 By Ray Rivers
May 28, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
Margaret Wente, a columnist for the Globe and Mail, wishes that Bill Davis were running in this provincial election because he represents “the good old days”. But Bill Davis, the Conservative, in all his fourteen years as Premier never once balanced a budget. In fact he was the kind of spender Tim Hudak daily accuses Kathleen Wynne of being.
Davis used public resources to grow the province, opening up the public treasury to improve education, infrastructure, health care, public transit, the environment and electrical energy. Davis understood that growing an economy is like growing a business, the business of good government. You need to invest and sow seeds if you want to harvest and profit. And he understood that investing for the longer term, in areas like education, is important too.
That is why I can’t support Tim Hudak. Even though we both obtained economic degrees at the same university, Hudak must have missed a few classes. I mean does he really want to be Mike Harris redux? Perhaps he is just stuck in time, given all those days he spent in the Harris caucus. Hudak’s promise to fire 100,000 teachers, nurses and civil servants has already sent shivers through the markets. And his war on trade unions would almost make Harris’s ‘Common Sense Revolution’ look like,,, common sense.
Harris learned the hard way that cutting taxes just makes the deficit bigger – which partly explains why he took so long to balance his budgets. By comparison, McGuinty’s growth program saw balanced budgets almost as often, despite the global recession which crippled our auto industry. And do we really want to further slash corporate taxes just so the big banks can make even greater profits?
Hudak’s so-called ‘million jobs plan’ has become the biggest joke in this election campaign. Wente’s reference to Hudak’s economic plan being described as “a load of ripe manure” pretty much sums it up.
And what has happened to Andrea Horwath. She turned up her nose at the kind of budget NDP’ers only dream of – the kind even Bob Rae had never introduced. Ms. Dithers, who took forever to decide to support the last budget, which gave her everything she wanted, was quick to reject this one because it offered the NDP too much. Having caused this election however, she has now decided to adopt essentially the same Liberal budget she’d just rejected as her platform.
Rank and file, and even her candidates, are disowning her. They are just as confused as she is about what she really wants. Lately and sadly, Horwath has reverted to just screaming corruption at the Premier. A false accusation since, while there may have been political pandering and some mismanagement during the McGuinty era, that is not corruption. We know that all governments, including that of good old Bill Davis, have also suffered their fair share of mismanagement and scandals.
Of course, the deficit is an issue and will need to be brought under control, and the debt paid down. But Ontario’s current debt is about the same as that of the federal government on a GDP basis, comparable by that measure to some of the other provinces and considerably lower than Quebec’s. Also, with the low interest rates we have been experiencing, debts and deficits are less of a concern, providing they are used to fund wise investments..
Had Mr. Hudak attended and paid attention to the economics classes dealing with fiscal policy, as I had, he would have learned that it is better to grow your way out of a deficit than to cripple the economy with tough austerity. The recent sad experience of European austerity is a good case study of just that. And if Mr. Hudak doesn’t believe me, he could always consult with that other economist, our PM, to learn about how growth has helped get the nation’s books out of the red.
 Energetic, engaging, open, stable and visionary. Some people think you need to change governments every couple of electoral terms, just to get a fresh start. Except that is not what the people of Alberta have been practicing for the last forty years. The ruling PC party there refreshes itself by changing its leader, usually before that leader reaches his/her best-before date. It is still democracy when you keep electing the same government, if only because the other parties are just too scary for you – as they are in this upcoming Ontario election.
Here in Ontario the PC’s once ruled continuously for 42 years with a number of different leaders at the helm. Kathleen Wynne has been Premier for a little over a year and has shown herself to be energetic, engaging, open, stable and visionary. She is as close as we get to Wente’s Bill Davis in this election.
Ray Rivers writes weekly on both federal and provincial politics, applying his more than 25 years as a federal bureaucrat to his thinking. Rivers was a candidate for provincial office in Burlington where he ran against Cam Jackson in 1995, the year Mike Harris and the Common Sense Revolution swept the province. He developed the current policy process for the Ontario Liberal Party.
Background links:
Wente on ghosts haunting Ontario
Bill Davis
Balanced Budgets
Alberta’s Elections
Tractor Pull
The NDP (Caplan)
Horwath’s Platform
Horwath’s Problems
Hudak’s Economics
Hudak (Caplan)
Hudak’s Million
Hudak’s Math
 By Pepper Parr
May 28, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON. You have to understand Ron Foxcroft and his affinity with the world of sports. He has been around every game that is played and while he can, on occasion, get the ball in the basket – that isn’t what he is known for.
 The whistle business all started on the floor of a basketball court. Earlier in the week there was a need to talk with Ron Foxcroft – getting to him is not easy – he is on the go from just after seven to late into the evening most days.
But get through we did – and started our conversation asking if he had caught the game – that being the one where the Habs took a hockey game in the direction it was meant to go – 7-4 with a hat trick for the Canadiens too boot. “Of course I got to the game – I had to rush out of the Burlington Sports Hall of Fame inductee event but I saw that game.”
 The Official Whistle of the NHL with a logoed edition for the Stanley Cup finals provided by a high school dropout who lives in Aldershot.  Then he adds – “did you know that Foxcroft International made the whistles – the logoed whistles for the NHL final?
No we did not know that – would you send us a picture? And here it is. Another Foxcroft product.
We chatted about the stupendous game goalie Dustin Tokarski is putting in as he stands between the pipes. Of course we all know the kid used to play for the Hamilton Bulldogs – which at one point was owned by Ron Foxcroft.
What matters of course are those whistles – will they blow at the right time? For the right team?
We will be watching the two remaining games and hopefully the cup – the Stanley Cup, will rest where it belongs – in the head office of the Le Club de Hockey Canadien. It really should be at the Forum, just along St. Catherine Street in Montreal – half a block from the Toe Blake Tavern.
That was a different era – but the hockey then was still the same – great! Jean Beliveau, Maurice Richard, Guy Lafleur – the dream goes on.
Background links:
Foxcroft on his own court.
 By: Peter Jacobsen Toby Mendel Shane Moffatt Cara Faith Zwibel
Originally published on Friday, November 8 2013 in the Toronto Star
Freedom of expression and democracy are being undermined in Ontario. A panel of experts convened by the Ontario government in 2010 found that the threat of abusive lawsuits claiming massive damages, especially for defamation, is deterring “significant numbers” of Ontarians from speaking out on issues of important public interest.
However, there is now hope that action will be taken to address this problem, as the province’s political parties find themselves in rare agreement that it is high time to deal with this threat through strong legislation.
 A court room is an expensive place to be – is this the place where justice gets done. Known as SLAPPs (Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation), these dubious lawsuits are often brought by deep-pocketed companies with the specific aim of silencing resource-poor defendants. And they are very effective. The defendants, usually ordinary citizens or public interest groups, naturally feel threatened by the prospect of massive legal fees, disruption of their activities and the possibility of large damage awards. Even when the lawsuits have no merit whatsoever, they often result in a chill on free speech.
Comments on a wide range of public interest issues have attracted SLAPP suits in the past. These include reporting on environmental violations by large companies, exposing corruption and other forms of wrongdoing, and criticizing the behaviour of powerful individuals. In other words, SLAPPs are an attack on democracy. They undermine the ability of civil society and private individuals to act as watchdogs over the powerful.
Unfortunately, the threat of facing a SLAPP suit in Ontario is very real today. Greenpeace Canada is currently fighting a $7-million lawsuit brought by logging giant Resolute Forest Products. Dylan Powell, founder of small environmental NGO Marineland Animal Defence, currently faces a $1.5-million SLAPP from Marineland. The issue of SLAPPs first gained prominence in Ontario when Big Bay Point residents were hit with multimillion-dollar lawsuits by developers.
We need legislative protection from these chilling lawsuits. Anti-SLAPP legislation may affirm a legal presumption in favour of the protection of speech on matters that are of public interest, or engage public participation. If the defendant can demonstrate that his or her statements fall within the scope of this presumption, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff who must show that the case has substantial merit, that it is unlikely that any defence would succeed and that, on balance, the harm it has suffered outweighs the harm that would be done to the public interest if the case were to proceed.
Anti-SLAPP legislation has already been adopted in Quebec and most U.S. states. It’s now time for Ontario to follow suit. Important steps have been taken in this regard, specifically in the form of Bill 83, submitted by the Attorney General to the Ontario legislature in May 2013 – the first government-sponsored anti-SLAPP bill in Ontario.
This follows the first ever Ontarian anti-SLAPP bill, put forward by Andrea Horwath of the NDP as a private member’s bill in 2008. The Progressive Conservatives have also voiced support for this type of legislation, noting that abusive lawsuits represent a serious waste of taxpayer dollars.
Despite these positive steps forward, we are concerned about whether there is sufficient political will to see this through. The parties must not delay in adopting legislation that will champion the human rights of ordinary Ontarians, allow for robust debate on matters of public interest, save taxpayer money and uphold confidence in our legal system and our democracy.
Our organizations, along with more than 150 environmental organizations, free speech groups and unions, call on the Ontario legislature to pass anti-SLAPP legislation as a matter of priority. No less than 64 municipalities and the Ontario Bar Association have also supported anti-SLAPP legislation. It is time to protect Ontarians’ right to free expression.
Peter Jacobsen is Chair of the Canadian Issues Committee of Canadian Journalists for Free Expression; Toby Mendel is Executive Director of the Centre for Law and Democracy; Shane Moffatt is Forest Campaigner for Greenpeace Canada; Cara Faith Zwibel is Director of the Fundamental Freedoms Program of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
Bill 183, the legislation that was to create anti-SLAPP legislation that would become law died on the Order Paper when the Legislature was dissolved for the provincial election.
 By Staff
May 28, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
It is the offence that cuts into the hearts of parents whose children are sexually molested.
Parents trust their children to teachers, coaches and others that play a part in the growth and development of their children.
When a person in a position of trust and authority abuses that trust the reaction is one of total and complete revulsion, especially when there are young people involved. All but impossible for a parent to look behind the abuse – it is foul, despicable and cuts to the core of what we as a society can bear. Too much – punish.
The Halton Regional Police continue to investigate sexual assault allegations against Sean Hewson as additional victims have come forward. Hewson was a Sailing Coach instructor.
On Tuesday, May 27th, 2014, Halton Police laid an additional sexual assault and sexual interference charge against Sean Hewson.
The Court has imposed a publication ban which was put in place on May 23rd, 2014.
Mr. Hewson has been remanded to Thursday the 29th of May, 2014 where police will be laying more charges in relation to a sixth victim.
The Halton Regional Police encourage anyone with information to contact D/Sergeant John Mans, Child Abuse and Sexual Assault Bureau at 905 465-8760.
The community’s task now is to aid in the investigation and to be part of the healing and recovery of those assaulted. This is a very hard time for many.
 By Staff
May 27, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
For the record:
In the Update to city council on matters relating to the Air Park staff said:
FOI (Freedom of Information requests) to MOE for Monitoring Plan and Details:
In May 2014 staff spoke with the Mediator from the Office of the Information and Privacy  Commissioner of Ontario. The Mediator has begun the process of contacting the third party (i.e. the Airpark) to inform them of the City’s scoped request to try and obtain information that pertains strictly to the proposed groundwater monitoring program at the Airpark, and any associated reports, studies and results. The Mediator is also continuing discussions with the MOE. At this point, staff will wait for further correspondence from the Mediator with respect to the possibility of receiving all or some of the requested information or whether additional discussion or mediation is necessary.
 Drill holes into the tonnes of landfill dumped on the air park property during the last five years. Very little of the landfill was inspected and it was put in place without an approved site plan. A Judge has already told the Air Park that they must comply with the city’s bylaw. The Air Park has appealed that decision which is their right.
What the Air Park cannot do however do is maintain that they are cooperating and have been transparent. The city’s most recent update does not square with what Vince Rossi is saying. Someone isn’t telling the truth here.
In a Letter to the Editor of the Hamilton Spectator Vince Rossi said:
To be clear, every test of neighbouring streams and wells has met or surpassed federal and provincial environmental standards. There have been six inspections, studies and/or tests carried out since 2009. None have indicated a problem with the fill or an adverse impact on local water. Further, after discussions with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, the airpark is in the process of voluntarily completing the most comprehensive study to date by carrying out a test well program
 By Staff
May 28, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
There are few more amazing comeback stories than that of the magnificent Trumpeter Swan.
 Brought back from the brink of extinction through the dedicated, decades-long work of volunteers, 200 Trumpeter Swans now overwinter at LaSalle Park in Burlington.
But these beautiful birds also did their part to rescue their species from the ashes of extinction. Hear their remarkable tales through stories about Athena, Magic, Pig Pen and many other individual swans at Swan Stories, a free, public event sponsored by the Trumpeter Swan Coalition.
 The event will take place on Thursday, May 29 from 7:30 to 9:00 p.m. in the Centennial Room at Burlington’s Central Library, 2331 New St. More on the swans and the story to save their winter home.
 By Pepper Parr
May 26, 2014
Burlington, ON.
Well we kind of expected it would come to this.
The Burlington Gazette, it’s publisher Pepper Parr, Monte Dennis and Vanesa Warren were served with Notices of Libel during the month of April, three for the Gazette, two each for Dennis and Warren.
 These are the lands that are described as the Burlington Air Park upon which tonnes of uni-nspected landfill were dumped without a city site alteration approval. None of the parties served libel notices chose to apologize and the Gazette decided the articles were not libelous and let them remain on the web site.
The air park lawyers then sued the three people, Parr, Dennis and Warren asking for $100,000 in exemplary damages. The air park set out 23 points in their Statement of Claim. They are set out below along with links to the articles they took offence to
1: The plaintiff claims:
(a) compensatory and exemplary damages for libel of $100,000
(b) prejudgment interest on the compensatory damages and post judgment interest on all the damages;
(c) an injunction restraining the defendants and each of them from alleging that the plaintiff has created an environmental hazard by bringing fill onto its lands that has or may adversely impact the groundwater or surrounding watercourses ;
(d) costs together with HST.
The plaintiff
- The writ describes the plaintiff; Burlington Air Park Inc.,who they are and where they are located. This is the Burlington Air Park Inc.
The defendants
- The defendants are described in sections 3,4,5,6 and 7. This is the Gazette, Parr, Dennis and Warren.
The defamatory publications.
Editor’s note: Links to each of the articles are set out at the end of this piece.
Describes an article: “A “fishy” story – people are being hurt and a part of rural Burlington may have a badly contaminated water supply.
- Our Burlington posted the following concerning the plaintiff on its website https://www .burlingtongazette .ca/:
On or about April 16, 2014 Our Burlington posted the following concerning the plaintiff on its website https://www .burlingtongazette.ca/ :
“North Burlington residents petition the MOE – but they don’t make their demands public.
There were four reader comments attached to that piece; they read as follows
Bob says on April 16, 2014 at 11:37 am
(the Bob comment is not set out in the writ)
reply
Vanessa Warren says on April 17, 2014 at 11:39 am
 Vince Rossi, president of the Burlington Executive Air Park and believed to be the sole shareholder of the private company was sued by the city for failing to comply with a city bylaw. The Court found in favour of the city. The Air Park has appealed. The appeal is to be heard June 11, in Toronto at Osgoode Hall. Mr. Rossi.
The Kovachik family opened the airpark in 1962, and for 44 years operated in harmony with its neighbours and its rural surroundings . You are not allowed to capitalize on that history. The history that you ‘re accountable for is amounting to an environmental disaster in our pristine protected countryside, and you may not manipulate that truth unchallenged anymore.
This is not an airpark improvement issue. This is a landfill issue, a water protection issue, a storm water management issue, a truck entrance and road use issue, and a property destruction and flooding issue.
Are we to celebrate that you ‘ve spent money to improve your for-profi t business? Who doesn ‘t do that? You say you ‘ve spent 4 million in improvements , but what about the income you ‘ve made from charging for untold hundreds of thousands of tons of unregulated fill? What about the protected watercourse you ‘ve destroyed? What about the regionally significant woodlot you gutted? The cost to the environment, the community and the City for your ‘improvements ‘ has been too high to bear.
Ask your immediate neighbours – none of whom have “recently purchased their homes” – bow things have improved for them? Flooded fields are unfarmable. Backyards and septic beds are underwater from silted run off. Sight lines and property enjoyment are destroyed. Anxiety about well water safety is high, and you will not permit the MOE to release on-site testing data. Writing that you ‘ve “always respected your neighbours .. .” is more than untrue; it’s cruel.
There are no unsubstantiated claims. Terrapex Environmental found unacceptably high levels of contaminants like hydrocarbons and heavy metals in the paltry 52 soil reports you were able to provide. Off-site water testing may be fine to date (again, where’s the data?), but how long might it talce for those contaminants to leach into wells?
The City of Burlington legally won the right to impose it‘s Site Alteration Bylaw on airpark property , and yet you still will not comply. The community would truly love to know that your property is NOT full of contaminated fill – why don‘t you give us the verified, third-party data to prove it?
We are all so weary of your attempts to manipulate . Standing up to you and stopping the trucks was never political , it was ethical, and you have no ethical credibility left.
Vanessa Warren Aside:
Hamilton Spectator, please don‘t publish this man ‘s letters anymore. The community around this airpark has been under siege since 2007 and the negative psychological impact of unbalanced coverage like this is enormous.
Ford Motor Company, Mercedes-Benz Canada, Evertz Microsystems, L- 3 Communications , Big Brothers and Big Sisters and PwC Epic Tour Halton – are you comfortable being cited in this letter?
reply
Rob Narejko says on April 16, 2014 at 1:44 pm
It is hard to believe that our legal system allows an individual or a corporation ‘s right to privacy to be intact, when the actions of that individual I corporation are detrimental to the quality of life of others.
The tests were paid for by our government and the government is empowered on our behalf to look after the interests of the citizens. The materials from the land fill I dump are more than likely leaching onto other people’s property. The information from the MOE study should be made public without having to resort to Freedom of Information requests .
I give the City credit for jumping on this issue and for their approach. The rights of one person or corporation should not trump the community‘s rights to know what is there. Without knowing what is there, how will it ever be re-mediated? And what happens to the environmental concerns and the adjacent owner’s property value?
PS Check out the ‘scenic’ asphalt piles dumped in the field on the west side of Walker ‘s Line, just north of the 407 overpass. It will be interesting to see why this road waste material was allowed to be dumped in an agricultural field. Or was it?
Editor’s note: We understand that Mr. Narejko has not been sued.
reply
Roger says on April 16, 2014 at 5:10 pm
Bob could not have gotten it any better . The article in the Spec as self serving and deficent on fact.
reply
 The owner of a property on Appleby Line stands at her property line. Plans submitted to the Region at one point had a large helicopter pad sitting atop the 30 foot pile of earth. The owner of the property on which the heliport was to be built claimed he did not have to get site plan approval from Burlington. A Judge disagreed with him. That decision is being appealed. Stephanie Cooper-Smyth says April 16, 2014 at 3:32 pm
Vincenzo Rossi – we know you follow this website, you ‘ve even posted on it. So if you can see this now, which may be difficult considering how exponentially your nose grew while crafting that exceptional ‘tale ‘ for the Spectator, get this:
You have accepted hundreds of thousands of truckloads of (contaminated) fill since 2008, and all you’ve got to show for ‘improvements ‘ is: you paved over a grass runway, you ‘ve done some alterations to your main runway, you ‘ve built a few hangers.
Really?? Hundreds of thousands of truckloads of fill every year since 2008 . ..for just that?? How much longer are you going to try and dupe the good folks of Burlington?
And one more thing, Vincenzo Rossi: According to the information submitted to Hizzoner at the hearing last year, the income from the hundreds of thousands of trucks to which you sold dumping rights, (last figure released was $85.00 per truck) for ‘improving ‘ your airpark”, doesn ‘t even appear on the Airpark ‘s financial statements in 2011, 2012 or 2013. (Hello CRA?)
As for the legacy of the airpark, (“it’s long and accomplished history in Halton”), which you are attempting to claim: How dare you hijack the reputation and relations that the Kovachik ‘s built!
Since you bought the airpark, Vincenzo Rossi, all you have done is destroyed the environment , misled and deceived the authorities, ruined the lives and threatened the safety of the neighboring community. That is YOUR legacy.
Why don‘t you just go to where ever you sent all the money you earned from accepting all that toxic landfill – you are neither believed nor wanted here by citizens of Burlington.
Editor’s note: We do not know if Stephanie Cooper-Smyth has been sued
reply
Joan says on April 17, 2014 at 2:32 pm
Mabe someone should seek advice from Erin Brockovic.
- On or about April 24, 2014 Our Burlington posted the following concerning the plaintiff on its website.
“Letter to the Spectator editor altered on Air Park web site: still a “lousy neighbour“
The publication by Our Burlington and Parr on April 11, 2014 set out in paragraph 7 above was actuated by actual malice, in that it was published knowing it to be untrue, or reckless as to its truth. In an article dated April 9, 2014 Our Burlington and Parr republished allegations from an earlier posting dated July 16, 2013 that was, at April 16, 2014, still available on the http ://www.burlingtongazette .ca/ website, that the fill on the plaintiff s land was “toxic” and that the plaintiff had been running “an unlicensed landfill operation.” It also republished allegations from an August 5, 2013 posting that was, at April 16, 2014, still available on the http ://www .burlingtongazette.ca/ website, falsely claiming that a Terrapex report established that contaminants were migrating from the plaintiff s property. The August 5, 2013 posting reported that testing was being done of neighbouring wells. When this posting was emphasized on April 9 2014, the City of Burlington had reported on those results in its Burlington Executive Airport Update #6 dated September 9, 2013 as follows: “On August 23, city staff were sent an email by the Region of Halton regarding testing of wells on several properties adjacent to the airport. The email indicated that the MOE and the Halton Region Health Department were working together to sample and analyze the drinking water wells of homes located immediately adjacent to where the fill was placed on the airport site. Well water samples were collected by MOE staff from two properties . The samples were being analyzed for inorganics, volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and petroleum hydrocarbons.
Results of this testing were provided to the Health Department. The results were then compared to the health-based Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards and the Ministry of Environment Table 2 Brownfields standards. The Region has indicated that no exceedances were reported . These results have been shared with the property owners. Permission was given by these property owners for the Health Department to share the results with city staff.”
Further, the publications referred to in paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 were actuated by malice as Our Burlington and Parr published a letter on May 19, 2014 that made the following allegations concerning the plaintiff s president: “… Are his victims, or anyone who ‘s objected to his fill business soon to be ‘buried ‘ as well?
I think the residents of Rural Burlington better start using the buddy system whenever they leave their homes. And I suggest a telephonic head count every morning, and include Pepper Parr’s…”
On May 2, 2014 Dennis published the following letter to the editor m the Hamilton Spectator:
“Tainted Airpark fill a threat to neighbours’ wells.
Improvements to airpark up in the air (Opinion, April 16)
The recent article by Burlington Airpark owner Vince Rossi leaves out important, relevant facts.
The Burlington Airpark’s own soil analysis data, provided to the City of Burlington’s soil specialists, showed that much of the imported fill is chemically contaminated , and represented only a portion of the imported fill. The tens of thousands of loads of fill dumped onto the airpark were spread throughout the site and will require a grid-work of soil sampling to fmd and quantify.
Depending on imported soil types, conditions, groundwater mobility, precipitation amounts and other factors, the negative impacts could take years to be detected in area wells .
Although the dumping has stopped, the concern is that toxic materials will sooner or later leach into neighbours’ wells. The immediate neighbours have experienced excessive water run-off due to the altered drainage. Some of the land is too wet for farming. Some of the wells are silted, making the water undrinkable.
While waiting for a court settlement and the Ministry of Environment research results, residents are suffering from the stress of an uncertain future. The clean up and rectification of this mess could take years and cost millions. Why won’t the Burlington Airpark share the soil and groundwater test results? The airpark claims the data is private and confidential.
The Ministry of Transport directive asks the airparks to comply with provincial and local regulations that do not affect aviation . Federal legislation regulates the safe movement of aircraft. The airpark lost the court case on the validity of the Burlington fill bylaw and plans to appeal in June. In the case of Scugog Airpark, a judgment decreed that fill operations must comply with Scugog’s municipal fill bylaws, which should be the case with all municipalities. This would result in lawfu l, responsible and environmentally sustainable development.
Monte Dennis on behalf of the Rural Burlington Greenbelt Coalition”
Rural Burlington Greenbelt Coalition is not a corporation, nor is it a registered charity. If it exists, it is an unincorporated association of individuals.
Editors note: The cheek, the unmitigated cheek. Both Mr. Rossi and his legal counsel are fully aware of the existence of the Rural Burlington Greenbelt Coalition who delegated very effectively at both the city of Burlington and the Region of Halton.
The republications
On April 22, 2014 Our Burlington published the libel notice i t received with respect to the publication described in paragraph 7 above on its website https://www.burlingtongazette.ca/ and Twitter account https://twitter.com/OurBur . Such publication of the libel notice amounts to a republication of the original libel. On or about April 22, 2014 Warren posted the following on her website https://vanessawarren .ca/ and Twitter account https ://twitter.com/VanessaAWarren “Vince Rossi threatens to sue @OurBur for libel. Wonder who is next? #BurlON
#BurlingtonAirpark https:// www .burlingtongazette .ca/air-park-lawyer -threaten-to-sue for-libel-gazette-considering-its-options .. .” The links in the postings amount to republication by Warren of the libel described in paragraph 7 above. Having read the article on Our Burlington ‘s website, Warren knew that the plaintiff was asserting that the original publication was defamatory, yet she maliciously chose to draw it to the attention of persons who might not otherwise have been aware of that publication.
Warren republished the comment referred to in paragraph 8 above on her website http ://vanessawarren.ca/ on or before April 23, 2014. The precise date of posting is not known to the plaintiff , but is known to Warren.
Further, on May 2, 2014 Warren made the following post on her Twitter account: vanessaawarren as follows: “Vanessa Warren @VanessaAWarren •May 2 Thank you Hamilton Spectator for balancing the dialogue and bravo RBGC – well said! https://m.thespec.com/opinion-story /4494486-tainted-airpark-fill-a-threat-to-neighbours wells/” The link in that tweet took a reader to the letter set out in paragraph 12 above.
The links referred to in paragraphs 14, 15 and 16 did not simply make reference to the existence and location of content, they also repeated the sting of the libel in the articles to which reference was made, and encouraged viewers of her posts to visit those sites.
The articles and comments are defamatory and were calculated to injure the plaintiff
In addition to the plain meaning of the words so published , by these words the defendants meant, and were understood to mean that the plaintiff was putting the community as well as groundwater, streams and ponds in the community at risk, or causing members of the community actual harm by having brought onto its land toxic fill that was adversely affecting the groundwater , streams and ponds and the fish living in such streams and ponds . They further meant, and were understood to mean that the plaintiff was preventing the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (“MOE”) from publishing test data in the possession of the MOE. They further meant and were understood to mean that the plaintiff has caused flooding and silted runoff onto neighbouring lands. The defendants meant and were understood to mean that Terrapex had actually performed testing in connection with the plaintiff s lands. They further meant and were understood to mean that the plaintiff had posted on its website an altered version of a document that it had already published in the Hamilton Spectator.
The words printed in the foregoing articles and comments were and are defamatory. The addition of photographs and commentary in the publication referred to in paragraph 9 were not part of the letter published by the plaintiff in the Hamilton Spectator, and would have misled readers into believing that they had been. The allegations that the plaintiff brought contaminated fill onto its property and is putting groundwater, neighbouring streams and ponds and the environment generally at risk are calculated to injure the plaintiff in an effort to delay or prevent the further development of the Burlington Executive Airport. By reason of the publication of these defamatory statements, the plaintiff has suffered damages.
The words published by Warren were also false and misleading in a material respect and were knowingly or recklessly made by her for the purpose of promoting directly or indirectly her business interest in Capstone Farms, contrary to s. 52(1) of the Competition Act, RSC 1985, c. C-34, as amended .
The republications described in paragraphs 14 through 17 above were done with callous disregard of the plaintiff s rights and are deserving of an award of exemplary damages which are necessary to dissuade the defendants from engaging is such conduct in future. The protection of a party’s reputation arising from the publication of false and injurious statements must be effective. The most effective means of protection will be supplied by the knowledge that fines in the form of exemplary damages may be awarded in cases where the defendants ‘ conduct is truly outrageous, as it has been in the present case.
So there you have it. This is what will get presented to a Judge who will decide if we libeled or defamed Mr. Rossi.
We do know this – the city of Burlington and the and the Burlington Air Park sued each other and Justice Murray found in favour of the city. He also awarded the city costs of $40,000.
In asking for exemplary damages of $100,00 from the Gazette, Parr, Dennis and Warren, Mr Rossi appears to be attempting to recover from the defendants the amount he had to pay the city.
We have yet to decide what we will ask the Judge who hears this case what the defendants will seek for the vexatious, egregious and whatever big word lawyers use to say what they mean, in the way of damages from Mr. Rossi.
What we would like most is for Mr. Rossi to follow and adhere to the rule of law that he is now using to hammer two citizens who were exercising their right to speak their minds. As for the Gazette, we can take care of ourselves.
Links to past editorial content:
The “fishy” story.
North Burlington residents petition MOE
Letter to the editor.
 By Staff
May 26, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
 The police are on the prowl for a Dodge Caravan – beige. Last week an estate home in the City of Burlington was broken into; Wednesday May 14th at 11:50 am to be exact.
Two suspects entered the home and targeted jewellery. These two suspects are associated to a 2005 Dodge Caravan, beige in colour.
Are you getting the connection? The police would like to find that van.
Anyone with information is asked to contact Detective Ellie Bale, 3 District Criminal Investigations Bureau at 905 825-4747 ext 2312 or ellie.bale@haltonpolice.ca or,
Anyone with information on this or any other crime is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 1 800 222-8477 (TIPS) or through the web at Crime Stoppers or by texting “Tip201” with your message to 274637 (crimes).
By Pepper Parr
May 26, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
Well it’s government, municipal government at that –so what did you expect? They need more time. This time – the need is real – the discussions and negotiations are tricky and the city has to deal with a provincial ministry.
 It is a view to die for – and one that citizens of the city might not get to enjoy if the planned sale of this piece of waterfront property gets sold to the three property owner’s whose land abuts land owned by the city and the provincial government. Council didn’t see it that way and they agreed to the sale with a number of provisos.
To dispose of Water Street land parcels and develop Windows-to-the- Lake at the foot of St. Paul and Market Streets in a minimalistic manner (benches and signage); and
Direct the Director of Parks and Recreation to report back with a concept for the Windows-to-the-Lake; and
Direct the Director of Roads and Parks Maintenance to enhance Port Nelson Park with available funds.
 There are three parcels of land currently owned by the city and the province. Council decided to sell the land in the centre and to create small parkettes on the east and the west. The small red line in the centre lot show the delineation between city and provincial lands. The property belongs to the city – which means the public – but many members of this council don’t see the waterfront quite that way.
Council also directed the City Solicitor and Manager of Realty Services to work with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and enter into an agreement for the sale of MNR and city lots between St. Paul Street and Market Street to the adjacent land owners within the next six months. They added to that to have the the City Solicitor and Manager of Realty Services to report back to Community Services Committee if a sale agreement for city lots between St. Paul Street and Market Street has not been reached within the six month period.
The six months is up and the people who unalterably opposed to the idea of selling the land in the first place plan to delegate and ask some hard questions.
The man managing the flow of paper, Ron Steiginga, Manager of Realty Services, is one of the best there is. He was the staffer that handled the transfer, a lease actually, of that patch of land off Fairview that the Freeman Station is now sitting on. On that project he had to deal with the Canadian subsidiary of an American multi-national corporation, the city and a private citizens group – and while it took a while – he got it done. The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) should be a piece of cake for Steiginga.
The staff report lays out the process:
“Given the independent process that the MNR requires, it will take longer than the 6 months to process the agreements and complete all of the negotiations.
“Realty staff has been in regular contact with MNR staff to advise them of Council’s resolution to sell the land to the adjacent owners and to determine what the MNR requirements are to proceed with this matter. In order for MNR staff to consider the sale of the land to the three landowners, the landowners were required to submit individual Applications for Crown Land which were processed by MNR staff.
“MNR staff has recently indicated to the owners that they are prepared to dispose of the filled Crown lands subject to the Ministry policies and procedures which includes the following key provisions:
1. The land must be sold at market value.
2. The City owned Water Street land must be transferred to the three landowners first before the MNR lands can be transferred.
 The property with the fence along the edge has riparian rights – which could be used to extend the public pathway even further. They are working with the three landowners to resolve this issue. “It is clear” said the staff report “that both the MNR and City are in agreement that our respective policies require a fully documented appraisal process to determine the market value, and that both the City and the MNR are using the same valuation method and terms of reference.
 A resident opposed to the sale of the land put forward a proposal that would protect the privacy of the land owners and give the public access to the edge of the lake. The property on the right has riparian rights attached to it – and was rumoured to be going on the market in he near future. The city could have purchased the property, stripped the riparian rights and extended the waterfront trail just that much further. Port Nelson Park is one lot to the east of the riparian rights. Given the time it takes for the owners and/or MNR to obtain and review appraisals, and conduct negotiations, staff expect that this matter will not reach a conclusion for at least an additional 6 months.
The citizen based Waterfront Advisory group apparently don’t like either the look or the smell of this and will be at the Standing Committee delegating. This issue isn’t over yet.
Background links:
Selling the family jewels: Part 1
Selling the family jewels: Part 2
It wasn’t a popular decision.
 By Pepper Parr
May 25, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
All the election signs are either for Eleanor McMahon, the Liberal candidate or Jane McKenna, the Progressive Conservative incumbent seeking re-election. Have yet to see a sign for the New Democratic candidate. All those signs make it hard to appreciate that there is a municipal election working its way towards the day everyone will cast a ballot in October.
An exceptionally well connected business person, sometimes described as a pundit, was approached by a member of one of the city’s advisory committees and asked how the pundit would rank things in each of the wards. The member of the city advisory committee had decided that it was time in his career to get involved in local politics and make a contribution at the city council level.
Our potential candidate at first thought he would take a shot at the job of Mayor but decided that he needed to learn to walk first before starting to run.
 There are at least five people who want to eat her lunch: Councillor Blair Lancaster has a fight on her hands – if she runs again. The pundit ranked things this way: Ward 6 is going to have a different council member come October he is reported to have said. Given that there are now five people seeking that seat – the incumbent has yet to file nomination papers – that would seem to be a safe assumption. A lot of people seem to feel Blair Lancaster can be beaten. With a possible six candidates on the ballot it would be a mistake to count the former beauty queen out just yet – name recognition will take a candidate a long way.
Ward 5 is the next easiest to win in opined the pundit. The sense of the pundit was that the incumbent Paul Sharman doesn’t own his ward yet.
Ward 4 is still a tossup, the Roseland Community Organization doesn’t like any of the people who have their hat in the ring and they dearly want to see a strong candidate defeat the incumbent Jack Dennison who will be at his Ontario Municipal Board hearing Thursday and Friday of this week. Dennison has yet to file nomination papers but then he always waits until June to do so.
 Councillor Jack Dennison: is he running again? Councillor Dennison asked the Committee of Adjustment to allow him to sever his Lakeshore property into two pieces so he could sell off a part for a reported $900,000. Many in Roseland thought that was an atrocious thing to do and took exception to their Councillor doing something that would lessen the value of properties along Lakeshore Road.
Ward 3 is going to be a fight for anyone who decides to take on 22 year veteran John Taylor. He can be beaten but it will take a candidate with a lot of energy and a strong start to topple Taylor.
Ward 2 is thought to be suicide territory for anyone who decides to run against Marianne Meed Ward. She is certainly popular – but she has yet to be tested. If she is re-elected by a significant majority – and she should win – she will be a leading candidate for the office of Mayor in 2018
Ward 1 – Rick Craven has a tight grip on that ward – nothing happens in Aldershot without Craven knowing about it and giving it his blessing. He goes bananas when Meed Ward buts in on his territory.
Of the two newbies running in ward 1 Katherine Henshell is the only one that can give Craven any kind of a run for his money. The woman is focused, does her homework and is also very pregnant. Will that make any difference? Shouldn’t – might even get her the Mommy vote – and in Aldershot that counts for quite a bit.
 Councillor Rick Craven, centre, managed to hide behind a council chamber partition while a vote on an Aldershot matter was being debated. Here he sits with Councillors Dennison and Taylor during a budget meeting. The three are the most experienced members of Council. Henshell did tweak Craven’s nose when she told a city council meeting she was the only person speaking for Aldershot and the Bridgeview development brought to a Standing Committee meeting at which Craven didn’t say a word – he wasn’t even in the council chamber – he remained outside the room for all of the more than an hour long debate – walking in seconds after the vote was cast.
One political observer we hear from regularly asked how much the developer had donated to the various election campaigns – we weren’t able to find that information on the city web site. While city hall has the data they don’t put it up on the web site where people can look at the file and learn who gave and how much did they give. This kind of information should be available for every member of council for every election then ran in.
Wonder what the Ministry of Municipal Affairs has to say about that kind of information net being available. A good city Clerk would have ensured the information was readily available.
For anyone to actually beat Craven would be an upset – but then that is what politics is all about.
His worship appears to be heading for an acclamation which is unfortunate. Rick Goldring needs a strong contender to stiffen him up. He’s not a bad mayor, many see him as a weak leader but a closer look, particularly at the way he handled the bringing in of an interim city manager when Burlington got dumped by then city manager Jeff Fielding showed some really good leadership on the part of the Mayor. Maybe he is growing into the office. Nevertheless, a good stiff competition would keep him on his toes.
You won’t be seeing city council candidates at your door until the provincial election is over – could that be a blessing?
There will be plenty for you to ask questions about as we wind our way through the summer.
 Mayor Rick Goldring. He is in the race – just doesn’t have anyone to race against right now. Early in this term of office Goldring said he wasn’t going to go the getting his picture in the paper route. Here he collects funds in a parade for the Old Timers hockey league.
 By Pepper Parr
May 25, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
It was an interesting week for the arts. The Arts and Cultural Collective got closer to what its mission will be while the Performing Arts Centre released its program for the 2014/15 season to more than acceptable comment.
Not to be outdone, the former Burlington Art Centre decided to go for a whole new look and re-branded themselves and will forever after be known as the Art Gallery of Burlington – AGB; the place where Creativity Lives.
 The arch in the A is supposed to signify the Skyway bridge – sure – with art the view is always in the eye of the beholder. The BAC, old acronym for the Burlington Arts Centre, made it a bit difficult for many people to figure out which was which. While the BAC – oops, that’s the AGB now, had a much stronger pedigree and “involved” more people, there was still the sense that the building on Lakeshore road needed a stronger look and an identity that made it stand out.
The BAC board put together a very strong presentation during the budget cycle and got the funding they needed to do the re-brand. They brought in John Duff to do the work.
The new name reflects their identity as a centre for art and supporting artists in the community and the evolution of the place as a multi-faceted gallery. For the past several years, the gallery administrators have been working to increase the profile and quality of their exhibitions and promote their acclaimed collection of Canadian contemporary ceramics. Today, they are positioned to host national and international exhibitions, tour their ceramics collection and further develop their award winning educational programs.
The Art Gallery of Burlington also brought in a new curator, Denis Longchamps, who uses the title Director of Programs, has some very clear ideas on the direction he feels the gallery should be going in.
The Art Gallery of Burlington has gone so far as to attach a promise to their brand – to embrace and celebrate creativity and integrate the gallery into the community at large. Delivery on this promise includes the promotion of three key messages:
- Art Gallery – providing the highest quality, stimulating exhibitions and contemporary ceramics collection
- Programs – that embrace the qualities of creativity, inspiration and supporting artistic development
- Outreach – that takes the AGB beyond its brick and mortar and into the community with partner events, school programs, city initiatives and connecting through Art Etc Gallery Shop
The tag line, CREATIVITY Lives Here! is the first example of how the Art Gallery of Burlington is going to define itself an operate.
In a letter to the membership President Ian Ross said: “We are increasing our investment in exhibitions, responding to emerging artists, celebrating our national-significant ceramics collection, enhancing creativity in our educational programs, and reaching throughout our community and forming new partnerships.”
Putting meat on the bones of that statement means that the AGB is committed to celebrating and promoting the innovative and imaginative elements in all that they do and in all that they are. Creativity will be the foundation seen in – Programming – Education – Partnerships – Membership – Strategy.
Founded by a number of guilds, the Art Gallery of Burlington has come up with a way to end the confusion as to who they are – Performing Arts Centre and Burlington Art Centre – PAC or BAC was confusing, but it will take more than a new name to get the message across.
What the public has not seen is the strength, energy and vision of two new staff members who are adding to the strength of the team that was already in place.
Leslie Page who runs the educational side, Johnathan Smith who has built the ceramics collection into what it is today are now joined by Kim Varian, Director of Enterprise and Dennis Longchamps, Director of Programs. This team is what will make the difference.
 The ceramics collection needs a home; a place where it can be properly and effectively displayed. Right now it gets scattered about the gallery with hundreds of pieces stacked on shelves in a storeroom.
Many at city hall have wondered if the land the gallery sits on is the most effective use of that piece of property. Heard aloud were the words: “great place for a high end condo” and indeed it would be. Selling the site would free up some money to build the kind of location an art gallery needs to display its ceramics collection.
More on the new team members, the ceramics collection and where the Art Gallery of Burlington might take the city in a future article.
By Pepper Parr
May 22, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
She was blonde, chatty, good with words and an infectious laugh. He was staid, sounded a bit shy but certainly knew what he was talking about.
The two of them sat in stiff chairs facing each other on the stage of the Performing Arts Centre (PAC) with all the instruments a good band would need to really rock the building off to the side. You knew instantly that these two were not going to be playing any of those instruments.
Connie Smith, an interviewer of some renown, and Brian McCurdy, PAC Executive Director sat before an audience that filled three quarters of the Main Stage to talk about the fourth year program that would go on sale to the public June 2.
The evening was a “sneak preview” of the 2014/2015 program before an audience of multiple ticket buyers and capital donours who soaked up every word. They do need to learn to clap more often though.
The Centre has had its trials and tribulations with the public. It has its core following – they are true believers and will support the organization almost forever. But there is a large part of the city that still doesn’t buy into culture all that much and doesn’t want to see tax money used to support it.
Past deficits certainly didn’t help nor did a subsidy request that people expect to be at around half a million a year balloon to over $1.2 million. That situation saw the first Executive Director exit stage left and some key people leave the board.
 That empty month on the calendar is empty anymore – Brian McCurdy gave the public its first look at the 2014/15 program – BOFFO! McCurdy describes himself as a “reformed trombone player” who once shared a stage with Bob Hope at the Community Auditorium in Thunder Bay. “Not only did I get to play in the backup band, I also played a round of golf with Mr Hope in the afternoon” said McCurdy.
You see him in a blue blazer and grey flannel trousers – effectively going about his business. The program released last night is pure McCurdy – his finger prints are all over it.
He has managed, at least on paper, to press all the right buttons and satisfy almost everyone. The proof will come when the program goes on sale to the public early in June.
The arts and culture business is dynamic and it is difficult to project revenue with a high degree of certainty but McCurdy thinks he can get the subsidy to less than $500,00 – which will please a lot of people in this town.
The Plastique performance is a total delight. Check it out for yourself.
Culturally McCurdy covers all the bases: jazz, opera, classical music, dance and a solid set of programs for the young, young set. There is quite a bit of Cuban material, more jazz than I expected along with a couple of purely Canadian nuggets. The only thing missing was a one night stand by Jimmy Tapp.
There are 16 different program series; there will be 65 productions and 93 performances including the National Ballet doing the Nut Cracker Suite at Christmas.
 The Nutcracker Suite will delight what will undoubtedly be SOLD OUT audiences. The Cushion Concert Series will return and there will be a Community on Stage program that will involve a number of the Burlington favourites. In the past some people complained, rather loudly, that the city had a brand new facility but the local performance groups didn’t get a chance to actually use the stage. The prices they were asked to pay seemed very steep to them. McCurdy and his team are bringing in the Student Theatre for two productions; the Burlington Concert Band has three productions scheduled. The Burlington Footnotes will run for two days with three performances and the Brott Music Festival will run from June 19th to August 14th in the Main Theatre.
McCurdy has created what he calls Series and has one with Jazz, another focused on Comedy, then one with a family angle – the Gruffalo is back. Dance, Blues & Rock have a Series as well. The Entertainer Series will include Jann Arden and John McDermott.
There is a “Marvel” Series and a Global Beat Series. Each series is made up of three to four performances.
The Opera Series will present Pucicini’s Tosca, Verdi’s Nabucco and Mozart’s Don Giovanni all done as cinemas coming from the Royal Opera House.
This reporter had to leave early so I didn’t see the standing ovation Brian McCurdy should have gotten at the close of the evening. The challenge now is to see how it goes at the Box Office. If Burlington doesn’t come through with SOLD OUT signs on most of these programs – the city doesn’t deserve a Performing Arts Centre.
By Ray Rivers
May 22, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
It was 1962 and the world was in the grip of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Fidel Castro was a rag-tag revolutionary, determined to nationalize American companies in his Cuba, regardless of Yankee pressure. It didn’t take long for Washington to pass judgement on this cigar chomping, bearded upstart – he was a ‘commie’ and was to be spurned. And so, as if in a self-fulfilling prophecy, he was pushed into the welcoming bear-hug of a Soviet Union looking for friends with real estate on America’s backdoor.
 That mushroom cloud from a Pacific Island test site has become the symbol of terror – in the wrong hands – terror would reign. In 1962, Kruschev accepted Castro’s offer to locate nuclear warheads on the island, though he kept the keys in Moscow. Once JFK was shown the evidence he engaged the world in a dangerous waltz with the Soviet leader. But in the end ‘The Russians tried. the Russians failed – homeward bound those missiles sailed’ (Phil Ochs). In return, the US agreed not to invade Cuba and to dismantle some obsolescent missiles in Turkey.
The Ukraine had been the third largest nuclear power in the world before they decided to destroy their weapons and sign onto the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT). That was a bold act for which they demanded and got a quid-pro-quo as Russia, USA and UK put their signatures on 1994 Budapest Treaty guaranteeing Ukrainian’s territorial integrity and preserving it from foreign aggression.
Well we all know how that worked out. The US and UK turned their blind eyes as Mr. Putin marched in and swallowed Crimea. So emboldened was the Russian leader by this act of treachery, that he adopted the very same tactics into his play for eastern Ukraine. It turns out the Budapest Treaty isn’t worth the paper it was written on.
 Stock pile of nuclear weapons. No one really knows how many of the things tehre are in the world – too many, Still, there is no question where this story leads, as Russia shows no sign of stopping its subversion and planned absorption of part or all of Ukraine into the new Russian empire. And the US and UK have no intention of lifting their hands in any meaningful way to help, other than the couple of finger jabs they call sanctions. Though there is an election in a few days and that may resolve or rekindle the chaos currently gripping the country.
Ukrainians are Slavic people which originates from the word slave. And that pretty much sums up what happens to passive nations which actually believe in peace. Watching the early events evolve in eastern Ukraine was a bit like reading a Ukrainian version of the 1936 children’s book, ‘The Story of Ferdinand’. Banned by Franco, burned by Hitler, restricted by Stalin but cherished by Mahatma Gandhi, it is the tale about a bull who would rather smell the flowers than fight in the ring. That seems to be a passing story, however, as the Ukrainian military finds its momentum.
Cuba prevented American invasion by threatening potentially deadly nuclear retaliation to rain down on Washington. Would that strategy also work to now protect the Ukraine? Would American or British nuclear missiles sited in Ukraine, close enough to evade Russian defensive systems, and capable of turning Moscow into a bowl of bubbling borscht,deter further Russian aggression. Or would it just hasten the end for all of us.
To be sure the most disturbing aspect of this whole Ukrainian mess is the nonchalance of Obama and Cameron, global leaders who upon inheriting an international treaty to protect Ukraine, have no intention of living up to it. Ukraine would not have given up its nuclear arsenal without the assurances it got to preserve its territorial integrity. And nuclear weapons have become the ultimate defence mechanism – the very reason Obama and the Cameron won’t seriously confront Russia.
So, is that the lesson for the rest of the world? Nobody else is going to protect you from these new renaissance warriors – so you better get yourself a nuke. Does flaunting or outright breaking of international treaties, protocols and laws have no consequences? Are we witnessing the death knell of globalization as new trade restrictions, sanctions, and border controls bring the hope of global free trade to an end?
 Any nation with a coast line and a submarine can transport its weapons anywhere in the world. Background links:
Ukrainian Nukes Canada on Ukraine Putin VS Hitler The USSR
Cuban Missile Crisis Cuban Revolution Nuclear Disarmament
By Staff
May 21, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON
It may have moved from top of mind ‘for a lot of people but a local chapter of the Council of Canadians activists, local residents, allies and First Nations blockaded the access road to an exposed section of Enbridge’s Line 9 pipeline Tuesday morning.
The blockade was to be twelve hours in length as a symbolic gesture; one hour for every thousand anomalies Enbridge has reported to exist on the line.
 Enbridge inspection workers were prevented from getting to their work site on Tuesday by protesters demonstrating against the National Energy Board decision to approve the direction of the flow through the line.  Integrity digs are when crews dig up the soil covering the pipe and inspecting it for cracks and possible leaks. They are checking on the “integrity” of the line and its ability to transport a product. Thepress release from the blockade states that “Line 9 has at least 12961 structural weaknesses along its length. And yet, Enbridge is only doing a few hundred integrity digs. Enbridge has been denying the problems with the pipe for years, and they still refuse to do the hydrostatic testing requested by the province. Are we really supposed to simply trust Enbridge when they tell us that this time they’ll do it right?”
Many of the blockaders point to the disastrous spill from Enbridge’s line 6b into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan in 2010, where millions of litres of oil spilled and have so far proven impossible to clean up. They also point out testimony at the NEB that Line 9 has a 90% chance of catastrophic failure in the initial years after its operation is changed.
 For the Line 9 protesters the issue is transporting oil from the tar sands in Alberta through a pipe line that runs through Burlington. This public demonstration in Burlington is the first seen since the National Energy Board approved the reversing of the flow in Line 9. There were a significant number of conditions attached to the approval, one of which was a number of digs to determine the condition of the line that is almost 40 years old.
By Staff
May 20, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
Some 300 people gathered at the Convention centre last Thursday, to witness the awarding of Burlington’s BEST awards to seven people who were chosen by their peers as leaders in the community.
There were 29 nominees in the 49th annual awards event that recognized Citizen of the Year; Senior Person of the Year; Junior Person of the Year; Heritage Person of the Year; Arts Person of the Year; Community Service Award and the Environmental Award.
Mayor Goldring put it perfectly when he said: “Volunteers” are the backbone of our community, and add tremendous value to Burlington.” The men and women who are received the awards were recognized by their friends and colleagues as putting forth an extraordinary effort to make Burlington a better place.”
The Burlington’s Best Awards are managed by a citizen’s committee established in 1965 with the mandate of recognizing Burlington residents who bring honour to the city and make a difference in their community.
The Heritage Person of the Year Award is sponsored by Heritage Burlington, a City of Burlington citizen advisory committee. The award goes to an individual who has demonstrated a long-term commitment to the preservation of Burlington’s heritage, and has volunteered his or her time to support the preservation of Burlington’s heritage.
 If it had to do with either heritage or history Les Armstrong was at the meeting – usually with the late Jane Irwin. To have lost both of them in such a short period of time.
The award, quite rightfully, went to Les Armstrong whose service to Burlington covers many decades. He was a longstanding executive member of the Burlington Historical Society. His most recent accomplishment was organizing the Friends of Freeman Station. Burlington truly is a better place because of Les Armstrong and his efforts to preserve Burlington’s history for today and tomorrow; his death late in January lessened all of us.
Community Service Award is sponsored by COGECO, the local cable company and
is given to a Burlington resident who volunteered in the areas of public relations, marketing, communications or special events during the previous calendar year. Nominees will have promoted Burlington’s sense of community by sharing good news or encouraging others to contribute their time, talent and enthusiasm.
The nominees for this award in 2013 included: John Ives, Tomy Bewick, Friday Night Community Team at Wellington Square United Church, Les Armstrong, Gordon Cameron, Trent Schwartz and Beth Hudson
Trent Schwartz and his family sparked the imagination of the city when they decided they would embark on 100 local adventures in 2013. Schwartz tirelessly promoted Burlington by helping to get the word out to everyone about all the fantastic events and activities in our city. Schwartz has been a Burlington ambassador who continues to encourage and inspire local people and tourists to experience the great things the city has to offer while promoting Burlington’s sense of community.
Environmental Award Sponsored by Newalta – a leader in rediscovering resources and changing how industry perceives waste by partnering with its customers, helping them to meet their environmental objectives. The nominees were: Ken Woodruff and Paul Toffoletti
The Environmental Award went to Paul Toffoletti, a dedicated environmental protection advocate who has volunteered with the Bruce Trail Conservancy since 1996 and has been a member of the Burlington Sustainable Development Committee (SDC) since 2008.
As a board member of the Iroquoia Bruce Trail Club, Toffoletti spent a significant amount of time monitoring this ecologically significant parcel of land to ensure that Burlington’s natural heritage features continue to be protected. As vice-chair of the SDC, Toffoletti helped raise the committee’s profile by organizing speakers’ series in Burlington on issues that include climate change, local food and environmentally friendly gardening. He was instrumental in leading the review of development applications and routinely delegated to City Council on environmental matters. Toffoletti has played an active role on the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Stakeholders Review Committee and continues to serve on the Cootes to Escarpment EcoPark Management Committee. Other environmental initiatives Toffoletti has supported include the Earth Day Hamilton-Burlington Eco Festival and various nature walk events. His dedication and enthusiasm for the environment has raised awareness and inspired others in Burlington to reduce their carbon footprint.
The K.W. Irmisch Arts person award went to a woman who took a big chance and brought one of the most imaginative cultural events to the city when she held the “No Vacancy” installation at the Waterfront Hotel. The nominees were: Selina Jane Eckersall, Christopher Giroux, Tomy Bewick and Jonathon Filipovic
 Selina Jane Eckersall looking over a model of Village Square – the location for her next “installation art” event. She is an entrepreneurial collaborator whose goal is to support and encourage a thriving contemporary art scene that extends beyond the gallery walls and into the hearts and minds of the city’s residents, artists and businesses.
Junior Citizen of the Year
Since 1875, B’Nai Brith has been respected for its groundbreaking work on matters relating to anti-Semitism, racism and human rights, as well as for its strong advocacy and the important social services it provides. Each year, local B’Nai Brith groups across the country reach out to those around them, helping to fund and organize activities that meet the special needs of communities.
The Junior Citizen of the Year Award is given to a secondary school student 18 years of age or younger, who, through devoted and energetic service to worthy causes, has been an example to the community. The nominees for 2013 were: Chad Buisman, Connor Withers, Curtis Kelly and Connor Fraser, Gabriella Paniccia, Justin McNerne
Chad Buisman has been volunteering with the Friday Night Community Dinner at Wellington Square United Church since its inception. He helps to feed more than 200 men, women and children each and every week with varying social, physical, social and emotional needs by supporting the dinners with set-up, food preparation and clean-up. He also organizes crafts for young children and shares his gift of music by playing musical instruments for the enjoyment of guests. Buisman is a volunteer with the church’s weekly children’s ministry program, Ryerson Camp and the City Kidz Foundation in Hamilton. He is a young role model who has spent more than 1,000 hours serving the Burlington community with a genuine humility that is beyond his years.
Senior Person of the Year
Canadian owned and operated, Schlegel Villages’ mission is to provide holistic health care in a home environment, located within an internal neighbourhood design that promotes a caring community, with an emphasis on optimal health and life purpose for each resident. The Village of Tansley Woods Long Term Care Home, the sponsor of this award, offers a rich selection of programs and activities year-round. The home is designed to build community while serving personal needs.
The Senior Person of the Year Award is given to a Burlington resident aged 60 years and over, who, through voluntary actions, has made a significant contribution to the city and its residents. The nominees for 2013 were: Michael Hourigan, Maggie Wheeler, Arnold Koopman, Thelma McGillivra
Maggie Wheeler
Wheeler is a cancer survivor who tirelessly serves the Burlington community. She collects non-perishable items for food banks and crochets hats, blankets and prayer shawls for cancer patients, women in crisis and disabled persons. When she travels to Mexico in winter months, she donates suitcases of school supplies and volunteers with her husband to support local food banks, schools and seniors’ homes. Within Burlington, Wheeler is also a volunteer with the Red Cross, Meals on Wheels, and Sew on Fire Ministries in Burlington. She is truly a selfless, charitable person whose heart touches each person she meets, with never a thought for herself.
Citizen of the Year Award
This award is brought to us by the service clubs of Burlington.
The world’s first service club, the Rotary Club of Chicago, was formed on Feb. 23, 1905. Since then, the club has grown to include 1.2 million Rotarians belonging to more than 32,000 Rotary clubs in more than 200 countries. Service above self is Rotary’s guiding principle. The 2013 nominees were: x Bev Jacobs, Judy Gerdes, Denise Davy, Jean Longfield and Beth Hudson. Of interest and of note is that all the nominees were women.
The Citizen of the Year Award is given to an individual who, through devoted and energetic service to worthy causes, has been an example to the community.
Jean Longfield has positively impacted the lives of thousands of people through her “Gift of Giving Back” program. Beginning in 2007, the annual food drive program has now collected more than 770,000 pounds of food with a collective value of $1.89 million to help less-fortunate people in Burlington and the surrounding communities.
 The Burlington Eagles at a city hall event.
 By Pepper Parr
May 19, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
We wrote a piece based on what we were told by our readers; ordinary people with strong convictions and a desire to get all the facts on the table.
Different readers had different search experiences (isn’t technology great?) for news about the Air Park which is a hot topic for people in Burlington.
The first hint we got was that everything about the air park had disappeared from the insidehalton web site was this: “I have been tracking for any coverage on the Burlington Airpark / Airport on Metro Media site (Spec and insideHalton) for some time. This weekend, all past articles on the Airpark have disappeared (there used to be a number of articles), and the return message shows that no search result found. What gives?”
That user got back to us with: , “I will continue to perform the search every day…“burlington airpark” airport on the whole Spec / Metro Media site. My searches today give me the following message…
We were unable to find results for “burlington airpark” in Burlington
That was followed by a comment from a reader who said everything after 2013 was no longer on the site.
That was followed by a comment from a reader who seemed to get a little panicky: “The article that Tina Depko-Denver won her recent award for (best rural story in Ontario community paper) no longer comes up on searches. This is freaking me right out.
“Here’s the link to the artcile (that I had to re-find via twitter) – see if you can find it by searching on insideHalton. https://m.insidehalton.com/news-story/3844524-airpark-neighbours-call-on-government-for-help/
That was followed by: “It came up for me.”
That was followed by this:
“The articles are all there…they come up in different order – by date or relevance – based on how you search for them.
“I get a different list based on how I search: searching by “rossi” as in Vince pulls up some, searching by “warren” as in Vanessa pulls them up in a different order of “relevance.”
“The best search is by “Burlington Executive Airport” it pulled up the most comprehensive list. It has them mostly sorted by date – since the article “neighbours call on government for help” as almost a year ago, it will appear lower down on the list, on page two.
“Here’s the list with that search function enabled:
https://www.insidehalton.com/search/news/?q=burlington%20executive%20airport&location=halton&sort=rel
Here are just some of the articles I found on the website dealing with the airpark.
https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/4417902-appeal-date-set-for-burlington-airpark-case/
https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/4220726-burlington-airpark-launches-appeal-of-landfill-ruling/
https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/4219079-burlington-wins-airpark-landfill-dispute/
https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/4252426-airpark-paying-city-40k-for-legal-fees/
https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3839981-neighbours-of-burlington-airport-complain-of-ongoing-fill-activity/
https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3907517-burlington-airport-city-hall-seeking-court-injunctions/
https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3870812-leaders-speak-out-against-burlington-airport-expansion/
https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3844524-airpark-neighbours-call-on-government-for-help/
“I think this is a question of digital technology: what search words are being used, and the search tool pulling up information based on chronology and relevance.”
The Gazette has been very deliberate in not using the names of people who send in comments. The libel chill is still in the air.
It would appear that the information on the insidehalton web site is still in place. Finding it requires one to use the most effective search terms. Should it be easier? We suppose so but one cannot blame the people who run the insidehalton web site for the search terms their readers use.
It is all their and we expect it will continue to remain on the site. We had planned on trying to reach the operators of the insidehalton site – but the holiday schedule meant no one was picking up their telephones.
We were perhaps a little too quick to call shame on the Metromedia papers and for that we apologize. There are a lot of frightened people in Burlington – and they have every reason to be frightened.
Background links:
The first we heard of editorial material disappearing.
Air Park legal counsel sending out libel notices
By Pepper Parr
May 19, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
Thursday evening Burlington celebrated its BEST – 29 people were nominated for the seven categories the city has within which it recognizes and awards citizens who have contributed to the community.
The day before, in a reception at the Performing Arts Centre, city hall staff met to bid former city manager Jeff Fielding adieu. It was an event tinged with sadness, disappointment and some of that gallows humour that makes its way into events where there is not a lot of joy in the room.
The city was watching a truly dynamic city manager leave after a hectic, topsy turvey 26 month run when literally everything was looked at differently.
City solicitor Nancy Shea Nicol summed it up rather well when she said much of her work with Jeff was first asking if what he had done was legal and then changing documents to make sure it was legal. Jeff Fielding was the kind of guy who immediately went to the edge of an issue and THEN pushed.
 City administration leadership team: city manager Jeff Fielding on the left with general manager community and corporate services, centre and general manager, development and infrastructure Scott Stewart on the right. The two general managers didn’t always pull with the same level of effort. General manager Kim Phillips, who had a choppy working relationship with Fielding, said staff wanted to have a caricature made up to present to Jeff but there wasn’t time to get it done. “Had we managed to put it together it would have been of Jeff on a bicycle heading towards a golf course with his golf clubs over his shoulders peddling by city owned buildings with for sale signs on them.
Jeff Fielding was close to radical in his approach to many of the tasks he took on. He understood fully the need for the municipal sector to change its business model; he knew that what we are currently doing is not sustainable.
Taking the job opportunity as city manager in Calgary gives Jeff Fielding the opportunity to work with a mayor who also knows the current municipal business model will not work – it isn’t working now. Fielding was very comfortable in Burlington; taking the job of city manager for Burlington was to be his last move before retirement. The fertile soil for change that he thought he saw turned out to be thin with nowhere near the nutrients to bring about real growth.
As one watched his behaviour at Standing Committee meetings and became aware of just how big his changes were – it was breath taking. On an occasion when a discussion was taking place in Fielding’s office – almost every square inch was covered with pieces of papers with ideas, comments and questions. There was this itch to write down as much as I could read and to whip out the camera and start clicking away. There wasn’t an issue that Fielding would not at least look at.
 Former city manager Jeff Fielding, on the left, was always on hand with Mayor Rick Goldring. Here Goldring explains to Kilbride area residents what was being done and the time frames the repair crews were working to in their community. He didn’t see any reason for the city to be in the golf club business – we think he was right on that one. He had a team of smart people begin a study of the city’s space needs – asked first what do we have and then asked staff to set out what was needed now and into the future – and then began looking for ways to leverage the city hall property.
Fielding was convinced that city owned parking lots had much more value in them than was being realized and he was constantly looking for ways to get at that value and make it work for the city.
He understood fully, more than most of the city’s population, the importance of culture to the city and the need to hype the Performing Arts Centre and work with the Art Centre to get more value – and traffic – to those locations.
City council wasn’t able to find the money to hire a full time Cultural Development manager in the 2014 budget. During the final delegation from the Arts Collective, Fielding turned and told the speaker that he would look for a way to find the money to hire that person. “I can’t promise I will find the dollars – but I will try” which is more than any of the current council members said.
 Jeff Fielding, on the left, didn’t take prisoners. He let lawyer Glenn Grenier,second from the left, who described himself as an expert on the legislation that governs air parks in Canada, know that Burlington wasn’t buying his story. City solicitor Nancy Shea Nicol and Blake Hurley look on. After the meeting Fielding had some stiff words for Grenier while city solicitor Nancy Shea Nicol and staff lawyer Blake Hurley looked on.
Fielding was direct, blunt and didn’t have much time for the “slackers”. On the other hand he recognized real talent which he nurtured and developed. There are a couple of dozen people on the city payroll who are bigger and better people today than they were the day Fielding arrived. For them his decision to leave now was extremely disappointing.
He turned the way the city does its budget upside down and took staff into a Results Based Accountability (RBA) approach where the departmental silos would be merged in a way that would be exceptionally difficult for some staff.
When asked what would happen to the RBA work that had been done Fielding told this reporter that all the basic budget work is completed and he felt staff could complete the shift. That is a stretch by any definition.
Fielding has made arrangements for people in London where he introduced the RBA approach to work with Burlington’s financial team and that help will certainly be useful. What Fielding has done is take a team of people in probably the best run department in the city and convince them to go way out on a limb with him and do something significantly different. This kind of thing does not happen in the municipal world.
The financial people were excited, motivated; pumped if you will, and at a critical time their coach and mentor walks off the field. As much as we admire Fielding –that decision is difficult to fathom and disappointing as well . The city needed another year to get RBA in place and functioning – it was within Fielding’s power to do that. He chose not to.
Fielding did say that he would have liked to have had one more year in Burlington – the city would certainly have liked to have had him for that additional twelve months. One wonders if the Mayor told Fielding that he was not prepared to accept the resignation at this time and sent him back to his desk. Too much to ask for I guess
Rick Goldring told staff at the reception that the day he advised his fellow council members that Fielding was leaving he saw an event on YouTube where the Mayor of Calgary was introducing Jeff as their new city manager. “I felt”, said the Mayor, “like the guy who breaks up with a girl one night and the next day sees her in the arms of some other guy”.
It was both a shock and a profound disappointment to everyone. One wonders why we did not see this coming.
Fielding raised the bar said the Mayor in his remarks and Fielding certainly did that. The problem was that he didn’t stick around long enough to get his team to the point where they could get over that bar day in and day out. Budget time in 2015 is going to have more than the usual bumps in the road.
 Former city manager Jeff Fielding was strong enough to wear his emotions on his sleeve. Made a difference while he was here. Fielding who is an exceptionally emotional man – came close to losing it when he spoke to the team that he led and explained that there are occasions when opportunities come along and you take them. He added that his decision to move from London to Burlington was a family decision. His wife works with the regional government and the two boys are attending Burlington schools. Fielding took out a golf club membership – this was home.
The decision to move to Calgary was not, Fielding explained, a family decision. He was going to Calgary on his own and would commute to be with his family.
 Pat Moyle, interim city manager, probably until NEXT June, brings years of experience in municipal government having served as Regional CAO and with the Association of Municipalities in Ontario. A steady hand during a period of change. Scott Stewart was the “ying” to Fielding’s “yang”. Fielding looked at things from the 30,000 foot level and could see beyond the horizon and relied on Stewart to execute on the decisions that were made. The two were a remarkable team – the only good luck in all this for Burlington is that Fielding didn’t take Scott Stewart with him.
There are always complex reasons for changes made in one’s life. Fielding was pretty sure that the move to Burlington would be the capstone of his career – but then the phone call from Calgary came and Fielding was unable to say no to an opportunity to return to the city where he once worked in the planning department. There appears to be some unfinished business in Calgary that has cost Burlington the most dynamic and effective administrative leader we have seen for a long time.
By Staff
May 18, 2014
Burlington, ON.
Since first publishing this piece there have been a significant number of responses that have come directly to the publisher in which readers set out their individual experiences in finding information about the air park on web sites; particularly the insidehalton web site. It is evident now that with precise, targeted searches on the insidehalton web site a lot of editorial material can be found. Readers of this article should read the following article as well
A committed reader and one of the more plugged in people in rural Burlington sent us the following:
“I have been tracking for any coverage on the Burlington Airpark / Airport on Metro Media site (Spec and insideHalton) for some time. This weekend, all past articles on the Airpark have disappeared (there used to be a number of articles), and the return message shows that no search result found. What gives?
What gives indeed.
The Air Park Inc., has been popping out libel notices faster than a very active female rabbit. The Gazette has been served libel notices on three occasions; Vanesa Warren, a candidate for city council in ward 6, has been served with a libel notice as has one of the Directors of the Rural Burlington Greenbelt Coaltion.
The notice the Gazette got demanded that we – well let’s let the Air Park Inc., lawyers tell you what they wanted.
mcm1llan
Reply to the Attention of Peter E.J. Wells Direct Line 416-307-4007
Fax 416-865-7048
Email Address peter.wells@mcmillan.ca
Our File No. 228177
Date April 16, 2014
SERVED BY PROCESS SERVER
Burlington Gazette 3142 Palmer Drive Burlington, Ontario L7M 1L4
Our Burlington Inc. 3142 Palmer Drive Burlington, Ontario L7M 1L4
Pepper Parr 3142 Palmer Drive, Burlington, Ontario
L7M 1L4
Dear Sirs:
Certified Specialist
[Civil Litigation and Intellectual Property Law
(Patent•Traae–mark•Copyright)]
Re: Burlington Airpark Inc. -Libel Notice to Burlington Gazette
We are the solicitors for Burlington Airpark Inc., the operator of the Burlington Executive Airport (collectively “Airport”). This letter is to serve as notice pursuant to s. 5(1) of the Libel and S!ander Act R.S .O. 1990 Chap. L.12.
Under the date of April 11, 2014 the following appeared on the website h ttp://www.bur 1ingtongazette .ca/:
“Was it the cold winter that resulted in hundreds of dead fish floating on the pond of the Appleby Line property that is surrounded on three sides by the Air Park land fill or is the death of the fish the result of toxic and silt filled water now in the pond?
The argument as to whether the land fill was going to do any real damage has been simmering in the background. Some (sic) testing was done but the
A spring fed pond with hundreds of fish – normally. Today wasn’t a normal day on the Appleby Line property.
Hundreds of dead fish were floating on the water this morning.
Ministry of the Environment got involved in a struggle over who was entitled to the information from their testing results -privacy issues came into play and the privacy officers at every level of government seem to be taking the time they feel they needed to determine just who can see what.
The spring fed pond is yards away from a mountain of landfill that was never properly tested when it was dumped on the property.
Runoff from the landfill is now getting to the water table -dead fish are showing up in the pond.
Some of the evidence may have come to the surface – literally, for one resident. Hundreds of dead fish were found floating on her pond this morning . That pond is yards away from a 30 foot high pile of landfill that is in place in violation of the city’s site alteration bylaw.
The property owner advises that the Ministry of the Environment will be on her property later today to test for contamination in the pond.”
These publications are false and misleading in at least the following respects:
The soil was tested. Results to date in 2009 were reviewed by Region of Halton which reported to the City of Burlington: “The results for all criteria meet the Regional and Provincial standards (potable) as required in Table 2 of the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.”
The Airport is not contaminating the groundwater. Multiple tests by Environment Canada, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (“MOE”) and Halton Region have shown no impact on groundwater.
When the City of Burlington reported the results of the Halton Region testing of wells on properties bordering the Airport in its Burlington Executive Airport Update #6- September 9, 2013: “On August 23, city staff were sent an email by the Region of Halton regarding testing of wells on several properties adjacent to the airport. The email indicated that the MOE and the Halton Region Health Department were working together to sample and analyze the drinking water wells of homes located immediately adjacent to where the fill was placed on the airport site. Well water samples were collected by MOE staff from two properties. The samples were being analyzed for inorganics, volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and petroleum hydrocarbons.
Results of this testing were provided to the Health Department. The results were then compared to the health-based Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards and the Ministry of Environment Table 2 Brownfields standards. The Region has indicated that no exceedances were reported. These results have been shared with the property owners. Permission was given by these property owners for the Health Department to share the results with city staff.”
These results were also discussed at the Burlington Development and Infrastructure Committee meeting on September 9, 2013 where it was reported: “On to Environmental matters on page 3 -the well testing. You can see the correspondence that’s come in from your CEO over at the Region of Halton. That work is being done in co operation with the health unit. That’s flowing through the good Doctor Nosal, so the results will continue; they have been shared with the property owners and the Health Department and we’ll get that information as it comes forward. Nothing negative at this stage and that is not unusual to see that there isn’t anything negative that would migrate from the site and be into any wells anyway, at this stage.”
The publication was actuated by malice justifying an award of punitive or exemplary damages, in that you caused these words to be published knowing them to be untrue, or being reckless as to their truth. In particular the Airport will rely on:
The publication of an article dated April 9 2014 reporting on the filing of nomination papers by Vanessa Warren. The article, when fairly read, is an endorsement of her candidacy. The article repeats earlier defamatory claims that the Airport was importing “toxic landfill” and was running an “unlicensed landfill operation”. Both these allegations are untrue. The July 16, 2013 article in which these claims were made is still available on the Burlington Gazette website, and the Airport claims with respect to these statements as well having been made less than one year prior to April 11, 2014.
The Burlington Gazette reported on the testing of neighbouring wells on August 5, 2013. This report is also inaccurate in claiming that the Terrapex study established that any contaminants were migrating from the Airport property. Terrapex did not comment on off-site impacts as that was not part of the scope of work assigned to it by the City of Burlington. In addition, it bad not done any testing that would have been required to comment on off-site impacts. The August 5, 2013 article in which the false claim that the Terrapex report was evidence of off-site impacts by the Airport is still available on the Burlington Gazette website, and the Airport claims with respect to that statement as well, having been made less than one year prior to April 11, 2014.Nevertheless , as a result of the reports by the City as set out in paragraphs 3 and 4 above, you knew or ought to have known that the tests of neighbouring wells showed no adverse impact due to the Airport and that the City of Burlington had advised the community that there wasn’t anything negative that would migrate from the site and be in any wells anyway. The failure to report these results was selective reporting intended to maintain the fiction that the Airport land was adversely impacting the neighbours, when the tests specifically performed to determine whether that was so were to the contrary.
Our instructions are to pursue legal proceedings unless the defamatory statements in the articles of April 11, 2014, July 16, 2013 and August 5, 20I3 are retracted and a full and fair apology satisfactory to our clients is published in the same fashion and in an equally prominent way as the statements specified in this notice.
PEJW/ml
LEGAL 22224578.1
Full disclosure: Some of the document formatting may have been lost in the transfer of the document from its original format and we corrected a few of the typographical errors.
 Vanessa Warren filing her nomination papers. She is one of five candidates running for the Council seat. Blair Lancaster, the incumbent has yet to file her papers. Since when is it libelous to endorse a candidate for political office? The Gazette wrote articles on most of the candidates who have filed nomination papers. We sincerely hope they don’t take what we write as an endorsement.
The libel notice served on Vanessa Warren called for her to retract and apologize and all that stuff – which will be difficult because it appears that the Letter to the Editor in the Spectator that Vince Rossie wrote apparently no longer appears in the on-line version of the paper.
The Gazette reprinted that Spectator Letter to the Editor and commented on the differences between what appeared in the Spectator and what now appears on the Air Park Inc. web site. We got served with a third libel notice. We may not know everyone who got served with a libel notice: our count at this point is a total of five notices to three people. Legal counsel took exception to a photograph of Mr. Rossi that we added to the re-print of the letter. Some graphic content is frequently added to editorial content to dress up the page.
 You might not find all you would expect to find in this media. And less harassment would serve everyone. Libel chill has been used by people who don’t want to be “in the news”. That chill appears to have wafted its way over to Metrolandmedia, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Toronto Star. They know better and should be ashamed of their behaviour.
Background links:
That letter in the Spectator.
Judge puts his thumb print on air park agreement.
Where was the ward Councillor when all this was happening?
By Staff
May 18, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON.
Reminders of the severity of that December ice storm are laid out along many of the rural roads in Burlington. The last chance to get rid of most of that brush brought about by the December ice storm will be between May 20th and May 30th.
The Region is currently providing bulk brush collection in the designated urban yard waste service areas and using all the resources they have to collect over sized bulk brush material.
Halton Region is providing a one-time extension of the special bulk brush collection program. Bulk brush will be collected one time for each household during the following date:
Burlington Area 8 – May 20 to May 30
Halton residents and contractors can continue to drop off yard waste and bulk brush until June 30, 2014, free of charge at the Halton Waste Management Site.
Bulk brush must be placed in one pile no larger than 6 m long by 1.8 m wide x 1.2 m high (20 ft. long by 6 ft. wide by 4 ft. high), with branches a maximum of 1.8 m (6 ft.) in length and 7.5 cm (3 inches) in diameter for the safety of the collection crews and to prevent damage to the collection trucks.
Bulk brush larger than the specified dimensions will not be collected.
By Pepper Parr and Mark Gillies
May 18, 2014
BURLINGTON, ON. With winter finally gone – still a bit of a chill in the air at times and pools won’t be all that warm for a bit – the Friends of Freeman Station can now get active and get the foundation for the building in place and then begin the real renovation work.
Mark Gillies, Fundraising and Membership Chairman, Friends of Freeman Station put together a really good collection of photographs that set out the role the railway station played in the economic growth of Burlington.
 Hand drawn map of the Village of Freeman. At our core we were a farming community blessed with some of the most fertile land in the country. We grew fruit and shipped it around the world. Burlington was at times described as the melon capital of the world. I once thought that perhaps Pepper Drive was named because they knew I was moving to the city – nope – it was once the locale of a very large pepper farm.
 Farmers with their wagons wait patiently to load their produce at the Freeman Station. It was known as the “fruit train” with its refrigerated cars. Burlington was a short stop – reported to be just 20 minutes and the farmers loaded their own produce.
 Baskets to hold the fruit grown in Burlington was manufactured in town.  Farmers loaded their produce onto the freight cars. Farmers have to do the loading themselves. They need to work quickly. These market gardeners had been working long before dawn, picking the crops and packing them into their baskets and crates. The train usually left twenty minutes after arriving, heading to Toronto with produce from “The Garden of Canada”.
 Biggs “evaporated” fruit. Post cards were the rage in the early 1900’s. Everyone had a post card made up and sold them for pennies. The Grand Trunk Railway produced their own line of postcards that showed life in Canada in the early 1900’s; a clever marketing technique to help encourage people in Europe to settle in Canada.
This postcard shows the “double track” line that the Grand Trunk Railway had at the time, and railway management took every opportunity to boast about it. The “double track” stretched 824 miles from Montreal to Chicago, and this postcard shows the train travelling through “The Garden of Canada”. Burlington was a huge part of that garden.
These which were sent back to Europe where they are believed to have played a part in enticing new settlers to Canada.
The Village of Freeman had an identity of its own. It had its own post office and was the place the market gardeners arrived at with their produce, loaded it onto the box cars and headed back to their farms. Downtown Brant as we know it was where the cannery was located.
 Robert Gray ran the toll gate that led to the train station platform. Funds collected were used to repair and maintain what is now Plains Road. His home on Plains Road backed on to the tracks. Market garden farmers had to pay Gray a toll to get their wagons with the crops to the Freeman station, and then pay him again when they left the station, so they could return home. This was how money was raised at the time to ensure the road (now Plains Road) was well-maintained. Robert Gray was Mark Gillies’ great uncle.
In 1906 the Dominion Canning Company produced various tomato products and was located at the foot of Brant Street, basically where the Waterfront Hotel is today. The smell of tomatoes cooking, permeated the air of the waterfront.
 Dominion Canning at the foot of Brant Street. $14 million and 100 years later and we have a pier on the same site. Today, Burlington, in fact the whole Region of Halton, doesn’t have very much in the way of a market garden economy. Some soybeans are grown, there are pick them yourself strawberry farms and a lot of hay is grown. The Region has an Agriculture committee and there are a few companies that package produce – but the trains don’t go through town anymore and a horse and wagon hasn’t been since on Mapleview since George Kerr was the Minister of something at Queen’s Park.
 The city had its own brand for produce. Ward 3 Councillor John Taylor want to see a bigger market somewhere south of Caroline; if he had his way he would shut Brant Street completely and make it totally pedestrian friendly.
Have you ever considered what it would be like for 100 per cent of your diet to come from local producers? That’s what J. B. MacKinnon and Alisa Smith decided to do — for an entire year. The couple devoted themselves to 12 months of eating only foods that came from within a 100-mile radius of their Vancouver apartment; an experiment in local eating that became a media phenomenon culminating in their book The 100-Mile Diet: A Year of Local Eating.
Is there a lesson here for Burlington? We were once nothing but an agricultural community; we grew some of the best produce in the world and shipped it around the world.
 Now much of what we eat gets trucked in from California or Mexico – all kinds of foods being flown around the world that don’t need to be — for instance, apples coming from New Zealand, or potatoes from somewhere far away in the States, when all those things can grow easily in most places in Canada — particularly potatoes, or some other more humble vegetables.
 A double track was a big deal in the early 1900’s from farm to wagon to train to ships – Burlington produce was moved around the world. The 100 mile diet raised the question of food miles — how far food travels from farm to plate is a starting point for many people. Burlington is currently in the process of studying the creation of a culturally protected part of the rural community – would this allow the growth of a market economy. Unbeknownst to many is the existence of a pear tree far on the north side of Dundas that has been in existence for more than 100 years.
The saving of Freeman station from a wrecking ball may have more than one lesson for us. It could point us to our past and teach us that the food we eat can come from all that land north of Dundas Road
The collection of pictures, which we have poached for the 20,000m people who consistently read the Gazette came from The Burlington Historical Society, The Joseph Brant Museum, the Ivan Cleaver Collection, George Kush, Dorothy Turcotte, and the late Jane Irwin.
|
|
