By Pepper Parr
April 9, 2015
BURLINGTON, ON
Remember that piece of land at the edge of the lake between Market and St. Paul that the city decided it would sell to the Michael Swartz and Janice Connell?
The sale of the city portion of the land has apparently gone through – the sale of the piece the province owns now gets processed.
Once both pieces are sold the public will be told how much the land was sold for – why the wait is not clear.
This is the view three property owners will have once their purchase of lake front land owned by the city and the provincial government closes. Sweet!
What is clear however is what will happen to the money the city gets for its portion of the land? It was to be used to create the Windows on the Lake that were to be at the end of Market and St. Paul Street, as well in other locations across the city.
Those “windows” now appear to be at risk.
The Market street and the St. Paul Street windows to the lake are thought to be ay serious risk by the Burlington Waterfront Committee.
There was a community meeting at which the two windows projects were being discussed – and it sort of got out of order. City staff were given a very rough time by one of the property owners – so much so that complaints have worked themselves up to the desk of the city manager.
Members of Council seemed to take the position that creating a window to the lake at the end of St. Paul and Market Streets was enough and that everyone would be happy when this file was finally closed.
Doesn’t look like this file is going to close anytime soon.
The owners of property in the streets that lead to the windows are wondering just how much pedestrian traffic there will be and will people be sitting close to the edge of the lake at all hours of the day and how much noise will there be?
Discussions amongst the people who live on Market and St. Paul have taken place and they apparently now want to know just how minimalist are these windows on the lake going to be.
Will it be just a bench and a waste container? Apparently there are not going to be any lights.
No city signage on this piece of city owned property. The obstructions in place were put in to suggest this is private property – it isn’t. Plans are in place to make a proper Window on the Lake at this location. Some feel these plans are at risk
Some people are getting the sense that there is a push to get rid of the windows all together or to make them so inaccessible that no one will want to go near the things.
Nelson Park, a block to the east of the Market/St. Paul street situation had a part of its lake frontage cleared giving a much bigger look at the lake. The St. Paul/Market street residents think this is enough for the public – no real need for any additional park space, which was part of the argument city council used then they decided to sell the waterfront land it owned.
This is the land at the end of St. Paul Street, owned by the city, public but there are no signs to indicate it is public. Few people walk past that bright sign. The city said that it would turn this into a full window on the Lake. Local residents are trying to get the city to change its mind
“It seems”, said one informed observer, “that the three property owners now feel they have title to the land behind their homes and now want to ensure that the public doesn’t get to wander around their houses.” Those houses are on public streets and Lake Ontario is a public right for all to appreciate.
What bothers people is that Council is aware of the problem but does not appear to be taking any steps to suggest to the people who managed to convince them to sell public land to be satisfied with what they have.
Really???!!!!
Let’s state the facts. The windows are owned by the city, the streets are city owned and the water is a public right. The residents whose properties are contiguous with the parkettes may need to put up a fence on the property line (fences do make good neighbours). The cost of the fence, if on the property line, and agreed upon by the two respective parties is usually split 50-50. This will stop the public from roaming on their compounds. Now, everything else is just trite nonsense and rhetorical emesis in hopes of disguising the true visage of the wealthy elitists.
To put it in simple English………you live beside a park!!! Lots of people do in the city and that comes with both good and bad. Most homes are enriched by living beside a park. It is often an area sought out by home buyers. Sooooo put up with the park or move. Seems easy to me. The problem will be, what will city council do??? The majority of council seem to listen to the wealthy and forget the majority who put them into power. I guess the wealthy throw better parties…….excuse me, soirees.
+1