The financial trade-offs shaping municipal budgets across Ontario will shape property taxes for years — not just this year’s levy are being made now.

By Gazette Staff

February 25th, 2026

BURLINGTON, ON

 

Across Ontario, councils are making financial decisions that will shape property taxes for years — not just this year’s levy.

✅ In Niagara, a $6 million reserve draw was rejected, leaving a 6.3% levy increase in place.

✅ In Waterloo, a $15.1 million emergency water project moved forward with no confirmed outside funding.

✅ In Burlington, up to $42 million in development charges remain in limbo as council weighs whether growth should continue paying for growth.

✅ In Tiny Township, reserves were committed to new spending and multi-year contracts before next year’s tax debate begins.

✅ In Mississauga, $40 million in capital work was deferred to reduce this year’s levy while long-term labour costs continue to compound.Some decisions reduce immediate tax pressure. Others shift financial exposure into future budgets. In several cases, reserves (municipal savings accounts) are being asked to absorb risk.If you care about where property taxes are headed, and how much flexibility your council will retain in the years ahead, these meetings matter.

Burlington Weighs Two Year Development Charge Elimination as Housing Sales Collapse

Burlington councillors spent hours confronting a housing market industry leaders described as “essentially dead.” New home sales have fallen more than 90 percent since 2022, with just 17 homes sold in 2025. Committee debated whether to temporarily eliminate residential development charges for two years. No final decision was made at this stage. If nothing is built, the city collects no development charges but also avoids growth costs. If projects restart under an exemption, infrastructure funding would need to come from other sources unless future tax growth offsets it. Council now must decide how much risk to take to revive construction.

YOUR ROLE IN MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTThree Questions Every Taxpayer Should Ask After These Meetings

You don’t need to be a municipal finance expert to influence a discussion. What matters is asking disciplined, repeatable questions that focus on risk, reserves, and long-term cost.Across the meetings above, councils balanced short-term relief against long-term exposure. The most effective residents bring the discussion back to sustainability. When one resident raises a concern, it can be dismissed. When multiple residents ask the same focused question, it signals a community issue. That often prompts clearer answers and follow-up reports.Here are the financial questions that deserve direct responses:

What does this decision look like three to five years from now?Many budget debates focus on this year’s levy. That is only part of the picture.Instead of focusing only on the immediate tax impact, ask councillors to explain:

·  What is the projected impact over the next three to five years?

·  What assumptions are being used about growth, inflation, and interest rates?

·  What is the backup plan if those assumptions don’t hold?

What kind of answer you’re looking for:

A clear explanation of the long-term cost curve, not just this year’s savings. If the answer relies heavily on optimistic growth projections or “future review,” that is important to note. A strong answer connects today’s decision to a documented future plan.
Where do reserves stand compared to policy targets?

>
Reserves are municipal savings accounts meant to stabilize taxes and manage risk. The question is not whether they should ever be used — its whether they are being used within established financial guidelines.Ask:

·  What is the official reserve policy target?

·  Where is the reserve balance today relative to that target?

·  What risk level does this decision create?

What kind of answer you’re looking for:

Specific percentages or dollar comparisons to policy benchmarks. If reserves are below target, ask how council plans to rebuild them and over what timeline. If reserves are being drawn down, councillors should be able to explain a replenishment strategy. If they cannot describe how and when reserves will be restored, that signals risk.
If development charges are reduced or waived, how will the city fund the infrastructure those charges were meant to pay for?

Development charges and growth-related revenue fund infrastructure for new housing. When those revenues shrink — or are reduced — infrastructure still needs funding.Ask:

·  If development charge revenue drops, what replaces it?

·  Will projects be delayed, debt increased, or costs shifted to existing taxpayers?

·  What is the downside scenario if construction does not rebound?

What you are looking for:

A clear funding source. If the answer is uncertain or dependent on outside funding that is not yet secured, that risk should be acknowledged openly.

A satisfying answer will identify a defined plan: re-prioritizing projects, adjusting capital timing, accessing a specific reserve, or revisiting the policy within a set time frame. If the response assumes that growth “will return” without explaining what happens if it does not, that is not a complete answer.A useful follow-up is: “What happens if building volumes remain at current levels for two more years?” or “Is there a written contingency scenario in the capital forecast?”

How to Raise These Questions Effectively

Although speaking at council is one of the best forms of action, you don’t need to speak at council to be heard. Effective engagement can include:

·  Emailing your councillor and copying the mayor or regional chair

·  Submitting a written delegation that becomes part of the official record

·  Attending ward meetings or community town halls

·  Requesting written clarification through the Clerk’s Office

·  Coordinating joint letters with neighbours to demonstrate shared concern

What matters most is clarity.Reference the exact report or motion. Ask for numbers and timelines. Request written responses where possible. Focus on sustainability, policy targets, and long-term impact.Avoid personal attacks and stick to the financial substance of the issue.Decision-makers respond more constructively when residents show they understand the trade-offs involved. Clear, disciplined questions are harder to dismiss than emotional reactions.Residents are far more effective together than alone.
Consider joining your local taxpayer or residents’ group.

Organized voices amplify shared concerns, track follow-up commitments, and maintain steady pressure between meetings.Are you a part of your local region property tax group?Visit our Alliance Member page to see whether your municipality has an alliance member organization within the PTA network. If your region is not yet represented, contact us — we may be able to help connect you or support the formation of a local group. Consider joining your local taxpayer or residents’ association. When local groups coordinate their research and raise consistent concerns, they strengthen their influence and create measurable change.

Informed engagement is not opposition. Its accountability.

If you found this helpful, forward it to a neighbour or friend who might benefit from it too?

The more residents who understand what’s happening, the stronger our communities become.

Return to the Front page

Discover more from Burlington Gazette - Local News, Politics, Community

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply