What is Public Medicare? 'you dont know what you got till its gone'

By Staff

November 28th 2024

BURLINGTON, ON

What is Public Medicare? ‘you don’t know what you got till its gone’

Public Medicare is the public health care system in Canada which is funded through our taxes. When you see a doctor or visit the hospital for medically necessary services using your OHIP card, you are using Public Medicare. Under Public Medicare, all Canadian residents can receive medically necessary hospital and physician services based on their medical need without user fees or charges. Health care is provided without cost based on our medical need, paid in our taxes, rather than based on our ability to pay or our wealth. Public Medicare enjoys a high level of support from Canadians. It is a source of pride for many, but years of relentless cuts and governments pushing privatization have contributed to problems in Medicare. The solution is not to privatize but to plan well, reorganize care in the public system, and restore and rebuild services that have been cut and downsized too far.

What is it like to not have Medicare?

  • Before Public Medicare, Canadians had no choice but to forego medical treatment because they did not have the money to pay for care, leading to suffering and death. Helen Heeney’s book Life Before Medicare tells the story of a young woman with cancer who refused pain medication because it would bankrupt her family. For two months, she had her husband lock her in their home when he left for work so that no one could enter to help her when they heard her screaming in pain. She did not want to bankrupt her family as she was dying.
  • In the United States where private insurance and for-profit delivery of health care services are widespread, health care costs are almost double per person those in Canada.
  • More than 26 million Americans did not have health insurance in 2023 and 38% of residents in the United States delayed getting medical treatment because they could not afford it.

Achieving Public Medicare & the Canada Health Act

1947: The first public hospital insurance plan in Canada was introduced by the Saskatchewan government led by Tommy Douglas.

1957: The federal government, with Paul Martin Sr. as Health & Welfare Minister, introduced the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act (1957) that brought in public hospital insurance across the country. The funding arrangement was that the federal govt shared half the cost of provincial/territorial hospital insurance plans. It faced strong opposition from pro-privatization forces wanting to bill patients directly (doctors, insurance companies, and large corporations).

1959: Ontario created a public provincial hospital insurance plan in 1959.

1961:

    • All provinces and territories had implemented a public hospital insurance plan by 1961.
    • In 1961, Saskatchewan passed legislation to expand their Medicare program to cover physician care outside of hospitals(e.g. doctors’ offices), prompting a three-week strike by doctors who wanted control and wanted to be able to extra-bill patients. The government held strong and brought in Public Medicare but with amendments allowing doctors to opt out of the plan. By 1965, once it was in operation, the majority of doctors supported the plan.

1964: The federal Diefenbaker government’s Royal Commission on Health Services led by Justice Emmett Hall called for national Public Medicare.

1966: The Medical Care Act (1966) was passed so that doctors and medical care would be covered for all Canadians (not just in hospital). The federal govt would share half of the cost with the provinces/territories.

1972:Each province and territory had implemented Public Medicare plans for hospital and physician services by 1972.

1984: In response to doctors extra-billing patients (charging patients extra user fees on top of OHIP/the provincial public health plan), the Canada Health Act was passed in 1984, establishing five principles for our health care system and banning extra-billing and user fees.

Tommy Douglas – the Saskatchewan politician who fought for public health care.

5 Principles of the Canada Health Act

      • Portability: Health coverage must not end or stop when a person travels or moves between provinces/territories in Canada.
      • Accessibility: All insured individuals must have reasonable access to health care without barriers, such as financial or physical limitations.
      • Universality: All Canadians must be covered by Public Medicare on equal terms and conditions.
      • Comprehensiveness: All medically necessary hospital and physician services must be covered, even when the services are provided by another designed health professional.
      • Public Administration: Provinces and territories must operate their health insurance plans on a non-profit basis. They must also be administered and operated by a public authority.

1995: The federal Chrétien government with Paul Martin (Jr.) as Finance Minister, brought in major cuts in the federal budget. The Canada Health and Social Transfer (CHST) combined funding for health, education and social services into one block fund and they cut federal health transfers by 40%. These cuts, combined with provincial cuts, led to the expansion of private clinics.

2001: The federal government created a National Commission (known as the Romanow Commission) on the future of Medicare, in part because of the crisis caused by the cuts.

2002: The 2002 Romanow Report called for the creation of the Canada Health Transfer (CHT) that would separate out health funding from other federal transfers and an escalator clause in the CHT to match inflation.

2004:

    • Ontario’s Commitment to the Future of Medicare Act was passed to uphold the Canada Health Act. It bans extra-billing, user fees, queue jumping, and restricting access to insured services through block or annual fees. It sets out fines and jail terms for offenders who accept payment for an OHIP-covered service and requires the Ministry of Health to reimburse patients for unlawful extra-billing and user fees.
    • The 2004 Health Accord introduced a 6% escalator for the CHT to offset the huge cuts made in the 1990s – although privatization had already gained a foothold. It also increased the federal share of health funding, not back to the historic 50-50 split with the provinces, but back to the 20% range (varying among provinces).

2006: The 2006 election of the Harper government halted progress as they sought to remove themselves from health care policy and refused to attend First Ministers’ meetings.

2011: The Harper government announced cuts to the funding formula that governed CHT increases by tying them to changes in GDP with a floor of 3% starting in 2017, eliminating the 6% escalator agreed upon in the 2004 Accord. The impact was estimated by the provinces to be a reduction in federal public health care funding by $36 billion over ten years compared to what provinces would have received under the 6% escalator.

2016-2017: During the 2016-17 Health Accord negotiations, the Trudeau govt only minimally modified Harper’s cut to the funding formula. After the provinces and territories rejected their proposal, the Trudeau govt left the negotiating table. They then went province-by-province pushing through 10-year bilateral deals (that means different deals between the federal government and each province) to pressure all the provinces and territories into adopting their proposal.

2022: Legislation to implement a national dental care insurance plan was passed in 2022. However, the federal govt contracted a private insurance corporation (Sun Life) to administer the plan.

2024: The Pharmacare Act was passed in October 2024 to create a national pharmaceutical insurance plan, starting with coverage for contraceptives and diabetes medications.

There are governments that want to privatize public health. You want to think really hard about that. Joni Mitchell made it clear:  ‘you don’t know what you got till its gone’

 

 

 

Return to the Front page
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

6 comments to What is Public Medicare? ‘you dont know what you got till its gone’

  • Dorothy P.

    If extra billing is not allowed how is it my doctor wants to charge me an annual fee to fax my repeat prescription to my pharmacist. Is this not a form of extra billing?

  • Allan Briskin

    Sorry to see you’re so defensive. It would have been better to see a report that indicates there are workable options. I subscribe to the Gazette to read news, not opinions.

    Editor’s note: Unfortunately Allan media is a combination of news, entertainment and opinion. You can always skip the opinion, it is clearly identified. What opinions do is introduce readers to new ideas and different ways of looking at issues.

  • Joe

    We know what we have and it is not working. Other countries have mixed systems that work better than ours. Why not share studies from Switzerland, Netherlands, Germany or Australia.

  • Ross Hamilton

    Much of our healthcare system is already private. All doctors serving patients run their own practices and are paid by OHIP based on the number of patients they treat or the number of treatments they provide….all established by OHIP….no extra billing allowed. They can improve their profitability through their own efficiency. Most Labs are the same and we even have a privately run and renowned hospital called Shouldice. It performs hernia operations at OHIP rates with no extra charge, for Canadians, despite their world renown and many international patients.

    Private health care is not the problem….allowing insurance companies into the process could create huge problems, and they have no place in universal health care anyway. Allowing the medical profession to establish universal rates for themselves provides an equitable basis for them to be paid (direct by the government) whether publicly or privately run. Those that are more efficient or effective will (and should) make more money based on that efficiency.

    Introducing insurance companies into the process, as the liberals are doing with the national dental program, will create huge problems for Canada. Many Canadians are currently covered by their employers or have their own insurance for dental plans through these same insurance companies. Employers that currently cover their employees for dental may start to think that it might be better left to the government and start scaling back their plans. The Liberal plan is not universal and would be better administered as an extension of welfare with the added cost and profit to be paid to insurance companies.

    Introducing more private specialty surgical clinics (the FORD plan as I understand it) could improve scheduling and efficiency of routine surgeries that are hard to schedule in public hospitals because public hospitals operate primarily on an emergency basis, for any conditions that present themselves. It should not allow for billing any differently than public institutions at OHIP rates.

  • Penny

    Healthcare in Ontario has declined dramatically. Many people have no access to a physician and depend on Emergency Rooms and Walk-In Clinics for their medical needs.

    Patients in some cases are being diagnosed with serious illnesses like cancer in an emergency room of a hospital because of the lack of physicians. The government’s kept control of medicare costs by limiting the number of physicians trained. Now this has come home to roost.

    In some provinces people have died because of the wait for cancer diagnosis and treatment. People have waited months and in some cases years for knee or hip replacement surgery. The government of Ontario says that they have reduced the wait time to have this type of surgery. The problem now exists in getting in to see the specialist. If you can’t see a surgeon for months one definitely does not have their surgery for months.

    Yes, we have Universal Healthcare but it comes at a cost in the diagnosis and care of patients. Pharmacare is a joke – contraceptives and diabetes medication is the only thing that is covered. Antibiotics would at least be something that all Canadians could benefit from.

    The National Dental Care program, while better than nothing, pays for very little and is not available to all Canadians.

    Nothing is free in this world. We pay dearly in taxes for Universal Medicare and also experience long waits in emergency rooms etc. because of the lack of physicians and hospitals cutting back on frontline staff to try to keep within their budgets.

    Some would say we are better off than other countries like the United States. But are we really?

    There are many Canadians who have to deal with the same issues of lack of medical care as those living in the United States, and we have Universal Medical Care.

  • Allan Briskin

    It now becomes obvious that Pepper is a Liberal/NDP mouthpiece. Privatization of health care is a good thing to improve service delivery as long as the system remains single-payer with the Province paying the bills. An example is the clinic at Walker’s Line and Dundas which is privately owned and provides most medical services, as well as containing doctors’ offices, all paid for by the province. The other thing Pepper obviously doesn’t understand is that most European government systems are a combination of public and private delivery.

    Editor’s note: Having a Liberal/NDP perspective is actually permitted in Canada. Most media support a point of view. Who do you think the Wall Street Journal support; who do you think the Toronto Sun supports. Opposing points of view are what make the democracy we have work.

Leave a Reply