You must have some oddballs in this community.

Former Toronto Mayor suggests Burlington

hold a competition on waterfront development

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON  January 14, 2011   –  It was Nicholas Leblovic’s return on an investment.  A couple of bottles of beer and an afternoon on a deck in Tiny Township resulted in the chair of the Waterfront access and Protection Advisory Committee getting what amounted to a graduate student lecture on growing a community.

Waterfront Advisory meetings are usually quiet events that take place on a Friday afternoon.  The 12 member committee has been going through a series of briefings but today it was the granddaddy of briefings and Nicholas was pleased.

David Crombie, former Mayor of Toronto and chair of a Royal Commission on   and creator of the Waterfront Trail that runs for more than 800 km from Niagara Falls to Quebec City; runs through 41 municipalities, 10 conservation areas, 182 parks – well you get the picture it was big and Crombie remembers every inch of it.

He began his talk with the statement: I have not come to Burlington to solve your waterfront problems but instead he asked the meeting (which had a dozen or so members of the public sit in) to step back twenty five to thirty years and remember what it was like then.  The railways were leaving waterfront areas in cities across the province; de-industrialization was taking place and people were beginning to look at their waterfront areas much differently.  The water was badly polluted, shore lines were in poor shape and access to the waterfront was blocked.

Local activists in many communities wanted access to the water and the great Lakes Agreement on water quality was put in place.  All these forces brought about the need to look at waterfronts across the province differently.

As we began to explore – and we did this with endless meetings, it became clear that the thread throughout was the waterfront and the need for connectedness.  We realized as a Commission that the link in all of this was our collected history.

Crombie pointed out that his generation didn’t understand the Oakwood moraine. “It was just a bump along the way to the cottage” he said.  But after listening to people a single view began to emerge.

It is all connected and we are responsible for the consequences of our actions.  We wanted to use those two realizations to animate the planning that was being done and we were faced with the question: How do you implement that?  The realizations sound simple and simplistic but they were what we used to build what we have today.

The Waterfront Trail Crombie emphasized will never be finished.  He added that what Burlington is today is not what it is going to be in 2025

Make sure Crombie advised that your waterfront becomes a priority.  Fix peoples attention on it he added.

Our waterfront certainly has our attention but not the positive attention Crombie meant.  He didn’t see our pier problem as a big deal – it would get resolved.  What he wanted this city to do was look beyond our own boundaries and realize that we are not alone in this.  That Burlington is not going to be able to create the waterfront it wants without involving Oakville and Hamilton and that all of the communities east and west of Burlington are part of our process.

And it is a process – meeting after meeting – listening and re-shaping ideas.

Set the stage with good planning

Teach and learn with one another.  There is no secret room with all the great planning ideas hidden away in it.  Plans come out of community and that means involving the community.

Use milestone projects to promote projects and design with heritage in mind.  Ooops, no one told Crombie that we are about to chop up the old Freeman Station for firewood.

Designing with heritage in mind wasn’t a cliché – we didn’t dream that up, we learned that.  We found that communities gained an interest in development through their history and he suggested that the planned commemoration events of the War of 1812 were an excellent opportunity for Burlington to recapture its history.

Gosh, we might even think of resurrecting poor Joseph Brant whose ancestral home by the hospital is one of the most under used assets the city has.

Crombie urged the city to make use of its connections and start first by fully understanding what the connections we have are and then partner with those connections.

We decided to create the Waterfront Trial and saw it not as a string of parks stretched along the edge of Lake Ontario but rather as a clothes line on which each community hung out what it saw itself as.  Crombie then went on to explain how different communities worked the Waterfront Trail into their waterfront development and mentioned to a small group afterwards that there was a time when developers didn’t have anything good to say about the waterfront trail.  Now they want to build near the thing and see it as an attraction.

Developers explained Crombie want to make money from the property they own and if you work with them to show how they can make even more money they will work with you.

This was where Crombie taught his “class” that partnerships have to be created.  The developer owns the property and wants to get a return on his investment – so make it possible for that to happen.

He explained that fighting with interest groups wasn’t going to get us anywhere

Burlington is certainly

Crombie spoke for more than an hour and passed on tons of wisdom including:

There was a time, Crombie told the meeting, when Burlington was seen as a leader in the fight to reclaim its waterfront but that in the past while its leadership had lapsed.  He talked about how the community might begin again to reclaim it’s waterfront.

Nick didn’t like that – cuts in on his turf.

It isn’t all about set backs and it isn’t all about how high a building can be – it was about securing public interest in a strategic plan.  Don’t try to push anything through – developing your water front isn’t about power.

It does said Crombie, take public money to get it started and if the province has said Burlington has to grow then use that demand of the province to leverage ideas and pull in the private sector.  Involve local pride and peer pressure.

We listened to all the perspectives and decided to string them together with a trail because we needed something that would bring people to the waterfront.

Theses places cannot be just “hike and bike” locations explained Crombie.  Your waterfront becomes a desolated places in the winter months of interest only to the xxx and the muggers.

Crombie knows Burlington.  He has family in the area and talked fondly about his younger years when he would walk through the Aldershot area, get to Coots Paradise and arrive at Pier 4, a tough, tough part of town that few ventured anywhere near.

Burlington Crombie pointed out has extra assets; it has gathering places, a history and a culture and has more than most to work with. “You have the financial and human resources that many others don’t have.

Crombie talked of ‘portals’ being developed – which he defined as each community doing its own thing and advised that looking for connectedness was the better route to go.  Each community can show its best side but there is still a connectedness between them.  Hamilton is connected to you – you may not like it but it is there, said Crombie to a room that chuckled

Your waterfront needs to be animated.  People have t live, work and play in the area – that makes it messier.

Mississauga was a geographical expression and not a place when all this waterfront development started listen to all the perspectives

And that is when David Crombie go to the best piece of advice Burlington is going to get in some time.  Hold a design competition – make it a juried competition and have some odd balls on that jury.  And see what the architects come up with.

Theses things aren’t easy but when Toronto got its new city hall it did so through a design competition and while the building isn’t all that efficient it put Toronto on the map, said Crombie.

Burlington could pull together all the developers in the downtown core – say from Caroline to the Lake and from say Pine Cove Road on the east to say Maple – QEW on the west and declare that that is the area we are asking people to design within.  Yes, it is a big area – but all we are doing is looking.  All the developers will be at the table and the property owners as well.  And then see what they come up with.

Burlington began that process with the landmark building due to go up on the old Riviera Motel site.  But that was small in scope and it seemed d to take forever to get started – they still haven’t put a shovel into the ground and most people have precious little idea as to what is going to go up – because they played no part in the planning.  Civic pride is a big factor in getting things done, added Crombie

Planning as Crombie will tell everyone is a messy business.  People say they don’t like tall buildings but I have found said Crombie that when people are bothered they use height of buildings to say what they are not really clear about.

Height is design explained Crombie – it is what you do with the height that matters

Set backs are ecological he added.  Pickering has a 40 foot set back, it looks like parts of Saskatchewan.  Scarborough was the most difficult to deal with – they were sort of the last hold out.

Bring in architects that spend a lot of time listening to the public.  “If you listen long enough, dialogue leads people to move to new spaces where new ideas are formed.  They begin to forget their previous views, explained Crombie and that he added is when the partnerships can be formed.  It is not just about density.

Sarah Banks read from a document and after listening for a few minutes Crombie said” Hire the guy.  Banks was concerned with the developers having all the power but Crombie explained that the city has leverage and the Mayor has a “bully pit” that he can use th rally public support and provide direction and focus.  The city does have muscle, explained Crombie – don’t be afraid to use it.

Mayor Rick Goldring sat beside Crombie through the presentation  Banks and Gary Scobie and Marianne Meed Ward were the only people to ask questions.  Crombie would have loved to see much more give and take.

Return to the Front page

‘Well THAT was exciting …

But nothing more than a whirl really.

But, it would have been nice.  Sigh.

Oh well – back to the knitting.

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON January 12, 2011  –  That whirlwind romance with the big guy on the football team is behind us now and the mayor, having adjusted his glasses and fixed his hair says “we’ve put that behind us”.  “We knew it was a long shot going in but it was worth taking a look at and we learned something about ourselves as a community.”  And that was enough for our Mayor.  Now he returns to the real world and looks at the issues in front of him.  There looking at him, a little more worn for wear, is the Pier.

Nothing much has changed and the bonding company has not sent the city a cheque nor have they said yet what they are going to do.  “We will be pushing quite a bit harder now that the holidays are behind us” said the Mayor, adding “I’m not happy with where things are.”  This problem is going to get resolved.  “It will come in over budget” said the Mayor but “that Pier will get completed”.  And if you recall his statement during the election campaign” “An arm, maybe – but not an arm and a leg.”  Expect this man to be fair but to also be very firm.

With the Pier a drama going on in the background the Mayor is focused on moving forward with the development of the Strategic Plan and then on to the budget.  We will see the Capital Expense budget around the middle of February and the Operating Budget shortly after.  Setting down specific dates was proving to be just a little difficult because Ward 3 council member John Taylor is going to be away for a week in February and this council isn’t about to even attempt to pass a budget without Taylor at the table.

The development of the Strategic Plan is going to take a bit of a twist this year.  Mayor Goldring has kept in touch with Oakville’s Mayor Burton.  The two exchange ideas frequently and when Goldring learned of a professor at McMaster who does excellent work with groups setting out their priorities and figuring out how to best handle and manage the conflicting demands being made on a civic government the Mayor decided to invite Dr, Chris Bart to take part in an all day workshop scheduled for Thursday, January 20th at the Paletta Mansion on Lakeshore Road.  All city staff from Director level and up will take part in the session.

The decision to bring in an outside to guide staff through a workshop exercise was the Mayor’s initiative. (Ed note: Having taken courses from Dr. Bart in the past I can tell you that staff is going to work with one of the best in this field.)  In his discussion about the workshop session the Mayor explained that Bart teaches people how to better engage with one another and to appreciate the strengths and responsibilities that each brings to the table.  The city will get real value for whatever they pay.

Strategic Plan is followed by budget and the city is in pretty good shape.  There was a surplus in 2009 and there will be a surplus in 2010 as well.  Surplus monies get used for specific projects – the Land acquisition fund being one and money for the hospital as well.

The General Brock land acquisition hasn’t been paid for yet and the Mayor let slip that there are some problems with that acquisition.

On balance our Mayor was feeling pretty good about the job he is doing with less than 90 days at his new desk.  Asked if there was anything that he’d do differently – he responded:  “I’ll pay attention to everything now.  It was just a little thing, an administrative matter and I saw no problem but the council member pay raise blew up in our faces and we just weren’t ready for it.  The optics were terrible” he said. I made a mistake – Big Time” said an exasperated sounding Mayor.  The pay matter has been deferred, which means that the decision to give the council members the amount that a Citizen’s Committee decided they should get, will be made at a later date – sometime in March when the budget is made final.

So there you have it – the rookie Mayor has settled into the job and has a council that is learning to work together.  The Mayor is using all the smart management tools to create a better bond between council and staff to guide and direct a city that is financially sound. Too early to issue a report card – but the kid hasn’t been sent out of the class for misbehaving and while there has been some public rumbling over what are really minor issues it would seem that the taxpayers are getting value for their money – so far

Return to the Front page

Foundation now manages $10.7 million; provides grants to 53 local organizations

News 100 blueBy Staff

July 20th, 2016

BURLINGTON, ON

 

How many association annual reports have you read? I mean read completely?

Pretty boring – but the things have to get put together voted on and filed.

The Burlington Foundation, which you once knew as the Burlington Community Foundation – quite why they took the word community out of their corporate name is beyond us – everything they do is community based.

The new name has an attractive corporate logo – what is really interesting is the way they set out the data points on what they have done in their annual report.

Imaginative, very visual and you know in an instant what they have done.

The work of the Foundation is broken out as funds they manage and funds they pass along to the community.
There are families in the community that have donated large sums that they want to see invested and the proceeds of the investments distributed to community groups.  There are now a total of 79 funds.  Most of the people who create an endowment do so in the name of a family member.

The funds are professionally managed and overseen by a Foundation Board committee.

Funds they manage.

 

What they do with the funds they raise.

Using the fundsA new endowment fund was created that will focus on Mental Wellness.  It was started with a $100,000 opening gift from  Dan Noonan of Argosy Securities.

Vital Signs is the wide-ranging and in-depth report on the  community and the challenges it faces now, and in the years ahead.

It is an important reference tool that focuses on the most critical areas that define the community. Built upon independent research, it is  used by people, agencies and corporations to understand areas of opportunity across our city.

The comprehensive quantitative and qualitative research that goes into ongoing Vital Signs research plays a key role in enabling the Foundation to focus on granting programs that meet some of the areas of need that were uncovered.

 

Return to the Front page

Premier backtracks very quickly on fund raising practices - she wants to get in front of the parade and not get trampled by a herd of protest.

News 100 redBy Staff

April 12, 2016

BURLINGTON, ON

The Premier of Ontario Kathleen Wynne released the following statement earlier today.

I have just had a meeting with the Leader of the Green Party of Ontario to discuss election financing reform. I want to thank Mr. Schreiner for a very positive meeting to discuss these much-needed changes. He provided input, advice and feedback on the areas for reform and on the questions I asked of him — the same questions I asked the Leaders of the Official Opposition and NDP yesterday. There was much agreement between me and Mr. Schreiner on the areas for reform.

Wynne RibFest-Rotary-guy-+-Premier-595x1024

GypTech president of Gary xxxx escorts Premier Wynne during a RibFest in Burlington.

Mr. Schreiner made some specific requests that I would like to respond to directly. He said he wants to make sure the legislative committee process to consider election financial reform is open, has time to hear from witnesses across the province on the draft legislation, and allows for a full consideration of the draft legislation after both First and Second Reading.

As I said yesterday, I intend to bring forward legislation in May before the Legislature rises on June 9. With the agreement of the Legislature, we would send that legislation to Standing Committee sooner than usual, after First Reading to allow for a first opportunity to make amendments based on public input, before Second Reading. In addition, further legislative committee hearings after Second Reading will allow for another round of input and amendments.

This would allow for consultation immediately, while the Legislature is still sitting, and for further consultation during the summer, across Ontario, in agreed-upon locations. The first government witness invited to appear before the legislative committee hearings would be Ontario’s Chief Electoral Officer. In the meantime, as the legislation is being drafted, we will consult regularly with the Chief Electoral Officer.

The second government witness invited to appear before the legislative committee hearings would be Mr. Schreiner.

wynne-at heritage dinner

Was it the smile that drew these two together? Does he have influence?

In an open letter prior to today’s meeting, Mr. Schreiner asked that “big money” be taken out of politics, and asked the government to bring in comprehensive reforms that include eliminating corporate and union donations prior to the next Ontario general election. The legislation we will introduce this spring will propose a ban on corporate and union donations and I am committed that changes be in place or significantly underway before the June 2018 election.

He has also asked that the government end the practice of “selling access to Ministers of the Crown.” As I said yesterday, political donations do not buy policy decisions. Any suggestion otherwise is completely false. As Premier, I’ve always been clear that decisions made by me and my Cabinet are always made with the best interests of Ontarians in mind.

Ministers need to fundraise, just as all MPPs do, to support their work during campaigns.  Ministers can do small group high-value fundraisers with two stipulations:

1. The event is publicly disclosed before it occurs.

2. The Minister is not meeting/fundraising with stakeholders of his/her ministry.

I have made the decision to immediately cancel upcoming private fundraisers that I or Ministers attend.

Future Liberal fundraisers will be made public on the OLP website.

Wynne Kathleen - looking guilty gas plant hearing

Premier Wynne can be very convincing.

To recap, our government has already undertaken a number of initiatives to make election financing more transparent. In 2007, we introduced third-party advertising rules and real-time disclosure for political donations. Last June, I announced that we would make further changes to the Elections Act. And, as I announced last week, our government plans to introduce legislation on political donations this spring, including measures to transition away from union and corporate donations.
The legislation we will bring forward this spring will include the following:

First — reform of third-party advertising rules, including definitions, anti-collusion measures and penalties. Maximum spending limits on third-party advertising will be severely constrained for election periods and constraints considered for pre-election periods.
Second — a ban on corporate and union donations.

Third — reduction of maximum allowable donations to a figure that is in the range of what is permitted federally for each Party; to all associations, nomination contestants and candidates, as well as leadership campaigns.

Fourth — constraints on loans/loan guarantees to parties and candidates, including leadership candidates

Fifth — reform of by-election donation rules.

Sixth — overall reduction in spending limits by central parties in election periods and introduction of limits between elections.

And seventh — introduction of leadership and nomination campaign spending limits and donation rules.

To reach critical decision points associated with these issues. I have asked the following questions of all three party Leaders.

Ribfest-Prsemier-with-ribs-and-helper1-1024x1007

Premier Wynne has been to Burlington on a number of occasions. She learned how to flip a rack of ribs pretty quickly at RibFest. She also personally recruited current MPP Eleanor McMahon to run as the Liberal candidate in the last provincial election.

• On the issue of third-party advertising, we are proposing a much lower spending limit. What should that limit be? What should the constraints on third-party advertising be between elections? Should there also be an individual contribution limit for those advertising campaigns?

• We are proposing a ban on corporate and union donations, which would begin on January 1, 2017. Should there be a transitional subsidy based on vote counts from the previous election? If so, how long should the transition period be in order to allow all parties to adjust?

• We are proposing a lower limit on donations. Should that limit be phased in over time?

• We are proposing that, during by-elections, that there be no special doubling of donations to the central party. By-election campaigns should be restricted to raising funds only to the allowable limit, both locally and centrally. What are the other Leaders’ thoughts on how we should manage any by-elections that occur before the legislation is in effect?

• We are proposing overall spending limit reductions in the writ period and setting limits between elections. We would like the Leaders’ input on this.

• We are proposing setting spending limits for leadership and nomination campaigns. What should these spending and donation limits be?
The government also intends to bring forward separate legislation this fall to amend the Elections Act, including proposals to:
• Change the fixed election date for the next general election to the spring of 2018

• Allow provisional registration of 16- and 17 year-olds

• Establish a single address authority in Ontario

• Eliminate the first blackout period for all elections, and

• Integrate, simplify and modernize a range of election processes as per the advice of the Chief Electoral Officer.

It is clear that there are flaws in the current legislation, which all parties have been operating under. The reality is that Ontario’s election financing system has not kept up with changes made federally and in some other provinces. The current system also does not meet today’s public expectations. I am determined to make changes that are right for Ontario. And I believe it is important that we now move expeditiously to make these changes.

It is important to get this right. I look forward to hearing further from all three Leaders as they consider the answers to the questions I have asked them, so that we can move quickly to bring about these needed reforms.

Ray Rivers on election funding.

The times they are a changing- the public has gotten to the point where they just plain don’t like the way the politicians climbed into bed with any special interest with a cheque book.  The conflict of interest was just too blatant.  The tip of that iceberg was identified by the Globe and Mail when they published a series of articles on how the politician raised the money they need to fight elections.   The opposition parties didn’t make too much noise over the news reports because they too rely on corporate, union and special interest money.

But the media coverage was a little too strong to ignore – and so now the Premier has set out an aggressive set of changes that everyone is going to get a chance to have their say on.  Note though that the Premier made this announcement after meeting with the Green Party – she is avoiding what the NDP and the Conservatives want to do to her neck.

Premier Wynne does deserve credit for getting in front of the parade and not getting trampled by a crowd reaction.

Return to the Front page