 By Staff
October 25, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
It was a quickie – took less than ten minutes that included a recorded vote.
City Council voted for the recommendation that came out of the Development and Infrastructure Standing Committee to not Approve the revised application the ADI Development Group put before the city last June.
This was the final step the city is able to take now that the matter is fully in the hands of the Ontario Municipal Board.
 Ward 2 Councillor Marianne Meed Ward said the proposed ADI Development group plans for the intersection of Martha Street and Lakeshore Road was over-development of the property and should not be permitted. The only person to speak to the motion was Councillor Marianne Meed Ward who said the proposal was an over-development of the site. She added that something would be built on the property but that “this wasn’t it”.
Councillors Sharman and Dennison did not attend the council meeting.
Whatever gets built on the property at the intersection of Martha Street and Lakeshore Road is now in the hands of the Ontario Municipal Board.
That Board is scheduled to meet on Thursday and Friday of this week for a pre-meeting that will clarify just what is going to be heard at the hearing scheduled for February of 2017
 Mayor Rick Goldring during the Monday Special Council meeting. The motion voted on yesterday was to endorse the staff recommendation to oppose amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law that would be required to permit the revised development proposal as outlined in this report for 374 and 380 Martha Street; and
Direct the City Solicitor and Director of Planning and Building to confirm Council’s opposition to the revised development proposal at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in this matter.
 By Staff
October 25th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
Local artist and newly appointed Co-President of the Burlington Fine Art Association, Vanessa Cress Lokos invites you to her exhibition, “Suspended.” Vanessa has a lengthy history with the Art Gallery of Burlington as a volunteer, staff and guild member.
The exhibit takes place October 29 – November 28, 2016; opening reception is Sunday November 6, 2:00 – 4:30 pm in the Fireside Lounge / 1333 Lakeshore Rd., Burlington, ON
 Suspended This body of work speaks to time and to all things suspended, literally and figuratively. Inspired by the diversity of landscape, it’s unnoticed details and the unexpected.
Primarily through the forgotten tradition of glaze oil painting, Vanessa explores luminous colour and depth. Whether derived from open air or first captured with a lens, these paintings compel the viewer to slow their pace and contemplate the beauty around us.
 Vanessa Cress Lokos Vanessa Cress Lokos obtained a BA with a Concentration in Visual Arts from the University of Ottawa. Her travels led her through Europe and eventually to Melbourne, Australia, where she continued to study art, exhibited and sold her work. Vanessa has also exhibited in Georgetown, Mississauga, Toronto, Waterdown, and juried exhibitions in Burlington and Hamilton. Vanessa is a member of a variety of art organizations including the Burlington Fine Arts Association and the Canadian Glaze Oil Society.
An Honourable Mention was awarded to Vanessa and members of the BFAA for a collaborative work at the Art Gallery of Burlington. Her work has been accepted and sold at several AGB live Art Auctions.
 By Pepper Parr
October 25th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
Should the Halton District School Board trustees decide that the Lester B. Pearson High School should be closed and its students asked to attend M.M. Robinson instead that would bring to an end a school that was created for the community more than forty years ago when the idea of a community school was considered important.
 Great way to get an idea as to just what the alphabet is for the nursery set. The Pearson school was made even more unique when a Co-op nursery program was included. That nursery now provides classes for close to 100 children.
There are morning and afternoon sessions in a setting that will be very very hard to replicate.
Fiona Wielhouwer, with a certificate that is the equivalent to the Canadian Early Childhood Education that she earned in the United Kingdom, is the supervisor who reports to a nine parent volunteer board. That board may have a very serious and perhaps daunting task ahead of them.
 Tucked in at the very back of the high school the nursery has a seperate entrance and a secure well outfitted playground. The nursery co-op was planned as part of a school that would serve the wider community. A school the size of Pearson would normally have two gymnasiums – Pearson has three. The intention right from the beginning was to make the space available to everyone in the community.
The nursery serves as a student placement location for those who think they might want to work in the childhood care field. It is also affiliated with both Sheridan and Mohawk colleges where Early Childhood courses are given.
Fiona Wielhouwer explains that the nursery uses an enquiry based approach to the care they give the children. “We aren’t a drop and run location – we work with the parents and prepare the children for the JK and SK classes they will move on to – during their time with us the children get used to the idea of being away from Mommy for short periods of time and they learn to mix with other children.
The nursery interacts with the high school but administratively it is a separate organization. We do get help from the IT people in the high school and when we need something from the shop people they work with us.
 Portables that were once necessary are now empty – a sign of the enrollment decline. As a community school it works. Pearson was never intended as a large high school. When enrollment exceeded the capacity a bunch of portables were stuck at the front of the school – they are now empty.
When the school was created it was intended as a “lab” school – a place where different ideas would be tested. The co-op nursery in a school has worked out very well. Some of that original thinking seems to have been forgotten and now it is a matter of numbers.
There are now parents who have their children in the nursery – there was a time when they were in the nursery and then attended the high school.
The city is said to have invested some money in the school when it was built and the belief is that the Region supports the nursery financially.
There was a time when there were community clubs in the school – the place was a real community hub – that too seems to have been given up on.
 Current Director of Education for the HDSB, Stuart Miller was once the vice principal at Pearson. The school is now set out as the preferred option of the board staff for closing – the current Director of Education Stuart Miller was once the Vice principal at the school and he knows what kind of a school it is – however, his job requires him to initiate the process of determining if a school should be closed when it falls below 65% of its capacity utilization.
It is now up to the trustees to determine of the school should close – and it is up to the parents to inform the trustees as to what they want.
For the children – this week is all about pumpkins – especially the ghost pumkins.
 By Staff
October 25th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
More public art.
 The public art painted on the King Road grade separation a number of years ago was done by Judy Mayer-Grieve and was reasonably well accepted. A new program through Burlington Public Art – the Park Marker Program will be drawing on the success of the Burlington Mural Project, which commissions local artists to create murals.
Additional detail on the mural project has been added to the end of this article.
 Teresa Seaton did the art work that is in Amherst Park park next to a community garden. The art has been tempered and will easily withstand the winter weather. The Park Marker Program will focus on public art sculpture.
This annual program will commission artists to create small-scale sculptures in neighbourhood parks throughout the city. These commissions are open exclusively to artists residing in Burlington, Ont. Applicants do not need previous public art and/or sculpture experience to apply to this program.
Applications are due Monday, December 12, 2016.
About the Park Marker Program
Applications for the 2016 program are now open! Please visit the Calls for Artists page to download the Request for Proposals and access the online application system.
There will be a workshop on Saturday, November 12, 2016, Time: 11:30 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. at the Central Library, Holland Room, 2331 New Street that will give you helpful insight into planning your project and preparing a great submission that will get you noticed by the jury.
The workshop will start with a brief overview of the Park Marker program and 2016/17 projects followed by a session led by artist Matthew Walker. Matthew will give helpful tips and tricks on preparing your submission and the steps you need to take to conceptualize your project. Following a brief break, public art fabricator Mike Bilyk will lead a session exploring material choices for outdoor sculpture and pointers on working with a fabricator.
This workshop is FREE and lunch will be provided. Please RSVP by Tuesday November 8th by visiting https://parkmarker.eventbrite.com
Workshop Facilitators
Matthew Walker: Matthew Walker is a Hamilton artist whose sculpture-based practice incorporates diverse technical approaches to object-making in public spaces. He has been involved in the production of public art in a range of capacities, including designing public calls, adjudication, receiving commissions, and engaging with other artists in the field as a technical mentor and advisor. For over a decades and a half, Matthew’s work as a facilitator has exposed him to a diversity of practices and conceptual approaches to art making that reflect the expansive experiences that are possible in the creation of public work.
During this workshop Matthew will provide insight into the processes behind the commissioning of artwork. How are calls for public art designed? How does the commissioning process take shape? What are some of the criteria that are considered when assessing a submission? Emerging artists seeking to enter the field of public art will find this discussion useful as they reflect on what approaches they may take in designing their work for public space, and, how to prepare an application.
Matthew’s current and previous work experiences includes being a member of The Town of Banff’s Public Art Committee, Supercrawl’s Curatorial Committee and as the Sculpture Facilitator at the Banff Centre’s international residency program. Matthew is currently working on a public commission for Artfarms in Buffalo, NY. You can look at what this artist does at – https://matthewwalkersculpture.carbonmade.com
Mike Bilyk is the President of Lafontaine Ironwerks, a custom metal fabrication and installation company located in Tiny, Ontario. Over the past 16 years, Lafontaine Ironwerks have developed a unique specialty in working with artists to develop and deliver complex public art projects. Mike and his team have worked with numerous internationally renowned artists including: Douglas Coupland, Michel DeBroin, John McEwan and Vito Acconci. Lafontaine Ironwerks works closely with artists from concept through to finished product to ensure the utmost in quality, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
For this workshop, Mike will give workshop participants a behind-the-scenes look into some of the large-scale projects produced by Lafontaine Ironwerks. Mike will also cover material choices and installation techniques for outdoor public art sculpture as well as helpful tips and tricks to consider when working with a fabricator.
https://www.liwi.ca
One-on-one Application Review Sessions: November 30, 2016, Times: 1 to 4 p.m. and 5 to 7 p.m.*
Location: Burlington City Hall (426 Brant St.)
Artists preparing a submission to the Park Marker program may book a 30-minute session with the Public Art Manager to review a draft of their application package and get constructive feedback.
Attendance is optional and appointments must be booked in advance. To book an appointment please contact: Kim Selman, kim@cobaltconnects.ca or 905-548-0111
The first round of public art was a collection of paintings in public places. The city’s public art adviser ran a juried competition and the following six people were selected:
 Tamara Kwapich did the mural in Orchard Community Park; once the location for some of the best apple orchards in the province. • Judy Mayer-Grieve: King Road Underpass, Ward 1
• Claire Hall: Freeman Station, Ward 2
• Teresa Seaton: Amherst Park, Ward 3
• Hannah Sell and Liam Racine: Port Nelson Park, Ward 4
• Tamara Kwapich: Orchard Community Park, Ward 5
• Donna Grandin: Ireland Park, Ward 6
 Hannah Sell and Liam Racine did the art work that is located in the small Port Nelson Park where it will be seen by thousands. There was a time when tonnes of timber was shipped from a wharf at the foot of the park.
 By Staff
October 25th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
We ran a piece a number of weeks ago about the high number of traffic tickets handed out in the Waterdown Road part of the city. The reaction from our readers was interesting.
The work the police are doing isn’t going to end – Halton Regional Police officers from 30 Division have been running two traffic initiatives across the City of Burlington throughout 2016.
 Operation RISC (Reducing Intersection Safety Concerns) has been in effect since 2015 by officers from 30 Division, in order to maximize police visibility and increase the public’s perception of safety while driving.
Collisions at intersections have a high risk potential of serious injuries or even death, making intersection safety a priority for the Halton Regional Police. The most common contributing factors are inattentiveness, distracted driving (cell phone use), failing to yield, driving too fast for road conditions, following too closely and disobeying traffic light signals.
The Halton Regional Police have also continued the Residential Traffic/Stop Sign/Speeding (RTSS) Initiative in order to deliver a clear message to drivers that our residential roads are not raceways. This traffic safety initiative was designed to increase compliance of stop signs. Police have utilized education and enforcement strategies throughout 2016 in order to reduce the speeds of vehicles travelling on residential roadways and to promote safer driving habits.
During the first 9 months of 2016, officers in Burlington conducted 8,137 traffic stops, issued 7,937 Provincial Offences Notices and handed out more than 400 warnings to drivers. Furthermore, Halton Police spent a total of 3,167 hours dedicated to these 2 initiatives throughout Burlington.
Police will continue to focus their efforts on intersections that pose a higher risk to the public based on past collision analytic data. “Accidents can be prevented if all drivers slowed down and were less distracted behind the wheel,” said Sgt. Jared McLeod, District Response Unit.
Halton Regional Police is committed to reducing motor vehicle collisions in an effort to provide a safer community. Halton Regional Police is further committed to reducing dangerous and aggressive driving behaviours that put all road users at risk. Operation RISC and Residential Traffic/Stop Sign/Speeding (RTSS) will continue throughout the City of Burlington.
If any citizen would like to report a traffic concern they can do so by visiting the HRPS website and submitting an online traffic complaint:
https://www.haltonpolice.ca/services/reporting/trafficcomplaints.php
 By Pepper Parr
October 25th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
There is an Ontario Arts Council workshop where valuable guidance on applying to the OAC’s Visual Artists grants program for individual artists is available. They can answer any questions you may have about applying for funding.
 Taking place at Hamilton Artists Inc., 155 James Street North, Hamilton, Ontario. Attendance is free but registration in advance is requested by Wednesday November 2 at 5:00pm.
It is being put on by the Hamilton Arts Council Visual Arts Committee – no reason why someone from Burlington can’t attend.
There is also the November 22 deadline of the Visual Artists: Emerging program is one of the few OAC programs selected as a pilot for a new online grant application system. This session will highlight some of the changes artists will see online, and provide some information on further Visual Arts program updates coming up in 2017.
To learn more about these upcoming changes, visit https://www.arts.on.ca/Page6375.aspx
Attendance is free but registration in advance is requested by Wednesday November 2 at 5:00pm.
 By Don Graves
October 26, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
I’ve been painting landscapes for the past 20 years. Prior to that I served as the Dean of Art at Sheridan College and later as the Dean of Art and Business at George Brown College. Incongruous as that sounds, art is a business and business certainly includes art.
 Don Graves – showing a piece of art to a potential client – they bought. My quick guide to buying art: if you see something that draws you in, something that ‘speaks to you’, a piece that has triggered your imagination… then you’re establishing a relationship with an artist and their work. I buy art from the person who created it. This isn’t full proof, it just works for me.
Where can you see and purchase fine art and fine craft?
• An art gallery. Big, small, located in major urban centres, nestled in seasonal tourist locations.
• The artist’s home studio and website. And the new variation, the gallery-studio.
• The auction—big time, fast paced, frenzied six-seven figure bidding down to small local silent auctions for good cause fund raising.
• The local art show-tour: one of the best, informal sources for art in homes or offices.
I’ve done all of the above and here’s why the local art show and local studio tour is my go-to choice.
 Don Graves – expounding on what art is all about. Understanding the business of buying art.
1. Artist cost: rent, paint, frames, brushes, website… and commission that can reach 50% and higher. (For an artist to recover $500.00, a gallery price hits at least $1000.00). Art shows and studio tours charge a contained rental fee. Like most artists, I want to see my work on your walls and art shows make that affordable for the artist and the buyer.
2. I want to meet you, talk about art, listen to you, and perhaps even paint. An informal atmosphere, with a coffee, is ideal.
3. What is art worth? Such a loaded word…worth. In the final analysis it is worth what someone will pay for it. A local show-tour offers the most purchase flexibility: prices with no jumbo-sized commissions, a reasonable price with payment terms.
4. “Damn, it’s sold. Look for it…and act.” The art show is an ideal place for that. I’m not suggesting buy in haste, repent at leisure. I am saying, buying art is based on what moves you, captures your imagination. A buyer needs to listen to their soul and act. I’ve had one buyer in 3 years come back to me saying they’d made a mistake. Do I want a painting on a wall where it is not wanted? I know few artists who do. I took the painting back and the buyer chose another piece.
The Burlington Studio tour is a unique opportunity. A studio tour is a rare opportunity to glimpse inside a working studio, a bit like my second choice on where to buy. You are where the action is, be it wood turning, painting, stained glass, jewellery, pottery. All fine art and fine craft, individually designed and created.
The 2016 Art in Action tour takes place November 5th and 6th.
 A collection of Graves’ art displayed in the Fireside Room at the Art Gallery of Burlington. Burlington is home to two exciting variations on this theme. Teresa Seaton’s Stained Glass studio and gallery and Gallery 2, with painters Anne Moore, Cheryl Goldring and Don Graves plus guests. The art of creation open to you…from inspiration, design, sketch, create to sell.
A closing thought; An art show-tour is a mix and mingle recipe. Couples, families, artists, location, fresh air, funky food…something special happens.
 By Pepper Parr
October 25, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
There is a team of four people, Dania Thurman, Michael Kukhta, Lynn Crosby and David Sykes, who rely heavily on parents from Central High School that are putting together the argument for keeping Central High open.
 At a Central high school parents meting they identified some of the issues that needed to be researched. At their most recent strategy – planning meeting, they wrote out a list of topics they need to research to make their case for keeping the high school open.
The topics have been assigned to different attendees at the meeting who volunteered to look at them. The leadership team believes there are many more “out there” who can also help out with the research and who might have additional topics that need to be researched.
Set out below are the topics they have identified. They expect that as the research work progresses some will naturally merge with others. If anyone has any information, articles or research on one of these topics (or any other) to share with the group as a whole, send it along to them at: info@centralstrong.ca If you would like to add your name to one of the topics and be connected with the person doing it please email them so introductions can be made.
What will they do with this research? They want to ensure that their trustees on the PAR Committee have it, so they can present it and use it at the committee meetings and use it in letters to the committee during the public input sessions.
People can use any of this research to present at the 5-minute “public delegation” sessions to the trustees that are scheduled for April 18, 2017 and any other meetings where delegations are allowed. Their objective is to convince trustees that closing Central is not the best option.
 The trustees will make the final decision next May. Parents are going to have to work with their trustees and convince them of the merits of the arguments they put forward. “It is important that Trustees receive letters on any of these topics or other factors you feel will make an impact. Simply explaining your own personal thoughts on why Central is so important to you and your family is also very important, ” suggested the team leaders.
The Program Accommodation Review (PAR) process begins officially on December 1 with an orientation session that will take place in each high school.
Tuesday, November 1, 2016 Robert Bateman HS 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm
Tuesday, November 1, 2016 Nelson HS 7:30 pm – 8:00 pm
Thursday, November 3, 2016 Aldershot HS 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm
Thursday, November 3, 2016 Burlington Central HS 7:30 pm – 8:00 pm
Monday, November 14, 2016 Lester B. Pearson HS 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm
Monday, November 14, 2016 M.M. Robinson HS 7:30 pm – 8:00 pm
Tuesday, November 15, 2016 Dr. Frank J. Hayden SS 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm
These is just orientation sessions – there will be no Q&A. Just the facts as the HDSB sees it all.
The first public meeting is on December 8.
The PAR Committee (with two representatives) will work through January, February and March.
A second public meeting will be held on March 2.
The Director will then prepare a report with all of the compiled feedback.
April 18 will be another public delegation night.
The BCHS parent group wants to see a big turnout of supporters at all of the public sessions. The final report will be presented to the Board of Trustees on May 3 and they will vote on it on May 17.
The BCHS goal is to show the Board why their recommended option is the wrong one.
Here are the topics the BCHS parents are going to research. The list may expand and some of the topics may merge.
 Some of the issues to be looked into that came out of a BCHS parent meeting. – Accessibility issues – Cheryl
– Partnerships – Shawna
– School Profiles (SIPs) – Maureen – this is a vital one and Maureen will likely need group input with this
– Transportation/bussing – Kevin
– Benefits of small schools – Heather
– City Strategic plan – Marianne
– Urban Growth Centre – Marianne
– Data collection/missing data/incorrect data – Mike Matich
– History of BCHS – Deborah and Lynn
– Market Share of Students – Deborah and Lynn
– Impact on 7/8 Students – Theresa and Dania
– Number of Seats Available vs. used – data – Stacey
– Socioeconomic Impact – Dania and Paul
– Alternate Options – Emil
– Fundraising/Alumni Support (compared to other schools) – Theresa and Laura
– The Process – Josie, Allison
– Appeal Process – Mike, Allison
– Ministry Funding Formula – Josie, Lynn and Deborah
– Special Programs at BCHS – Courtney and Karen
– Projected Numbers/Data – Andrew
– Costs/Capital – Phil and Todd
– Challenging Board Assumptions – Josie (other research on other topics will feed into this)
Other topics that should be considered as recommended by Terry Ruf and others include:
– Catholic Board PAR/LTAP interaction
– Strengths of Grade 7-12 schools
– Advantages of unified cohorts coming from feeder schools
There were 19 options identified. The Board staff chose to go forward with Option 19 however the PARC is free to use any other option or a mix of several options. The options were possibilities as the board staff saw things.
Option 13 makes a statement about unified cohorts, acknowledging this advantage, yet Option 19 will see split cohorts coming out of Central Public and Tom Thompson (depending what happens to the 7/8) as well as FI students from Pineland
 A Tim Hortons is considered part of a “complete community” Should the high school actually close – the revenue stream at this Tim Hortons is going to take a big hit. – Community School culture – Terry Ruf sees this in Central but is not sure all the high schools has what Central has. Central is suffering from some tunnel vision on this one. Pearson has a culture every bit as rich as Central.
– Central does have a unique configuration its Jk to graduation is unique. Does it limit the horizons of a student who does every day of their public school education in one location?
There is a lot of work to be done – and the parents at Central are well into it.
 The parents at Pearson have begun their work – they do have some catching up to do and they do have a very unique situation to deal with: – The Co-op nursery that has been part of that school for more than 40 years which the Gazette will report on.
 By Pepper Parr
October 24th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
A Fable…
Some thought it was a difficult decision to make – others thought the decision shouldn’t have been made at all – but it was too late for that.
The event was going to take place and the best they could all do was duck.
They were all basically decent people who lived in a prosperous community close to an international city. Geography had blessed them all. The land to the north wasn’t mountainous but there were nice rises of land in one part of the city with a fresh water lake at the southern edge.
The local hospital was the biggest employer. The wealthiest people tended to do their business in a city less than an hour away.
The city had its share of service clubs; it had the marks of the early stages of a local culture.
It once had a rich rural, cash crop history that tended to get forgotten.
And it had a number of very successful people who would, when pressed, write large cheques that their accountants and tax advisors assured them came with good tax benefits.
It was a community that held several galas that raised funds for the usual causes: poverty, mental health and youth that were in conflict with society.
Its local political leadership was what it was – not sterling but not corrupt. From time to time they made expensive mistakes but for the most part the rate payers were a forgiving lot.
Significant wealth tends to work its way towards philanthropy – those who have more than they are ever going to spend get known for the practice of writing large cheques – with the attendant tax benefits.
Once one philanthropist has been named – the challenge is to find others. And if the practice is to name a philanthropist every year – it can become a challenge. Sometimes the committee that is tasked with finding that person gets it perfect – on other occasions – well it doesn’t work out all that well.
A name is put forward – the person certainly has the funds – now to get them to give it to you. The name is a prominent one. The process of making contact and then doing the ask goes well enough. The funds are agreed upon and the prominent person agrees to let his or her name stand.
And another philanthropist is locked down.
Then the news stories come to the surface. The chair of the organization says he didn’t know. Ohers knew but thought it was low key enough to slide by. And they all cross their fingers and hope nothing will be said.
The question that gets asked is – which is the more important: a set of social values or coming up with a prominent name and a successful fund raising event ?
It depends on how tightly you want to hold your nose.
Prominent people with colourful backgrounds or questionable business dealings get fondly remembered when there is a tombstone with their name on it. They become part of the folk lore of the community – and people who never even saw the person will tell you of the conversations they used to have with the now deceased.
It is when the behavior is recent, still ongoing, perhaps still before the courts, that it gets awkward. Who knew ask the members of the committee – and now that they do know – what do they do?
Duck and hope no one raises the awkward question? Or look for a way to suggest to the nominee that he or she might find a passable reason to have to decline. The cheque will still be in the mail – but the name won’t get used.
Is there a lesson learned?
Who in a society sets the social values? There was a time when there were churches on many street corners that were well attended and the clergy set the tone. Or there was a citizen of exceptional standing who was a truly decent person who put city before self.
They are out there – just hard to find one every year to name as the philanthropist.
Perhaps the definition of philanthropy should be broadened to include people who are not wealthy
This group chose to duck – unfortunate.
By Pepper Parr
October 24, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
Vince Molinaro, president of the Molinaro Group had a bunch of people over for lunch last week – 40 of them to be exact – mostly fellow developers who can pack a lunch, if you know what I mean.
They were on an Ontario Home Builders Association tour of developments that were part of what have come to be known as hubs – places where different forms of transportation come together: Go trains and buses, transit, cars, bicycles and those who choose to walk.
 Burlington has identified four different locations for mobility hubs. while they haven’t officially determined which location they will start with the Molinaro Group has started construction on their five building Paradigm project. Municipalities are looking at the idea of making these hopes the focus of development opportunities.
Burlington has identified four such hubs.
While the city was doing its identification thing – the Molinaro group was digging a big hole in the ground and are not at the tenth floor of the west building of what is going to be a five structure project with an average height of 20 storeys just a bit over a stone’s throw from the GO station on Fairview east of Brant Street
 The West tower of the five building Paradigm project has reached the tenth floor level. They are at the 85% SOLD level on two of the five towers that will average 20 storeys each. The association says the population of the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area is expected to reach more than 10 million by 2041, and most of the growth — 79 per cent — will take place outside Toronto: in York, Durham, Peel, Halton and Hamilton.
This is a “historic moment for city building,” the association says, with an anticipated $32 billion in rapid transit expenditures over the next 10 to 15 years.
The 40 developers, members of the association and other interested people set off on a daylong excursion last Thursday that started in Port Credit before heading to Paradigm Condos adjacent to the Burlington GO station. From there, they continued to Hamilton’s West Harbour.
 Vince Molinaro – president of the Molinaro Group and a former president of the Ontario Home Builders Association Molinaro, whose Molinaro Group is the developer of the Burlington condominium project, says mobility hubs around GO stations are rich with possibilities but bring unique challenges.
A mobility hub is a term used to describe housing and commercial intensification around transportation nodes, such as GO stations. It creates opportunities for commuters to get around without relying on automobiles. The hubs are seen as a way to help with gridlock.
Molinaro says the municipal government in Burlington has been supportive of his project because the developer and city planners are on the same page when it comes to housing intensification. But with the development being so close to the railway tracks, his company has had to deal with numerous requirements from CN.
We had to construct a five-foot-thick, concrete wall between the tracks and the towers to help protect residents in case of a derailment.
 That is a five foot thick concrete crash wall that the railway authorities required between the development and the railway tracks. The track also required a 30-metre easement that cannot be used for residential space. More liability insurance was required than normal because of the five-tower project’s proximity to the tracks. Rather than $10 million, they needed $100 million.
Despite all of that, he says, the development is proceeding well. Construction on the west tower has reached the 10th floor, and a late summer opening is planned for next year. Work has also started on two other towers.
About 85 per cent of the units in the first two towers have been sold, Molinaro says. The buildings vary in height, but average 20 storeys. The final two to be built will have commercial and office space along with residential.
 By Pepper Parr
October 24th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
Would a Tour of homes, beautifully decorated for the holiday season be complete without something in Roseland?
The Hamilton Burlington Junior League has included a beautiful, older home, typical of the Roseland neighbourhood in the tour this year.
 One of the homes that makes Roseland the community it is – this is not one of the homes on the tour. You need to buy a ticket to learn where you will be going. The 5500 sq. ft house has been renovated to have all of the modern amenities but has kept the character of the original house.
The home is the largest one on the tour this year. It is very unique, in that the renovation and the decorating are both being done, in conjunction with the homeowners, by one decorator/builder. Marnie Warman of Interior Design House and her team at IDH Build group have worked with the homeowners to renovate this beautiful home.
Traditionally Junior League Home Tours have involved several decorators.
The main floor is open concept, featuring a beautiful kitchen-great room combination with two islands, allowing ease of preparation and serving when entertaining a larger group. It also allows everyone to be able to move around without feeling that they are missing out on another part of the party. The other important feature of this home is the completely renovated master suite that has been added over the garage. This space will give the parents a beautiful place to relax and escape to at the end of the day.
Putting together this annual Junior League event calls for a level of organization that is handled by co-chairs Diane Brown and Iris Hughes. Each house is assigned a team of “reps” that makes sure everything comes together; that the home owner is fully involved and that the different decorators are coordinated so that everything is the way they all wanted it to look like when the doors are opened to the public.
 From the left: Fonda Loft, Anne-Louise Watts and Emily Stewart. The reps for the Roseland Home are Fonda Loft, Anne-Louise Watts and Emily Stewart.
Tickets are available online for $25 each. CLICK HERE to get to the ticket ordering location.
There are opportunities to help out. If you think the Junior League is something that might interest you – tip your toe in the water and give Diane Brown a call at- divinepresents@gmail.com – – she would love to talk to you.
By Staff
October 24, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
It is that time of year again – needle in the arm. The province is reminding people to protect themselves and get their flu shot.
The free flu vaccine will be available in Ontario starting this week, so that people can better protect themselves against the flu virus and stay healthy.
 Burlington MPP Eleanor McMahon, and now Minister of Tourism, Sport and Culture getting her flu shot last year. The vaccine will be available at doctor’s offices, local public health units and community immunization clinics. Anyone five years of age and older can also be vaccinated for free by trained pharmacists at approximately 2,600 pharmacies across the province.
Influenza is a serious respiratory infection that can lead to hospitalization and even death. It’s important to get the flu shot every year to protect yourself, and those around you. Children under five, pregnant women and seniors are especially at risk of getting seriously ill from the flu. The vaccine is very safe and helps to protect against the most common strains of the virus.
People are also reminded to take everyday measures to protect themselves from the flu:
• Clean your hands often with soap and water or use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer
• Cough and sneeze into a tissue or your sleeve, not your hand
• Clean and disinfect surfaces often, such as countertops, telephones and keyboards; flu viruses can live on surfaces for up to eight hours
In 2015-16, approximately 2,500 participating pharmacies administered more than 869,000 doses of publicly funded influenza vaccine.
The flu vaccine is offered free of charge to anyone over the age of six months who either lives, works, or goes to school in Ontario.
Children and youth between the ages of five and 17 years can get the flu vaccine as an injection or nasal spray at a health care provider’s office, local public health unit or at a participating pharmacy.
Kids under five years of age must get the flu vaccine at a health care provider’s office or participating public health unit.
 Former Burlington MPP Jane McKenna got her annual flu shot from Anita Sahu at the Rexall Pharmacy on Guelph Line. A number of years ago when this program was introduced the Gazette went along to one of the pharmacies giving the free flu shots. Jane McKenna was the MPP at the time. when she arrived at the pharmacy she said hello and asked why I was there and I said I was going to take a picture of her getting her flue shot. “You know they put the needle into your bum – don’t you – and that’s the picture I want. McKenna’s jaw dropped but her daughter, who was with her took the fun out of the comment when she said: “Mom – he’s pulling your leg.”
By Pepper Parr
October 24th, 2106
BURLINGTON, ON
Last week city council voted to receive a report from the Planning department that had advised that the most recent ADI Development Group proposal for the property they want to develop at the intersection of Martha Street and Lakeshore Road should not be accepted. The controversial project is being marketed as an upscale development to be known as Nautique.
This development has an almost sordid history and, as the Mayor said during the debate, “it is not the way Burlington wants to do business”.
Back when ADI first presented their proposal it was for a 28 story structure on a very small lot.
Everyone was up in arms – the application was submitted to the city which had 180 days to render a decision on the application for the zoning and Official Plan changes ADI was asking for.
Oddly enough – and no one has ever explained why – the city failed to deliver a decision within the 180 day time frame – which allowed ADI to take their case to the OMB – which is exactly what they did.
When the case got to the OMB ADI again did something considerably different. They asked the OMB to adjourn the hearing while they re-submitted their application because they had purchased an abutting piece of land that allowed them to come back with something different.
 The lot identified as 380 was added to the land assembled. Many thought this would make the development a little easier to accept – the developer added 48 units to their application. Most people thought ADI would come back with a smaller development – something that would perhaps satisfy enough people to get council to accept the project.
That isn’t what ADI did – their revised project did lower the height by two floors but they added an additional 48 units.
That was a little like rubbing salt into a wound.
The revised proposal that included the small piece of property to the north of the site is as follows:
 The project has gone through several design changes. This is believed to be the most recent. – An increase in the area of the development site from 1,359 m2 to 1,701 m2
– An increase in the unit count from 192 residential units to 240 residential units
– An increase in Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from 11.1 to 11.26
– The elimination of above ground parking in favour of residential units
– An increase in underground parking from 4 levels to 6 levels
– An increase in indoor amenity area of 435 m2 from 428 m2 and an increase in outdoor amenity area of 693 m2 from 493 m2
– An increase in vehicle parking spaces to 241 spaces from 196 (300 spaces are required by the Zoning By-law); and
– An increase in ground floor retail space to 423.2 m2 from 327 m2.xx
This is what is going before the OMB this week – not to be argued but to figure out what the February 2017 full hearing is going to be over – recall that the reason this all went to the OMB is because ADI had claimed the city didn’t process their application within the prescribed 180 days.
The cheek of it all.
Now it was back before the OMB.
There is a hearing on Thursday and Friday of this week; it will be what they call a “pre-hearing” which is to settle just what the issues are and get some sense as to how much time is going to be needed to hear the case. Up to ten days is the estimate at this point. That full hearing is scheduled for February 2017, but that could change.
At this point whatever decision is going to be made is no longer in the hands of the city.
The Planning department has done everything they could be expected to do. Councillor Blair Lancaster told the public that the planning department tried to negotiate with the developer. They couldn’t reach an agreement.
During the delegations that took place last week five people spoke.
 Gary Scobie Gary Scobie said using the intensification argument has become a “race to the sky”. He suggested in his presentation that the developers approach has been to push the envelope as much as possible and then later settle for something less – which Scobie thought would come in at 18 storeys; which coincidently is what a prominent developer in the city has said was what ADI needed to make any money.
It is impossible to know how much ADI will make on this project – what is known to some degree is how much they are spending. The advertising and marketing expenses are considerable. At one point real estate brokers were being offered a commission of 4% on each unit sold.
 Tom Muir Tom Muir, who has delegated at city council when Councillors Taylor and Dennison were newcomers, said there was a time when council would tell him that there were a lot of problems but that when the growth took place the money to fix the problems would be there and the work would get done but that could only happen if we grow.
The problem Muir pointed out is that the future never happens – we are in a bigger mess now than we were before. You make it all worse at a ridiculous cost.
Earlier in his presentation Muir pointed out that the city was designed around the car. The city isn’t going to build any more roads and so intensification is the route to go or that is what they keep telling us. Intensification, which has yet to be fully defined, is the story every developer brings to the city.
Whatever density is – this project will be the most dense in the city.
This city has a fundamental question to answer said Muir – do we want tall building and what is tall enough?
Muir pointed out that when ADI asked for time to submit a new design at the last OMB hearing many thought we would see a smaller project. Instead they added 48 more units which Muir calculated would add $20 million to the revenue side of the project,
Dee Dee Davies a part of a waterfront group said she thought the Bridgewater project that was approved decades ago was a bad precedent and went on to say that developers own the downtown.
She said what the public wants is a walkable city with a human scale where there is sunshine on the streets at times other than just the noon day.
 Dana Anderson Dana Anderson, a consultant for the owners of 395 Martha, known as Martha Terrace, a 12 story tower built by the Molinaro people for the Sun Life Insurance Company, said most of the changes increase the impact of the development on the community. She believed the site should be developed with something that fits into the community – she didn’t think the proposal fit.
James Taylor who was a “walk on” delegation who said the structure would be catastrophic. He told Council “you have the ball at your feet – keep these developers under control. He thought 10 to 12 storeys would be pleasing.
“Hopefully you will do the right thing”.
 19 storey structure seems to be what Councillor Dennison is prepared to accept. The problem was no one was able to say just what that “right thing” was. Then Councillor Dennison asked Mr. Taylor how high the building on Lakeshore at the foot of Torrance was – no one in the room had the answer. 19 storeys. You knew where Jack was coming from and he now had that height on the record.
Once can be certain that his comment, as a Councillor with 20 years + experience will be put forward at the OMB hearing.
Mayor Golding said Council was hopeful that discussions with the ADI people would produce a comprise the city could live with. “Clearly that has not been the case” he said then added – that “this is not the end.
It seems it is the end as far as your city council is concerned. Something will come out of the OMB hearing and the city will have to live with whatever that is.
 Bridgewater project currently being built will consist of a 22 storey condominium and eight storey hotel and a smaller seven story condominium. By the time there is a decision the Bridgewater development on the other side of Lakeshore road will be close to opening.
The public just might see what ADI wanted to do with a different set of eyes.
By Pepper Parr
October 23rd, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
With a modified corporate name the Burlington Foundation held its annual gala, Share to Care, Saturday night at the Performing Arts Centre and took a “Marche” dining approach. No tables, there were what appeared to be organized collections of people in the Mezzanine/balcony areas.
 The picture is worth the thousand words. The gowns that were good were stunning. When the women in the city decide to show it off – they do a great job. It is no longer socially acceptable for men to comment on how stunning some women look – so we will leave it at that.
The Foundation uses the gala to raise their operating funds and manage the numerous endowments they have to do the fine work they have done and will undoubtedly continue to do.
They were responsible for raising the profile of mental health in the community and deserve credit for doing what no one else was prepared to take a chance on.
There are hundreds of not-for-profit groups in this city who are able to do their work to some degree because of the funding they have gotten from the Foundation in the past.
The Burlington Community Fund grants to the pressing needs in Burlington, with a current focus on poverty, youth and mental health. This unrestricted endowed fund responds to grant applications received from local charitable organizations.
 The Sold Out crowd made a night of it. During fiscal 2015-16 the Foundation made 14 grants that ranged from $1500 to $20,000.
When push comes to shove and there is a hard job, a really hard job that has to be done with no time to dither – it is the Foundation that gets the call. They in turn make the calls to the people they know will produce.
The response to that flood in 2014 is a sparking example as to just how effective a soundly run community organization can be. This newspaper still doesn’t understand why they took the word community out of their name – but with the track record they have – they can do whatever they like.
 That is a Jean Belliveau sweater. The Silent Auction tables were full enough – there was a Montreal Canadiens hockey sweater with the late Jean Belliveau’s number on it – worth whatever someone paid for it.
The sold out crowd appeared to enjoy themselves Saturday night. The DJ providing the music had a great selection – but this reporter didn’t see anyone dancing – well – this is Burlington.
The opportunity to network, get caught up with people they may have lost touch with and then take in some first class entertainment when Allan Doyle and The Beautiful Gypsies performed in the Main Theatre made it a fine evening.
By Pepper Parr
October 23, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
Here we go again.
The Burlington Air Park appeal of a Superior Court decision handed down June 30, 2016 that found in favour of the City of Burlington is scheduled to be heard by the Ontario Court of Appeal on March 28, 2017 at Osgoode Hall, in Toronto.
 Truck load after truck load was dumped on the air park property without site plan approval. What will the Appeal Court have to say and will that be the end of this story? On June 30, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled in favour of the City of Burlington’s application to compel Burlington Airpark Inc. to submit an application for a site alteration permit to comply with the city’s bylaw. With the court ruling, the Airpark was required to file an application for a site alteration permit for the fill deposited between 2008 and 2013 before Aug. 31, 2016 and was also ordered to pay the city’s court costs.
The Air Park has submitted a site plan that has yet to be approved.
 Dumped on the land illegally the neighbour wonders if the landfill will ever be removed. The City of Burlington site alteration bylaw 64-2014 regulates the placing, dumping, cutting and removal of fill or the alteration of grades or drainage on a piece of land. Individuals doing this type of work must first submit an application to the city for a site alteration permit.
By Pepper Parr
October 21, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
For the parents at Lester B. Pearson high school the thought of their school closing is a tough one.
Many parents wanted their children to attend a small school and moved into the neighbourhood for just that reason.
Some talk about actually moving out of the community or “we will send our kids to St. John”, which is the local Catholic school.
Another parents, who asked not to be identified said she did not want her kids “going to the pharmacy”, which was code for a school with a drug problem.
 Trustee Richelle Papin During the Board of Education discussion about Lester B. Pearson (LBP) trustee Richelle Papin talked about the Nursery Program in the school that has been in place for more than forty years that has become a model and a training ground for students from Mohawk who expect to work in the child care field.
The Halton District School Board is acutely aware that they face a serious situation where, as Director of Education Stuart Miller put it – “Students will begin voting with their feet and we will lose even more students”.
All the feelings and concerns don’t change the facts – Burlington has too much high school capacity. There are 1800 high school student seats that the Board can’t fill.
Yes, there is some intensification taking place but condominiums are being built and they tend not to house families with several children. Add to that – the population growth has been north of the QEW and the high school capacity is south of the QEW.
The Board of Education staff set out 19 possible options – and recommended what is referred to as option 19 – which proposes that:
• Close Lester B. Pearson HS, and redirect students to M.M. Robinson HS
• Close Burlington Central HS and redirect students to Aldershot HS and Nelson HS
• Change Dr. Frank J. Hayden SS boundary and programming.
 Hayden High school, Burlington’s newest already has portable classrooms and spotty WiFi service as well. This recommendation is not a final decision of the Board of Trustees, but a starting point for consultation.
Stuart Miller, Director of Education said: “I want to stress that the recommended option is the starting point for the Program Accommodation Review (PAR) process.” “With feedback from the public, and the research and work of the PAR committee, a different solution could arise as a result of this process.”
Initial information sessions will be held to provide communities with further information about the PAR process and rationale for why the Board is undertaking a PAR for Burlington secondary schools. These sessions will be ‘information only’. There will be no question and answer opportunity at these initial sessions.
There is a massive amount of data and detail the public will need to think through the alternatives.
 Parents looking over the agenda for a Board of Education meeting. Parents are now in the process of setting up what will be called PARC (Program Accommodation Review Committees) that will work through everything and give the Board of Trustees their recommendations.
It is the Board of Trustees that will make the final decision – however, whatever decision they make has to comply with provincial government guidelines and the cold hard fact is that – there are too many spaces south of the QEW and not enough north of the QEW.
The Hayden High school that hasn’t been open for three years already has portables set up – and worse – the WiFI service is “spotty”.
The people you elected as trustees are going to have to work with parents groups to come up with solutions that satisfy as many people as possible. It is going to be a busy year for everyone. The really positive upside is that the parents who have surfaced and are facing the challenge are a bright, energetic bunch of people –they are going to come forward with a solution.
It is the parents that are going to make the difference.
By Pepper Parr
October 20th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
There will be a Program Accommodation Review (PAC) – and it is going to keep the parents hoping.
Board of Education trustees voted last night 10 – 1 to form Program Accommodation Review Committees.
The possible closure of both Burlington Central High school and Lester B. Pearson high school are now distinct possibilities.
There is a tremendous amount of work to get done and the learning curve is going to be very steep for the parents.
A Program Accommodation Review is something a board of education has to do when the enrollment in a school falls below 65%.
 Central High school could handle an additional 275 students – but they just don’t live in the community.  Lester B. Pearson is a small school to start with and enrollment is projected to decline. The recommendation the Board put on the table was to look at closing both Lester B. Pearson and Burlington Central High school.
Central High is a large school with a very strong connection to their community – they hit the ground running and have made strong arguments for not even holding a Program Accommodation review at this time.
The trustees didn’t see it that way and voted to take the next step which is to form a Program Accommodation Review Committee (PARC). (Note the school board people love acronyms – get used to them.)
The task now is to create the PARC’s. Burlington Central is well prepared for this next step.
Lester B. Pearson (LBP), a much smaller high school and it doesn’t have the depth as a community school that Central has. We will return to the LBP situation.
 Trustees Papin, Oliver and Grebenc The Board of Trustees is responsible for deciding the most appropriate pupil accommodation arrangements for the delivery of its elementary and secondary programs. Decisions that are made by the Board of Trustees are in the context of carrying out its primary responsibilities of fostering student achievement and well-being, and ensuring effective stewardship of school board resources. The Board of Trustees may consider undertaking pupil accommodation reviews that may lead to school consolidations and closures in order to address declining and shifting student enrollment.
 Trustees Sams, Reynolds and Collard. The PARC process has been revised and this is the first time the Halton Board has had to work under the new rules which shorten the amount of time to go through that process.
Here are the steps that are going to be taken:
● Director’s Preliminary Report to the Board of Trustees; DONE
● Preparation of the School Information Profile(s); these are ready to now be turned over to the PARC that is to be formed.
Each high school will have its own PARC
● Board of Trustee’s approval to undertake a Program and Accommodation review process; They did that on October 19th.
● Communication with all stakeholders about the process, opportunities for involvement, and identifying outcomes; The Board staff are going to have their work cut out for them on this level.
● Establishing the Program and Accommodation Review Committee; The jockeying for the spaces on this committee is going to be interesting to watch.
● Consultation with Local Municipal Governments/Community Partners;
● Public Meetings;
● Final Staff Report, including a Community Consultation section;
● Public Delegations to the Board of Trustees;
● Decision by the Board of Trustees; and,
● Implementation and Transition Planning.
A PARC will be formed following the consideration by the Board of Trustees of the Director’s Preliminary Report.
 Parents getting the agenda explained to them by the Board o Education communications manager. The PARC will consist of the following persons:
A Trustee as an ad hoc member, and Superintendent, both from an area not under study;
From each affected school:
the school Principal or designate (resource only)
two parents/guardians from each school, one of whom will be nominated by the School Council Chair; the other will be selected by the Superintendent(s) through the submission by parents of an expression of interest. The Superintendent will review all parent representations and endeavor to ensure that all affected geographic areas and programs are represented.
All Trustees are invited to attend PARC working meetings to observe the proceedings.
 Dania Thurman on the left – one of the more active parents at Central High school. The PARC is to be created within five business days of the motion to form the PARC was passed – which happened yesterday. Things begin to move very quickly at this point – and it is going to be difficult for the parents at Lester B. Pearson to keep up.
Once the PARC is constituted, it will invite a municipal Councillor or delegate to join the Committee. The Committee will be deemed to be properly constituted whether or not all of the listed members are willing and able to participate.
 Matthew DiSouza – a Lester B. Pearson student The Board will invite PARC members from the school(s) under review to an orientation session that will describe the mandate, roles and responsibilities, and procedures of the PARC.
That is what the community is going to immerse themselves in – the people selected for the PARC is important – getting the right people is important.
How did we get to this point? Well enrollment numbers were the first indicator that a change was needed. Burlington has seven high schools, Oakville has six. And Oakville has a larger high school population than Burlington.
Director of Education Stuart Miller explained that the preferred size of a high school is 1200 students. He added using that number Burlington has one and a half too many high schools.
That is the lens the board of education bureaucrat use – they have to look at the numbers – the province requires that they do just that.
However, it is the parents that are at the top of the food chain. It is their money that pays for everything and it is the education of their children that is at issue.
It is now up to the parents to come up with the ideas that will resolve the problem on the table.
 Director of Education Stuart Miller getting a briefing. Miller said a number of times that the option put on the table is rarely if ever the option that gets chosen. Which is fine but in order to be able to come up with the best option parents need to ensure that they do not lose control of the process.
By Staff
October 20th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
The Halton Region Health Department reports a second confirmed case rabies in a raccoon found in the City of Burlington.
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency provided the data. The Health Department is reminding residents to avoid all contact with raccoons and other wild animals.
Rabies is a viral disease that causes severe damage to the brain and spinal cord, and if untreated before symptoms appear will lead to death. The virus is spread through the saliva of an infected animal, usually entering through a bite or scratch.
 Cute – but not when they are infected with rabies. “Anyone who comes in physical contact with a raccoon or other wild animal should see a physician immediately and contact the Health Department by dialing 311,” said Dr. Hamidah Meghani, Medical Officer of Health for Halton Region. “After someone is exposed to rabies, timely use of the rabies vaccine can prevent the rabies illness. The rabies vaccine is extremely effective if it is administered before any symptoms occur.”
While this is only the second confirmed case of raccoon rabies in Halton in 2016, the Health Department wants to remind residents that there have been a higher than average number of cases reported in areas neighbouring the region and that precautions should be taken when you see wild animals. There are a number of things you can do to protect your family and pets:
• Make sure your pet’s rabies vaccinations are up to date.
• Warn your children to stay away from any wild, stray or aggressive animals.
• Do not touch dead or sick animals.
• Do not feed or keep wild animals as pets.
• Keep your pet on a leash when off your property.
• Seek medical attention immediately if you come in contact with a raccoon or other potentially rabid animals.
• Any pet that has come in contact with a raccoon or other wild animal should be seen by a veterinarian.
• Report all animal bites or scratches to the Halton Region Health Department.
For more information on rabies or to learn about positive raccoon rabies results in Halton, visit halton.ca/rabies or call the Halton Region Health Department by dialing 311.
 By Staff
October 20th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
History lives and a couple of hundred people have the chance to become a clone of Spencer Smith. And if you don’t know who Spencer Smith is – search him in the Gazette. The Spencer Smith Park is what it is today due in no small measure to this man.
Trees that Spencer planted seventy years ago were cut down because the city arborist thought the degree of rot in the tree trunks made them a public safety matter.
 Here’s a picture that is a keeper – the gazebo that is no more along with the willow tree that got cut down – city has saved 200 + clippings that will be given away in the spring. The two 70-year-old weeping willow trees near the gazebo at the waterfront park were removed in June 2016 to ensure public safety. City of Burlington arborists had found significant rotting and areas of decay in the trees, originally transplanted by park founder Spencer Smith in the 1950s.
Arborwood Tree Service Inc. and Exotic Woods are at the city’s roads and parks maintenance building this week, planning, milling and then kiln-drying the wood from six large logs to make boards that can be used for whatever wood can be used for.
 Ward 2 Councillor Marianne Meed Ward hugging a willow tree in Spencer Smith Park that is no more Ward 2 Councillor Marianne Meed Ward didn’t want to see the trees taken down and did give them a nice little send off.
The city then moved in and tore down the gazebo and began to upgrade the landscaping and put in pathways and level out the land; there was a bowl effect that collected water and made that part of the park less useful than it could be.
The city saved more than 200 clippings from the willow trees that are growing in a greenhouse. There are plans to distribute those seedlings to people who are interested in growing a piece of history on their own properties sometime in 2017. Expect more from city hall on this initiative in the spring.
Burlington and the Region of Halton have done a good job of preserving historically significant trees.
 They call it the Brant Oak tree – it’s located on Allview Street in the west end of the city and is known as one of the markers setting out the boundary of the land grant given to Joseph Brant. The tree that marks part of the boundary marking the lands that were given to Joseph Brant is still in place.
More information will be available in early 2017 about how people can get one of the willow clippings or to take a piece of wood home as a souvenir.
Related story:
Who was Spencer Smith?
By Pepper Parr
October 20th, 2016
BURLINGTON, ON
There is a scramble going on in Burlington for the provincial Progressive Conservative nomination.
Jane McKenna is seen as the nominee, in name only, because she was the candidate, and the MPP but she has to earn the nomination just like anyone else.
And she is out there running hard. She is reported to have Mike Wallace managing her campaign.
 Candidate Jane Michael and Bishop Crosby. There is another Jane in the race for the nomination – Jane Michael, who is the current chair of the Catholic school board.
And now for the wrinkle.
There is apparently a web site that reported Michael has pulled out of the race. We checked in with Michael and she says she hasn’t pulled out – she is getting the package of information that every candidate gets from the Progressive Conservative party and expects to be out knocking on doors and selling memberships.
There was a time when the Progressive Conservatives couldn’t find a candidate – that was back in 2011 when they almost drafted Jane McKenna after telling Rene Papin that he wasn’t quite what they had in mind and they weren’t ready to give Brian Heagle the embrace that he wanted.
 Whoever posted this on the internet uses the initials that most of us understand to represent the school board – this didn’t come from the school board – so who put it up? This race looks like it just might get nasty. There is some pretty mean spirited stuff being thrown around. This isn’t the way political nominations are earned.
Come 2018 – and it looks like there could actually be a horse race for that nomination – contested nominations usually result in better candidates.
McKenna has kept her hand in the political game and claims to have worked with Patrick Brown to “revitalize and refocus the PC Party. I still see so much work that needs to be done to get Ontario back on track.”
Two scrappy women fighting it out – it is going to be up to the Tory’s to figure out which one is best for the city. It shouldn’t be all that hard to do – just look at the track records.
The full story on that nomination meeting is interesting. You can read that in our July 2011 issue: McKenna gets the Tory nomination.
|
|
