Construction crews on air park site take a pass on being filmed; missed there 15 minutes of fame

News 100 redBy Pepper Parr

May 30, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

While the CBC News crew was doing its interview on the Sheldon property on Appleby Line, construction equipment and work crews along with what were believed to be crew managers were seen. 

Once it became evident to them that camera crews were on the property filming they retreated but the equipment remained on the site

There is a very solid community in north Burlington that watches what goes on like a bunch of hawks.  Their objective is to document and photograph as much as they can; including run off from the air park site where tonne upon tonne of partially inspected fill was dumped without the required sit plan alteration permit.

A Superior Court judge has ruled that the air park must comply with municipal bylaws.  Burlington Air Park Inc., has appealed that decision.  The appeal will be heard in Toronto June 11, 2014

Sheldon interview scene 1

Appleby Line property owner does a CBC News interview with view of the landfill dumped without a site alteration permit.

Sheldon interview scene 2

Construction crews skulk away in the background. They appeared not to be available for an interview.

Sheldon interview scene 3

Construction crews continue their work just out of site of news camera crews.

Return to the Front page

Four sports achievers inducted into the Burlington Sports Hall of Fame.

SportsBy Pepper Parr

May 29, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON

On the night that the Montreal Canadiens were showing North  America that they really knew how to play the game by beating the New York Rangers 7-4 –  175 sports people took part in the Burlington Sports Hall of Fame 2014 Inductee event. (Two night later the Habs lost the game and the semi-final series.)

Mayor Rick Goldring presented a certificate with a pin from Council to Jesse Lumsden in recognition of his participation in the 2014 Olympic Winter Games.  

The inductees were – Dr Frank Hayden,  Ken and Elaine Lake – long time track and field officials,  Jesse Lumsden – Olympic Bobsledder – former football player and Nelson grad and  Melanie McKay – Olympic Swimmer

Ken and Elaine Lake photo

Elaine and Ken Lake – tireless workers.

Elaine and Ken officiated in Edmonton at the World Outdoor Championships, at the Vancouver Commonwealth (1994), at the PAN AM Junior in Windsor, at the World Junior in Charlettown, and finally in Toronto at the 2012 World Athletics Deaf Championships.

At the NOC Level, Elaine served as Vice Chair for Human resources for six years, and when she left in 1992, she passed the position on to Ken. Both performances have been excellent and most of their  work is still applied today.  At the provincial Level, Elaine served as the Ontario Officials’ Council Chair for 1977 -78 while Ken covered the same position during 1984-85. In addition, Ken acted as OOC’s Vice Chair, Evaluator and Clinician, and member of the Provincial Test.

Lance Nethery – NHL Hockey Player – is currently CEO of the Cologne Sharks in the German Hockey League.  Centre Lance Nethery played 41 NHL games during the early ’80s. He was a fine goal scorer who put up impressive numbers in college, the minors, and European leagues.

The Toronto native scored 91 goals in four seasons at Cornell University. After scoring 32 times in 29 games, he was chosen 131st overall by the New York Rangers in 1977. He was named to the ECAC first all-star team twice and the second team once and was a two-time selection to NCAA east first all-American team.

During the 1979-80 season Nethery adjusted well to the pros by scoring 62 points for the New Have Nighthawks of the AHL. He was called up by the Rangers in 1980-81 and scored 23 points in 33 games but eventually lost out to centres Mike Rogers, Mark Pavelich, Mike Allison, and Robbie Ftorek.

Nethery began the 1981-82 season on Manhattan but was returned to the minors then traded to the Edmonton Oilers for veteran goalie Eddie Mio. He played three games in Edmonton but spent most of his time with the CHL’s Wichita Wind where he scored 35 goals in only 46 contests. He battled injuries in 1982-83 before joining the HC Davos club of Switzerland the next year. Nethery was a dominant scorer for his new club and led the Swiss League with 46 goals in 1985-86. He retired in 1988 after leading Davos to two Swiss Elite League championships.

Mayor Goldring added in a comment later that he and Lance are the same age – went to school together from Kindergarten or Grade 1 to Grade 13 – two Nelson Grads.   “We played on the same house league team when we were eight.  One of my more vivid memories is scoring my first goals in organized hockey with Lance being the first to congratulate me.”

Jesse Lumsden photo

Jesse Lumsden – set records that have yet to be broken.

 JESSE LUMSDEN: is a hometown boy who loved to play all kinds of sports.  But his passion was football and he was good – so good in fact that in 2004 this former McMaster Marauder was awarded the HEC CRIGHTON trophy recognizing the most outstanding collegiate football player in Canada.   In the same year Jesse was honoured by the CIS as not just the best football player in the country but the best university ATHLETE in the country.

Jesse followed in the footsteps of his father Neil who had an accomplished career at the University of Ottawa and ten remarkable years in the CFL.  2014 is a memorable year for this father-son team. Later this year Neil will be inducted into the Canadian Football Hall of Fame while his son is recognized now in his hometown as a member of the Burlington Sports Hall of Fame.

Jesse earned football prominence very early in his Nelson High School career.  He captained the 1999 Nelson Lords to an undefeated season, earning a trip to the Metro Bowl played in Toronto’s Skydome.  A clear underdog, Nelson defeated a bigger and much older Toronto Central Tech team to win the provincial title. This gifted running back was named the game’s MOST VALUABLE OFFENSIVE PLAYER AWARD and a Greater Toronto Area All-Star.

 Heavily recruited, Jesse selected McMaster where he made an immediate impact.  He electrified spectators (and coaches too) with his speed and elusiveness.  In his third year he broke the single season O.U.A. rushing mark gaining a remarkable 1497 yards and averaging 8.4 yards per carry.  He also tied the single season touchdown record with 20.  His sensational season earned the Nelson grad McMaster’s Male Athlete of the Year. In his senior season he continued to tear up the turf rushing for 1816 yards – averaging 10.2 yards per carry and establishing a record 21 touchdowns.  He was named OUA 1st Team All-Star and CIS All-Canadian and he repeated as Mac’s Athlete of the Year

As a young man Jesse dreamt about playing pro ball in the NFL.  Even though drafted in 2004 in the first round  by the Hamilton Tiger  Cats  he was drawn south of the border where he signed as a free agent with the NFL’s  Seattle Seahawks. The Cats hoped he would return to Tigertown. And he did.  Jesse had an incredible rookie season and earned a spot as an Eastern all-star.  Injuries short-circuited the talented young man’s six year CFL career.

This gifted athlete recently turned his athleticism to bobsledding. Recognized as one of the top brakemen in the world, the Nelson grad has twice worn the Canadian singlet on the world stage at the 2010 and 2014 Olympic Games.  Today we recognize his football talent and welcome “hometown hero” – Jesse Lumsden – to the Burlington Sports Hall of Fame.

 DR. FRANK HAYDEN: Frank Hayden had a high school named after him but before that he was a major moving force in the creation of what was first known as the Special Olympics.

 A pioneer sets out to explore and find new territory.  He/she must have vision but along with this rare quality must come perseverance, tenacity and diligence.  Dr. Frank Hayden displayed these qualities and much more in his quest to provide sporting opportunities for those who are developmentally disabled and intellectually challenged.

Hayden with Lt Governor

Frank Hayden with Ontario Lt Governor after receiving the Order of Ontario

In the early sixties, testing of children with intellectual disabilities revealed that they were only half as physically fit as their non-disabled peers.  It was assumed that their low fitness levels were a direct result of their disability.  Dr. Hayden questioned this assumption.  He conducted research which concluded that, given the opportunity, intellectually disabled people could become physically fit, and acquire the physical skills necessary to participate in sport. 

His belief and understanding led him to conceive the idea of Special Olympics, a national sports program for people with an intellectually disability.  His proposal was originally rejected by the Canadian government, however, his research became known to the Joseph P. Kennedy Foundation in Washington D.C.  So he went to work with Eunice Kennedy Shriver for the next seven years.    Here he served as Director at the Kennedy Foundation and was the catalyst in establishing federal legislation to assist persons with a disability. 

He returned to Canada and worked to establish a similar program here.  Canada’s first games were held in Toronto in 1969 with 1400 athletes.   In 1975 and assumed the position of Director of the School of Physical Education and Athletics at McMaster.  From there Dr. Hayden persisted with his dream and established the Special Olympics Office of International Development , assisting with the growth of International programs from 15 to 50. 

His list of achievements and awards is remarkable.  Here are a few:  Honorary Member of the Canadian Olympic Association; Officer of the Order of Canada in 1999 and Order of Canada in 2000.  Also, he was recognized recently by the Halton Board of Education as the name of their newest and ‘state of the art’ secondary  school here in Burlington is Frank Hayden  High School.  Dr. Hayden legally incorporated “Special Olympics Inc.” and today the program provides training and competition for more than three million athletes in more than 170 countries. 

Olympic swimmer Melanie McKay was also recognized and inducted into the Burlington Sports Hall of Fame.  A biography of Ms McKay was not available.

 

Return to the Front page

Kite festival Sunday at Brant Hills Park – free, fun and healthy.

Event 100By Staff

May 30, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

Burlington’s annual Kite Festival takes place on Sunday, June 1 at Brant Hills Community Park between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m.

Kites - kids flying Show up, join the fun and build a kite for free, while supplies last. Event attendees will be able to fly their kites in the open space at Brant Hills Park throughout the day.

The event will feature entertainment from:

• Nick’s Juggling Family

• Thompson Clarke, a competitive Rubik’s cube solver, and

• Safari Science.

Face painting, a photo booth and a balloon artist will be part of a fun day.

A variety of vendors and activity providers from the community will be on-site. Local favourites include Burlington B.G.’s and Gymnastics Club, Putting Edge, Momstown, and Health from Within.

Kite - squid lookingLocal kite experts from Hobby and Toy Central will be at the event to answer questions about kite selection and kite flying. An assortment of adult and children’s kites such as easy flyers, diamonds, deltas, stunt and parafoil kites will be available for test flights and to purchase. Hobby and Toy Central will be offering event attendees 10 per cent off all Kite Festival purchases.

Kites sqaure colourfullThe Kite Festival will take place rain or shine. Brant Hills Community Park is located at 2255 Brant St. For more information about the event, including the entertainment schedule and list of booths, visit the city web site. 

Return to the Front page

Air park might be getting a little air time: CBC News crew on the site.

News 100 redBy Pepper Parr

May 29, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON. 

The weather was great; fine day to be working outside – but it didn’t work out quite that way for a couple of King Paving workers.

CBC on site May 29, 2014 (2)

CBC News crew was on site at one of the Appleby Line properties destroyed by the air park site alteration work being done without benefit of a permit. Program to be aired early in June.

King Paving's amateur attempt at retrenching  2

King Paving work crew has difficulty digging a small trench with a backhoe on the south side of the air park.

The work was being done on air park property.

The trenching problems just happened to take place the day a CBC National News team was on site to film a portion of a show that will air later in the month on development problems in both Burlington and elsewhere in the province.

The CBC crew appears to want to interview Mr. Rossi but was not able to do so today.  Good luck with that effort. Vince Rossi, owner of the air park that is in the middle of a legal dispute with the city, is very choosy about who he gives interviews to.  The appeal of the court case the air park lost a number of months ago is to be heard June 11th.

Given both the complexity and significance of this case for both the air park community and the municipal world it might be after Labour Day before a decision is handed down.

A few days after the hearing the city team overseeing this file will review what they heard in the court room and determine as best they can the city’s “plan B”.

Should a decision be available before the October municipal election that may well change the temperature and the tone of whatever the prime election issue is going to be.

 

Return to the Front page

Entrepreneur of the year is whistling dixie – and expecting the referees to use his whistle to officiate the Staney Cup finals

SportsBy Pepper Parr

May 28, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.    You have to understand Ron Foxcroft and his affinity with the world of sports.  He has been around every game that is played and while he can, on occasion,  get the ball in the basket – that isn’t what he is known for.

Foxcroft-preparng-for-the-shot-175x300

The whistle business all started on the floor of a basketball court.

Earlier in the week there was a need to talk with Ron Foxcroft – getting to him is not easy – he is on the go from just after seven to late into the evening most days.

But get through we did – and started our conversation asking if he had caught the game – that being the one where the Habs took a hockey game in the direction it was meant to go – 7-4 with a hat trick for the Canadiens too boot.  “Of course I got to the game – I had to rush out of the Burlington Sports Hall of Fame inductee event but I saw that game.”

Fox40_SuperForce_NHL_Whistle_WebSafe  V2 unwrapped

The Official Whistle of the NHL with a logoed edition for the Stanley Cup finals provided by a high school dropout who lives in Aldershot.

Fox40_SuperForce_NHL_WhistleThen he adds – “did you know that Foxcroft International made the whistles  – the logoed whistles for the NHL final?

No we did not know that – would you send us a picture?  And here it is.  Another Foxcroft product.

We chatted about the stupendous game goalie Dustin Tokarski is putting in as he stands between the pipes.  Of course we all know the kid used to play for the Hamilton Bulldogs – which at one point was owned by Ron Foxcroft.

What matters of course are those whistles – will they blow at the right time?  For the right team?

We will be watching the two remaining games and hopefully the cup – the Stanley Cup, will rest where it belongs – in the head office of the Le Club de Hockey Canadien.   It really should be at the Forum, just along St. Catherine Street in Montreal – half a block from the Toe Blake Tavern. 

That was a different era – but the hockey then was still the same – great!  Jean Beliveau, Maurice Richard, Guy Lafleur – the dream goes on.

Background links:

Foxcroft on his own court.

Return to the Front page

Is it right for a citizen to get SLAPPED around when they express an opinion that is honestly held?

BackgrounderBy: Peter Jacobsen Toby Mendel Shane Moffatt Cara Faith Zwibel

Originally published on Friday,  November 8 2013 in the Toronto Star

Freedom of expression and democracy are being undermined in Ontario. A panel of experts convened by the Ontario government in 2010 found that the threat of abusive lawsuits claiming massive damages, especially for defamation, is deterring “significant numbers” of Ontarians from speaking out on issues of important public interest.

However, there is now hope that action will be taken to address this problem, as the province’s political parties find themselves in rare agreement that it is high time to deal with this threat through strong legislation.

Courtroom - Canadian

A court room is an expensive place to be – is this the place where justice gets done.

Known as SLAPPs (Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation), these dubious lawsuits are often brought by deep-pocketed companies with the specific aim of silencing resource-poor defendants. And they are very effective. The defendants, usually ordinary citizens or public interest groups, naturally feel threatened by the prospect of massive legal fees, disruption of their activities and the possibility of large damage awards. Even when the lawsuits have no merit whatsoever, they often result in a chill on free speech.

Comments on a wide range of public interest issues have attracted SLAPP suits in the past. These include reporting on environmental violations by large companies, exposing corruption and other forms of wrongdoing, and criticizing the behaviour of powerful individuals. In other words, SLAPPs are an attack on democracy. They undermine the ability of civil society and private individuals to act as watchdogs over the powerful.

Unfortunately, the threat of facing a SLAPP suit in Ontario is very real today. Greenpeace Canada is currently fighting a $7-million lawsuit brought by logging giant Resolute Forest Products. Dylan Powell, founder of small environmental NGO Marineland Animal Defence, currently faces a $1.5-million SLAPP from Marineland. The issue of SLAPPs first gained prominence in Ontario when Big Bay Point residents were hit with multimillion-dollar lawsuits by developers.

We need legislative protection from these chilling lawsuits. Anti-SLAPP legislation may affirm a legal presumption in favour of the protection of speech on matters that are of public interest, or engage public participation. If the defendant can demonstrate that his or her statements fall within the scope of this presumption, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff who must show that the case has substantial merit, that it is unlikely that any defence would succeed and that, on balance, the harm it has suffered outweighs the harm that would be done to the public interest if the case were to proceed.

Anti-SLAPP legislation has already been adopted in Quebec and most U.S. states. It’s now time for Ontario to follow suit. Important steps have been taken in this regard, specifically in the form of Bill 83, submitted by the Attorney General to the Ontario legislature in May 2013 – the first government-sponsored anti-SLAPP bill in Ontario.

This follows the first ever Ontarian anti-SLAPP bill, put forward by Andrea Horwath of the NDP as a private member’s bill in 2008. The Progressive Conservatives have also voiced support for this type of legislation, noting that abusive lawsuits represent a serious waste of taxpayer dollars.

Despite these positive steps forward, we are concerned about whether there is sufficient political will to see this through. The parties must not delay in adopting legislation that will champion the human rights of ordinary Ontarians, allow for robust debate on matters of public interest, save taxpayer money and uphold confidence in our legal system and our democracy.

Our organizations, along with more than 150 environmental organizations, free speech groups and unions, call on the Ontario legislature to pass anti-SLAPP legislation as a matter of priority. No less than 64 municipalities and the Ontario Bar Association have also supported anti-SLAPP legislation. It is time to protect Ontarians’ right to free expression.

Peter Jacobsen is Chair of the Canadian Issues Committee of Canadian Journalists for Free Expression; Toby Mendel is Executive Director of the Centre for Law and Democracy;  Shane Moffatt is Forest Campaigner for Greenpeace Canada; Cara Faith Zwibel is Director of the Fundamental Freedoms Program of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.

Bill 183, the legislation that was to create anti-SLAPP legislation that would become law died on the Order Paper when the Legislature was dissolved for the provincial election.

Return to the Front page

Additional charges laid in sexual assault investigation at sailing club.

Crime 100By Staff

May 28, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

It is the offence that cuts into the hearts of parents whose children are sexually molested.

Parents trust their children to teachers, coaches and others that play a part in the growth and development of their children.

When a person in a position of trust and authority abuses that trust the reaction is one of total and complete revulsion, especially when there are young people involved.  All but impossible for a parent to look behind the abuse – it is foul, despicable and cuts to the core of what we as a society can bear.  Too much – punish.

The Halton Regional Police continue to investigate sexual assault allegations against Sean Hewson as additional victims have come forward.   Hewson was a Sailing Coach instructor.

On Tuesday, May 27th, 2014, Halton Police laid an additional sexual assault and sexual interference charge against Sean Hewson.

The Court has imposed a publication ban which was put in place on May 23rd, 2014.

Mr. Hewson has been remanded to Thursday the 29th of May, 2014 where police will be laying more charges in relation to a sixth victim.

The Halton Regional Police encourage anyone with information to contact D/Sergeant John Mans, Child Abuse and Sexual Assault Bureau at  905 465-8760.

The community’s task now is to aid in the investigation and to be part of the healing and recovery of those assaulted.  This is a very hard time for many.

 

 

Return to the Front page

Transparency means telling everyone the same story – and keeping the story honest. Air Park fibs.

News 100 redBy Staff

May 27, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

For the record:

In the Update to city council on matters relating to the Air Park staff said:

 FOI (Freedom of Information requests)  to MOE for Monitoring Plan and Details: 

In May 2014 staff spoke with the Mediator from the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. The Mediator has begun the process of contacting the third party (i.e. the Airpark) to inform them of the City’s scoped request to try and obtain information that pertains strictly to the proposed groundwater monitoring program at the Airpark, and any associated reports, studies and results. The Mediator is also continuing discussions with the MOE. At this point, staff will wait for further correspondence from the Mediator with respect to the possibility of receiving all or some of the requested information or whether additional discussion or mediation is necessary.

Airpark-testing-for-contaminents-again-2-BEST

Drill holes into the tonnes of landfill dumped on the air park property during the last five years. Very little of the landfill was inspected and it was put in place without an approved site plan.

A Judge has already told the Air Park that they must comply with the city’s bylaw.  The Air Park has appealed that decision which is their right.

What the Air Park cannot do however do is maintain that they are cooperating and have been transparent.  The city’s most recent update does not square with what Vince Rossi is saying.  Someone isn’t telling the truth here.

In a Letter to the Editor of the Hamilton Spectator Vince Rossi said:

To be clear, every test of neighbouring streams and wells has met or surpassed federal and provincial environmental standards. There have been six inspections, studies and/or tests carried out since 2009. None have indicated a problem with the fill or an adverse impact on local water. Further, after discussions with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, the airpark is in the process of voluntarily completing the most comprehensive study to date by carrying out a test well program

Return to the Front page

Magnificent creatures that many thought were headed for extinction – now winter at LaSalle Park. Not a choice that sits well with everyone.

Event 100By Staff

May 28, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

There are few more amazing comeback stories than that of the magnificent Trumpeter Swan.

Trumpeter swan - wings wideBrought back from the brink of extinction through the dedicated, decades-long work of volunteers, 200 Trumpeter Swans now overwinter at LaSalle Park in Burlington.

But these beautiful birds also did their part to rescue their species from the ashes of extinction. Hear their remarkable tales through stories about Athena, Magic, Pig Pen and many other individual swans at Swan Stories, a free, public event sponsored by the Trumpeter Swan Coalition.

Trumpeter - skidding to a stopThe event will take place on Thursday, May 29 from 7:30 to 9:00 p.m. in the Centennial Room at Burlington’s Central Library, 2331 New St.  More on the swans and the story to save their winter home.


Return to the Front page

Air Park sues Gazette and two citizens for libel and defamation; wants $100,000 and an injunction.

News 100 greenBy Pepper Parr

May 26, 2014

Burlington, ON.

Well we kind of expected it would come to this.

The Burlington Gazette, it’s publisher Pepper Parr, Monte Dennis and Vanesa Warren were served with Notices of Libel during the month of April, three for the Gazette, two each for Dennis and Warren.

Airpark aerial used by the city

These are the lands that are described as the Burlington Air Park upon which tonnes of uni-nspected landfill were dumped without a city site alteration approval.

None of the parties served libel notices chose to apologize and the Gazette decided the articles were not libelous and let them remain on the web site.

The air park lawyers then sued the three people, Parr, Dennis and Warren asking for $100,000 in exemplary damages. The air park set out 23 points in their Statement of Claim.  They are set out below along with links to the articles they took offence to

1: The plaintiff claims:

(a)              compensatory and exemplary damages for libel of $100,000

(b)             prejudgment interest on the compensatory damages and post judgment interest on all the damages;

(c)             an injunction  restraining the defendants and each of them from alleging that the plaintiff has created an environmental hazard by bringing fill onto its lands that has or may adversely impact the groundwater or surrounding watercourses ;

(d)             costs together with HST.

The plaintiff

  1. The writ describes the plaintiff; Burlington Air Park Inc.,who they are and where they are located. This is the Burlington Air Park Inc.

The defendants

  1. The defendants are described in sections 3,4,5,6 and 7. This is the Gazette, Parr, Dennis and Warren.

The defamatory publications.

Editor’s note: Links to each of the articles are set out at the end of this piece.

 Describes an article: “A “fishy” story – people are being hurt and a part of rural Burlington may have a badly contaminated water supply.

  1. Our Burlington posted the following concerning the plaintiff on its website https://www .burlingtongazette .ca/:

 On or about April 16, 2014 Our Burlington posted the following concerning the plaintiff on its website https://www .burlingtongazette.ca/ :

“North Burlington residents petition the MOE – but they don’t make their demands public.

There were four reader comments attached to that piece; they read as follows

 Bob says on April 16, 2014 at 11:37 am

(the Bob comment is not set out in the writ)

 reply

Vanessa Warren says  on April 17, 2014 at 11:39 am

 

Vince Rossi, president of the Burlington Executive Air PArk and beleived to be the sole shareholder of the private company, met with north Burlington residents.  He took all the comments made "under advisement"..

Vince Rossi, president of the Burlington Executive Air Park and believed to be the sole shareholder of the private company was sued by the city for failing to comply with a city bylaw.  The Court found in favour of the city.  The Air Park has appealed.  The appeal is to be heard June 11, in Toronto at Osgoode Hall.

Mr. Rossi.

The Kovachik family opened the airpark in 1962, and for 44 years operated in harmony with its neighbours and its rural surroundings . You are not allowed to capitalize on that history. The history that you ‘re accountable for is amounting to an environmental disaster in our pristine protected countryside, and you may not manipulate that  truth unchallenged  anymore.

 This is not an airpark improvement issue. This is a landfill issue, a water protection issue, a storm water management issue, a truck entrance and road use issue, and a property destruction and flooding issue.

 Are we to celebrate that you ‘ve spent money to improve your for-profi t business? Who doesn ‘t do that? You say you ‘ve spent 4 million in improvements , but what about the income you ‘ve made from charging for untold hundreds of thousands of tons of unregulated  fill? What about the protected watercourse you ‘ve destroyed? What about the regionally significant woodlot you gutted? The cost to the environment, the community and the City for your ‘improvements ‘ has been too high to bear.

 Ask your immediate neighbours – none of whom have “recently purchased their homes” – bow things have improved for them? Flooded fields are unfarmable. Backyards and septic beds are underwater from silted run off. Sight lines and property enjoyment are destroyed. Anxiety about well water safety is high, and you will not permit the MOE to release on-site testing data. Writing that you ‘ve “always respected your neighbours .. .” is more than untrue; it’s cruel.

 There are no unsubstantiated claims. Terrapex Environmental found unacceptably high levels of contaminants like hydrocarbons and heavy metals in the paltry 52 soil reports you were able to provide. Off-site water testing may be fine to date (again, where’s the data?), but how long might it talce for those contaminants to leach into wells?

 The City of Burlington legally won the right to impose its Site Alteration Bylaw on airpark property , and yet you still will not comply. The community would truly love to know that your property is NOT full of contaminated fill why dont you give us the verified, third-party data to prove it?

 We are all so weary of your attempts to manipulate . Standing up to you and stopping the trucks was never political , it was ethical, and you have no ethical credibility left.

Vanessa Warren Aside:

Hamilton Spectator, please dont publish this man ‘s letters anymore. The community around this airpark has been under siege since 2007 and the negative psychological  impact of unbalanced coverage like this is enormous.

 Ford Motor Company, Mercedes-Benz Canada, Evertz Microsystems, L- 3 Communications , Big Brothers and Big Sisters and PwC Epic Tour Halton – are you comfortable being cited in this letter?

 reply

 Rob Narejko says on April 16, 2014 at 1:44 pm

 It is hard to believe that our legal system allows an individual or a corporation ‘s right to privacy to be intact, when the actions of that individual I corporation are detrimental to the quality of life of others.

 The tests were paid for by our government and the government is empowered on our behalf to look after the interests of the citizens. The materials from the land fill I dump are more than likely leaching onto other people’s property. The information from the MOE study should be made public without having to resort to Freedom of Information requests .

 I give the City credit for jumping on this issue and for their approach. The rights of one person or corporation should not trump the communitys rights to know what is there. Without knowing what is there, how will it ever be re-mediated? And what happens to the environmental concerns and the adjacent owner’s property value?

PS Check out the  ‘scenic’ asphalt piles dumped in the field on the west side of Walker ‘s Line, just north of the 407 overpass. It will be interesting to see why this road waste material was allowed to be dumped in an agricultural field. Or was it?

 Editor’s note: We understand that Mr. Narejko has not been sued.

 reply

 Roger says on April  16, 2014 at 5:10 pm

 Bob could not have gotten  it any better . The article in the Spec as self serving and deficent on fact.

 reply

 

The owner of a property on Appleby Line stands at her property line.  Plans submitted to the Region at one point had a large helicopter pad sitting atop the 30 foot pile of earth.  The owner of the property on which the heliport was to be built claimed he did not have to get site plan approval from Burlington.  A Judge disagreed with him.  That decision is being appealed.

The owner of a property on Appleby Line stands at her property line. Plans submitted to the Region at one point had a large helicopter pad sitting atop the 30 foot pile of earth. The owner of the property on which the heliport was to be built claimed he did not have to get site plan approval from Burlington. A Judge disagreed with him. That decision is being appealed.

 Stephanie Cooper-Smyth says April 16, 2014 at 3:32 pm

Vincenzo Rossi – we know you follow this website, you ‘ve even posted on it. So if you can see this now, which may be difficult considering how exponentially your nose grew while crafting that exceptional ‘tale ‘ for the Spectator, get this:

 You have  accepted hundreds of thousands of truckloads of (contaminated) fill since 2008, and all you’ve got to show for ‘improvements ‘ is: you paved over a grass runway, you ‘ve done some alterations to your main runway, you ‘ve built a few hangers.

 Really?? Hundreds of thousands of truckloads of fill every year since 2008 . ..for just that?? How much longer are you going to try and dupe the good folks of Burlington?

 And one more thing, Vincenzo Rossi: According to the information submitted to Hizzoner at the hearing last year, the income from the hundreds of thousands of trucks to which you sold dumping rights, (last figure released was $85.00 per truck) for ‘improving ‘ your airpark”, doesn ‘t even appear on the Airpark ‘s financial statements in 2011, 2012 or 2013. (Hello CRA?)

 As for the legacy of the airpark, (“it’s long and accomplished history in Halton”), which you are attempting to claim: How dare you hijack the reputation and relations that the Kovachik ‘s built!

 Since you bought the airpark, Vincenzo Rossi, all you have done is destroyed the environment , misled and deceived the authorities, ruined the lives and threatened the safety of the neighboring community. That is YOUR legacy.

 Why dont you just go to where ever you sent all the money you earned from accepting all that toxic landfill you are neither believed nor wanted here by citizens of Burlington.

Editor’s note: We do not know if  Stephanie Cooper-Smyth has been sued

 reply

 Joan says on April 17, 2014 at 2:32 pm

 Mabe someone should seek advice from Erin Brockovic.

  1. On or about April 24, 2014 Our Burlington posted the following concerning the plaintiff on its website.

Letter to the Spectator editor altered on Air Park web site: still a lousy neighbour

 The publication by Our Burlington and Parr on April 11, 2014 set out in paragraph 7 above was actuated by actual malice, in that it was published knowing it to be untrue, or reckless as to its truth. In an article dated April 9, 2014 Our Burlington and Parr republished allegations from an earlier posting dated July 16, 2013  that was, at April 16, 2014, still available on the http ://www.burlingtongazette .ca/ website, that the fill on the plaintiff s land was “toxic” and that the plaintiff had been running “an unlicensed landfill operation.” It also republished allegations from an August 5, 2013 posting     that     was,     at      April      16,      2014,      still      available      on      the  http ://www .burlingtongazette.ca/ website, falsely claiming that a Terrapex report established that contaminants were migrating from the plaintiff s property.   The August 5, 2013 posting reported that testing was being done of neighbouring wells. When this posting was emphasized on April 9 2014, the City of Burlington had reported on those results in its Burlington Executive Airport Update #6 dated September 9, 2013  as follows: “On August 23, city staff were sent an email by the Region of Halton regarding testing of wells on several properties adjacent to the airport. The email indicated that the MOE and the Halton Region Health Department were working together to sample and analyze the drinking water wells of homes located immediately adjacent to where the fill was placed on the airport site. Well water samples were collected by MOE staff from two properties . The samples were being analyzed for inorganics, volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and petroleum hydrocarbons.

Results of this testing were provided  to the Health Department.   The results were then compared to the health-based Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards and the Ministry of Environment Table 2 Brownfields standards. The Region has indicated that no exceedances were reported . These results have been shared with the property owners. Permission was given by these property owners for the Health Department to share the results with city staff.”

 Further, the publications referred to in paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 were actuated by malice as Our Burlington and Parr published a letter on May 19, 2014 that made the following allegations concerning the plaintiff s president: “… Are his victims, or anyone who ‘s objected to his fill business soon to be ‘buried ‘ as well?

I think the residents of Rural Burlington better start using the buddy system whenever they leave their homes. And I suggest a telephonic head count every morning, and include Pepper  Parr’s…”

 On May 2, 2014 Dennis published the following letter to the editor m the Hamilton Spectator:

“Tainted Airpark fill a threat to neighbours’ wells.

Improvements to airpark up in the air (Opinion, April 16)

The recent article by Burlington Airpark owner Vince Rossi leaves out important, relevant facts.

The Burlington Airpark’s own soil analysis data, provided to the City of Burlington’s soil specialists, showed that much of the imported fill is chemically contaminated , and represented only a portion of the imported fill. The tens of thousands of loads of fill dumped onto the airpark were spread throughout the site and will require a grid-work of soil sampling to fmd and quantify.

Depending on imported  soil types, conditions, groundwater mobility, precipitation amounts and other factors, the negative impacts could take years to be detected in area wells .

Although the dumping has stopped, the concern is that toxic materials will sooner or later leach into neighbours’ wells. The immediate neighbours have experienced excessive water run-off due to the altered drainage. Some of the land is too wet for farming. Some of the wells are silted, making the water undrinkable.

While waiting for a court settlement and the Ministry of Environment research results, residents are suffering from the stress of an uncertain future. The clean up and rectification of this mess could take years and cost millions. Why won’t the Burlington Airpark share the soil and groundwater test results? The airpark claims the data is private and confidential.

The Ministry  of Transport directive asks the airparks to comply with provincial and local regulations that do not affect aviation . Federal legislation regulates the safe movement of aircraft. The airpark lost the court case on the validity of the Burlington fill bylaw and plans to appeal in June. In the case of Scugog  Airpark, a judgment decreed that fill operations must comply with Scugog’s municipal fill bylaws, which should be the case with all municipalities. This would result in lawfu l, responsible and environmentally sustainable development.

Monte Dennis on behalf of the Rural Burlington Greenbelt Coalition”

 Rural Burlington Greenbelt Coalition is not a corporation, nor is it a registered charity.  If  it exists, it is an unincorporated association of individuals.

Editors note:  The cheek, the unmitigated cheek.  Both Mr. Rossi and his legal counsel are fully aware of the existence of the Rural Burlington Greenbelt Coalition who delegated very effectively at both the city of Burlington and the Region of Halton.

The republications

 On April 22, 2014 Our Burlington published the libel notice i t received with respect to the publication described in paragraph 7 above on its website https://www.burlingtongazette.ca/ and Twitter account https://twitter.com/OurBur . Such publication of the libel notice amounts to a republication of the original libel. On or about April 22,  2014  Warren  posted  the  following  on  her  website https://vanessawarren .ca/  and  Twitter  account   https ://twitter.com/VanessaAWarren   “Vince  Rossi  threatens  to  sue  @OurBur  for  libel.  Wonder  who  is  next?  #BurlON

#BurlingtonAirpark https:// www .burlingtongazette .ca/air-park-lawyer -threaten-to-sue­ for-libel-gazette-considering-its-options .. .” The links in the postings amount to republication by Warren of the libel described in paragraph 7 above. Having read the article on Our Burlington ‘s website, Warren knew that the plaintiff was asserting that the original publication was defamatory, yet she maliciously chose to draw it to the attention of  persons who might not otherwise have been aware of that publication.

 Warren republished the comment referred to in paragraph 8 above on her website http ://vanessawarren.ca/ on or before April 23, 2014. The precise date of posting is not known to the plaintiff , but is known to Warren.

 Further, on May 2, 2014 Warren made the following post on her Twitter account: vanessaawarren  as  follows:  “Vanessa  Warren  @VanessaAWarren  •May  2  Thank  you Hamilton   Spectator   for   balancing   the   dialogue   and   bravo   RBGC   –   well   said! https://m.thespec.com/opinion-story /4494486-tainted-airpark-fill-a-threat-to-neighbours­ wells/”  The link in that tweet took a reader to the letter set out in paragraph  12 above.

 The links referred to in paragraphs 14, 15 and 16 did not simply make reference to the existence and location of content, they also repeated the sting of the libel in the articles to which reference was made, and encouraged viewers of her posts to visit those sites.

The articles and comments are defamatory and were calculated to injure the plaintiff

 In addition to the plain meaning of the words so published , by these words the defendants meant,  and were understood to mean that the plaintiff was putting the community as well as groundwater, streams and ponds in  the community at risk, or causing members of the community actual harm by having brought onto its land toxic fill that was adversely affecting the groundwater , streams and ponds and the fish living in such streams and ponds . They further meant, and were understood to mean that the plaintiff was preventing  the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (“MOE”) from publishing test data in the possession of the MOE. They further meant and were understood to mean that the plaintiff has caused flooding and silted runoff onto neighbouring lands. The defendants meant and were understood to mean that Terrapex had actually performed testing in connection with the plaintiff s lands. They further meant and were understood to mean that the plaintiff had posted on its website an altered version of a document that it had already published in the Hamilton Spectator.

 The words printed in the foregoing articles and comments were and are defamatory.  The addition of photographs and commentary in the publication referred to in paragraph 9 were not part of the letter published by the plaintiff in the Hamilton Spectator, and would have misled readers into believing that they had been. The allegations that the plaintiff brought contaminated fill onto its property and is putting groundwater, neighbouring streams and ponds and the environment generally at risk are calculated to injure the plaintiff in an effort to delay or prevent the further development of the Burlington Executive Airport. By reason of the publication of these defamatory statements, the plaintiff has suffered damages.

 The words published by Warren were also false and misleading in a material respect and were knowingly or recklessly made by her for the purpose of promoting directly or indirectly her business interest in Capstone Farms, contrary to s. 52(1) of the Competition Act, RSC 1985, c. C-34, as amended .

 The republications described in paragraphs 14 through 17 above were done with callous disregard of the plaintiff s rights and are deserving of an award of exemplary damages which are necessary to dissuade the defendants from engaging is such conduct in future. The protection of a party’s reputation arising from the publication of false and injurious statements must be effective. The most effective means of protection will be supplied by the knowledge that fines in the form of exemplary damages may be awarded in cases where the defendants ‘ conduct is truly outrageous, as it has been in the present case.

 

So there you have it.  This is what will get presented to a Judge who will decide if we libeled or defamed Mr. Rossi.

We do know this – the city of Burlington and the  and the Burlington Air Park sued each other and Justice Murray found in favour of the city.  He also awarded the city costs of $40,000.

In asking for exemplary damages of $100,00 from the Gazette, Parr, Dennis and Warren, Mr Rossi appears to be attempting to recover from the defendants the amount he had to pay the city.

 We have yet to decide what we will ask the Judge who hears this case what the defendants will seek for the vexatious, egregious and whatever big word lawyers use to say what they mean, in the way of damages from Mr. Rossi.

 What we would like most is for Mr. Rossi to follow and adhere to the rule of law that he is now using to hammer two citizens who were exercising their right to speak their minds.  As for the Gazette, we can take care of ourselves. 

Links to past editorial content:

The “fishy” story.

North Burlington residents petition MOE

Letter to the editor.

       

Return to the Front page

If your Dodge Caravan is beige in colour – you might have a difficult week.

Crime 100By Staff

May 26, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

Dodge Caravan 2005 beige

The police are on the prowl for a Dodge Caravan – beige.

Last week an estate home in the City of Burlington was broken into; Wednesday May 14th at 11:50 am to be exact.

Two suspects entered the home and targeted jewellery.  These two suspects are associated to a 2005 Dodge Caravan, beige in colour.

 Are you getting the connection?  The police would like to find that van.

Anyone with information is asked to contact Detective Ellie Bale, 3 District Criminal Investigations Bureau at 905 825-4747 ext 2312 or ellie.bale@haltonpolice.ca or,

Anyone with information on this or any other crime is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 1 800 222-8477 (TIPS) or through the web at Crime Stoppers or by texting “Tip201” with your message to 274637 (crimes).

Return to the Front page

The sale of that waterfront land isn’t a done deal yet – a citizens group will be delegating against any extension at council this week.

News 100 redBy Pepper Parr

May 26, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

Well it’s government, municipal government at that –so what did you expect?  They need more time.  This time – the need is real – the discussions and negotiations are tricky and the city has to deal with a provincial ministry.

Market - Lakeshore-foot-of-St-Paul-looking-west3-1024x682

It is a view to die for – and one that citizens of the city might not get to enjoy if the planned sale of this piece of waterfront property gets sold to the three property owner’s whose land abuts land owned by the city and the provincial government.

Council didn’t see it that way and they agreed to the sale with a number of provisos.

To dispose of Water Street land parcels and develop Windows-to-the- Lake at the foot of St. Paul and Market Streets in a minimalistic manner (benches and signage); and

Direct the Director of Parks and Recreation to report back with a concept for the Windows-to-the-Lake; and

Direct the Director of Roads and Parks Maintenance to enhance Port Nelson Park with available funds.

Market-and-St-Paul-Street-LAkeshore-Rd2

There are three parcels of land currently owned by the city and the province. Council decided to sell the land in the centre and to create small parkettes on the east and the west. The small red line in the centre lot show the delineation between city and provincial lands.

The property belongs to the city – which means the public – but many members of this council don’t see the waterfront quite that way.

Council also directed the City Solicitor and Manager of Realty Services to work with the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) and enter into an agreement for the sale of MNR and city lots between St. Paul Street and Market Street to the adjacent land owners within the next six months.  They added to that to have the the City Solicitor and Manager of Realty Services to report back to Community Services Committee if a sale agreement for city lots between St. Paul Street and Market Street has not been reached within the six month period.

The six months is up and the people who unalterably opposed to the idea of selling the land in the first place plan to delegate and ask some hard questions.

The man managing the flow of paper, Ron Steiginga, Manager of Realty Services, is one of the best there is.  He was the staffer that handled the transfer, a lease actually, of that patch of land off Fairview that the Freeman Station is now sitting on.  On that project he had to deal with the Canadian subsidiary of an American multi-national corporation, the city and a private citizens group – and while it took a while – he got it done.  The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) should be a piece of cake for Steiginga.

The staff report lays out the process:

“Given the independent process that the MNR requires, it will take longer than the 6 months to process the agreements and complete all of the negotiations.

 “Realty staff has been in regular contact with MNR staff to advise them of Council’s resolution to sell the land to the adjacent owners and to determine what the MNR requirements are to proceed with this matter. In order for MNR staff to consider the sale of the land to the three landowners, the landowners were required to submit individual Applications for Crown Land which were processed by MNR staff.

“MNR staff has recently indicated to the owners that they are prepared to dispose of the filled Crown lands subject to the Ministry policies and procedures which includes the following key provisions:

1.     The land must be sold at market value.

2.     The City owned Water Street land must be transferred to the three landowners first before the MNR lands can be transferred.

Market - Lakefront-Foot-of-St.-Paul-730x1024

The property with the fence along the edge has riparian rights – which could be used to extend the public pathway even further.

They are working with the three landowners to resolve this issue. “It is clear” said the staff report “that both the MNR and City are in agreement that our respective policies require a fully documented appraisal process to determine the market value, and that both the City and the MNR are using the same valuation method and terms of reference.

Market - water street lots Ziegler-drawing

A resident opposed to the sale of the land put forward a proposal that would protect the privacy of the land owners and give the public access to the edge of the lake. The property on the right has riparian rights attached to it – and was rumoured to be going on the market in he near future. The city could have purchased the property, stripped the riparian rights and extended the waterfront trail just that much further. Port Nelson Park is one lot to the east of the riparian rights.

Given the time it takes for the owners and/or MNR to obtain and review appraisals, and conduct negotiations, staff expect that this matter will not reach a conclusion for at least an additional 6 months.

The citizen based Waterfront Advisory group apparently don’t like either the look or the smell of this and will be at the Standing Committee delegating.  This issue isn’t over yet.

Background links:

Selling the family jewels: Part 1

Selling the family jewels: Part 2

It wasn’t a popular decision.


Return to the Front page

Need to get the provincial election done with before you can focus on city hall. Just what is happening in that campaign anyway?

SwP thumbnail graphicBy Pepper Parr

May 25, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

All the election signs are either for Eleanor McMahon, the Liberal candidate or Jane McKenna, the Progressive Conservative incumbent seeking re-election.  Have yet to see a sign for the New Democratic candidate.  All those signs make it hard to appreciate that there is a municipal election working its way towards the day everyone will cast a ballot in October.

An exceptionally well connected business person, sometimes described as a pundit, was approached by a member of one of the city’s advisory committees and asked how the pundit would rank things in each of the wards.  The member of the city advisory committee had decided that it was time in his career to get involved in local politics and make a contribution at the city council level.

Our potential candidate at first thought he would take a shot at the job of Mayor but decided that he needed to learn to walk first before starting to run.

Councillor Blair Lancaster" not a big fan of public meetings.

There are at least five people who want to eat her lunch: Councillor Blair Lancaster has a fight on her hands – if she runs again.

The pundit ranked things this way:  Ward 6 is going to have a different council member come October he is reported to have said.  Given that there are now five people seeking that seat – the incumbent has yet to file nomination papers – that would seem to be a safe assumption.  A lot of people seem to feel Blair Lancaster can be beaten.  With a possible six candidates on the ballot it would be a mistake to count the former beauty queen out just yet – name recognition will take a candidate a long way.

Ward 5 is the next easiest to win in opined the pundit.  The sense of the pundit was that the incumbent Paul Sharman doesn’t own his ward yet.  

Ward 4 is still a tossup, the Roseland Community Organization doesn’t like any of the people who have their hat in the ring and they dearly want to see a strong candidate defeat the incumbent Jack Dennison who will be at his Ontario Municipal Board hearing Thursday and Friday of this week.  Dennison has yet to file nomination papers but then he always waits until June to do so.

"I don't want to hear anymore delegations" said Councillor Jack Dennison.

Councillor Jack Dennison: is he running again?

Councillor Dennison asked the Committee of Adjustment to allow him to sever his Lakeshore property into two pieces so he could sell off a part for a reported $900,000.  Many in Roseland thought that was an atrocious thing to do and took exception to their Councillor doing something that would lessen the value of properties along Lakeshore Road.

Ward 3 is going to be a fight for anyone who decides to take on 22 year veteran John Taylor.  He can be beaten but it will take a candidate with a lot of energy and a strong start to topple Taylor.

Ward 2 is thought to be suicide territory for anyone who decides to run against Marianne Meed Ward.  She is certainly popular – but she has yet to be tested.  If she is re-elected by a significant majority – and she should win – she will be a leading candidate for the office of Mayor in 2018

Ward 1 – Rick Craven has a tight grip on that ward – nothing happens in Aldershot without Craven knowing about it and giving it his blessing.  He goes bananas when Meed Ward buts in on his territory.

Of the two newbies running in ward 1 Katherine Henshell is the only one that can give   Craven any kind of a run for his money.  The woman is focused, does her homework and is also very pregnant.  Will that make any difference?  Shouldn’t – might even get her the Mommy vote – and in Aldershot that counts for quite a bit. 

Councillor Rick Craven, centre, with a copy of the 2013 budget on a memory stick. Craven did a superb job of chairing the budget committee last year.  He will have no argument with candidate Henshell over the need for additional shopping facilities in Aldershot - getting themt there has been the challenge.

Councillor Rick Craven, centre, managed to hide behind a council chamber partition while a vote on an Aldershot matter was being debated. Here he sits with Councillors Dennison and Taylor during a budget meeting.  The three are the most experienced members of Council.

Henshell did tweak Craven’s nose when she told a city council meeting she was the only person speaking for Aldershot and the Bridgeview development brought to a Standing Committee meeting at which Craven didn’t say a word – he wasn’t even in the council chamber – he remained outside the room for all of the more than an hour long debate – walking in seconds after the vote was cast.

One political observer we hear from regularly asked how much the developer had donated to the various election campaigns – we weren’t able to find that information on the city web site.  While city hall has the data they don’t put it up on the web site where people can look at the file and learn who gave and how much did they give.  This kind of information should be available for every member of council for every election then ran in.

Wonder what the Ministry of Municipal Affairs has to say about that kind of information net being available.  A good city Clerk would have ensured the information was readily available.

For anyone to actually beat Craven would be an upset – but then that is what politics is all about.

His worship appears to be heading for an acclamation which is unfortunate.  Rick Goldring needs a strong contender to stiffen him up.  He’s not a bad mayor, many see him as a weak leader but a closer look, particularly at the way he handled the bringing in of an interim city manager when Burlington got dumped by then city manager Jeff Fielding showed some really good leadership on the part of the Mayor.  Maybe he is growing into the office.  Nevertheless, a good stiff competition would keep him on his toes.

You won’t be seeing city council candidates at your door until the provincial election is over – could that be a blessing?

There will be plenty for you to ask questions about as we wind our way through the summer.

Mayor Goldring picking up donation in the Santa Claus parade - met with other GTA Mayors to pick up provincial finds to help with the ice storm damage.  Maybe he should have taken the hockey stick and the sock with him?

Mayor Rick Goldring.  He is in the race – just doesn’t have anyone to race against right now.  Early in this term of office Goldring said he wasn’t going to go the getting his picture in the paper route.  Here he collects funds in a parade for the Old Timers hockey league.

Return to the Front page

Art centre takes on a new name and attaches a promise to it: Art Gallery of Burlington, creativity will live there.

theartsBy Pepper Parr

May 25, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

It was an interesting week for the arts. The Arts and Cultural Collective got closer to what its mission will be while the Performing Arts Centre released its program for the 2014/15 season to more than acceptable comment.

Not to be outdone, the former Burlington Art Centre decided to go for a whole new look and re-branded themselves and will forever after be known as the Art Gallery of Burlington – AGB; the place where Creativity Lives.

AGB logo with colour graphic

The arch in the A is supposed to signify the Skyway bridge – sure – with art the view is always in the eye of the beholder.

The BAC, old acronym for the Burlington Arts Centre, made it a bit difficult for many people to figure out which was which.  While the BAC – oops, that’s  the AGB now, had a much stronger pedigree and “involved” more people, there was still the sense that the building on Lakeshore road needed a stronger look and an identity that made it stand out.

The BAC board put together a very strong presentation during the budget cycle and got the funding they needed to do the re-brand.  They brought in John Duff to do the work.

The new name reflects their identity as a centre for art and supporting artists in the  community and the evolution of the place as a multi-faceted gallery.  For the past several years, the gallery administrators have been working to increase the profile and quality of their exhibitions and promote their acclaimed collection of Canadian contemporary ceramics.  Today, they are positioned to host national and international exhibitions, tour their ceramics collection and further develop their award winning educational programs.

The Art Gallery of Burlington also brought in a new curator, Denis Longchamps, who uses the title Director of Programs, has some very clear ideas on the direction he feels the gallery should be going in.

The Art Gallery of Burlington has gone so far as to attach a promise to their brand – to embrace and celebrate creativity and integrate the gallery into the community at large.  Delivery on this promise includes the promotion of three key messages:

  1. Art Gallery  providing the highest quality, stimulating exhibitions and contemporary ceramics collection
  2. Programs   that embrace the qualities of creativity, inspiration and supporting artistic development
  3. Outreach  that takes the AGB beyond its brick and mortar and into the community with partner events, school programs, city initiatives and connecting through Art Etc Gallery Shop

The tag line, CREATIVITY Lives Here!  is the first example of how the Art Gallery of Burlington is going to define itself an operate.

In a letter to the membership President Ian Ross said: “We are increasing our investment in exhibitions, responding to emerging artists, celebrating our national-significant ceramics collection, enhancing creativity in our educational programs, and reaching throughout our community and forming new partnerships.”

Putting meat on the bones of that statement means that the AGB is committed to celebrating and promoting the innovative and imaginative elements in all that they do and in all that they are.  Creativity will be the foundation seen in – Programming – Education – Partnerships – Membership – Strategy.

Founded by a number of guilds, the Art Gallery of Burlington has come up with a way to end the confusion as to who they are – Performing Arts Centre and Burlington Art Centre – PAC or BAC was confusing, but it will take more than a new name to get the message across.

What the public has not seen is the strength, energy and vision of two new staff members who are adding to the strength of the team that was already in place.

Leslie Page who runs the educational side, Johnathan Smith who has built the ceramics collection into what it is today are now joined by Kim Varian, Director of Enterprise and Dennis Longchamps, Director of Programs.  This team is what will make the difference.

BAC aerialThe ceramics collection needs a home; a place where it can be properly and effectively displayed.  Right now it gets scattered about the gallery with hundreds of pieces stacked on shelves in a storeroom.

Many at city hall have wondered if the land the gallery sits on is the most effective use of that piece of property.  Heard aloud were the words: “great place for a high end condo” and indeed it would be.  Selling the site would free up some money to build the kind of location an art gallery needs to display its ceramics collection.

More on the new team members, the ceramics collection and where the Art Gallery of Burlington might take the city in a future article.

 

Return to the Front page

Performing Arts Centre gives select crowd a “sneak peak” at the newest schedule – looks great. Jann Aden is part of the program.

theartsBy Pepper Parr

May 22, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

She was blonde, chatty, good with words and an infectious laugh.  He was staid, sounded a bit shy but certainly knew what he was talking about.

The two of them sat in stiff chairs facing each other on the stage of the Performing Arts Centre (PAC) with all the instruments a good band would need to really rock the building off to the side.  You knew instantly that these two were not going to be playing any of those instruments.

Connie Smith, an interviewer of some renown, and Brian McCurdy, PAC Executive Director sat before an audience that filled three quarters of the Main Stage to talk about the fourth year program that would go on sale to the public June 2.
The evening was a “sneak preview” of the 2014/2015 program before an audience of multiple ticket buyers and capital donours who soaked up every word.  They do need to learn to clap more often though.

The Centre has had its trials and tribulations with the public.  It has its core following – they are true believers and will support the organization almost forever.  But there is a large part of the city that still doesn’t  buy into culture all that much and doesn’t want to see tax money used to support it.

Past deficits certainly didn’t help nor did a subsidy request that people expect to be at around half a million a year balloon to over $1.2 million.  That situation saw the first Executive Director exit stage left and some key people leave the board.

BPAC-McCurdy-with-schedule-797x1024

That empty month on the calendar is empty anymore – Brian McCurdy gave the public its first look at the 2014/15 program – BOFFO!

McCurdy describes himself as a “reformed trombone player”  who once shared a stage with Bob Hope at the Community Auditorium in Thunder Bay. “Not only did I get to play in the backup band, I also played a round of golf with Mr Hope in the afternoon” said McCurdy.

You see him in a blue blazer and grey flannel trousers – effectively going about his business.  The program released last night is pure McCurdy – his finger prints are all over it.

He has managed, at least on paper, to press all the right buttons and satisfy almost everyone.  The proof will come when the program goes on sale to the public early in June. 

The arts and culture business is dynamic and it is difficult to project revenue with a high degree of certainty but McCurdy thinks he can get the subsidy to less than $500,00 – which will please a lot of people in this town.

The Plastique performance is a total delight.  Check it out for yourself.

Culturally McCurdy covers all the bases: jazz, opera, classical music, dance and a solid set of programs for the young, young set.  There is quite a bit of Cuban material, more jazz than I expected along with a couple of purely Canadian nuggets.  The only thing missing was a one night stand by Jimmy Tapp.

There are 16 different program series; there will be 65 productions and 93 performances including the National Ballet doing the Nut Cracker Suite at Christmas.

nutcracker_production_header.jpg__740x448_q85_crop_upscale

The Nutcracker Suite will delight what will undoubtedly be SOLD OUT audiences.

The Cushion Concert Series will return and there will be a Community on Stage program that will involve a number of the Burlington favourites.  In the past some people complained, rather loudly, that the city had a brand new facility but the local performance groups didn’t get a chance to actually use the stage.  The prices they were asked to pay seemed  very steep to them.  McCurdy and his team are bringing in the Student Theatre for  two productions; the Burlington Concert Band has three productions scheduled.  The Burlington Footnotes will run for two days with three performances and the Brott Music Festival will run from June 19th to August 14th in the Main Theatre.

McCurdy has created what he calls Series and has one with Jazz, another focused on Comedy, then one with a family angle – the Gruffalo is back.  Dance,  Blues & Rock have a Series as well.  The Entertainer Series will include Jann Arden and John McDermott.

There is a “Marvel” Series and a Global Beat Series.  Each series is made up of three to four performances.

The Opera Series will present  Pucicini’s Tosca, Verdi’s Nabucco and Mozart’s Don Giovanni all done as cinemas coming from the Royal Opera House.

This reporter had to leave early so I didn’t see the standing ovation Brian McCurdy should have gotten at the close of the evening.  The challenge now is to see how it goes at the Box Office.  If Burlington doesn’t come through with SOLD OUT signs on most of these programs – the city doesn’t deserve a Performing Arts Centre.

 

Return to the Front page

Protesters prevent pipe line crews from inspecting a line that will carry oil from the Alberta tar sands to Montreal – via Burlington.

News 100 redBy Staff

May 21, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON

It may have moved from  top of mind ‘for a lot of people but a local chapter of the Council of Canadians activists, local residents, allies and First Nations blockaded the access road to an exposed section of Enbridge’s Line 9 pipeline Tuesday morning.

The blockade was to be twelve hours in length as a symbolic gesture; one hour for every thousand anomalies Enbridge has reported to exist on the line.

Line 9 demonstration May 20-14

Enbridge inspection workers were prevented from getting to their work site on Tuesday by protesters demonstrating against the National Energy Board decision to approve the direction of the flow through the line.

Line 9 - integrity dig

Integrity digs are when crews dig up the soil covering the pipe and inspecting it for cracks and possible leaks. They are checking on the “integrity” of the line and its ability to transport a product.

Thepress release from the blockade states that “Line 9 has at least 12961 structural weaknesses along its length. And yet, Enbridge is only doing a few hundred integrity digs. Enbridge has been denying the problems with the pipe for years, and they still refuse to do the hydrostatic testing requested by the province. Are we really supposed to simply trust Enbridge when they tell us that this time they’ll do it right?”

Many of the blockaders point to the disastrous spill from Enbridge’s line 6b into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan in 2010, where millions of litres of oil spilled and have so far proven impossible to clean up. They also point out testimony at the NEB that Line 9 has a 90% chance of catastrophic failure in the initial years after its operation is changed.

Line 9 - tar sands sign

For the Line 9 protesters the issue is transporting oil from the tar sands in Alberta through a pipe line that runs through Burlington.

This public demonstration in Burlington is the first seen since the National Energy Board approved the reversing of the flow in Line 9.  There were a significant number of conditions attached to the approval, one of which was a number of digs to determine the condition of the line that is almost 40 years old.

 

Return to the Front page

Seven of the very best celebrated. Mayor calls them the “backbone of the city”.

News 100 redBy Staff

May 20, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

Some 300 people gathered at the Convention centre last Thursday, to witness the awarding of Burlington’s BEST awards to seven people who were chosen by their peers as leaders in the community.

There were 29 nominees in the 49th annual awards event that recognized Citizen of the Year; Senior Person of the Year; Junior Person of the Year; Heritage Person of the Year; Arts Person of the Year; Community Service Award and the Environmental  Award.

Mayor Goldring put it perfectly when he said: “Volunteers” are the backbone of our community, and add tremendous value to Burlington.”  The men and women who are received the awards were recognized by their friends and colleagues as putting forth an extraordinary effort to make Burlington a better place.”

The Burlington’s Best Awards are managed by a citizen’s committee established in 1965 with the mandate of recognizing Burlington residents who bring honour to the city and make a difference in their community.

The Heritage Person of the Year Award is sponsored by Heritage Burlington, a City of Burlington citizen advisory committee.  The award goes to an individual who has demonstrated a long-term commitment to the preservation of Burlington’s heritage, and has volunteered his or her time to support the preservation of Burlington’s heritage.

erbgh

If it had to do with either heritage or history Les Armstrong was at the meeting – usually with the late Jane Irwin.  To have lost both of them in such a short period of time.

The award, quite rightfully, went to Les Armstrong whose service to Burlington covers many decades. He was a longstanding executive member of the Burlington Historical Society.  His most recent accomplishment was organizing the Friends of Freeman Station. Burlington truly is a better place because of Les Armstrong and his efforts to preserve Burlington’s history for today and tomorrow; his death late in January lessened all of us.

Community Service Award is sponsored by COGECO, the local cable company and

is given to a Burlington resident who volunteered in the areas of public relations, marketing, communications or special events during the previous calendar year. Nominees will have promoted Burlington’s sense of community by sharing good news or encouraging others to contribute their time, talent and enthusiasm.

The nominees for this award in 2013 included: John Ives, Tomy Bewick, Friday Night Community Team at Wellington Square United Church, Les Armstrong, Gordon Cameron, Trent Schwartz and Beth Hudson

Trent Schwartz and his family sparked the imagination of the city when they decided  they would embark on 100 local adventures in 2013. Schwartz tirelessly promoted Burlington by helping to get the word out to everyone about all the fantastic events and activities in our city. Schwartz has been a Burlington ambassador who continues to encourage and inspire local people and tourists to experience the great things the city has to offer while promoting Burlington’s sense of community. 

Environmental Award Sponsored by Newalta – a leader in rediscovering resources and changing how industry perceives waste by partnering with its customers, helping them to meet their environmental objectives.  The nominees were: Ken Woodruff and Paul Toffoletti

The Environmental Award went to Paul Toffoletti, a dedicated environmental protection advocate who has volunteered with the Bruce Trail Conservancy since 1996 and has been a member of the Burlington Sustainable Development Committee (SDC) since 2008.

As a board member of the Iroquoia Bruce Trail Club, Toffoletti spent a significant amount of time monitoring this ecologically significant parcel of land to ensure that Burlington’s natural heritage features continue to be protected. As vice-chair of the SDC, Toffoletti helped raise the committee’s profile by organizing speakers’ series in Burlington on issues that include climate change, local food and environmentally friendly gardening. He was instrumental in leading the review of development applications and routinely delegated to City Council on environmental matters. Toffoletti has played an active role on the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Stakeholders Review Committee and continues to serve on the Cootes to Escarpment EcoPark Management Committee.  Other environmental initiatives Toffoletti has supported include the Earth Day Hamilton-Burlington Eco Festival and various nature walk events. His dedication and enthusiasm for the environment has raised awareness and inspired others in Burlington to reduce their carbon footprint. 

The K.W. Irmisch Arts person award went to a woman who took a big chance and brought one of the most imaginative cultural events to the city when she held the “No Vacancy” installation at the Waterfront Hotel.  The nominees were: Selina Jane Eckersall, Christopher Giroux, Tomy Bewick and Jonathon Filipovic

Cirque - cropped front of VS model

Selina Jane Eckersall looking over a model of Village Square – the location for her next “installation art” event.

 She is an entrepreneurial collaborator whose goal is to support and encourage a thriving contemporary art scene that extends beyond the gallery walls and into the hearts and minds of the city’s residents, artists and businesses.

Junior Citizen of the Year
Since 1875, B’Nai Brith has been respected for its groundbreaking work on matters relating to anti-Semitism, racism and human rights, as well as for its strong advocacy and the important social services it provides. Each year, local B’Nai Brith groups across the country reach out to those around them, helping to fund and organize activities that meet the special needs of communities.

The Junior Citizen of the Year Award is given to a secondary school student 18 years of age or younger, who, through devoted and energetic service to worthy causes, has been an example to the community.  The nominees for 2013 were: Chad Buisman, Connor Withers, Curtis Kelly and Connor Fraser, Gabriella Paniccia, Justin McNerne

Chad Buisman has been volunteering with the Friday Night Community Dinner at Wellington Square United Church since its inception. He helps to feed more than 200 men, women and children each and every week with varying social, physical, social and emotional needs by supporting the dinners with set-up, food preparation and clean-up. He also organizes crafts for young children and shares his gift of music by playing musical instruments for the enjoyment of guests. Buisman is a volunteer with the church’s weekly children’s ministry program, Ryerson Camp and the City Kidz Foundation in Hamilton. He is a young role model who has spent more than 1,000 hours serving the Burlington community with a genuine humility that is beyond his years.

Senior Person of the Year
Canadian owned and operated, Schlegel Villages’ mission is to provide holistic health care in a home environment, located within an internal neighbourhood design that promotes a caring community, with an emphasis on optimal health and life purpose for each resident. The Village of Tansley Woods Long Term Care Home, the sponsor of this award, offers a rich selection of programs and activities year-round. The home is designed to build community while serving personal needs.

The Senior Person of the Year Award is given to a Burlington resident aged 60 years and over, who, through voluntary actions, has made a significant contribution to the city and its residents.  The nominees for 2013 were:  Michael Hourigan, Maggie Wheeler, Arnold Koopman, Thelma McGillivra

Maggie Wheeler
Wheeler is a cancer survivor who tirelessly serves the Burlington community. She collects non-perishable items for food banks and crochets hats, blankets and prayer shawls for cancer patients, women in crisis and disabled persons. When she travels to Mexico in winter months, she donates suitcases of school supplies and volunteers with her husband to support local food banks, schools and seniors’ homes. Within Burlington, Wheeler is also a volunteer with the Red Cross, Meals on Wheels, and Sew on Fire Ministries in Burlington. She is truly a selfless, charitable person whose heart touches each person she meets, with never a thought for herself.

Citizen of the Year Award
This award is brought to us by the service clubs of Burlington.

The world’s first service club, the Rotary Club of Chicago, was formed on Feb. 23, 1905. Since then, the club has grown to include 1.2 million Rotarians belonging to more than 32,000 Rotary clubs in more than 200 countries. Service above self is Rotary’s guiding principle.  The 2013 nominees were: x Bev Jacobs, Judy Gerdes, Denise Davy, Jean Longfield and Beth Hudson.  Of interest and of note is that all the nominees were women.

The Citizen of the Year Award is given to an individual who, through devoted and energetic service to worthy causes, has been an example to the community.

Jean Longfield has positively impacted the lives of thousands of people through her “Gift of Giving Back” program. Beginning in 2007, the annual food drive program has now collected more than 770,000 pounds of food with a collective value of $1.89 million to help less-fortunate people in Burlington and the surrounding communities.

Eagles at city hall March 17-14

The Burlington Eagles at a city hall event.

 

Return to the Front page

Did technology do them in – or are there a lot of frightened people in Burlington? They are frightened and they have reason to be.

BackgrounderBy Pepper Parr

May 19, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

We wrote a piece based on what we were told by our readers; ordinary people with strong convictions and a desire to get all the facts on the table.

Different readers had different search experiences (isn’t technology great?) for news about the Air Park which is a hot topic for people in Burlington.

The first hint we got was that everything about the air park had disappeared from the insidehalton web site was this:   I have been tracking for any coverage on the Burlington Airpark / Airport on Metro Media site (Spec and insideHalton) for some time. This weekend, all past articles on the Airpark have disappeared (there used to be a number of articles), and the return message shows that no search result found. What gives?”

That user got back to us with: , I will continue to perform the search every day…“burlington airpark” airport on the whole Spec / Metro Media site. My searches today give me the following message…

 We were unable to find results for “burlington airpark” in Burlington

That was followed by a comment from a reader who said everything after 2013 was no longer on the site.

That was followed by a comment from a reader who seemed to get a little panicky: The article that Tina Depko-Denver won her recent award for (best rural story in Ontario community paper) no longer comes up on searches.  This is freaking me right out.

“Here’s the link to the artcile (that I had to re-find via twitter) – see if you can find it by searching on insideHalton.  https://m.insidehalton.com/news-story/3844524-airpark-neighbours-call-on-government-for-help/

That was followed by:  “It came up for me.”

That was followed by this:

“The articles are all there…they come up in different order – by date or relevance – based on how you search for them.

“I get a different list based on how I search: searching by “rossi” as in Vince pulls up some, searching by “warren” as in Vanessa pulls them up in a different order of “relevance.”

“The best search is by “Burlington Executive Airport” it pulled up the most comprehensive list. It has them mostly sorted by date – since the article “neighbours call on government for help” as almost a year ago, it will appear lower down on the list, on page two.

“Here’s the list with that search function enabled:

https://www.insidehalton.com/search/news/?q=burlington%20executive%20airport&location=halton&sort=rel

 Here are just some of the articles I found on the website dealing with the airpark.

 https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/4417902-appeal-date-set-for-burlington-airpark-case/

 https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/4220726-burlington-airpark-launches-appeal-of-landfill-ruling/

https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/4219079-burlington-wins-airpark-landfill-dispute/

https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/4252426-airpark-paying-city-40k-for-legal-fees/

https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3839981-neighbours-of-burlington-airport-complain-of-ongoing-fill-activity/

 https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3907517-burlington-airport-city-hall-seeking-court-injunctions/

 https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3870812-leaders-speak-out-against-burlington-airport-expansion/

 https://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3844524-airpark-neighbours-call-on-government-for-help/

“I think this is a question of digital technology: what search words are being used, and the search tool pulling up information based on chronology and relevance.”

The Gazette has been very deliberate in not using the names of people who send in comments.  The libel chill is still in the air.

It would appear that the information on the insidehalton web site is still in place.  Finding it requires one to use the most effective search terms.  Should it be easier?  We suppose so but one cannot blame the people who run the insidehalton web site for the search terms their readers use.

It is all their and we expect it will continue to remain on the site.  We had planned on trying to reach the operators of the insidehalton site – but the holiday schedule meant no one was picking up their telephones.

We were perhaps a little too quick to call shame on the Metromedia papers and for that we apologize.  There are a lot of frightened people in Burlington – and they have every reason to be frightened.

Background links:

The first we heard of editorial material disappearing.

Air Park legal counsel sending out libel notices

Return to the Front page

26 months of dynamic civic leadership have come to a close; the bar was raised – now staff have to learn how to get over it.

News 100 redBy Pepper Parr

May 19, 2014

BURLINGTON, ON.

Thursday evening Burlington celebrated its BEST – 29 people were nominated for the seven categories the city has within which it recognizes and awards citizens who have contributed to the community.

The day before, in a reception at the Performing Arts Centre, city hall staff met to bid former city manager Jeff Fielding adieu.  It was an event tinged with sadness, disappointment and some of that gallows humour that makes its way into events where there is not a lot of joy in the room.

The city was watching a truly dynamic city manager leave after a hectic, topsy turvey 26 month run when literally everything was looked at differently.

City solicitor Nancy Shea Nicol summed it up rather well when she said much of her work with Jeff was first asking if what he had done was legal and then changing documents to make sure it was legal.  Jeff Fielding was the kind of guy who immediately went to the edge of an issue and THEN pushed.

City administration leadership team: city manager Jeff Fielding on the left with general manager comunity and corporate services, centre and general manager, development and infrastructure Scott Stewart on the righ

City administration leadership team: city manager Jeff Fielding on the left with general manager community and corporate services, centre and general manager, development and infrastructure Scott Stewart on the right.  The two general managers didn’t always pull with the same level of effort.

General manager Kim Phillips, who had a choppy working relationship with Fielding, said staff wanted to have a caricature  made up to present to Jeff but there wasn’t time to get it done.  “Had we managed to put it together it would have been of Jeff on a bicycle heading towards a golf course with his golf clubs over his shoulders peddling by city owned buildings with for sale signs on them.

Jeff Fielding was close to radical in his approach to many of the tasks he took on.  He understood fully the need for the municipal sector to change its business model; he knew that what we are currently doing is not sustainable.

Taking the job opportunity as city manager in Calgary gives Jeff Fielding the opportunity to work with a mayor who also knows the current municipal business model will not work – it isn’t working now.  Fielding was very comfortable in Burlington; taking the job of city manager for Burlington was to be his last move before retirement.  The fertile soil for change that he thought he saw turned out to be thin with nowhere near the nutrients to bring about real growth.

As one watched his behaviour at Standing Committee meetings and became aware of just how big his changes were – it was breath taking.  On an occasion when a discussion was taking place in Fielding’s office – almost every square inch was covered with pieces of papers with ideas, comments and questions.  There was this itch to write down as much as I could read and to whip out the camera and start clicking away.  There wasn’t an issue that Fielding would not at least look at.

Mayor Rick Goldring explaining to Kilbride area residents what was being done and the time frames the repair crews were working to in their community.

Former city manager Jeff Fielding, on the left, was always on hand with Mayor Rick Goldring. Here Goldring explains to Kilbride area residents what was being done and the time frames the repair crews were working to in their community.

He didn’t see any reason for the city to be in the golf club business – we think he was right on that one.  He had a team of smart people begin a study of the city’s space needs – asked first what do we have and then asked staff to set out what was needed now and into the future – and then began looking for ways to leverage the city hall property.

Fielding was convinced that city owned parking lots had much more value in them than was being realized and he was constantly looking for ways to get at that value and make it work for the city.

He understood fully, more than most of the city’s population, the importance of culture to the city and the need to hype the Performing Arts Centre and work with the Art Centre to get more value – and traffic – to those locations.

City council wasn’t able to find the money to hire a full time Cultural Development manager in the 2014 budget.  During the final delegation from the Arts Collective,  Fielding turned and told the speaker that he would look for a way to find the money to hire that person. “I can’t promise I will find the dollars – but I will try” which is more than any of the current council members said.

Air-Park-Fielding-city-lawyers-+-Air-Park-counsel-1024x766

Jeff Fielding, on the left, didn’t take prisoners. He let lawyer Glenn Grenier,second from the left, who described himself as an expert on the legislation that governs air parks in Canada, know that Burlington wasn’t buying his story. City solicitor Nancy Shea Nicol and Blake Hurley look on.

After the meeting Fielding had some stiff words for Grenier while city solicitor Nancy Shea Nicol and staff lawyer Blake Hurley looked on.

Fielding was direct, blunt and didn’t have much time for the “slackers”.  On the other hand he recognized real talent which he nurtured and developed.  There are a couple of dozen people on the city payroll who are bigger and better people today than they were the day Fielding arrived.  For them his decision to leave now was extremely disappointing.

He turned the way the city does its budget upside down and took staff into a  Results Based Accountability (RBA) approach where the departmental silos would be merged in a way that would be exceptionally difficult for some staff.

When asked what would happen to the RBA work that had been done Fielding told this reporter that all the basic budget work is completed and he felt staff could complete the shift.  That is a stretch by any definition.

Fielding has made arrangements for people in London where he introduced the RBA approach to work with Burlington’s financial team and that help will certainly be useful.  What Fielding has done is take a team of people in probably the best run department in the city and convince them to go way out on a limb with him and do something significantly different.  This kind of thing does not happen in the municipal world.

The financial people were excited, motivated; pumped if you will, and at a critical time their coach and mentor walks off the field.  As much as we admire Fielding  –that decision is difficult to fathom and disappointing as well .  The city needed another year to get RBA in place and functioning – it was within Fielding’s power to do that.  He chose not to.

Fielding did say that he would have liked to have had one more year in Burlington – the city would certainly have liked to have had him for that additional twelve months.  One wonders if the Mayor told Fielding that he was not prepared to accept the resignation at this time and sent him back to his desk.  Too much to ask for I guess

Rick Goldring told staff at the reception that the day he  advised his fellow council members that Fielding was leaving he saw an event on YouTube where the Mayor of Calgary was introducing Jeff as their new city manager.  “I felt”, said the Mayor, “like the guy who breaks up with a girl one night and the next day sees her in the arms of some other guy”.

It was both a shock and a profound disappointment to everyone.  One wonders why we did not see this coming.

Fielding raised the bar said the Mayor in his remarks and Fielding certainly did that.  The problem was that he didn’t stick around long enough to get his team to the point where they could get over that bar day in and day out.  Budget time in 2015 is going to have more than the usual bumps in the road.

City manager Jeff Fielding: About to put his stamp on the way the city has to be run.

Former city manager Jeff Fielding was strong enough to wear his emotions on his sleeve.  Made a difference while he was here.

Fielding who is an exceptionally emotional man – came close to losing it when he spoke to the team that he led and explained that there are occasions when opportunities come along and you take them.  He added that his decision to move from London to Burlington was a family decision.  His wife works with the regional government and the two boys are attending Burlington schools.  Fielding took out a golf club membership – this was home.

The decision to move to Calgary was not, Fielding explained, a family decision.  He was going to Calgary on his own and would commute to be with his family.

Patrick Moyle

Pat Moyle, interim city manager, probably until NEXT June, brings years of experience in municipal government having served as Regional CAO and with the Association of Municipalities in Ontario. A steady hand during a period of change.

Scott Stewart was the “ying” to Fielding’s “yang”.  Fielding looked at things from the 30,000 foot level and could see beyond the horizon and relied on Stewart to execute on the decisions that were made.  The two were a remarkable team – the only good luck in all this for Burlington is that Fielding didn’t take Scott Stewart with him.

There are always complex reasons for changes made in one’s life.  Fielding was pretty sure that the move to Burlington would be the capstone of his career – but then the phone call from Calgary came and Fielding was unable to say no to an opportunity to return to the city where he once worked in the planning department.  There appears to be some unfinished business in Calgary that has cost Burlington the most dynamic and effective administrative leader we have seen for a long time.

Return to the Front page

Libel chill going around: local media appears to have removed air park articles from their web sites.

News 100 redBy Staff

May 18, 2014

Burlington, ON.

Since first publishing this piece there have been a significant number of responses that have come directly to the publisher in which readers set out their individual experiences in finding information about the air park on web sites; particularly the insidehalton web site.  It is evident now that with precise, targeted searches on the insidehalton web site a lot of editorial material can be found.  Readers of this article should read the following article as well

A committed reader and one of the more plugged in people in rural Burlington sent us the following:

“I have been tracking for any coverage on the Burlington Airpark / Airport on Metro Media site (Spec and insideHalton) for some time. This weekend, all past articles on the Airpark have disappeared (there used to be a number of articles), and the return message shows that no search result found. What gives?

What gives indeed.

The Air Park Inc., has been popping out libel notices faster than a very active female rabbit.  The Gazette has been served libel notices on three occasions; Vanesa Warren, a candidate for city council in ward 6, has been served with a libel notice as has one of the Directors of the Rural Burlington Greenbelt Coaltion.

The notice the Gazette got demanded that we – well let’s let the Air Park Inc., lawyers tell you what they wanted.

 mcm1llan

 Reply to the Attention of  Peter E.J. Wells Direct Line  416-307-4007

Fax      416-865-7048

Email Address            peter.wells@mcmillan.ca

Our File No.       228177

Date         April 16, 2014

 SERVED BY PROCESS SERVER

 Burlington Gazette 3142 Palmer Drive Burlington, Ontario L7M 1L4

 

Our Burlington Inc. 3142 Palmer Drive Burlington, Ontario L7M 1L4

Pepper Parr 3142 Palmer Drive, Burlington,  Ontario

L7M 1L4

Dear Sirs:


Certified Specialist

[Civil Litigation and Intellectual Property Law

(Patent•Traaemark•Copyright)]

 Re:       Burlington Airpark Inc. -Libel Notice to Burlington Gazette

 We are the solicitors for Burlington Airpark Inc., the operator of  the  Burlington  Executive Airport (collectively “Airport”). This letter is to serve as notice pursuant to s. 5(1) of the Libel and S!ander Act R.S .O. 1990 Chap. L.12.

Under    the    date    of    April     11,    2014    the     following     appeared     on    the    website h ttp://www.bur 1ingtongazette .ca/:

“Was it the cold winter that resulted in hundreds of dead fish floating on the pond of the Appleby Line property that is surrounded on three sides by the Air Park land fill or is the death of the fish the result of toxic and silt filled water now in the pond?

The argument as to whether the land fill was going to do any real damage has been simmering in the background.   Some (sic) testing was done but the

 A spring fed pond with hundreds of fish – normally. Today wasn’t a normal day on the Appleby Line property.

Hundreds of dead fish were floating on  the water this morning.

Ministry of the Environment got involved in a struggle over who was entitled to the information from their testing results -privacy issues came into play and the privacy officers at every level  of government seem to be taking the time they feel they needed to determine just who can see what.

The spring fed pond is yards away from a mountain of landfill that was never properly tested when it was dumped on the property.

Runoff from the landfill is now getting to the water table -dead fish are showing up in the pond.

Some of the evidence may have come to the surface – literally, for one resident. Hundreds of dead fish were found floating on her pond this morning . That pond is yards away from a 30 foot high pile of landfill that is in place in violation of the city’s site alteration bylaw.

The property owner advises that the Ministry of the Environment will be on her property later today to test for contamination in the pond.”

These publications are false and misleading in at least the following respects:

The soil was tested. Results to date in 2009 were reviewed by Region of Halton which reported to the City of Burlington: “The results for all criteria meet the Regional and Provincial standards (potable) as required in Table 2 of the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.”

The Airport is not contaminating the groundwater. Multiple tests  by  Environment Canada, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE”) and  Halton  Region  have shown no impact on groundwater.

When the City of Burlington reported the results of the Halton Region testing of wells on properties bordering the Airport in its Burlington Executive Airport Update #6- September 9, 2013: “On August 23, city staff were sent an email by the Region of Halton regarding testing of wells on several properties adjacent to the airport. The email indicated that the MOE and the Halton Region Health Department were working together to sample and analyze the drinking water wells of homes located immediately adjacent to where the fill was placed on the airport site. Well water samples were collected by MOE staff from two properties. The samples were being analyzed for inorganics, volatile organic compounds, polycyclic  aromatic hydrocarbons  and petroleum hydrocarbons.

Results of this testing were provided to the Health Department. The results were then compared to the health-based Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards and the Ministry of Environment Table 2 Brownfields standards. The Region has indicated that no exceedances were reported. These results have been shared with the property owners. Permission was given by these property owners for the Health Department to share the results with city staff.”

These results were also discussed at the Burlington Development and Infrastructure Committee meeting on September 9, 2013 where it was reported: “On to Environmental matters on page 3 -the well testing. You can see the correspondence that’s come in from your CEO over at the Region of Halton.  That work is being done in co operation with the health unit.  That’s flowing through the good Doctor Nosal, so the results will continue; they have been shared with the property owners and the Health Department and we’ll get that information as it comes forward. Nothing negative at this stage and that is not unusual to see that there isn’t anything negative that would migrate from the site and be into any wells anyway, at this stage.”

The publication was actuated by malice justifying an award of punitive or exemplary damages, in that you caused these words to be published knowing them to be untrue, or being reckless as to their truth.  In particular the Airport will rely on:

The publication of an article dated April 9 2014 reporting on the filing of nomination papers by Vanessa Warren. The article, when fairly read, is an endorsement of her candidacy. The article repeats earlier defamatory claims that the Airport was importing “toxic landfill” and was running an “unlicensed landfill  operation”.  Both  these allegations are untrue. The July 16, 2013 article in which these claims were made is still available on the Burlington Gazette website, and the Airport claims with respect to these statements as well having been made less than one year prior to April 11, 2014.

The Burlington Gazette reported on the testing of neighbouring wells on August 5, 2013. This report is also inaccurate in claiming that the Terrapex study established that any contaminants were migrating from the Airport property. Terrapex did not comment on off-site impacts as that was not part of the scope of work assigned to it by the City of Burlington. In addition, it bad not done any testing that would have been required to comment on off-site impacts. The August 5, 2013 article in which the false claim that the Terrapex report was evidence of off-site impacts by the Airport is still available on the Burlington Gazette website, and the Airport claims with respect to that statement as well, having been made less than one year prior to April 11, 2014.Nevertheless , as a result of the reports by the City as set out in paragraphs 3 and 4 above, you knew or ought to have known that the tests of neighbouring wells showed no adverse impact due to the Airport and that the City of Burlington had advised the community that there wasn’t anything negative that would migrate from the site and be in any wells anyway. The failure to report these results was selective reporting intended to maintain the fiction  that  the Airport land was adversely impacting the neighbours, when the tests specifically performed to determine whether that was so were to the contrary.

Our instructions are to pursue legal proceedings unless the defamatory statements in the articles of April 11, 2014, July 16, 2013 and August 5, 20I3 are retracted and a full and fair apology satisfactory to our clients is published in the same fashion and in an equally prominent way as the statements specified in this notice.

PEJW/ml

LEGAL 22224578.1

Full disclosure: Some of the document formatting may have been lost in the transfer of the document from its original format and we corrected a few of the typographical errors.

Warren with nomination papers

Vanessa Warren filing her nomination papers. She is one of five candidates running for the Council seat. Blair Lancaster, the incumbent has yet to file her papers.

Since when is it libelous to endorse a candidate for political office?  The Gazette wrote articles on most of the candidates who have filed nomination papers.  We sincerely hope they don’t take what we write as an endorsement.

The libel notice served on Vanessa Warren called for her to retract and apologize and all that stuff – which will be difficult because it appears that the Letter to the Editor in the Spectator that Vince Rossie wrote apparently no longer appears in the on-line version of the paper.

The Gazette reprinted that Spectator Letter to the Editor and commented on the differences between what appeared in the Spectator and what now appears on the Air Park Inc. web site.  We got served with a third libel notice.  We may not know everyone who got served with a libel notice: our count at this point is a total of five notices  to three people.  Legal counsel took exception to a photograph of Mr. Rossi that we added to the re-print of the letter.  Some graphic content is frequently added to editorial content to dress up the page.

Metroland - search page graphic

You might not find all you would expect to find in this media.

And less harassment would serve everyone.  Libel chill has been used by people who don’t want to be “in the news”.  That chill appears to have wafted its way over to Metrolandmedia, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Toronto Star.  They know better and should be ashamed of their behaviour.

 Background links:

That letter in the Spectator.

Judge puts his thumb print on air park agreement.

Where was the ward Councillor when all this was happening?

Return to the Front page