are now in the Burlington GO station in and around that area and no longer in downtown Burlington.
“The application that is appealing a decision which proposed the tallest towers in the city today is on a property that is no longer in an urban growth center or a major transit station area.
“All of the existing towers in the downtown area were approved in the context of a policy that had the urban growth center located in the downtown and that is no longer the case.
“From an urban structure perspective, the policy context for this site at the regional level in that this area is now no longer part of an urban growth center, but it’s called a secondary regional node. The minimum density targets that were associated with being in an urban growth center and a major transit stationary do not apply to secondary regional nodes, which in the overall hierarchy of growth structure in the region is second from the bottom in terms of the hierarchy of growth.
“You’ll hear about that policy context, in the opinion evidence of Adrian Smith, who is a land use planner retained by the city to examine the application after the appeals were filed and to provide his independent analysis and opinion which he will share with the tribunal.
“His conclusion is that the Appeals and the proposal have excessive scale, height and intensity. And it will have inappropriate impacts, including quite crucially, a lack of integration with the surrounding lakefront and park; he’ll give you the full context and reasons for his opinion when he testifies.
“You’ll also hear from Katherine Jay, who is also an independent urban designer who was retained to evaluate the applications and provide her opinion after the appeals were filed on both the urban design and landscape architecture aspects of the proposal. And she will provide her conclusions and opinion that the proposed built form is of a scale and mass that has unacceptable impacts on the park and on the lakefront, as well as other urban design and landscape architecture impacts.
“At the end of the day, this the city is not opposed to and in fact supports intensification on this site, but not at the height, the intensity and the scale that’s proposed in the applications that are before you.
 There have been some changes to the design. The bridge at the 5th storey level between th two proposed towers is gone and the structure on the east side has been moved closer to the lake. But the height is still there.
“That changed policy context for downtown Burlington has to have meaning. The studies that were undertaken and the approvals by the region and by the Minister, which shifted location of the focus of growth in Burlington has to have meaning. And what that meaning is will be our submission – that downtown Burlington is no longer the location for the highest degree of intensification. And what’s being proposed with these proposed tallest towers in the city is and will result in unacceptable impacts on Spencer Smith Park and on the downtown area.
“The city will respectfully request that the appeals for the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendment be dismissed by the tribunal.”
That’s what the 15 day plus hearing is about. Chris Barnett nailed it in his remarks this first day of the hearing. Once he had finished everyone else did their best to get as far away from what Barnet put in the table.
The 2020 Lakeshore Road Corporation lost this case back in 2022 when they failed to get necessary documents to city hall in time.
Why Darko Vranich is spending a tonne of money trying to fight what we think is a losing battle is hard to understand.
By Staff
April 24th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
We want to point out to readers that the content of this article was lifted from Joey Coleman’s x item. Coleman appears to be upset, saying we “ripped” the content from his x article. Coleman took the words from Hassaan Basit’s book which wasn’t something Coleman wrote. Coleman gets credit for covering Hamilton like a blanket. Does an ego have to get in the way of his solid work?
Hassaan Basit, Burlington’s newly minted City Manager wrote a chapter in The Role of Canadian City Managers, edited by Michael Fenn, a former Burlington City Manager.
 City Manager Hassaan Basit one 20 authors writing about serving as a City Manager.
Basit and co-author Patrick Moyle, who was an interim Burlington City Manager, write that the first 100 days are when a new city manager reveals their plans, personality, and management style, all of which will answer questions about how they will lead as the city’s top public employee.
“It will be a time when first impressions take on considerable importance as council and staff assess what they really have in their new leader.”
The new city manager must “present the most positive impression possible based on a thoughtful plan” during this time.
Don’t Make Sudden Moves During the First 100 Days – Wait a Few Months
Basit and Moyle write new city managers should not implement significant reorganizations of municipal administration.
“The biggest mistake and the most sudden move that some new [city managers] make is to implement the dreaded reorganization without taking the time to understand relationships and dependencies within and across departments.”
 City Manager Hassaan Basit starting his networking attends an event with City Councillors and Minister of Municipal Affairs. Basit is second from the right.
“To be clear, changes to structure and the people within that structure might need to occur, but you must do this correctly and prudently. The first three to six months is simply not sufficient time to understand the culture,”
They cite other books that show the “gunslinger” approach to change management does not work in municipal government.
Successful city managers know “how to manage change successfully by understanding and respecting the local culture and by thinking rationally and deliberately. They were not prone to making sudden moves.”
Build Networks and Relationships
“The first 100 days should involve the building of three networks, two external and one internal to the organization.”
They state new city managers should seek out more experienced city managers in other municipalities for advice, they should create relationships with “community leaders, such as successful business people in the community, academics, and leaders from the not-for-profit sector, including organized community groups.”
New managers should be in the community, meet with major employers, and avoid becoming trapped inside a City Hall bubble.
They need to meet front-line municipal staff.
“It is imperative that, during the first 100 days, you, as the new CAO, get out of your corner office and meet the employees who deliver the services. The interface between the taxpayer and the municipality is not the CAO, but the civic employee who collects the taxes at the counter, issues the building permit, works in the local arena, ploughs and maintains the roads, drives the transit bus, and so on.”
Be Visible
 There is much mystery, uncertainty, and drama during the first 100 days, said Basit. Don’t expect to see him in his office.
“There is much mystery, uncertainty, and drama during the first 100 days, so be visible. If you remain bunkered down in your office or get pulled into the vortex of meetings and processes, the potential for angst and uncertainty increases proportionally to the time spent in your well appointed office. If you are invisible, your persona and personal brand might be developed and defined by others.”
They suggest new managers visit outside facilities “especially those that have been identified in the capital budget forecast” to learn about municipal operations and hear from front-line staff. This will improve decision making.
Find Quick Wins
“There will be an expectation that the new leader will bring positive change and strive to improve the organization. Early wins, therefore, will help solidify your reputation, confirm that council made the right choice, and demonstrate to staff how you go about making decisions.”
Evaluate Existing Senior Leadership
In keeping with their opening advice to not make significant changes during the first six months as city manager, Basit and Moyle describe the first 100 days as “an opportunity to assess the senior leaders” both formally and informally.
New city managers need to determine the state of municipal leadership – is it functioning well or dysfunctional?
By the end of the first 100 days, a city manager “should be able to form a picture of the strengths and weaknesses” of senior leadership.
Relationships
Basit and Moyle close their chapter with this paragraph:
“The first several months will set the stage for the balance of time you work for the community. A successful first impression can lead to a lasting and positive effect if you have an entry plan, together with the energy and commitment to lead your staff and be of service to council and the community.”
It will be interesting to see how closely Basit follows his own script.
By Staff
April 24th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
Metrolinx reports that as of April 19, 2024, transit customers have made over five million transfers between the TTC and participating transit systems through Ontario’s One Fare Program.
“Through the One Fare Program, riders only pay once when travelling between TTC and GO Transit, Brampton Transit, Durham Region Transit, MiWay and York Region Transit. First launched to customers on February 26, 2024, the program is reducing the cost of using public transit, with potential savings of up to $1,600 annually for an adult commuting five days a week.
“This milestone is a testament to the program’s success in making transfers between local transit systems more affordable and accessible for commuters across the region. Commuters can also leverage various payment options to pay for their fare, including PRESTO cards, credit/debit cards, or PRESTO in Google Wallet, to take advantage of savings through the One Fare Program.
“Whether travelling from Brampton, Oshawa or anywhere in between, Ontario’s One Fare Program makes it more affordable and easier to choose transit first. You can learn more about Ontario’s One Fare Program and the 5 million transfers milestone HERE.”
It works!
By Pepper Parr
April 16th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
Drawing attention to myself is not one of my strengths said Tim Commisso as he spoke to Council for the last time.
He had a 20 year career with the city, then a good stretch of time in Thunder Bay, his home town and returned to serve as the City Manager for five years “which has been the culmination of everything” he said.
“If you’d told me I’d be the city manager for the best city in Canada, I’d never believed you.
I grew up in a small northern Ontario town, Pickle Lake and that’s at the end of the road.
He went on to say “thank you to my counsel” with more emotion one has come to expect from Tim
I respect the fact that you had discussions today with me that were obviously near and dear to my heart. One of the principles I adhere to is to make the tough decisions, have the tough debates in open session at counsel.”
“The suggestion that something should be named in my honour – I’m not interested in naming anything – there may be a rumour going around that I might get a temporary naming of the parking lot, which in two years, you can rip out because it’s going to be redeveloped.
Tim fondly remembers Lisa Kearns calling him the big cheese in front of some sixty people.
“I want to thank Council for facilitating a seamless transition for a new city manager.
“A lot of times you’ll see acting or interim City Manager. I want to talk about a bit about next Monday when Hasaan will be sitting in this seat whenever you guys meet again. I am really impressed quite frankly with the decision you made to have him come on.
“I’ve been working with him for a couple of months. He’s given me his time and met with senior staff. We’ve spent a lot of time going through transition items. He will do very well and I wish him nothing but the best moving forward.
Tim closed with a remark I didn’t expect. “After 42 years, I’ll quote Neil Young’s “Comes a time”. I don’t like saying I live my life through rock and roll but that song kind of epitomizes everything for me.
Comes a time when you’re driftin’
Comes a time when you settle down
Comes a light, feelings liftin’
Lift that baby right up off the ground
Oh, this old world keeps spinnin’ ’round
It’s a wonder, tall trees ain’t layin’ down
There comes a time
You and I, we were captured
We took our souls and we flew away
We were right, we were giving
That’s how we kept what we gave away.
No, Tim didn’t sing those lyrics but he was clearly feeling them as he spoke to a Council that he guided and in five cases mentored and help them grow into the job.
 Tim Commisso: His practice was to think it through.
Tim wanted the public to understand that everybody on the leadership team, compared to five years ago is new. “That’s 19 people. I want that to resonate with you because it is a reflection of the fact that we’ve been able to attract or promote the senior leadership team.”
“It’s the reality of my era, everyone has probably retired, but you’ve got a very strong team; a group of about 70 staff. A lot of them, I would say 85% of them, are new in their roles over the last five years. People like Emilie Cote who was here today: you know, five years ago, she was maybe a supervisor. What you’ve got is really a talented team. The reason I’ve really enjoyed working with all of you is it really comes down to two reasons.
 Adieu!
“One is their passion and compassion. Passion is the unrelenting desire to fulfill your own wishes that drives you. And I always look at it as drive in the context of doing better for the city?
“The other one, and this is as important for me, is your desire to help others. That, quite frankly, has been the primary motivating thing people ask sometimes, like, how do you do this job? It’s because you align yourself with people that have both compassion, and passion. And ultimately, the outcome is building a great community.
“I think I’ve covered the bases here. I just want to say this is pretty surreal, but it is real. So thank you very much. I will leave it at that Mayor.
Council began to applaud and then as a group they stood and continued to applaud.
I’ve had my issues with Tim and he has had his with me. He has served the people of Burlington very well. Much of his work is evident today – what people will realize a decade from now is that he was right, very right, far more often than he was wrong.
By Staff
April 15th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
With news like this – you now know why Bonnie Crombie took a pass on running for the Milton seat in the Legislature.
The Ontario government is moving ahead with the largest GO train service expansion in more than a decade, adding more than 300 trips per week on the Milton, Lakeshore West, Lakeshore East, Kitchener and Stouffville lines. The 15 per cent increase in weekly trips will give commuters more choice to get where they need to go faster.
“As part of our work to get it done on the largest public transit expansion in North America, our government is adding hundreds of additional GO train trips each week for communities across the GTA,” said Premier Doug Ford. “Today’s announcement, along with our recent introduction of free transfers between different transit systems through One Fare, will help get people across the region where they need to go faster, while saving the average transit rider $1,600 every year.”
Starting April 28, 2024, weekend train service will increase from every 30 minutes to every 15 minutes in the afternoon and evening on the Lakeshore West and Lakeshore East lines between Oakville GO Station, Union Station and Durham College Oshawa GO Station. For the first time, riders on the Kitchener line will also benefit from new 30-minute weekday service during midday and evenings between Bramalea and Union Station.
| “As Ontario’s population continues to grow, our government is investing in a world-class transit network that connects communities and people to good jobs and affordable housing,” said Prabmeet Sarkaria, Minister of Transportation. “We’re delivering on our plan to bring more reliable, convenient two-way, all-day GO train service to commuters in the Greater Golden Horseshoe.”
The province is also adding evening train service seven days a week on the Stouffville line, as well as an additional morning rush hour trip to Union Station for commuters in Milton and an afternoon rush hour trip from Union Station to Milton GO.
“Investing in GO rail service and infrastructure is critical to advancing Milton’s long-term complete community vision,” said Mayor Gordon Krantz, Town of Milton. “Additional GO rail service trips in Milton further connects people to jobs, students to learning, stimulates our economy, fosters housing builds in our transit corridors and improves connections to other transit services. We thank the Government of Ontario for this investment, demonstrating a positive step forward in the shared two-way all-day GO service vision for 2031.” |
By Pepper Parr
April 10th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
During the two day Council meeting Chris Kroes, Manager, Health, Safety & Wellness reported on Employee Health, Safety and Wellness. Not much in the way of good news in the document.
Disturbing was the number of public to staff harassment complaints.
There were 58 such reports in 2023 – that’s more than 1 a week. Of the 58 – 17 required a staff member being away from work. The 17 lost time incidents in 2023; was up from 10 in 2022
The city is a self-insured employer. What this means is the city does not pay insurance premiums but rather pays for all injury and illness costs plus a WSIB administration fee to administer the claims.
Based on some feedback from senior leaders the City introduced a mechanism for senior leaders to be notified if a WSIB incident occurs in their service area. This allows them to be aware of it and to inquire with their groups. We’ve enhanced our corrective action process for better tracking, trending and ultimately to ensure completion of those corrective actions to ensure that we prevent re-occurrence.
Chris Kroes was reporting on the 2023 Human Resources report said:
“It is important for City Council to have an awareness of Employee Health, Safety and Wellness matters.
“In recent years, we’ve been tracking incidents of harassment and violence more closely. We have successfully increased reporting and follow up on these incidents; this supports compliance with the Occupational Safety Act.
 A “citizen” getting something off his chest at a public meeting. Former Mayor Rick Goldring and a now retired staff member Vito had put up with it.
“In 2023, there were 58 incidents reported: a note – this is public to staff interactions and does not include staff to staff cases, that’s handled separately and not tracked here.”
City Manager Tim Commisso later added that 17 of the 58 became lost time incidents.
A general review of the data suggests that around 79% are categorized as harassment in nature, and the majority are verbal interactions. 24% of incidents involve some form of violence.
Kroes continues: “The work done by the legal and clerk’s departments on new public conduct policy has also provided for consistency in dealing with misconduct. It should be noted that management of corporate security has been identified as a resource gap city wide and we are looking to make improvements in this area to ensure risks are adequately mitigated to keep staff and the public safe and secure.
Chair Nisan: Thank you, Chris for your diligent work keeping us safe. Mayor Mead Ward has a question.
Mayor Meed Ward: ”I’m very concerned and startled by that number of 58. I want to clarify that number and follow up
Chris: “Yes, these are members of public to the staff. That’s the interaction types. We do have a relatively low threshold of reporting, which is which is by it that’s done intentionally and it’s based on our customer service guidelines. Those incidents are members of the public to city staff and there was 58 of those reported.”
Mayor: Can you give us an indication are these and some with violence, which is really terrifying and my heart goes out to anyone who’s experienced that it’s completely unacceptable. So are some of these online harassment or would all of this be? I mean is some of it email? Is it verbal? Or a mix?
Chris: It includes any type of interaction that sort of falls within the customer service guidelines would generally say level two or level two or level three of the customer service guidelines.
 Staff who work behind the counters at City Hall are the front line people that are experiencing rising levels of personal abuse.
So those interactions could be in person they could be over the phone that could be via email, just incidents that are conduct that’s harassing in nature. And again, it’s a relatively low reporting threshold and not all of them may actually meet that strict definition in the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
But they are reporting and we are ensuring that there’s adequate follow up and that our eyes are on it from health, safety and wellness as well, to make sure those employees are supported through that interaction.
I will point out that we also focus on how the employee feels after that interaction. So it you know, someone may not have intended something but as we know that that’s not always how it’s received by staff. So again, it’s our primary focus is to look at how they’re feeling and ensuring they’re supported after those incidents.
City Manager Tim Commisso: This is the fourth year we’ve reported out on our safety. I’m really trying to come to grips with this. I do want to thank Council though, over the last five years for adding more human resources particularly around safety and wellness.
Relative to the number of interactions we have given the work we do every day this is still relatively low, but we will strive to keep that lower. This year, we didn’t do an update on staff turnover. We still have a relatively low turnover level across the organization. And in our management team, our objective is 5% and I’m just waiting to hear back on those numbers.
 Mayor Meed Ward: “”I’m very concerned and startled by that number of 58.”
Mayor: With respect to our front line staff customer facing who may be facing some of us harassment that showed up on the last slide. Do you think there may be more measures that we could take to mitigate reduce that are there some practical steps that you would be able to look into to bring back to us that we might be able to endorse to ensure that we provide excellent customer service, but that we protect our staff at the same time?
Chris: I think there’s I think it’s a multifaceted approach and it’s based on an assessment of each individual work area, customer facing work area to make sure that they have the training they need in terms of being able to de-escalate and, and sort of, you know, mitigate those interactions from going you know, to a point where it poses a hazard.
Also looking at the customer service counters and making sure that they’re adequately secured and there’s places that people can go to sort of as a as a shelter area so they can get away as needed, obviously there’s emergency protocols like lockdown, hold insecure procedures that we’re looking at improving and enhancing. Ultimately security as a whole and workplace violence risk assessments as a whole.
There’s a lot of work we still need to do and ultimately, there may be some things that we need down the road that we identify and those assessments. I don’t want to I don’t want to list those out now before we before we get to doing a comprehensive assessment but definitely need to take a closer look and making sure that we’re assessing and controlling these workplace violence risks.
Mayor: Do you have any, do you have an idea how often a like a front line staff would be getting on the on the receipt of bad language for example, or you know, excessive negativity? Do you ever do a line on that? Because of these are not all not all those will be reported obviously.
Chris: This is why we we’ve introduced a very low threshold for reporting. So when interactions are happening that are inappropriate and aggressive and you know, swearing and yelling and that sort of thing.
Chris: We’re definitely encouraging those to be reported and it’s very clear that those need to be reported in our policies and procedures. I would say that, that the lion’s share or the or the majority of the 58, there would be those types of interactions. That would be the majority of it. So it’s verbal interactions that are yelling, swearing, unfortunately, sometimes somewhat threatening. That’s, I would say the majority of the 58 would be would be the yelling and the swearing and that sort of thing.
Mayor: I’m curious around what are processes for reporting. So what you know, somebody feels they’ve been harassed in any way. Whether it meets the OSA definition or not, is there a portal do they come talk to you do they talk to their supervisor what’s what do we tell folks to do or invite them to do if they experience this?
Chris: There is a reporting protocol. It’s handled the same way as any workplace incident, whether it’s a hazard or an injury, incident with injury; our direction has been to report it the same way
It goes to the supervisor first. Again, the supervisor looks at the customer service guidelines and sees you know if the interaction is within those different categories, and then ultimately, there’s an online portal that we have for all incident reports and that the supervisor will log into that portal. They will submit information and particulars about the incident they’ll do a preliminary investigation so that they can report it. That report once they hit submit the entire health safety and wellness team is alerted that something has occurred. And then we have safety advisors that will follow up with the supervisor and dig into it more. Depending on the severity and ensuring controls are placed in place to prevent it. If it if it does, if the activity or the conduct does potentially fall into misconduct as defined under the Public conduct policy, then it’s up to the supervisor and again they consult with us as well to refer for review under the misconduct as misconduct under the Public conduct policy. So that’s sort of the after the initial reporting is done and review is done.
Then there’s a there’s a decision on whether it needs to be reviewed as misconduct under the Public conduct policy and that’s a separate process, as you know, where that gets reviewed by either a director or a committee depending on the department and then steps are taken as a result of that review if needed.
Mayor: Okay, so I’m just thinking about how we because you talked about under reporting, and that notwithstanding some of these might not reach the threshold of what the statute says is harassment.
Nevertheless, they create a very toxic, fearful, degraded environment for people to work in.
You’re asking people to report right so how do we encourage people if you know they’ve got something that is just making them feel threatened, making them feel degraded as an individual? You know, we’ve all seen the we’ve all gotten emails like that personally, our staff certainly have – they take it on the chin more than anyone in terms of very derogatory personal comments, etc. and so forth. So maybe not an WSIB payable offence, but certainly not a nice way to start your day. So how can we support people to still come forward with those things?
Chris: That’s why we’ve ensured that it’s a low threshold – so essentially, you know, if you feel uncomfortable if someone was aggressive if someone was yelling someone who was swearing let your supervisor know that’s the first step.
That would would trigger the next steps. We regularly talk about this in safety talks. To say okay, here’s our respect in the workplace policy. Here’s our customer service guidelines. Here’s our incident reporting guidelines. We and supervisors are essentially reminding staff fairly regularly, you know, that if these interactions happen, you need to let me know as a supervisor, and then so I can make sure that’s looked after
So, Mayor, in terms of seeing the numbers increase over the years. I do you believe we’re being effective in encouraging that that reporting and ensuring psychological safety on the part of the staff member to feel comfortable escalating that to a supervisor. I think I think we’re definitely making some progress there. And I’m optimistic that we’re definitely heading in the right direction there.
 Councillor Rory Nisan, Chair of the Committee that heard the Wellness report.
Chair Nisan: Mayor, would you like to move the report? Do you have any comments?
Mayor: I do. Thank you, Chris for all of your work on this. It ultimately does land on our table as the council as the directors of the corporation. That’s a very significant duty and responsibility on our shoulders to ensure a respectful safe harassment free workplace wherever that harassment is coming from.
And I you know, wheels are turning in my mind around how I can support my own team, because we get this a lot. I say to folks, we’re public servants. We’re not public Punching. Bags. We’re not here for others sport and amusement. We’re here to do a job and serve and that needs to be done in a respectful environment. We all deserve that. The good news is I read this report and the previous one together. We don’t have any trouble attracting people to come and work for us. So it’s great to see the positions that we funded in the last budget, getting filled and people really wanting to join our team and when they put their trust and faith in us and they come to work for us, and as Tim said, we have a fairly low turnover rate, but we’ll get those numbers. People want to be here and we want to make sure that it’s safe and enjoyable for them to be here and to stay and that they know that we’ve got their back.
Chair Nisan: Thank you, Mayor. I don’t see any other comments I’ll just add my own. I am concerned that it is far more common than the reporting so that the numbers in the report indicating an increase doesn’t necessarily reflect what’s going on on the ground. So maybe you and I can take it offline with the responsible Executive Director as well and talk further about that. I witnessed harassment City Hall, myself late last week.
And it appears to me to be a very common occurrence. So that’s my concern – that there may be an ongoing and an increase in the culture of harassment of a small minority of residents who are not being respectful of people who are here to serve them. I look forward to talking more about the issue and how we can root it out.
With that. I don’t see any other comments. I will call the vote all those in favour. Any opposed?
That item is carried.
By Staff
April 8th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
The Eclipse is not the only big deal on Monday.
Getting to the point you want to be at to watch the eclipse just might be the challenge.
More than a million people were being projected to arrive in Niagara Falls. GO transit has laid on additional trains making those trains 12 cars long.
GO transit has added extra trips added to the Lakeshore West line from Union Station to Niagara Falls with trains scheduled to depart at 9:02 a.m., 10:02 a.m. and 11:02 a.m. Trips are also being added and modified on the Lakeshore West line from Niagara Falls to Union Station. Return trips from Niagara Falls set to depart at 4:24 p.m., 4:54 p.m., 7:21 p.m. and 10:51 p.m.
What might this mean to traffic on the 400 roads? The much-anticipated eclipse on Monday could mean heavy congestion for travellers in and out of Toronto, Niagara, Hamilton and other southern Ontario cities and towns.
 Is this what traffic is going to look like today?
People are being asked NOT to try taking pictures of the eclipse from their car while driving. NOT to pull over and take pictures. The objective is to keep traffic moving – and the traffic load is expected to be much bigger during the half hour either side of the eclipse.
Drivers are advised to not — under any circumstances — stop on the highway to marvel at the celestial phenomenon. Don’t pull over to the shoulder, don’t leave your vehicle. Just turn on your headlights in the reduced lighting and continue at a safe speed.
“We’re reminding all drivers to obey the laws, and only stop or park where it’s legal and safe to do so,” the ministry said.
 Is Pelee Island going to be the best place in the province to experience the eclipse?
The Niagara Region and Pelee Island are expected to experience heavy traffic.
 Is the CN Tower the place to be to best experience the eclipse?
Is there a special deal on being in the CN Tower? Reservations are no longer being taken.
Plan ahead and consider options such as carpooling or taking public transit.”
The ministry of transportation said its working to co-ordinate highway closures and detours, and is liaising with ONroutes highway rest areas about the potential need to prepare for large crowds.
VIA Rail trips between Toronto and Niagara on Monday’s eclipse day were sold out well in advance, even after the company added 50 extra seats per trip, on top of the regular 150.
Train operations are not impacted by the eclipse and no unusual congestion is expected since locomotives are well equipped to block out the sun.
Going to be interesting at the end of the day to see how we behave as a society.
By Staff
April 4th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
For less than five minutes next Monday afternoon millions of people will be bustling with solar eclipse excitement.
Toronto will also be busy with sporting enthusiasts attending the Blue Jays’ opening game and the Toronto Maple Leafs vs. Pittsburgh Penguins hockey game.
Metrolinx expects a record numbers of travellers and will be rolling out special GO Transit services to accommodate this influx of travellers.
Niagara Falls Service
 Additional GO rolling stock will be added to the service upgrades.
On Monday, April 8, there will be special service to and from Niagara Falls on the Lakeshore West line for customers travelling to see the solar eclipse:
- Two extra trips are being added to the Lakeshore West line from Union Station to Niagara Falls. Trains will depart at 9:02 a.m., 10:02 a.m. and 11:02 a.m., ensuring customers have enough time to get to Niagara for the solar eclipse.
- Trips are also being added and modified on the Lakeshore West line from Niagara Falls to Union Station. Return trips from Niagara Falls will depart at 4:24 p.m., 4:54 p.m., 7:21 p.m. and 10:51 p.m. to give customers more departure options.
- All trains to and from Niagara Falls will be 12 cars long to provide as much room onboard as possible.
- Regularly scheduled GO bus service will also be available for customers via Route 12 Niagara Falls/ Burlington.
- Trains will stop at Exhibition, Port Credit, Oakville, Burlington, Aldershot and St. Catharines GO stations in between Union and Niagara.
Event Service for Jays’ opening game and Maple Leafs’ game
 Locals taking the GO to a ball game.
Also on Monday, April 8, there will be special event service on the Lakeshore West, Lakeshore East and Barrie lines to support customers travelling for the Jays and Leafs games in Toronto. Additional express trips, adjusted schedules and replacement buses are being implemented including:
- Lakeshore West: Two extra express eastbound trips will depart Oakville GO at 5:07 p.m. and 6:03 p.m. The 10:52 p.m. westbound trip to Niagara Falls will also depart 20 minutes earlier at 10:32 p.m. to help get customers home earlier.
Customers are encouraged to use gotransit.com or triplinx.ca to plan their trips as schedules and connection times have changed for this weekend. Customers can also check the GO Transit Service Updates page for real-time details
Transit is now more convenient and affordable with Ontario’s One Fare Program, allowing transit riders to pay only once when travelling between the TTC, GO Transit, Brampton Transit, Durham Region Transit, MiWay and York Region Transit. Learn more about One Fare here: metrolinx.com/onefare.
By Pepper Parr
April 4th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
This is how a municipal budget gets put together when the Mayor uses the Strong Mayor Powers.
Council is being asked to:
Receive and file finance department report providing an update to the format of the 2025 budget documents and the preliminary 2025 Mayors budget approval timelines; and Direct the City Clerk to schedule a Special Council meeting on November 25, 2024 for the purpose of reviewing the Mayor’s proposed budget.
Section 284.16 of the Municipal Act, 2001 S.O. 2001, c. 25 outlines a statutory process for the approval of municipal budgets beginning with the presentation of the Mayor’s proposed budget, amendment of the proposed budget by City Council, veto of amendments by the Mayor and override of vetoes by City Council.
The general provisions of the Act regarding budgets are summarized below: Page 2 of Report Number: F-19-24
By February 1 of each year the Mayor must prepare and propose a budget to Council for consideration
Authority to prepare and propose the budget rests solely with Mayor
This authority cannot be delegated to Council or staff
Mayor can issue a staff direction for staff to prepare budget
Once the Mayor proposes a budget, Council has 30 (calendar) days to meet and pass budget amendments.
30-day period can be shortened by Council resolution
May require special council meeting to meet 30-day timeline
Following the amendment period, the Mayor has 10 (calendar) days to veto budget amendments passed by Council.
Mayor vetos must be set out through a Mayoral Decision and include reasons for veto.
Mayor can shorten veto period via a Mayoral Decision.
Budget amendments vetoed by Mayor are considered not to have been passed by Council
If veto power is not exercised, budget is deemed to have passed
Within 15 days of the veto period ending Council may meet to attempt to override Mayoral vetos.
Council override of Mayoral veto requires 2/3 super majority to pass.
After process of amendments, vetos and overrides has passed the budget is deemed to have been adopted.
Council no longer needs to vote on budget in its entirety.
Budget is considered to have been passively adopted once the approval process above has finished.
The following graphic outlines the key budget process steps as stipulated in the Act:
Mayoral Direction – Budget Development
As outlined earlier, under the provisions of the Act, the authority to propose a budget rests solely with the Mayor. However, a Mayoral direction can be issued for staff to undertake the work required to prepare a draft budget. In order to formalize this requirement for the 2025 budget, the Mayor will be issuing this Direction later this year.
The staff process to inform the Mayor’s Proposed Budget will include:
An extensive line by line review of the draft operating base budget submitted by each service will be conducted by the Acting Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
An extensive review of the draft capital budget will be conducted by the Corporate Infrastructure Committee (CIC).
Staff will prepare a Financial Needs and Multi-Year Forecast report which will be presented to Committee of the Whole in June. This report will outline key budget pressures and significant drivers as well as make recommendations for additional budget investments to address key risks, increase or enhance service levels or address operational challenges.
Draft Budget timelines

Further refinement of the 2025 budget process and timelines will be undertaken prior to reporting back to June COW including the opportunity to consider alternative service delivery priorities and multi-year budget impacts.
Budget Motion Memorandums Forms
Similar to the process used in previous years, should a Member of Council wish to propose an amendment to the Mayor’s Proposed 2025 Budget, they are requested to prepare a Motion Memorandum. This memo will include the rationale for any proposed Page 4 of Report Number: F-19-24 budget amendment.
These Motion Memorandums will provide other members of Council and as well as the public, greater clarity as to why an amendment is being proposed and the rationale for the budget change request.
Motion Memorandums are due to Finance by 4:30 pm on November 11, 2024, to allow sufficient time for inclusion into the Budget Committee agenda of November 18, 2024. These Motion Memorandums will form the basis for the agenda to review the Mayor’s 2025 Proposed Budget.
Revised Budget Book Format
The 2024 budget approval process was a year of transition given that the Province of Ontario only extended Strong Mayor Powers to Burlington on July 1, 2023. As this change occurred well into the budget development process there was limited time to make significant alterations to the process.
As a result, the traditional staff proposed budget was renamed to the Financial Needs and Multi-year Forecast and the budget book was aligned with those figures.
The Mayor used this document for reference purposes when preparing the Budget and outlined in a table the differences between the Financial Needs and Multi-year Forecast and the Mayor’s Proposed Budget.
We heard from members of Council and the public that this reconciliation between the two items was extremely detailed and cumbersome to manage. Additionally, we heard that the overall length of the budget book at over 730+ pages was not user friendly as a review document.
As a result of this feedback two significant changes will be made for the 2025 Budget process.
When the Financial Needs and Multi-year Forecast is presented at June COW, it will include a comprehensive staff report and presentation but will not include a lengthy reference document. When the Mayor’s Proposed budget is presented, it will include a detailed budget book fully aligned to those figures.
The format of the budget book will be condensed. Service Business Plans will no longer be included in the budget book but will be replaced with streamlined content focusing on current service delivery and operations, emerging opportunities and risks, key service investments and an operational financial summary of the service-based budget. Also included for each service will be headline measures which demonstrate and depict service performance. Finally, the 10-year capital investments will be included at the service level.
A sample of the revised budget book content for a single service is set out below.


Financial Matters:
The approved 2024 Budget invested $346.2M into delivering city services to the community and $88.6M into the capital program to renew aging infrastructure and invest in new community assets.
The budget process provides a venue in which decisions are aligned and made to ensure an appropriate balance between affordability, maintaining/enhancing service levels and financial sustainability is achieved over the long term.
The Financial Needs and Multi-year Forecast will be prepared to recognize key budget drivers including ongoing inflationary pressures as well as investments required to stabilize service delivery. It will also make recommendations for increased funding to key areas to address the needs of our growing community.
This Financial Needs and Multi-year forecast will inform the Mayor with detailed information while providing sufficient time to prepare her 2025 Proposed Budget.
Climate Implications:
 A plaza was seriously flooded in 2014 – expectation is that there will be flooding in the years ahead due to climate change.
The impacts of a changing climate can have a significant impact on the City’s budget. For example, increasing extreme weather events such as wind, freezing rain, extreme heat and cold can result in operational expenditures due to clean-up costs, more frequent emergency response and recovery efforts, and unbudgeted impacts to infrastructure requiring repairs and/or replacement.
Similarly, efforts to mitigate climate change can have a budgetary impact. Investments in renewable energy, electric vehicle charging infrastructure and public transit help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Engagement Matters:
The city will continue to use existing online engagement tools such as survey opportunities on GetInvolvedBurlington.ca.
 Will the public choose to take part in budget deliberations the way they used to – or with apathy become the norm?
A Budget Townhall is also planned for November 6, 2024.
The results of all public engagement will be reported back to Council as part of the Mayor’s Proposed Budget and in advance of the budget review process.
The Open Book platform will also be used to present the budget and allow the public to view the budget data in an interactive and intuitive format.
A communications strategy will also be developed in conjunction with the presentation of the Proposed Budget.
This reported presents preliminary 2025 Budget approval timelines as well as outlines an update to the format of the budget book documents.
By Pepper Parr
Match 24th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
UPDATE: Trains will stop at Exhibition, Port Credit, Oakville, Burlington, Aldershot and St. Catharines GO stations in between Union and Niagara.
You are going to hear far more than you want to hear about the April 8th eclipse.
Metrolinx, those people who get you where you want to go have put together some interesting travel package.
On Monday, April 8, Niagara Falls will be bustling with solar eclipse excitement. Toronto will also be busy with sporting enthusiasts attending the Blue Jays’ opening game and the Toronto Maple Leafs vs. Pittsburgh Penguins game.
With record numbers of travellers expected, Metrolinx is rolling out special GO Transit services to accommodate this influx of travellers.
 There will be a two minute period of time when you will hear the sound of water tumbling over the falls and not be able to see what is taking place. Awesome!
Niagara Falls Service
On Monday, April 8, there will be special service to and from Niagara Falls on the Lakeshore West line for customers travelling to see the solar eclipse:
- Two extra trips are being added to the Lakeshore West line from Union Station to Niagara Falls. Trains will depart at 9:02 a.m., 10:02 a.m. and 11:02 a.m., ensuring customers have enough time to get to Niagara for the solar eclipse.
- Trips are also being added and modified on the Lakeshore West line from Niagara Falls to Union Station. Return trips from Niagara Falls will depart at 4:24 p.m., 4:54 p.m., 7:21 p.m. and 10:51 p.m. to give customers more departure options.
- All trains to and from Niagara Falls will be 12 cars long to provide as much room onboard as possible.
- Regularly scheduled GO bus service will also be available for customers via Route 12 Niagara Falls/ Burlington.
Event Service for Jays’ opening game and Maple Leafs’ game
 Was the connection made?
Also on Monday, April 8, there will be special event service on the Lakeshore West, Lakeshore East and Barrie lines to support customers travelling for the Jays and Leafs games in Toronto. Additional express trips, adjusted schedules and replacement buses are being implemented including:
- Lakeshore West: Two extra express eastbound trips will depart Oakville GO at 5:07 p.m. and 6:03 p.m. The 10:52 p.m. westbound trip to Niagara Falls will also depart 20 minutes earlier at 10:32 p.m. to help get customers home earlier.
Customers are encouraged to use gotransit.com or triplinx.ca to plan their trips as schedules and connection times have changed for this weekend. Customers can also check the GO Transit Service Updates page for real-time details
Transit is now more convenient and affordable with Ontario’s One Fare Program, allowing transit riders to pay only once when travelling between the TTC, GO Transit, Brampton Transit, Durham Region Transit, MiWay and York Region Transit. Learn more about One Fare here: metrolinx.com/onefare.
By Pepper Parr
March 3rd, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
The Ontario Trillium Foundation advises that: The $615K grant was a Grow grant which are typically have terms of up to 3 years. The other 2 grants were Resilient Community Fund grants which had terms of 1 year and a maximum request amount of $150K.
OTF does not accept MPP letters of support nor are MPPs required to support grant applications.
Council will hear a request from BurlingtonGreen this week for an annual fee from the city for services they provide.
The Staff recommendation is to approve one time funding for 2024 in the maximum amount of $50,000 from the Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve Fund as a fee for services provided by BurlingtonGreen.
Direct the Executive Director of Environment, Infrastructure and Community Services to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City and BurlingtonGreen outlining the services to be provided in 2024, including performance measures in a form satisfactory to the Executive Director of Legal Services and Corporation Counsel; and
Consider an ongoing fee for services approach with BurlingtonGreen in the amount of $50,000 per calendar year during the Mayor’s 2025 budget process the period of 2024 – 2027.
 This is where the rubber hits the road for the BurlingtonGreen people. CleanUp-GrenUp
In 2023, BurlingtonGreen received $70,000 under the Recreation, Community and Culture’s Community Development program to deliver programs which support the City’s strategic directions related to sustainable transportation, urban nature priorities, climate change actions and zero waste.
The unfortunate part of the Staff report before City council this week is that there is no mention of the $ 773, 500. BurlingtonGreen has received from the provincial Ontario Trillium Foundation (OTF) that distributes profits from the lotteries.
Ontario Trillium Foundation Community Investments
Amount awarded$615,300.00
Year2017-2018
Delivering a project that builds on the success of a proven model or program with a $615,300 grant over 36 months to increase the number of people volunteering in community eco-action activities. Encouraging people to support a healthy and sustainable environment, this initiative is helping people and resource users take deliberate actions to benefit the environment, and has an impact on the lives of 6,300 people in the community.
 In Burlington activities like this are part of the right of passage; an experience that stays with younger people forever.
Ontario Trillium Foundation Resilient Communities Fund
Amount awarded$78,400
Year2021-2022
Our organization, with a $78,400 Resilient Communities Fund grant over 12 months, will rebuild and recover from impacts of COVID-19 by engaging staff to create new, inclusive and safe volunteer opportunities, attract more diverse volunteer participation, and implement new volunteer fundraising strategies.
Ontario Trillium Foundation Resilient Communities Fund
Amount awarded $79,800
Year2023-2024
 Three generation Clean Up crew – an annual event that draws thousands.
From 2017 through to 2023/24 BurlingtonGreen has received $773,500.00 from different OTF programs that are financed by the proceeds from the different lottery programs.
BurlingtonGreen has been operating in the community since 2007 and has a long history of partnering with the City. They took over the annual community Clean Up event from the City in 2011 (formerly organized by the Mayor’s office) and significantly increased participation as it has evolved into the annual Clean-up Green-up event, running over several months instead of just one week around Earth Day.


Forestry staff and BurlingtonGreen have partnered on several occasions to deliver tree planting, give aways and educational events. The City entered into a funding agreement with BG in 2021/22 to complete the community based Electric Mobility Strategy presented to Council in September 2022 (fifty percent of funding was provided by the provincial Ministry of Energy).
 The Pump House that once brought in water from the lake to meet the city’s needs and is now used by BurlingtonGreen as an EcoHub. No word on how long a lease was signed or the rental rate.
In 2022, BG successfully made arrangements with the City to lease the Burlington pump house located on the Beachway. They transformed it into a community Eco Hub where they present climate related programs and actions, such as:
- Home energy retrofits showcasing the air source heat pump installed at the Eco Hub;
- Active and sustainable transportation given the location on the multi-use trail along with bike parking and a bike repair station; and
- Electric mobility with the soon to be installed electric vehicle charging
The fee for services approach will help to supplement external funding and provide additional support for staff and resources allowing BurlingtonGreen to attract volunteers, develop and coordinate communications and successfully deliver activities noted above.
BurlingtonGreen has made a huge difference to the public perception of environmental issues. Their reach starts with students at the elementary level through to grandparents. The corporate sector is very comfortable and readily identifies with the group.
But there is a bigger question here that does not get raised in the Staff report – at what point does the City pick up all the costs of this organization.
There are other community organizations that deliver services to the community at no cost. The work done by Bfast has resulted in transit services that meet the needs of that part of the population that depends on public transit.
 A neighbourhood tradition in Burlington – not a dime of public money.
The Food Banks provide services without financial support from the city.
The matter before Council should not be: does the City keep providing and increasing ongoing financial support but rather at what point do taxpayer dollars get used to support community groups. There is a policy the city does not appear to be adhering to.
There is absolutely nothing in the Staff report on the BurlingtonGreen financials; how much they raise and what it gets spent on.
BurlingonGreen has an impressive public profile; it has close to Holy Grail status. Its reach within the community is both admirable and far reaching – the questions is how far should it be reaching into the public purse.
The 3711 taxpayers who signed a petition against the 7.5% 2024 tax increase have to be taken into consideration – their voice is as valid as the BurlingtonGreen supporters.
 Past due property tax at the highest level in 5 years.
 Transparency and accountability launched a political career.
Missing anywhere in the Staff report are the two pillars that said to be critical to what gets done with public money: transparency and accountability – a special interest group doesn’t use the words and City Council appears to be taking a pass on them as well.
We will return tomorrow with detail on what BurlingtonGreen has done in terms of its own fund raising and how it spends the funds it receives. And we will look at that policy as well.
By Staff
February 26th, 2024
BURLINGTON, ON
That One Fare program Metrolinx has put in place starts today.
As announced earlier this month, the province – in collaboration with Metrolinx and local transit agencies – is working to connect communities across the region. Through Ontario’s One Fare Program, transferring from one transit system to another will be simpler, more convenient and more affordable.
Ontario’s One Fare Program allows transit users to only pay once when traveling between the TTC, GO Transit and participating transit systems like Brampton Transit, Durham Region Transit, MiWay and York Region Transit.
When travelling between systems, the discount will be applied automatically when you tap a PRESTO card, credit or debit, or PRESTO in Google Wallet to connect between GO Transit, TTC and all participating transit systems.
What you need to know:
- Free transfers: For trips between the TTC and GO Transit, your TTC fare is free, regardless of travel direction and the cost of your TTC trip is discounted from your overall trip cost. For trips between the TTC and other local transit systems, the second fare of your trip is free.
- Transfer flexibility: Transfers are valid for two hours when trips start on local transit and three hours when you tap on a GO bus or train.
- Proof of payment: The payment method you use to tap is your proof of payment. Customers paying with PRESTO in Google Wallet, credit or debit card, must tap on and off with the same card.
For an adult who commutes five days a week, the One Fare Program could save them up to$1,600 per year.
You can learn more about Ontario’s One Fare Program here and watch a step by step video on our YouTube channel.
|
|