Councillor Sharman suggests the Transit service should consider using Argo buses - they are already doing that Councillor

By Pepper Parr
May 1st, 2026
BURLINGTON, ON
In a lengthy comment published on Facebook, Ward 5 Councillor Paul Sharman shared his views on transit,  They are evolving.

Councillor Sharman: “We all can see with our own eyes, that most of the time buses in Burlington have mostly empty seats.”

“I would catch the bus if they were more convenient. I spent my entire childhood and youth years depending on public transit. I have never described the Burlington Transit in any demeaning way. Indeed, a bus that now costs over $1m to purchase, which requires significant maintenance, and will be replaced after 12 years, is a thing of beauty. Our drivers are well managed, courteous and friendly people, who care about their work.

That never describing Transit in a demeaning way is a huge stretch.
“I have pointed out what we all can see with our own eyes, that most of the time buses in Burlington have mostly empty seats. Empty seats = idle capacity, which costs a fortune.
“The Burlington 2026 transit budget is $37m, fare collection is about $6m, ie 16% of cost. A very large proportion of riders live in Hamilton, coming to work here, for which we are grateful, but they are also subsidized by Burlington property taxes. Average daily number of rides is about 9500, which = about 4700 people riding to where they are going and back again. Deduct the riders who live in Hamilton and do not pay Burlington property taxes, you can see that for Burlington property tax payers it means that about 98.5% them of do not use the service for which they will pay $31m out of their own pockets. That is $157 annually collected for every person in Burlington who don’t use our buses or $516 annually from every property tax payer.
“There are reasons why Burlington property tax payers don’t catch the bus system. The system is designed around large capacity buses, fixed routes and a fixed schedule. Routes and bus stops are designed such that every home is within 400 mtrs walk of a stop, which is a long way for people in a hurry, or people who find such a walk difficult. Some stops have shelters others not, but they are pretty cold in winter…. especially if you miss the first bus you intended to catch. We can do so much better.
“Many of the increasing number of older adults continue to drive into their later years because walking to a bus stop or inconvenience does not work for them. Nor for most people. Further, did you know that Handy Vans are only available to people who have a doctors certificate. Handi Van riders find they have to book a ride up to 2 weeks in advance to be certain to get a seat, and may have to get a taxi home later if their appointment goes too long.

Appleby GO station parking lot.

“Burlington residents drive to the GO station because it is convenient time wise and access to their own transportation is at the door. They will pay the considerable cost of owning a car because of accessibility and convenience.

“Modern technology, suitable vehicles, operators such as Argo exist and are already operating around the world, in Canada and in Ontario. On demand rider cost would be the same as present
“Older drivers, commuters and everyone else can simply call for a ride when they want one. Ridership will increase dramatically at a massively reduced cost to tax payers. If anyone has any doubt of whether what other municipalities and people who need transportation already know, just order an Uber, that the cost will four times more than a bus for a local ride.
“Burlington can continue to offer large bus service on the few routes that justify them, but even on those routes, small vehicles will do the job outside peak hours. We might even need more bus drivers!

Sharman: insists he is a numbers man.

“I am a numbers person and it is my belief that 1) $37m is massively excessive; 2) riders will take advantage of a convenient on demand service that will pick them up where they are, when they want to be picked up, and dropped off where they wish to go; 3) that ridership will increase dramatically, which will have the effect of increasing $ total fares collected: 4) increased fare revenue will cause total cost to tax payers to reduce and therefore reduce taxes! Win, win, win.

“If nothing else staff should try this out.”
What Sharman fails to reveal is that Burlington Transit is already using Argo buses to transport people who had asked for HandiVan service
Related news story:
Return to the Front page

Rivers: A Wealth Fund or a Debt Fund?

By Ray Rivers

May 1st, 2026

BURLINGTON, ON

 

 

Mr. Poilievre is having a field day mocking the Carney government for creating a wealth fund.  There are something like thirty such funds around the world.  Alberta’s former premier Lougheed created the provincial Heritage Saving Fund in 1976, built with the substantial petroleum royalties at the time and based on the fear, back then, that the province might eventually run out of the black gold.

Despite criticism that the Alberta fund over the years has been treated like an ATM, more like a chequing than a saving account, and accessed whenever the government felt it needed cash, it has grown to over $30 billion today and is targeted to hit $250 billion some day in the future.  Unlike Alberta though, the federal government gets very little in the way of oil and gas royalties.

These war loans were heavily subscribed to – note the picture of the King and Queen at the time.

So the plan for Canada’s new national wealth fund will be based on a $25 billion endowment by the feds and open investment to private corporations and presumably individuals with a little extra cash in their pockets.  That might end up as something akin to investing in a war bond to fund rebuilding the economy in this economic war with the USA.

The details are yet to come – most likely only after a board of directors is constituted.   Canada already has a large pool of capital in the Canada Pension Plan, which currently is approaching $800 billion in value.  However, being largely composed of obligatory contributions by future pensioners, the government is wise not to mess with one of the world’s most successful pension funds.

Poilievre’s claims that a wealth fund should be financed by federal budgetary surpluses is a laudatory but naive notion given that for almost twenty years, since the 2008 economic recession, neither the Liberal nor Conservative governments have ever generated a budgetary surplus.  Fellow Tory Doug Ford was all about eliminating deficits as well, that is until he became premier and realized that the prospect of raising taxes or cutting essential programs has a political as well as a social and economic cost.

And Poilievre’s demand that the federal government remove all gas taxes would just add another eight billion dollars to the current deficit.  That kind of math helps explains why he thinks he understands economics better than the sitting PM with his Harvard and Oxford degrees and his record as central banks governor.  The complexity of higher finance clearly seems to evade the Tory leader’s comprehension – so he lashes out as best he can, accusing the PM of directing government policy to further enrich himself and his former business associates – essentially accusing him of corruption.

Poilievre has once again been transformed into attack dog mode.

But perhaps what is most concerning about Mr. Poilievre, who has once again been transformed into attack dog, is his lack of faith in Canadians and his inference that Canada doesn’t have enough wealth to start a fund – that Canada only has debt and that the new Sovereign wealth fund is just another debt fund.  This is not the time to depreciate the country, especially if you are a political leader hoping one day to govern.

Canada is widely considered the 18th richest nation on earth with the 11th largest economy.  Not bad for a nation of just over 40 million  people, about half a percent of the planet’s population.  According to the International Monetary Fund Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7, with the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio, at just under 12% and a triple A credit rating.

Ray Rivers, a Gazette Contributing Editor, writes regularly applying his more than 25 years as a federal bureaucrat to his thinking.  Rivers was once a candidate for provincial office in Burlington.  He was the founder of the Burlington citizen committee on sustainability at a time when climate warming was a hotly debated subject.   Ray has a post graduate degree in economics that he earned at the University of Ottawa.  Tweet @rayzrivers

Background links

Wealth Funds –       Poilievre on Wealth Fund –      Wealth Funds –     Alberta Heritage Fund –    Brookfield Funds –

 

 

 

 

 

Return to the Front page

The currently leaderless Ontario Liberal Party is just one point behind the Premier in recent Abacus polling

By Pepper Parr

May 1st, 2026

BURLINGTON, ON

An Abacus poll found Ford’s Progressive Conservatives at 37 per cent with the leaderless Liberals, who elect a new chief Nov. 21, at 36 per cent, a statistical tie. Marit Stiles’ New Democrats remain in third place with 17 per cent while Mike Schreiner’s Greens were at five per cent.

Say that again:  A political party with no leader is a point behind the Premier of the province

Doug Ford: Time to say as little as possible and hope the public concerns blow over.

The poll found Ford’s Progressive Conservatives at 37 per cent with the leaderless Liberals, who elect a new chief Nov. 21, at 36 per cent, a statistical tie. Marit Stiles’ New Democrats remain in third place with 17 per cent while Mike Schreiner’s Greens were at five per cent.

Abacus president David Coletto said two recent contentious moves by the premier appear to have hurt the Tories.

First, Ford’s decision to amend the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act to retroactively exclude the release of his records and those of ministers, parliamentary assistants and aides.

Second, his $28.9 million purchase of a 2016 Bombardier Challenger 650 executive jet to be used for official travels.

The public will begin to focus on the municipal election, which take place on October 26TH – nominations opened today.

 

Return to the Front page