Male chooses to expose himself to women in underground garages. Police believe they are looking for just the one suspect.

By Staff

BURLINGTON, ON  February 2, 2013  Police are investigating two separate incidents that had a  male exposing  himself to women in Aldershot.  I don’t know about you but that was both disgusting and stupid.

The suspect police are looking for lurks in underground garages and exposes himself to women.  He assaults those who challenge him verbally.  The photo above was captured on a surveillance system and is of a person the police want to meet with.

Very late on January 29th 2013, a male approached a female in the underground parking lot of an apartment building at 695 Surrey Lane Burlington. The male exposed his genitals to the female and then walked away without any further incident.

The suspect is described as male white, 20-30 years old, approximately 5’8″ with a slim build.  He was wearing a black hooded sweatshirt, light coloured track pants and black and white running or skateboarding shoes.

There was no other detail given to the police.

On January 31st 2013 at approximately 3:00 am,  a male approached a female in a townhouse complex at 699 Marley Road. The male exposed his genitals to the woman who verbally expressed her disgust at his behaviour. The male then assaulted the woman by punching her in the face. He then fled the area on foot.

This suspect is described as male white, 20-25 years old, approximately 5’10” with a slim build. He was wearing a black bomber style jacket, blue baggy jeans and white running or basketball type shoes.

Police investigators believe they are looking for just one suspect.

Investigators are requesting public assistance in identifying a male party who was observed in the underground parking lot of 695 Surrey close to the time of the first incident on January 29th. A surveillance photo of this individual is attached to this release.

Anyone who can provide information pertaining to either one of these incidents is asked to call the Burlington Criminal Investigations Bureau at 905-825 4747 ext. 2315.  Alternatively any pertinent information can be forwarded to Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS (8477), through the web at www.haltoncrimestoppers.com or by texting “Tip201” with your message to 274637 (crimes).

 

Return to the Front page

City looking into making home based business`s legal; will this solve part of the economic slowdown?

By Staff

BURLINGTON, ON  January 31, 2012   Burlington’s Public Involvement Coordinator is setting up a focus group with people from each ward in the city to talk about home based business’s – which at this point aren’t legal in Burlington – although there are tons of them in the city.

Christine Iamonaco, Burlington’s Public Involvement coordinator is facilitating a focus group to gather views and feelings about the current home-based business bylaw.

By not being legal the city means you cannot employ a person and have that person working out of your house.  You can be a hair dresser and toil away by yourself – but you can’t hire another person as a hair dresser and pay that person a wage.

It’s been a bit of a sticky issue.  People who provide a service feel they should be able to do so and hire other people to work for them.  The man who fixes out lawn mower works out of his garage – is that considered his home?  For a lot of guys the garage is home – but I digress.

There are people in some neighbourhoods who don’t want abnormal traffic coming and going to a home that has a couple of woman working as hair dressers.

The city appears to want to review the bylaw that governs all this.

Home-based businesses have been described as a growing and dynamic part of Burlington’s local economy with   hairdressers, music lessons and pet grooming given as examples.

City staff is looking for 6 to 8 people to take part in a 1 ½ -hour focus group conversation about home-based businesses in Burlington. They want to learn about your experiences with home-based businesses in your area.

Should people be permitted to run a dog grooming business out of their homes? Focus group being held to get answers to that question.

The city is looking for one person from each ward; people who operate a home-based business; • people who live next door to, or near-by to a home-based business and  people who live in single detached, semi-detached, or multi-residential units including townhouse, condo, or apartment.

The focus group session will take place on February 5, 2013, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at Burlington City Hall. Compensation for participating is $50.00.

If you think this might be something that interests you or something you have an opinion on answer the questions below and email them to christine.iamonaco@burlington.ca by Feb 4, 2013. If you are selected for the focus group, city staff will phone you to confirm your participation.

 

Cut and past with the answers in place and email to: iamonacoc@burlington.ca  Put words focus group in the subject line

Home Based Business Focus Group Participant Application

Name: _____________________________

Ward and/or Postal Code:____________

Dwelling type: single detached house semi-detached home or multi-residential unit

Indicate if you are: a home-based business operator OR a home-based business neighbor or near-by resident

Phone number(s):________________

Your E-mail address:________________

 

 

Return to the Front page

Burlington Chamber of commerce releases Business Confidence Update – our part of Ontario feels they are doing well.

By Staff

BURLINGTON, ON  January 30, 2013  The Ontario Business Confidence Index, an index produced by the Ontario Chamber of Commerce,  shows that most Ontario businesses are confident in their own outlook (72 percent) and are planning to expand over the next five years (60 percent). However, the same businesses are unsure about the overall direction of Ontario’s economy–41 percent express confidence.

The index is a survey of 2,386 businesses and was conducted as part of Emerging Stronger 2013, a business-driven economic agenda for Ontario released today by the Ontario Chamber of Commerce and the Burlington Chamber of Commerce, along with their research partner, the Mowat Centre at the University of Toronto.

A lot of money was spent on the presentation but the clientele needed to make a go of it just didn’t appear.

Emerging Stronger 2013 is a transformational agenda aimed at accelerating Ontario’s economic growth. It identifies Ontario’s challenges and advantages, and sets out practical and detailed recommendations for government and business.

Some of its key recommendations include: enabling better access to capital for start-ups and small businesses through crowd funding; encouraging businesses to employ more Aboriginal people and people with disabilities; opening up more government services to private sector and not-for-profit delivery; utilizing Ontario’s large immigrant population to grow exports; and, allowing more employers to participate in training.

The shingle had to come down after more than a year of solid effort – the customer base just wasn’t big enough for Celestial Beauty. The disposable income that many thought would drift from the several condominiums on Lakeshore Road just didn’t make its way to this shop.

The agenda comes days after Kathleen Wynne was named Ontario’s next premier and is intended to provide a non-partisan platform that should appeal to all three parties.

Keith Hoey and the Chamber of Commerce Emerging Stronger agenda will sit well with parts of the commercial sector but the several small business types in the core that went out of business this month don’t see it quite that way.

“The OCC’s Emerging Stronger agenda is truly transformative for Ontario,” said Keith Hoey, President of the Burlington Chamber of Commerce. “It outlines a plan for the provincial and federal governments to work together with private and not-for-profit sectors to achieve success.”

“The Ontario Chamber of Commerce has crisscrossed this province engaging and hearing from local chambers and their 60,000 members,” said Allan O’Dette, CEO of the Ontario Chamber of Commerce. “We are confident that Ontario has all the assets to prosper, but we need to act collectively, strategically, and with purpose.”

“This Index is one of the largest surveys ever conducted of business opinion in Ontario,” according to Dave Scholz, Vice President of Leger Marketing, the pollster. “Business sentiment is very much ‘glass half-full’ in the province right now.”

Among the survey findings are:

Ontario is falling behind on productivity: only 10 percent of respondents believe their sector is a global leader in productivity.

Some sectors are much more confident than others: the financial services sector is the most confident in their own outlook (74 percent say their business will expand in the next 5 years).

Businesses are struggling to diversify their exports: 45 percent of Ontario businesses view China as the most critical market in the next 5-10 years. Yet only 1.4 percent of Ontario’s exports are bound for China.

Some regions are more confident than others: Greater Hamilton Area businesses are most likely to respond that the economy is heading in the right direction (48 percent), while Eastern Ontario businesses are the least likely (36 percent).

Return to the Front page

City finally tells citizens that fighting the Nelson quarry battle cost us $2.1 million. It was money well spent.

By Pepper Parr

Burlington, Ont. – Jan. 31, 2013—They are learning – they are trainable.  They are capable of being transparent.

Burlington city council is usually pretty timid when it comes to talking about how much they spend on legal fees – we’ve not heard a word about how much we’ve spent on the attempt to recover $7.5 million from the people who screwed up the first attempt to get a pier built at the bottom of Brant Street.  But we now know how much was spent on legal fees to fight the application for a second quarry.

This is the quarry that is currently being mined.  Its productive life will end in a number of years and over time fill with water.  The city and the residents of north Burlington have an opportunity to decide what they want to see this property become.

$2.1 million and while there will be some grousing – this city will get very good value for those dollars.

Burlington spent $2.1 million on legal and consulting fees to protect the Niagara Escarpment, a UNESCO biosphere reserve, from a quarry proposed by Nelson Aggregate Co.

In a unanimous decision released on Oct. 11, 2012, the consolidated hearings board (Joint Board) dismissed Nelson’s application for permits that would allow a new quarry and aggregate processing on the Mount Nemo plateau.

“For protection of the unique and sensitive ecologic areas of the Jefferson Salamander habitat, particularly the two known breeding ponds within the prescribed habitat area, the Joint Board finds that Nelson had not made sufficient provision for the protection of these unique ecologic and environmentally sensitive areas in the event that Nelson’s projections are wrong,” the Joint Board decision stated.

This is a topographical map with the existing quarry that is currently being mined outlined in orange.  The patch at the south of the current quarry is the land Nelson wanted a permit to quarry in the future.

In December 2011, City Council approved a policy that allows Council to disclose legal costs following the completion of a matter, as decided on a case-by-case basis.

Details of the city’s legal process, including services provided by legal counsel Rod Northey of Fogler Rubinoff in Toronto, were shared with City Council in a confidential meeting in December 2012. The city’s legal costs for the Nelson Aggregate matter were approved in segments between October 2008 and January 2012, with funding coming from a contingency reserve fund.

The Joint Board’s decision was released after a four-year hearing process, including several preliminary hearings and a main hearing that lasted several months and included nearly 300 exhibits. The board heard from 60 witnesses, including 47 experts and 13 members of the public. The city retained nine expert witnesses who appeared before the board and provided evidence covering hydrology; hydrogeology; biology; wetlands; salamanders; agriculture; air quality; human health; and planning.

“I am impressed by the efforts of city staff, including the legal team, on behalf of the Niagara Escarpment,” said City Manager Jeff Fielding. “The city has worked collaboratively with other levels of government and community groups, such as Protecting Escarpment Rural Land, to keep this treasure intact.”

Burlington now has to decide what will become of this property once it has been mined out.  There is an opportunity here for the city to create something that will invigorate the northern part of the city and still keep it rural.

PERL, Protect Escarpment and Rural Lands, the group that led the fight, would certainly like to see someone pick up the significant legal tab they incurred; when they announce their fund-raising event – be sure to attend.

Nice comment from the city manager but it is really a canned statement which he probably didn’t write.  As impressive as Fielding is – he wasn’t the city manager when this battle took place.  Better to have said nothing than permit a statement like this to be made on his behalf; almost as bad as a photo-op.

Big bucks; one tenth of what the pier is going to cost but this time we are getting long-term value.

Much of the detail in this piece came to us as a media release from city hall.

 

Return to the Front page

35×3 – translates into the number of regional artists involved in the Art Centre 35th anniversary auction.

By Staff

BURLINGTON, ON  January 30th, 2013  The Burlington Art Centre (BAC) appears to be going all out to raise funds and promote the work of regional artists.

They are holding three different auctions that involve 105 Canadians artists.

A Yukon Indian fishing creel done by K. Crowder.

One of the auctions is a live event that takes place on February 8th at 8:30 pm.  Reception before the bidding begins.  A couple of glasses of wine should goose up some of the bids.

The second is a silent auction that runs from the 6th to the 8th of February.

And the third is an on-line auction.  This is the first time the Art Centre has auctioned art on-line.  We set out below some of the questions – with answers – you might have.  It can be kind of fun to look for an item you like and watch the bidding climb.

Bless your wee cotton socks; a delightful folk art ceramic by S. Merritt.

Each auction will offer 35 pieces – tying into the 35th anniversary of the Art Centre.

The on-line auction has already begun and will continue to February 7th.  Slip over to the BAC website, register  and begin looking at what has been put up for auction.

Doors will close on the silent auction and live previews at 5 pm on February 8. The pre-auction reception open to anyone with a ticket starts at 6 pm and offers a final chance to bid on silent auction items, while mingling and enjoying a drink and hors d’oeuvres before the live auction.

You’ll need a $40 ticket that lets you take part in both the silent and live auctions.  That ticket gets you into a reception prior to the live auction on February 8.

The online auction at theBAC.ca/35online is ongoing until February 7 and already has bidding wars. Register now and join in.

Tickets can be purchased online at theBAC.ca/auction, by calling 905-632-7796, ext. 326, or at the Art Centre ,  1333 Lakeshore Road in Burlington.

The Art Auction is a fundraiser for the Burlington Art Centre Foundation, in support of BAC programs.

Photographs are courtesy of the Burlington Art Centre and copyright is held by the artist.  Seek their permission before using please.

How do I place a bid?

To place a bid, you must first be logged into your account. Once logged in, simply select ‘Start Bidding Now from your Account Profile or go to the Auction Items page. Click on the auction item you are interested in to see the full description and bidding box. Place your bid and optional comment and hit the button ‘Place Bid’.

The BAC has the best collection of Canadian ceramics in North America.This bowl by Scott Barnim comes out of that tradition.

How does the bidding Process work?

By placing a bid, you are committing to this amount and the actual amount displays immediately. The system does not use a maximum bid feature (like eBay), where a bidder enters the maximum amount they wish to spend and the system bids incrementally on their behalf until reaching that maximum. This means you need to monitor your bids. This is easy to do, as you are notified by email each time you are outbid.

What is the Bid Increment?

The Bid Increment signifies that the next bid placed must increase the current bid by a specific amount. For example, if an item is currently at $100 and the Bid Increment is $25, the next bid must be at least $125.

B Darcy is offering this painting: Harvest time

Will  I get email confirmation messages during the auction?     

Yes! We will send you an email when you have been outbid. Auction emails will come from do-not-reply@dojiggy.com so please add this email address to your “acceptable email list” to help avoid spam filters.

Can I delete a bid?

If you accidentally place a bid, please contact your auction administrator.

How I change my password or other account information?

By logging in to your account, you will be able to:

  • Update your profile (including editing your email, address and phone)
  • Change your password
  • Review your Bid History
  • Donate an item for the auction

What technology do I need? What browsers are supported?

Please see our requirements page at: https://www.dojiggy.com/app/services/requirements.cfm

** If you have any questions about specific auction items or the organization holding the auction, please contact the auction administrator directly. **

Return to the Front page

Is Burlington talking to one of the companies it is suing over the construction of the pier about a settlement?

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON.  January 30, 2012  City council going into a closed session is not unusual.  They do seem to go private a little too much when the pier is involved but that is a legal mess.

Monday evening the Mayor advised Council that there would be a Closed Session at the end of the regular council meeting.  Again – not unusual.  But when he said it was to “discuss a confidential legal matter about the Brant Street Pier” my ears shot up.

Wasn’t it earlier in the week that the Mayor said in his State of the City address that all was well on the waterfront?  Yes, he did say: I am very pleased to advise that meaningful progress has been made on the Brant Street Pier in 2012. Work has continued in the winter and staff expect the ribbon to be cut in June.

Is that an offer to settle rising above the under construction pier or have the lawyers in Hamilton just turned on the lights over there?

This wasn’t surprising.  Construction is going well.  The contractor has managed to pour some concrete and while 11 days were lost when Sandy hurricane hit the United States all was well.  So well that plans for the Official Opening during the Sound of Music festival were underway if only in a preliminary way.  The largest service club group in the city is talking to staff about some ideas they have.

While construction is going well – things on the legal side are actually beginning to move along as well.  That process lawyers call “discovery” where each side gets to ask the other about information that has come out of documents each side has made available to the other begins.  Because there are so many players in this game close to a month has been set aside.

This legal quagmire is not just the city suing Harm Schilthuis and Sons Ltd. , and AECOM plus a bunch of smaller players  for $7,500,000. Schilthuis is counter-suing the city for $2,699,344.32.

The first version of the pier was to be built for $6.9 million – that figure worked it’s way up to the $15.9 million the project has cost to date.

The rocket scientists out there can do the math with those numbers.  Do you see the “win-win” for the city in there somewhere?

February 4th – Ross Steel goes through the process

February 5th – PV&V gets its turn

February 6th – Lombard Insurance gets to talk and answer questions

February 7th – Brave, a concrete company gets its turn.

February 8th     EFCO Canada Company

February 11th , 12th and 13th Harm Schilthuis and Sons Ltd. is in the room

February 14th  Burlington’s Director of Engineering, Tom Eichenbaum gets to answer questions.

February 15th – Zurich Insurance is up.

The Judge handling this case has apparently allowed extra time for Eichenbaum to answer questions.

At this stage in the proceedings all the evidence is on the table.  The city has turned over 23,000 pages of information consisting of emails and reports – anything that was written down relating to the construction of the pier.  The prime contractor Harm Schilthuis and Sons Ltd. has given the city 17.000 pages.

With all the evidence on the table lawyers on both sides question witnesses and delve into the details as they build their case.  Why did you say this in that document; what did you mean when you wrote that – that kind of thing.

Lawyers get a pretty good sense of where their case is going once they have gone through all the documents and if there is going to be a settlement before a case goes to court – this is the time to have a conversation.  Who takes that first step and how they take it is a critical part of the legal dance.

One side doesn’t want appear weak by asking if “perhaps we can talk”.  That’s what lawyers do for a living.

Knowing this – one had to wonder – what was it that the city solicitor Nancy Shea Nicol wanted to talk to city council about in a closed session?

The Mayor had said all was well on Thursday.

Construction of the pier was going just fine in the fall with very little time lost due to weather.  The legal case was moving along just as well.  Will there be a settlement before the pier is opened?

Methinks someone has suggested there might be a possible settlement before things go any further.  Who talked to who and when?  We don’t know but we are pretty sure the city is engaged in a conversation.

The Closed Session lasted for about 50 minutes after which council decided to:

Refer memo dated January 28, 2013 from Nancy Shea Nicol, City Solicitor, providing a litigation update on the Brant Street pier; and Direct the City Solicitor to provide further information to the Budget & Corporate Services Committee meeting of February 5, 2013.

What that means is that the city solicitor sent Council a memo; they discussed that memo in a Closed Session of Council and then directed to city solicitor to provide more information to a council committee that meets next Tuesday.

We can’t wait to hear what gets said:  will they do that in a Closed Session as well?

Stay tuned.

 

 

Return to the Front page

Halton Police investigating a suspicious fire in Aldershot; arsonist shown on security camera footage. Amazing pictures.

By Staff

BURLINGTON, ON  January 30th, 2013  At around 6:30 a.m. Friday, January 11th, an O.P.P. officer was approached by a citizen and advised that a nearby business at #650 Plains Road E. appeared to have had its windows smashed.  Upon further investigation it was also determined that the premise and a neighbouring business had been flooded by water.

Burlington Firefighters and Halton Regional Police officers were called to the site.  It was soon determined that a fire had triggered the sprinkler system inside the building.  Due to the nature of the origin of the fire, police have deemed the fire suspicious.  No injuries were reported due to this incident.

The Office of the Ontario Fire Marshall has some of the best forensic minds in the country doing the investigations.   They have rarely seen the kind of footage found in the Aldershot pizza store fire.

The building was secured and the Ontario Fire Marshall (OFM) notified.  The Halton Regional Police Collision Reconstruction Unit (CRU), which also investigates fire scenes, was called and commenced an investigation with Forensic Identification Services officers.

A joint investigation between an OFM Investigator and the CRU will be conducted.

That investigation has produced some security camera footage that is amazing.  You see the crime taking place and in several places the video is taken into slow motion giving a viewer an opportunity to look carefully at the person being filmed.  The footage is of an arsonist at work – seldom seen.

The arsonist is wearing hood making it very difficult but there might be enough for someone to identify the arsonist.

Halton Regional Police are appealing for anyone with information on the deliberate fire set on January 11, 2013 at 650 Plains Road E in Burlington to contact The Collision Reconstruction Unit at 905 825-4747 x 5065, Crime Stoppers at 1 800 222-TIPS(8477), through the web at www.haltoncrimestoppers.com or by texting “Tip201” with your message to 274637(crimes).

 

 

Return to the Front page

City hall dropped the ball on this one – they’re going to kill what little history we have.

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON  January 29, 2013  Did you know that CoBALT Connects is the managing partner of the City of Burlington’s public art program? They are! And they are going to be “on hand this Thursday and Sunday at various Burlington locations with New Brunswick artist Peter Powning as he makes “Cultural Mulch” with the community’s prized possessions, turning those objects’ outlines into the bronze cast that will form the facade of his piece.

Jeremy Freiburger, the media friendly maestro who sent us this information about the Cultural Mulch might be the only person in the room – along with the artist of course,  who we are looking forward to meeting.

The city does not appear to have spent as much as a dime promoting this event.

The Spiral Stella sculpture that is going to be placed outside the Performing Arts Centre is going to be around for at least 100 years – if this world lasts that long.  Tens of thousands of people will look at it and see what we thought was important to us as a community to tell the story of our past.

Powning wants to take artifacts the people of Burlington bring in – make a mold and then a casting that will be used in the sculpture.

There have to be hundreds of people who have “stuff” in the attics or their basements that artist Peter Powning  would like to consider.

Touchstone was above all a collaborative community enterprise. My idea of asking the community to take part in creating it’s own narrative was the germ of the project. By providing me with objects and artifacts that had a part in defining Canmore for them personally, people gave me the source material for the bronze relief that is at the core of this sculpture. I wanted to encourage community involvement.

But if people don’t bring out their artifacts – there won’t be anything to make a casting of and nothing for the public of the future to see.

At some point in the future there will be a tourist standing in front of the sculpture and asking: “Is that all this city has to show us about their past?”

Burlington has this annoying habit of getting the Mayor out there to have his picture taken every time there is a donation or an award being given.  Last night he was at a table signing the Freeman Station Joint Venture document – a project he really didn’t get behind.  At least we didn’t hear him say very much when the Friends of Freeman Station (FOFS) were struggling to find a home for the structure.

Peter Powning on site in Canmore, Alberta where he installed touch stone, a sculpture along the same lines as the planned work for Burlington.

Powning will be in Burlington so dig through the keep-sakes trunk and bring an object that matters to you. It’s a great way to be a part of the artistic process and to either contribute an object, or simply watch the process in action. Objects will not be damaged in the process, and will be returned after the mold is cast (about five minutes).

Sessions are on:

Thursday, January 31st: Burlington Public Library, Central Branch, 10 am to 3 pm

Thursday, January 31st: Burlington Performing Arts Centre, 7 pm to 9 pm

Sunday, February 3rd: Burlington Art Centre, 2 pm to 4 pm

 

 

Return to the Front page

When Dad goes missing – you’re terrified and not sure what to do next; a useful resource, log in and bookmark this one.

By Staff

BURLINGTON. ON.  January 29, 2013    We see a couple of these reports each month and we can expect to see more as our population ages.  A recent police media release went like this:

Male Missing:  Elderly Man with Alzheimer’s Believed to Be Lost in the Toronto Area

The Halton Regional Police Service and the Toronto Police Service are seeking the assistance of the public in locating a missing elderly male person who is believed to be lost in the Toronto area.

The missing male person is a 82-year-old senior who resides in the City of Burlington in the Regional Municipality of Halton. The missing person has recently been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. The missing person is dependent upon certain medications and his health may deteriorate without his prescribed medication, and may appear confused. The male will be reluctant to accept help if approached.

At approximately 10:53 p.m. a member of the Halton Regional Conservation Authority Parks Department was on routine patrol.

In this situation the follow up was a good news story:

A Parks Officer came upon the scene of a single motor vehicle collision on Milborough Town Line north of Campbellville Sideroad in the rural area of MILTON.  Sometime prior to the officer’s arrival a single motor vehicle had left the roadway and struck a tree.

It was determined that the vehicle involved in the collision belonged to Gerard HOOLBOOM, who had been reported as missing to Halton Regional Police earlier in the day.

Mr. HOOLBOOM was found conscious, near the vehicle. The officer immediately rendered first aid to Mr. HOOLBOOM for minor injuries and summoned EMS and police to the scene.

 The Halton Regional Police take these calls, broadcast the missing person to the media and we do what we can to get the message out to the largest possible community.

Because this is such an emotional issue for any family that goes through the experience the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police and the Canadian Centre for Information on Missing Adults (CCIMA) have provided a guide that is very well put together.

CCIMA is a bilingual online resource that provides information and acts as a referral centre for Canadian families and friends of missing adults.

The guide provides families with useful and practical information to help cope with the realities associated to having a missing adult.  Bookmark this page – you don’t want to have to search for it if you need it.

The police are behind this: “We wholeheartedly support the efforts of CCIMA in their development of this comprehensive guide for families of missing adults to assist them in what is often an emotionally overwhelming situation,” said Deputy Chief Andrew Fletcher.

 

 

Return to the Front page

The deal has been done – the Friends of Freeman Station now have what they need to get on with restoring the station.

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON  January 29, 2013  Finally, the document was signed and the Friends of Freeman Station (FOFS) could get on with the task of moving the structure from its storage site the couple of hundred yards from where it sits beside the Fire Station on Plains Road to its restoration home on property they have rented from Ashland Oil.

The City of Burlington and The Friends of Freeman Station have signed a joint venture agreement that outlines the shared responsibility for relocating Freeman Station, the city’s historic train station.

Much of the railway level thinking that is part of the FOFS task, was done by the John Mellow, shown here talking to the Mayor.  On the far right Reg Cooke.  In between is Ron Steiginga , ther man at city hall who stick handled all the paper work between the city and a multinational corporation located in Burlington that owns the land.  The Mayor signed the agreement on behalf of the city.

It has been a grind – but it’s done and now the team moves on to the next step.  And it didn’t take this crowd long to get a move on.  They signed contracts to move the building onto the new site and they signed a contract with the company that is going to oversee the actual restoration less than two hours after the agreement with the city was signed.

The building will get moved onto its new location and will then have the basement dug and put on its new foundation.  The idea is to get the structure moved – it’s been sitting in sort of storage for far too long.

FOFS station expect to have the move done late in April

Freeman Station, built in 1906 by the Grand Trunk Railway, is being moved from the Burlington Fire Department headquarters on Fairview Road to corporately-owned land nearby, thanks to an agreement between the city, the Friends of Freeman Station and manufacturer Ashland Inc.

Signing what is called the Joint Venture Agreement – a JV in city hall lingo – is the start and the document sets out who is to do what, and, when and where the chips fall if and when the wheels fall of the venture.

James Smith, President of Friends of Freeman Station, and Mayor Goldring signed the agreement, which includes moving details and costs for the move, expected to take place in April or May.  Further agreements are being negotiated to cover the restoration and operation of the station as an educational facility and community space.

JV’s are relatively new to the city – each organization out there using a city owned building or a structure on city owned land will have a Joint Venture agreement with the city.  This practice is one that was introduced by General Manager Scott Stewart. ‘There was a time when the city had all kinds of agreements, some done on not much more than a handshake, with no one at city hall really know what was really going on.”   That practice has stopped.

The city recently passed an evaluation framework for all Joint Venture operations – it will be a sort of report card type report – council wants that document ready for sometime late this year.

Getting the Freeman Station stabilized and then moved is what is going to occupy the FOFS crowd for the immediate future; then the fund-raising that is going to be needed to make it all possible.

Oddly enough – the even bigger step is to determine what they want to do with the building once it has been restored.  Saving the structure has been the focus – and it has not been an easy task.   Much of the credit for giving the FOFS station the time they needed to find a home for the building goes to Councillors Meed Ward and Lancaster.  It was their effort that convinced city council to give them more time. The city had totally  screwed up the Stimulus grant it had gotten from the federal government and it looked as if the building was going to end up as kindling for someone’s fireplace.

The city ran an advertisement trying to get someone to just haul it away – even with that there were no takers.  There were some less than generous comments made by a number of councillors during the debates on what to do with the building.  Councillor Sharman’s behaviour was not one he will put in his resume.

All that is behind us – isn’t it – or will we see everyone on this Council taking credit for “saving” the Freeman Station?

Despite a council that couldn’t figure out a way to save the building it has now been saved and while the ceremonial signing of the Joint venture was a quiet event – it is a significant one for Burlington.  Citizens moved in and took over when their council was unable to do what needed to be done; something that needs to be remembered.  Citizens are the last resort.

From the left John Mellow, James Smith, tucked in behind him is Less Armstrong, then Mayor Goldring, then Brian Aasgaard, Councillor Blair Lancaster, Reg Cooke, Councillor Meed Ward and FOFS member Jacqui Gardner.  This picture would never had been taken were it not for the work of Meed Ward and Lancaster.  The Mayor was never a strong supporter of the idea – he just went along with the rest of council when he was just a member.

Now what – building is saved; it will be restored, expect the guys doing the job to provide the city with an exceptional restoration.  The bring passion, energy and enthusiasm to the task.

Les Armstrong on the left knows better than many people in the city what it was like when the railway line ran along the edge of the Lake west of Spencer Smith Park.  Armstrong talks with James Smith, president of the FOFS and a former candidate for the ward 5 seat at the council table.  Is he gearing up for another shot at that brass ring?

 

While it will sit on a site that is far from where the station will eventually rest – the longer term challenge is to get the station into Beachway Park alongside the old railway embankment where it truly belongs.

That will take some effort on the part of FOFS but they have shown this city council, and this city, that they can get things done.

Their fund-raising drive will start soon – be generous, it is your heritage you’re paying for.  A city that has struggled with what it wants to keep and doesn’t want to keep in terms of buildings took a big step in the right direction last night.

For Burlington to have a Heritage Advisory Committee that is doing great work and to also have a citizens committee that stepped in when its city council couldn’t put one foot in front of the other without tripping – this is a good day for Burlington.  Celebrate!

The Friends of Freeman Station will be at the Burlington Heritage Fair, on Saturday, Feb. 2 from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Burlington Central Library, 2331 New Street.  Visitors can see pictures of Freeman Station, get updates on the big move, and view train-related artifacts. Supporters can buy a T-shirt or print of the station, became a member and sign up for email updates.

Return to the Front page

A very healthy debate is developing over whether the city should even do the pilot installation of bike lanes on Lakeshore.

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON.  January 28, 2012  A city council committee took four hours two weeks to get to the point where they voted 4-2 to go ahead with a pilot project to collect data on just what having bicycle lanes on either side of Lakeshore Road from Seneca Avenue eastward to Guelph Line would do to the flow of traffic.  That vote now has to be confirmed at a city council meeting tonight.  It is expected to fail.

The public seemed to want Car Free Sundays so that bikes could take over the streets – but that same public doesn’t want the bikes in their own lanes on Lakeshore Road.

Ward 4 Councillor Jack Dennison attended a public information meeting a few days later on the water main work that has to be done along Lakeshore Road before the lane markings get put in and said he expects to be tarred and feathered by the people he represents for supporting the pilot plan.  He added that the Mayor is feeling the pressure.  When asked if he thought the Mayor would hold, Dennison gave that look that suggested he too wondered if the Mayor would cave in to the pressure.

And there is pressure. The Mayor is being bombarded with emails and phone calls.

What the city doesn’t have is very much in the way of real, supportable data.  What it does have is a lot of emotion.

I drove the stretch of road that is at issue – Lakeshore Road from Seneca Avenue to Guelph Line – and yes there was traffic but I had no problem making left hand turns into Seneca from Lakeshore nor did I have any problem making a left hand turn back onto Lakeshore from Delaware where I continued along Lakeshore and made a left north onto Green. I then drove along First went south on Beaver and made another left onto Lakeshore.

There was always oncoming traffic – but other than waiting – say maybe 10-15 seconds – I had no problem and there was never a back-up of traffic behind me when I was proceeding east on Lakeshore.

“When did you do this trial run”,  I was asked.  On Monday between 5:05 pm and 5:25 pm.  “You went too early I was told”.

There are a lot of emotions about this issue but policy doesn’t get made based on emotions – does it?

The objective of the pilot is to determine if the changing of the size of the various traffic lanes on Lakeshore Road will affect people who live in the area adversely.

Three of the six council members are directly impacted by any changes to this road: Sharman, Meed Ward and Dennison.  Meed Ward, whose Newsletter is the best of any council member, sets out why she voted against the change in lane markings.  Her comments follow:

Councillor Meed Ward has always been good at listening – is the LAkeshore Road cycling issue an opportunity to lead?

My Take: Along with my colleagues councillors Sharman and Taylor, I support retaining the current configuration of Lakeshore Road, primarily for safety reasons for all road users. Here are 10 reasons why we need to retain the centre lane on Lakeshore Road, and take steps that will actually deliver on the goal of helping residents to use cycling and active transportation.

1. The road is currently functioning safely.

Transportation staff have confirmed that the collision type and number are what you’d expect for an arterial road, and it is not listed on the Top 10 of problem roads in Burlington.   In short, the road is safe for both drivers and cyclists.

2. Current cycling infrastructure in this area is adequate.

The Centennial bike path provides a safe, segregated and beautiful route for cyclists heading between downtown and the east of the city. In addition, there is the multi-use asphalt path on the South side of Lakeshore Rd. That path will be upgraded as part of the road reconstruction. A number of cyclists told council that for speed reasons they don’t like to use either Centennial path or the multi-use path, but the bottom line is that these services exist. No one is required to cycle on the road. Riders who feel safe on Lakeshore Road already cycle there without a bike path; those who don’t likely won’t cycle on Lakeshore Road even with a bike lane.

As an aside, the city is poised to invest heavily in cycling infrastructure – the proposed capital budget for 2013 includes $1.25m for new and upgraded multi-use paths throughout the city – we need to encourage cyclists to use these paths, rather than compromise road safety for everyone.

3. Changes to the road will compromise safety for both cyclists and drivers.

Residents on Lakeshore Road remember when the centre turn lane was installed for the safety of cars turning left onto and off of the road. They noticed fewer collisions after the centre turn lane was installed. I have asked Transportation Staff to provide that data (it should have been part of the initial report). Further, with just a narrow painted median for cars to wait while turning left, passing vehicles will veer into the cycling lane to pass, putting cyclists at risk.

4. Delays will result.

Traffic flow will be impeded by removing the centre turn lane, stealing precious minutes of time from families due to commuting, reducing their quality of life and adding further emissions to the air, affecting both drivers and cyclists. As one resident said in a letter to committee: “Should we not be concerned about the plan’s generation of so much idling traffic, with its resulting air pollution, in such close proximity to a public school and a dense residential area…There’s a Burlington by-law to stop vehicles idling for over 30 seconds; how many violations of that by-law will be directly caused by this plan?”

5. If you build it they will come only works in the movies.

We’re told that on-road bike lanes will increase the number of people cycling, but this vague hope fundamentally misunderstands why people don’t cycle now. It’s not because there is a lack of on-road bike lanes; it’s because more than half our residents must leave the city to work. Until we focus on economic development and bringing jobs to Burlington, cycling to work will remain a dream for our residents, even with on-road bike lanes. As one resident said in her letter to committee: “I like cycling myself. I cannot, however, find a way to bike my two children to daycare and then down to St. Catharines in order to do the job that pays my property taxes in Burlington….I have found biking over 100km a day to be especially trying in winter.”

6. There is no data to suggest on-road bike lanes will increase cycling in Burlington or has done so where bike lanes have been added.

Creating congestion and traffic delays as a means to get people out of their cars and onto bikes, without taking steps to rectify why people don’t cycle now, only produces…..congestion and delays. We need to balance the needs of all road users; this proposal creates significant safety and other negative impacts for the vast majority of current road users. It’s not balanced. Cyclists and cars are sharing the road well now.

7. Families won’t cycle on Lakeshore Road.

For many families and individuals on-road cycling is too dangerous even with on-road bike lanes. Our residents are looking for dedicated bike paths and separated bike lanes – Ottawa is a good example. This will take more planning and time – a precious commodity in an impatient world of instant gratification – but separated bike paths will go further to achieving the results we want.

8. The “pilot” has no goals to determine success (or failure).

The pilot will measure vehicle counts, travel time, bicycle counts and motor vehicle collisions, but no thought has been given to how many more cyclists will be required to deem the pilot a success, or how many accidents or delays are “acceptable” to deem this a success. Even one accident is too many – we should not be using our residents as guinea pigs to test the safety of the road. The lack of clear targets creates the impression that calling this a pilot is simply a device to push this through without proper data, consideration or due process.

9. Poor process leads to poor decisions.

This project has suffered from lack of good data and poor public consultation – being sprung on residents before Christmas, with a proposed amendment coming days before the final vote. There was no opportunity for a public meeting that would have provided an opportunity for table group discussion to learn from our residents what would help them pursue a more active lifestyle, and whether on-road cycling lanes on Lakeshore Road will have any impact at all on their cycling patterns.

10. We ignore the public at our peril.

More than 125 residents wrote to me and other members of council, to ask that the centre turn lane be retained. An additional 250 residents submitted a petition asking for the road to remain as is. Residents have clearly communicated their concerns, and goals for a balanced approach to cycling infrastructure. Yet those have been set aside. We’ve been told that supporting the on-road bike lanes at any cost to drivers and despite the concerns of residents, is showing “leadership.” Leadership has become the code word to justify ignoring public input.

The best decisions are made by carefully consulting and considering the views of the people most directly affected by our decisions. The city’s commitment to community engagement is built on this premise. It recognizes that elected officials don’t have a corner on wisdom (no one does), but that collectively there is much wisdom in our community if we listen and learn from each other.

When politicians dream about the future and impose a solution, it doesn’t always work out the way it’s supposed to, and residents are left suffering with the consequences until we fix it. One example will suffice: last week, council members discussed parking problems in the Uptown community of Burlington in Ward 5. This community was designed as high density with limited parking to “get people out of their cars” and onto transit. It didn’t work – people still have to drive outside the community for work, or long distances for shopping or recreation. So now Councillors are having to fix the situation, and have approved relaxed on-street parking rules in the area. Several councilors expressed surprise that the vision hadn’t worked. The reason: without jobs (and shopping and recreation) close by, residents still have to drive.

Making it hard for residents to drive doesn’t automatically get them out of their cars, if nothing else in the community changes. We need to heed this lesson before imposing hardship on the users of Lakeshore Road.

Meed Ward is not going to ignore her public – but she isn’t going to lead it either.

The proposed pilot test of new lane markings on Lakeshore Road would run from Seneca (not Torrance) east to Guelph and have a very small divider lane with exclusive bike lanes on either side.  Residents see that small divider lane as too small for them to make left hand turns.

Dennison who is an avid cyclist, thinks the cycling lanes are part of the direction Lakeshore Road should be going in.

Sharman,  who is also a consistent bicycle user and a strong proponent of the Car Free Sundays appear to be reacting to public pressure.  For a guy who always wants the data he doesn’t seem too concerned about the lack of data on this issue.

The whole idea was to determine if putting bicycle lanes on either side of Lakeshore road would make any difference to the flow of traffic.

The Region ensured that the public got an opportunity to fully understand what was going to happen to Lakeshore Road when the water main was upgraded.  The public was given useful data.  Why can’t the public let the city gather useful data on what separate bike lanes would do to the flow of traffic on Lakeshore?  Perhaps because emotions are over ruling reason?

The road is going to get ripped up to have a new water main put in by the Region and no one is grousing about the problems that is going to cause.  When the road is resurfaced after the water main has been installed the city wants to remark a section of the road and make provision for bike lanes that will stay in place from about September of this year until April of 2014.

What’s the big deal?  If it becomes evident that the road cannot safely, and at little inconvenience to the people who live in the immediate area, handle the change in lane markings, then bike lanes should come out.

After driving about Lakeshore I headed north up Appleby Line to look at a parking problem in the Uptown area and then headed west along Upper Middle Road.  If you want to have to handle traffic and struggle to make a left hand turn, with traffic lights to help – try Upper Middle.  I wanted to go south on Walkers to get home.  The traffic was backed up and it was going to take several lights before I would make it through the intersection.

I went further west to Centennial and was able to make a left and get home.

Upper Middle Road was a lot harder to drive than Lakeshore Road.  And there were bike lanes which didn’t get in the way – but then it was cold, cold, cold and there was just the one brave cyclist on the road.

We have added some material from a city, Minneapolis, that has an active cycling policy in place.  They have snow there and they have the coldest average temperature of any major metropolitan area in the United States.

The City of Minneapolis Bicycle Program is integrated into many divisions and departments at the city. The core staff of the Bicycle Program operates out of the Traffic & Parking Services Division of the Public Works Department. They have the primary responsibilities of educating the public through the Bike Walk Ambassador Program and implementing new projects through the Non-Motorized Transportation Pilot Program. Bicycle Program staff also produces the Minneapolis Bicycle Map and organizes the annual bicycle count. Other staff in Traffic & Parking Services responds to bicycle traffic safety issues and rents out bike lockers at municipal parking ramps in the downtown area.

Elsewhere in Public Works, new off-street bike trail projects, the bike rack cost share program, and the Bicycle Master Plan are managed by staff in the Transportation Planning & Engineering Division. Many Minneapolis bikeways are cared for by crews in the Street Maintenance & Repair Division.

In the Minneapolis Police Department, the Bicycle Recovery Unit stores recovered and abandoned bicycles and holds bicycle auctions. The Traffic Unit investigates accidents between bicyclists and motorists. The Traffic Control Unit enforces parking rules in bike lanes. Police officers in each of the five precincts enforce bicycle-related laws and respond to emergencies. Twenty-Eight percent of the MPD police force is certified to patrol by bicycle.

This is a city with a committed policy and pro-active programs that lead to, foster and support increased use of cycling.

Burlington has a Master Cycling Plan and does make attempts to promote cycling.  The city held a Bike to Work day event at which breakfast was served for those who arrived at city hall on their bikes.  The Mayor was there on the bike that seems reserved for just photo ops; he does not ride to work on a bicycle.

Cyclists have a right to be on every road in the city – not the 400 series roads but certainly on Lakeshore Road.  They have a right to the safe use of those roads.  Bike lanes will be safer.  Will creating exclusive bike lanes make it safer for cyclists and not unduly delay car drivers – that’s what the six to nine month trial was being put in place to tell us.

Will this Mayor on his bike ever get to ride on a separate and safe bike lane on the Lakeshore Road? Not if they Mayor folds at city council this evening.

The cycle enthusiasts put forward some very solid data at the council committee meeting that deserves attention.  Those opposed to the cycle lanes gave anecdotal evidence that had an obstetrician missing a birth because of traffic.  Why didn’t he leave earlier; he certainly knew the road and its traffic patterns.

Councillor Sharman fanned useless flames when he spoke of the possibility of one of his constituents dying in an ambulance because it got tied up in traffic – such rubbish.

Mayor Goldring speaks glowingly of the cycle plans he saw in Portland, Oregon when he visited that city.  The glow appears to have rubbed off – most indications are that the mayor is getting antsy about the vote for the pilot he cast at a council committee meeting.

Looks like we are in for a long city council meeting tonight.


Return to the Front page

If their parents aren’t telling them then somebody has to – Region takes on Sex Ed role.

By Pepper Parr

The Halton Region Health Department is launching the first phase of Sex Healthy Halton; a social media campaign to promote safer sex, healthy relationships, raise awareness, and reduce sexually transmitted infections. There is aFacebook page

“The landscape for today’s youth is constantly changing and evolving and we need to ensure the youth are able to get trustworthy, reliable and accurate information and services,” stated Gary Carr, Halton Region Chair. “The Health Department’s approach to service and education is reflecting these changes.”

Infections transmitted sexually are not just an uninformed teen problem – it`s n adult problem as well.

The Facebook page is the first phase. A YouTube channel with videos of Public Health Nurses answering frequently asked questions and discussing current and local topics will be launched later this fall.

In Halton, Chlamydia rates increased 173 per cent between 2001 and 2010. In 2011, a total of 833 Chlamydia cases were reported compared to 454 cases in 2007. Social media and networking sites are quickly gaining popularity as a medium.

And that is all the Region tells you.  We researched a bit and have added this:

What is chlamydia?

Chlamydia is a common sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by a bacterium. Chlamydia can infect both men and women and can cause serious, permanent damage to a woman’s reproductive organs.

How common is chlamydia?

Chlamydia is the most frequently reported bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the United States. In 2011, 1,412,791 cases of chlamydia were reported to CDC from 50 states and the District of Columbia, but an estimated 2.8 million infections occur annually. A large number of cases are not reported because most people with chlamydia do not have symptoms and do not seek testing. Chlamydia is most common among young people. It is estimated that 1 in 15 sexually active females aged 14-19 years has chlamydia.

There is a lot more information the Region could have provided – are we sensing some timidity here?

“There are a lot of false information, myths and misconceptions about sexual health and sexuality,” stated Dr. Bob Nosal, Halton Region Medical Officer of Health. “We hope to provide a safe and trusted environment for youth to ask questions and seek answers. Social media will never replace one-to-one services or counseling, but this will open the door for discussions and education.”

Youth will be able to ask questions (publicly or privately), search for answers, connect with a Public Health Nurse, and find information about clinic locations, times and services.

You can follow-up on this: Dial 311 or call 1-866-442-5866.

There were just 13 likes on the Facebook this morning  – we will track this and see if it is serving a useful purpose or if it is just one of those mickey mouse, tepid efforts that bureaucrats who don’t want to embarrass anyone  tend to do.

A mistake made as a teenager alters a life forever and usually not just the life of the teen.  Kids get it – we just need to inform them.  This just might be one of the good ideas.


 

Return to the Front page

This comes with your Canadian passport – natural ice in a natural setting – tax free.

By James Smith

BURLINGTON, ON  January 27, 2013  This is as Canadian as it gets – folks taking advantage of the cold to play shinny on the storm water retention pond on the north side of North Service Road just west of Guelph Line.

Coincidentally the same weekend as the start of the Last Burlington Winter Carnival.

With a game being played on one ice pad parents remove surface snow for a second pad.  Who said the Winter Games couldn’t be played this year?

I loved finding wild ice and playing shinny or just going for a skate when was a kid in Montreal and Etobicoke. These games always seemed more satisfying than our organized hockey league games. When my kids were little, we made our way to the marsh in Bronte several times for this kind of skating  fun.

One could say something cliché about how this is oh so Canadian, but heck, it really, really is!

There’s just something wonderful about people without a whole lot of planning  taking advantage of an impromptu situation and making the most of it. These kids will remember this experience all their lives.

My only quibble is this is a busy stretch of roadway, & is a little dangerous, pity there’s no place to park other than the shoulder of the road. I do hope the City Parking Storm Troopers don’t get wind of this!

Return to the Front page

New Premier for the province when you get back to the office on Monday.

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON  January 25, 2013  So – Sandra Pupatello wins – then what happens?

First there will be a by-election to get her a seat in the Legislature.  Then the Legislature will resume and Pupatello will show the province just what she is made of.  This woman is a tiger – she doesn’t take prisoners.

She will eventually get the election she wants and wipe the floor with Tim Hudak.  She will go to the public with a strong set of candidates – what will that mean to Burlington?

Provincial Liberal leadership delegate Sandra Pupatello meets Burlington’s Ward 1 Councillor Rick Craven.  Could they work well together?

Jane McKenna will want to brush up her resume.   Burlington has two, maybe three potential candidates – one of whom can win the seat with a dynamic enough leader.

Ted McMeekin, the cabinet minister to the east of us and the go to guy when Burlington wants to be heard by the provincial government.  He is supporting Kathleen Wynne because she might keep him in cabinet.  Pupatello won’t invite McMeekin into the cabinet she forms.

There is an opportunity for McMeekin to run for Mayor of Hamilton – they will love him over there – but Mayor of the zoo on the other side of the Skyway may be more than McMeekin wants to take on.

Ted Chudleigh should hold his Halton seat which includes parts of  northern Burlington .  It would take someone who has done a lot of ground work to beat the man who knows his job, does his job and is well liked. He has high name recognition and there are no smears on his copy book.

Sandra for sure on Saturday – then let the games begin.  Ontario has never seen a leader like this before.

 

Return to the Front page

A little more depth in that State of the City address would have been nice; telling the full story and sharing the concerns is better practice.

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON  January 24. 2013  It was back in 1986, when Roly Bird was Mayor of the city.  At that time there was a regular Mayor’s Breakfast – an event that gave the wheelers and dealers and wanna be’s an opportunity to get together and network – they didn’t call it that then – it was just the way local politics was done.

Someone came up with the idea of having the Mayor give an annual address.  They needed a name for it and decided they would model it after the State of the Nation address used in the United States.  Burlington was keeping one step ahead of Oakville which still have Mayor’s Breakfasts.

Burlington has been doing this ever since.  This morning, on a crisp Canadian winter day, more than 400 people drove out to the convention centre on Burloak, drove around looking for a parking spot and did what Roly Bird introduced them to back in ’86; get caught up on what’s happening at city hall.

These State of the City addresses gives the Mayor a chance to trot out the list of things that have been done – sort of like a shareholders meeting where all those holding preferred shares get to enjoy their dividend.

This event is put on by the Mayor; his office controls the flow and the event.  No questions get asked and you’re given phrase after phrase of the kind of stuff only a public relations specialist can write.

On balance Burlington is in good shape.  At some point the people at city hall are going to stop trotting out all the MoneySense magazine ratings.  It is a fine city but we seem to have let ourselves be defined by our geography.  The “gem” or the “jewel” of a waterfront (with a pier that is coming in at three times it original cost) and an Escarpment that makes the city both rural and suburban at the same time.  The city is not yet at that point where it can say it is urban or urbane.

We now know that the property either side of the QEW is our Prosperity Corridor and we were assured that city council will approve the Official Plan and the rezoning that is going to be needed to get IKEA into the property it has optioned on the North Service Road.

Council will pass the changes  to the Official Plan and give IKEA the rezoning it wants and it’s then a done deal, said the Mayor except for three words that are laden with possible very serious problems.  Goldring mentioned “two other processes” that we must go through – the Regional government and the Conservation Authority.

Region because Walkers Line is a Regional Road that is nearing capacity and the Conservation Authority because of a creek that is on the eastern edge of the property.

While Burlington wants the IKEA move to happen – the Region isn’t as close to the issue and are not facing the same pressure.  There are 1 million visits to IKEA now – making it the city’s biggest tourist attraction (which got the only laugh Goldring was going to get with this address).  The new location is expecting to get 1.5 million visitors annually.  Walkers Line in its current form cannot handle that traffic and the two lanes that make up the North Service Road certainly can’t handle the traffic going into the location.

THE QEW cannot be made narrower so is any width for the North Service Road going to come out of the land IKEA has optioned?   The next problem then is the railway line at the north side of the property.  Is IKEA’s hope to  make their site wider?

That red line is the railway tracks – the thin black line is the creek on the east of the property.  Getting 1.5 million cars through the Walkers Line intersection is not going to be an easy transportation exercise.  Mayor Goldring misleads when he doesn’t tell the full story.

In the world of planning and design all is possible – but it is not easy and the Mayor misleads his audience when he says “two other processes” – when he should have said two bloody big hurdles that we don’t know quite how we are going to get over and if you’ve got any good ideas – give me a call.

The QEW is a provincial road so we are going to have to work closely with them

The Mayor then used some rather good public relations spin and turned this problem into what you are going to hear called THE PROSPERITY CORRIDOR which will stretch from Guelph Line to Appleby line on both sides of the QEW.  That prosperity is going to amount to two million square feet of new office and industrial space and 6,000 high value jobs.

The Mayor talked about the role the IKEA project played in “helping us shape the new direction for the Burlington Economic Development Corporation” (BEDC).  That was an impressive piece of public relations spin.  The Mayor’s former Chief of Staff, Frank McKeown felt the best thing that could be done with the BEDC, which wasn’t performing all that well, was to “blow it up”.

There are some 20 people on the BEDC board.  It looks like a federal cabinet that has to meet the demographics of a large diverse country.  A board that size has people there to ensure that their interests are protected.  The objective should be to get the smartest people you can find to do the job forget who they represent.  Paul Subject, a member of the board, didn’t expect to have to jump into the fray when he put in more time than he expected working through the way the BEDC would re-shape itself to meet the very real problems it was facing.

The city hasn’t approved the budget that is going to be needed to re-shape the BEDC; the Mayor didn’t mention that one either.

The proof is always in the pudding – and this one is still in the pot.  The people who do the thinking in this city are going to find themselves re-thinking and perhaps re-shaping the council that leads them.  See that as a heads up.

Return to the Front page

If the weather channel doesn’t do it for you – you can now look at maps with crime locations,

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON  January 24, 2013   Effective immediately, Halton residents can access neighbourhood-level crime incident data from the previous day, week, or month, or even search as far back as six months ago through a new crime mapping function that can be accessed through the Service’s website www.haltonpolice.ca.

“Providing reliable, timely crime data to the communities we serve is one of our top priorities, because an informed public is a safer public,” says Halton Chief of Police Steve Tanner. “This partnership with CrimeReports gives us the ability to keep the public informed on a regular basis as to what is going on in our community.”

Police dispatch data is stripped of personal information, including the exact address, and sent securely to CrimeReports.com, which hosts the crime mapping software.  The public can access the data through the Service’s website, under the Crime Files/Mapping navigation button.

Each of the small coloured squares on the map indicates a crime – theft from an auto, a break and enter or an assault. Click on the graphic and you get some detail.  Will you be safer with this information – probably not.  Will you feel safer?  Maybe – nice toy which we are paying for.

Incidents reflected on the map will be shown within 100 numbers of the address, to protect individual’s privacy, while still being within the general vicinity to give people an accurate idea of crime in their neighbourhood.

The crime mapping data will include police-dispatched calls for property damage, sexual assault, assault, robbery, break and enter, theft, impaired driving, homicide, attempted murder, offensive weapons, drug-related offences, and various traffic-related offences such as impaired driving, hit and run, and motor vehicle injuries and fatalities.

“Information is power,” Chief Tanner added. “We hope that by giving the community this information, it will help them understand crime trends and better enable them to assist us in preventing crime in their neighbourhoods.”

The public can access the free crime data through the Service’s website or through the CrimeReports iPhone app, available for free download in the Apple iTunes store. The new service even lets local citizens sign up for free customizable email updates, so they can monitor crime in their neighborhood, or click to link to the CrimeStoppers of Halton website to file an anonymous crime tip.

The HRPS asks the public to keep a few things in mind when accessing the software:

• In order to access the data, people will need to first read and click a disclaimer

• It takes a few minutes for the map data to load, depending on your internet connection. Please be patient.

• Map data is based on dispatched calls, not completed investigations so therefore incident codes may change.

“Police are often dispatched to a call that initially may be reported as a one type of crime and later turn out to be unfounded or another type of crime.  In such a case, the call will appear on the map as initially reported but later be removed or changed,” explained Chief Tanner. “The crime map data is as accurate as possible, but not 100% fool-proof given the evolving nature of police investigations.”

This looks like one of the ideas Chief Tanner brought with him from Kingston where he was the top cop before he came to Burlington.

LATER:  Having read what the police had to say about the service I logged in – and sure enough there is a map with little squares in different colours that tell me the kind of offence that took place.  There was a drug bust over on Inglehart – not too far from me and a theft from an auto on Walkers Line but nothing on my street.

So what does this service do to keep me safer?   I guess knowing that there was a drug arrest on my street would let me know there is a dealer nearby if drugs are my recreation of choice or tell me that I can keep an eye out for “suspicious” behavior and call the police.   Noticing that there were a number of auto break-ins in the area might get me to ensure that my car is locked before I bed down for the night.

And of course there is an App for this too – so I can keep up to date on crime on my street while on the GO train.  Or – I can add even more to my overflowing email box and get a notice sent directly  to me telling me what’s happening in the “hood”.

There is no mention of what the service is costing – it can’t be free but it sure is a  whiz bag toy if there is nothing on TV – I guess.

Ain’t technology great?

Return to the Front page

Ward 4 resident says PAC was a mistake before it was built and is now an expensive mistake.

 

 

 

 

BURLINGTON, ON

January 24th, 2013

Dear Sir:

In the beginning there was a plan for a partnership between the city, senior levels of government and interested citizens of the city to build a Performing Arts Centre and then have it operated by a separate and independent board.   As years past the estimated cost of construction grew without any government commitment to maintain or increase their share of the costs. Private groups came forward saying they would hard to make up the difference but there were no tangible dollars put down.

As estimated costs grew without a plan to pay for them I wrote council and the Post about the financial peril of the project. Unfortunately dreams prevailed over facts and the project went ahead.

Ward 4 resident Jim Barnett says: “The mayor now says this slow start-up is normal. If it is normal, then it would have been anticipated. It is abnormal, thus the city is being asked to bail the project out. It was not that long ago the city was touting the independent board that would make handouts unnecessary.”

The business plan as presented never did have a realistic ramp up in revenues in the early years, but with out this incorrect forecast, the project might not have gone ahead. Therefore it was ignored and the praying started. Well the praying did not work and there is a substantial shortfall. Not only in 2013 but likely for some years to come.

The mayor now says this slow start-up is normal. If it is normal, then it would have been anticipated. It is abnormal, thus the city is being asked to bail the project out. It was not that long ago the city was touting the independent board that would make handouts unnecessary.

Having to hire two more people at this time again points out the flaws in the plan to date.

Let us all remember that only a small cross-section of the citizens use the facility.

When all costs are in, the pier will exceed $20 million and you will not be getting anything back in insurance.

I fear that Performing Arts Centre will also become a drain on the city’s resources, making plans for the hospital more difficult, and increasing taxes for the people who do not use the facility.

Unfortunately I do not have a solution. I hope someone can come forward with a way to save the project and prevent another embarrassment for the city.

In the meantime, I hope the city going forward gets out of the business of building structures that they do not know how construct, finance, budget or manage.

Jim Barnett

Letters to the Editor are welcome.  Please include a telephone number at which you can be reached.  We qualify each submission.  Include illustrations if you wish.

Return to the Front page

Mayor tells a sold out crowd that the city is doing just fine – said the same thing last year.

By Staff

BURLINGTON, ON  January 24, 2013   Mayor Rick Goldring delivered his third State of the City address to a sold out audience at the Burlington Convention Centre:

Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen and thank you for taking time from your busy schedules to attend this year’s State of the City Address. This is my third address and it is something I look forward to every year.

Before I go any further, there are several people I want to thank and acknowledge. The Chamber of Commerce for not only hosting today’s event, but for your relentless efforts in advocating for business and increased prosperity in Burlington.

Throughout the first half of this his first term as Mayor, Rick Goldring has been out in the community talking and listening; doing what a Mayor us supposed to do.

I would like to thank today’s sponsors – Scotia Bank, Bell, Certified Management Accountants and The Centre for Skills Development & Training. Events like these would not be possible without the support of our valued community sponsors.

I also want to thank TVCogeco for broadcasting this address to those who cannot attend in person or are here today but want a repeat viewing. An informed community is an engaged community.

I would also like to thank and introduce my Council colleagues: Councillors Rick Craven, Marianne Meed Ward, John Taylor, Jack Dennison, Paul Sharman, and Blair Lancaster. Of the many achievements we have accomplished, what I value the most from you is the professionalism, dedication, and collaboration you bring day in and day out. While differences of opinion arise from time to time, as they do and must in great councils, the interests of our constituents’ and the City always remain first and foremost. I can honestly say this Council is focused on and committed to the tasks at hand and the people of Burlington. Burlington is a fine example of the effectiveness of municipal government.

City management and staff – we are proud and fortunate to have a fine team that serves the needs of our community, often without fanfare or notice. You are the backbone of our daily lives, making sure that the vital, in-demand services you provide each day are done professionally, efficiently, and with our customers in mind. I would like to introduce two of our three senior executive teams – both Jeff Fielding, City Manager and Kim Phillips, General Manager of Community Services are with us this morning.

And to the people of Burlington: it is truly an honour and privilege to serve you.

This year’s State of the City Address is a time to review our performance and share our upcoming priorities and opportunities. It is a measurable and transparent scorecard, which reflects three core themes that are important to this council: strong governance, accountability, and community aspirations.

This morning’s address is divided into three areas:

1. 2012 in Review

2. Looking Ahead: 2013 and Beyond

3. The Long Term Vision for the Future

2012 in Review

As we all know, the global economy remains seriously challenged. With escalating debt levels and an uncertain economic horizon, governments around the world, at all levels, are challenged in maintaining highly valued, if not essential services, despite an ever straining tax base. Burlington is not immune to these head winds.

But as we also know, Canada has, to date, been able to weather through these difficult times better than most countries. With Burlington’s location, talent and creativity, we have forged a road ahead, on our own terms, accomplishing impressive wins for our community.

I will go through the key highlights of 2012 now, but if you want details, please refer to report we are releasing today: “The Sum of 2012”which is available here and on the city’s website.

I invite you to view it at your leisure to see all the great and tireless work being done by so many in our great city. I want to thank the city manager’s offices, our communications department and my staff for their hard work.

Burlington’s robust economy continued to grow in 2012.

• 680 new full-time jobs and 220 new businesses were created.

• Our unemployment rate is at 6.0%, which remains lower than the provincial average of 7.8%.

• In 2012, Burlington issued 2,138 building permits having a construction value of over $425 million.

• The office vacancy rate has fallen to 10.5% from significantly higher levels only a few years ago.

• More businesses are either coming or expanding in Burlington. The industrial vacancy rate is down to 5.5%, a low mark.

Meeting after meeting listening, making comments and doing what a Mayor is supposed to do

I am pleased to advise that the re-development of Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital is on track. The contribution agreement for the City’s $60 million was finalized last year. City staff are currently working on the site plan application for Phase 1 of the project and we expect this part of the process to be completed relatively soon.

I am very pleased to advise that meaningful progress has been made on the Brant Street Pier in 2012. Work has continued in the winter and staff expect the ribbon to be cut in June.

As you know, the City of Burlington and Halton Region strongly opposed the expansion of the Nelson Quarry, which is nestled on the Niagara Escarpment in a designated UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. A Joint Board decision that undeniably supported our position was reached in October.

Prior to becoming Mayor, I identified the need to review our Downtown plans and get back on track. Council established a downtown task force early in the term to update these plans, which incorporate the waterfront, and we continue to receive feedback from across the City. On November 6, a Downtown Vision Workshop was held at the Burlington Art Centre and I was inspired by the number and energy of the participants, who shared their vision and ideas. The key findings from this summit will form an important component of our Official Plan Review.

Back in 2011, I determined that local graduates were not finding career opportunities in Burlington. I was concerned about losing our best and brightest. Determined to change that, innovateBurlington was created along with several community partners. I’m pleased to report that innovateBurlington has been a huge success with:

10 graduates participating in the program this first year;

• 5 alumni now working locally in their field;

• Revenue targets were exceeded and innovateBurlington worked with 12 companies and completed 13 projects;

• 16 mentors provided guidance and experience to our grads.

innovateBurlington is a great example of how we integrate opportunities for local youth employment and the needs of the local business community, and provides us with our future community leaders.

Responsible governments have to be fiscally prudent. 2012 offered unique challenges in the constant battle to weigh the inevitable trade-offs between increasing taxes and tailoring services and responsibilities. We have managed this well, despite the challenges.

Council agreed to an increase in the hospital tax levy of 1% in 2012 and the expectation at this stage is that we will do the same for 2013 and 2014. The community has told us loud and clear that the Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital redevelopment is a number one priority. The community needs to get behind the foundation as they work to raise their $60 million share for the redevelopment.

For 2011 and 2012, there was a cumulative increase of 3.2% for the Burlington portion of property taxes or 4.2% including the increase in the hospital levy. Our objective in the longer term is to maintain average tax rate increases around inflationary levels, which is very challenging to achieve.

What does all this mean?

MoneySense magazine named Burlington the GTA’s number 1 city and the second best city in Canada in which to live. It was also rated the 8th best place for jobs.

In an independent survey this past Fall conducted by Environics, Burlington residents who were surveyed responded:

• They were very satisfied with the services they receive from the City of Burlington

• 83% of Burlington residents surveyed said they receive excellent value for their tax dollars

• Burlingtonians are very satisfied with municipal government.

• Residents also have a positive outlook on the future as it pertains to both their quality of life and personal financial situation.

• 95% say they have an excellent or good quality of life.

Our 2012 efforts and results will go a long way towards Burlington continuing to be a destination and home for families and businesses. The challenge going forward will be to maintain this positive progress and energy, and build on this foundation and drive.

Mayor Goldring delivers his speeches in a direct deliberate style.

Last month, at a presentation hosted by the Burlington Economic Development Corporation (BEDC), Craig Wright, Chief Economist at TD Bank and Burlington resident, suggested that Canadian growth would be dampened and kept at about the 2% level, interest rates will likely remain low and the regional housing market will cool, with little risk of a major declines. Craig then moved to his view of the local Burlington economy and clearly stated that we have a “vibrant local economy that is well positioned to grow.” As evidence, he cited the diversity of our economic base, noting the healthy mix of professional services and manufacturing in Burlington and the fact that we are a relatively prosperous community; our household incomes are nearly 20% higher than the Ontario average. This will sustain the local housing market and fuel future growth in consumer spending to the advantage of local businesses.

Canadian businesses have improved balance sheets, indicating a future acceleration of their respective investment levels. This means to me that we need to ensure Burlington is well positioned to capture more than “our fair share” of such future investment.

We must position and market ourselves accordingly, with the right infrastructure in place. Burlington must be fiscally responsible and well-run; an engaging place that businesses are attracted to and invest in and where their people want to live because of the amenities and quality of life we offer and enjoy. This is our key challenge for 2013 and beyond.

Looking Ahead: 2013 and Beyond

So what must we get right in 2013?

The Pier construction must continue to be well-managed by our staff. This project has been a visible distraction to all of us. Once completed, the pier will integrate positively into our iconic waterfront and provide an identity for future generations.

Last year several parks were completed in North Burlington and our new state-of-the-art Alton Public Library and Community Centre, built-in conjunction with a new public high school, will be open this fall. Knowing that access to parks and green space are important drivers of citizen satisfaction and quality of life, we are investing in our communities and creating vibrant neighbourhoods.

We are working with our neighbours in Hamilton on mutually important issues through the Greater Bay Area Sub-Committee. This includes the clean-up of Randle Reef and potential economic development opportunities, which will open the door for future, mutually beneficial partnerships.

Our Official Plan Review will continue in 2013. This is an extremely important process because our population is changing and there is very little room left for brand new greenfield development. Within our Alton community, there is only potential for 450 more single family homes. Our present and future state is infill, intensification and redevelopment that provide us the opportunity to create compact, mixed use and walkable neighbourhoods.

We also have a growing number of seniors and single person households. The needs for housing, transit, and services will also change. The Official Plan Review will be a big picture look at how and where we will grow from here, to meet our needs and create the Burlington of the future.

A number of important strategic initiatives took place in 2012 where we will see results this year.

Our Community Energy Plan team will submit their report, allowing us to set and achieve long-term sustainability goals. Together with Halton Region, we are working towards the development of the Beachway Park Master Plan with recommended actions in 2013.

Late last year, the province advised us that they will be addressing transportation challenges in the Halton, Hamilton, Niagara regions by widening existing highways and not with a brand new Niagara GTA highway through North Burlington-for now. The details will be announced in February.

Widened highways will not address the issue long-term. Commute times in the GTA are some of the longest in North America. We need the province to aggressively support “The Big Move” plan of Metrolinx. This requires $50 billion of funding of which only $16 billion of that has been funded. If implemented, the result will be a 32 minute reduction in average commute times in the GTA.

With the fiscal challenges of the provincial government, they have to look at alternative sources of revenue to pay for this which could include road tolls, parking levies, a regional sales tax or increases in the gas tax. The federal government needs to step up as well, as Canada is one of the few countries in the world where the federal government does not contribute to public transit. There is no time to wait on this, as the cost of congestion is significant for both commuters and consumers.

Led by our City Manager, Jeff Fielding, staff has initiated Results Based Accountability, with a goal to have Performance Based Budgeting in place for 2015. We will continue to realign our programs and services to meet the goals and objectives of this Council’s Strategic Plan. This includes continuing with a head count freeze at City Hall. All new positions required are filled by redeployment of existing staff or attrition.

The City’s e-government technology project is underway with the goal to significantly advance our web-based customer service.

One of the key priorities for 2013 will be the Burlington Economic Development Corporation. In November 2012, Burlington City Council endorsed aggressive growth targets and formally requested the BEDC to take a more direct, active and strategic role in the short and long-term development and marketing of Burlington.

While the city’s employment lands are valuable strategic assets, they are in limited supply. We must take a proactive and targeted approach to preserve and optimize the city’s employment land inventory to yield higher tax contributions bringing in proportionally more revenue and making us less reliant on residential property taxes. The longer term goal will see the City essentially double its industrial/commercial revenues over 20 years by focusing on business intensification below the escarpment, thereby driving Burlington’s long-term fiscal capabilities and sustainability.

Looking Ahead: Beyond 2013

Burlington is at an interesting point in its history. We are becoming built out as mentioned earlier, resulting in our tax assessment growing at a slower rate. We are aging at a rate greater than provincial averages with 17% of residents over age 65, and 45% over 45. The major revenue source for the City is from property taxes. Now more than ever, we need to be creative in looking at our financial situation in the long-term and analyzing our balance sheet, which could result in the redeployment or leveraging of our assets. We cannot accept status quo thinking.

As Mayor, I am part of the Large Urban Mayors Caucus of Ontario (LUMCO). One of the areas we are focusing on is research in preparation of asking the provincial government for the opportunity to access alternative sources of revenue. There is real unfairness about a tax system that sees municipalities receiving 11% of tax revenue generated along with maintaining 65% of the capital infrastructure. Mississauga Mayor Hazel

McCallion has said many times that the federal government has all the money, the province has all the power and the municipalities have all the problems.

So what must we get right in the long-term?

We must redefine and market Burlington’s value proposition to target global and national companies in key economic sectors including advanced manufacturing, financial services and information technology.

We must review the City’s planning and development approvals system to be more in tune to the needs of industry and business and create a distinct, sustainable competitive advantage.

An early example of this is the Ikea project, which played a vital role in helping us shape the new direction for the Burlington Economic Development Corporation, by creating the opportunity for big picture thinking about the needs for our future growth and development to retain and attract the kind of businesses we want for Burlington.

I am pleased to announce that at our next Council meeting, we will be approving an Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application to allow for the relocation of Ikea to the QEW and Walkers Line. While there are two other processes that we must go through with the Region, Conservation Halton and the Ministry of Transportation, I am confident that we will be successful in keeping Ikea’s Canadian head office here in Burlington. What does this mean for Burlington?

A new head office and store over 440,000 square feet, which is 70% larger than the existing facility;

• about 90 new jobs or nearly a 20% increase to their team;

• $1.7 million in total tax revenue and $10.8 million in total development charges;

• a facility that attracts about 1.5 million visitors to Burlington.

IKEA has become the catalyst for unlocking the development potential of the North Service Road area.

Developing the area of North Service Road between Guelph Line and Appleby Line is the starting point for turning the QEW employment lands into Burlington’s Prosperity Corridor.

Our vision is to launch a cycle of re-investment that will see high-profile sites fill the QEW corridor with new office buildings that will house companies and create high quality jobs that mirror the skills of our residents. This will be an opportunity to leverage our investment in the DeGroote of School Business with the prosperity corridor. This will be a significant development of over 2 million square feet of new industrial/office development projects and will accommodate over 6,000 new high-value jobs.

Another element in the development of our employment lands to create jobs and prosperity for the city is the redevelopment of the King Road Underpass, also known as the ‘Big Push.’ This significant engineering accomplishment marks the kind of strategic and innovative investments that will continue to take us into the 22nd century.

Our goal is to build over 900,000 square feet of new industrial/commercial facilities every year which will generate over $600,000 in new ICI tax revenue; and create 1,526 jobs per year for a total of approximately 29,000 new jobs across the city by 2031. This will increase the opportunity for more residents to not only live in Burlington, but work here as well, improving their quality of life.

Burlington’s era of automatic pilot growth and new construction is over. We are out of land for large new residential subdivisions and our supply of industrial/commercial land is also constrained. So, I repeat the earlier question, “what must we get right in 2013 and beyond?”

When Wayne Gretzky played hockey, he saw and played the game in a very different way. He never worried about where the puck was at any given moment. Everyone else did. He stayed steps head, thinking where the puck is going to be and then acted. We have to anticipate and shape our future and then act, ahead of, smarter, and better than others.

If civic government was merely the fiscal administration and execution of specific services, this would be simple and clear. But I propose that civic leadership is more than that. As stewards for our community, we must harness and galvanize the energies and desires of our people, community groups, and businesses to make Burlington the choice where people want to dream, live, enjoy, work, raise their families, and invest, now and in the future.

To do this, we have to dare to create a clear, unified vision, designed and executed by all stakeholders, and then drive to put and maintain Burlington on the map of top-tier communities. We have to envision and create our future on our own terms.

Two months ago, I arranged for an Inspire Burlington – Defining Our Dream workshop for 35 community leaders including representatives from Council, business, media, education, community groups, faith, sports, arts and culture, healthcare, youth and environmental advocacy groups, to define the dream for Burlington.

The objective of the two-day workshop was to define an exciting future or dream that we can all aspire to, work towards, and benefit from. The two days were both invigorating and exhausting. The depth of people’s passion for Burlington was phenomenal and authentic. There were three major themes that came out of the workshop.

Burlington is a compassionate, connected community. This is evidenced by the work of our social agencies, faith communities and service clubs that reach out to those in need including the 17,000 people in Burlington living below the poverty line.

There is a tremendous connection with our natural environment. In fact, the terms “Iconic Natural Identity”, “Jewel on the Lake” and “Sense of Place” were used. While the Niagara Escarpment is not unique to Burlington, it is integral to our City.

The other theme encompasses “Super Charging Ideas” which recognizes that with our limited growth potential and the way the world is changing, we need to be innovative and creative using “22nd century thinking” to maintain and enhance the vibrant nature of Burlington, where we are the home of “great opportunities” with “local riches and “global impact” being created.

Burlington offers so much: wonderful neighbourhoods, a great waterfront, our rural north, great parks and open space, recreational and cultural opportunities, great businesses and educational institutions. If you can’t find what you need in Burlington, you don’t have to go very far to find what you are looking for.

Why do people choose to live in Burlington or have their business in Burlington? It is quality of life. I mentioned earlier that 95% of the people surveyed by Environics rank their quality of life very high. Our challenge will be to maintain what we have.

This, for me, was an amazing process – both inspirational and educational. For us as a collective, it solidified the direction of our strategic plan and reinforced the work we have begun at the City. I believe, ultimately, that the information gleaned during this process can become a blueprint for all of our stakeholders and partners to use in planning for their future. It can give us an intelligent, pragmatic, and sustainable competitive advantage and serve as our legacy to future generations. As a community, we must shape and drive our future together.

So what do I want you to take away from today?

Opening new parks, cutting ribbons – all part of the job a Mayor does.

Be positive. Burlington is in good shape. Council is committed to keep Burlington as a thriving, prosperous, inclusive community through strong fiscal management, innovation and partnerships.

Be open to change. We have a meaningful Strategic Plan in place with a focused Council and staff that understands Burlington’s priorities. We will continue to look at how we engage the community as we work through the change that is taking place. The City of Burlington is focused on improving customer service, improving productivity through technology, and decision-making through teamwork and performance based measurement.

We will overcome challenges and continue to position ourselves as the community of choice for residents and business because of our strengths, amenities, and quality of life. We will not take anything for granted.

What makes me optimistic for our future? Burlington is a not just a city. We are a community; a community of partnerships, and generosity. A community of people who strengthen this city giving it its character and charm, who balance pride with humility, with neighbours working together and otherwise people from different walks of life, who selflessly and quietly help others. I am continually inspired by the efforts of the many people who do caring things for others in our community.

It’s the single volunteer who cooks a turkey for Christmas dinner at Carpenter Hospice, to those who contribute precious dollars and talent to community groups, all the way up to the rather astounding force of the Burlington Eagles Hockey Club who along with other organizations, collected more than 200,000 pounds of food in their Fall Food Drive for local food banks.

We have a past and present that we can be rightfully proud of. But what excites me, what inspires me, is the enduring spirit of our community and people.

So let’s dream and join together, for Burlington and each other. We are in this together. And together we will continue to build a wonderful city.

Thank You.

Return to the Front page

A winter that can be celebrated; a full day of fun: The Lowville Winter Games Sunday 11-4

By Staff

BURLINGTON, ON January 24, 2013  While hockey is the sport that drives our passion – winter is what really makes us Canadians.  To get outdoors when there is snow and just plain play is a large part of what this country is all about.  The Lowville Winter Games take place this Sunday from 11:00 am until 4:00 pm.  There is plenty to keep you active, interested and busy and outdoors with snow on the ground.

Getting the hang of how to use a cross-cut saw on a cold winter day – part of the Lowville Winter Games.

There is a log sawing contest – if the city’s fireman show up they could take this one.

There will be Horse drawn wagon rides.

Not sure quite who is having the most fun here – but hot chocolate is going to go down well after this tumble.

It looks like there has been enough snow and it certainly has been cold enough for the snow to stay which means tobogganing.

Winter weather and outdoor activity means tummy’s that want filling; frequently.

Now if this child could be as focused while doing homework – but this is the Lowville Winter Games – that marshmallow comes first.

The Lowville Bistro will be operating full tilt; the United Church will be holding a BBQ and the Gorilla Cheese Truck will be on hand as well.

The Body Zorbs Race Track, the Human Gyroscope and craft by Momstown are part of the day’s events

Conservation Halton will be putting on a Birds of Prey Show.

Return to the Front page

The million dollar ask might have some significant conflict to deal with; Theatre Board will be called to account on this one.

By Pepper Parr

BURLINGTON, ON.  January 24, 2013   It was early in the term of this city council.  She forced a recorded vote on six different items knowing full well when she asked for the vote that she was going to lose every one of them.  Her fellow council members rolled their eyes and went through the exercise.

While very little of the brashness has left Meed Ward,  she is wiser than she was that first year and has her ear to the ground not only in her ward but across the city.

She has major issues with the close to $1 million the Burlington Performing Arts Centre is asking the city to cough up.  Part of the money is to cover the $225,250 short fall from last year’s operations and some additional money to hire additional staff, which Meed Ward feels is using the solutions that haven’t worked in the past to solve problems before the BPAC staff now.

Meed Ward at her old city hall office – the desk is as cluttered in her new space where she tends to fill up her voice mail box and overspend her postage allowance. She promises to get back to people within 24 hours – and delivers on that promise. Now she wants to deliver on her promise to keep spending in line with what is in the bank.

Meed Ward doesn’t think public money should go into making up the losses on commercial acts that didn’t pay for themselves.  Those losses should come out of the reserve BPAC has suggests Meed Ward, who believes the city can and should provide funds that will go towards helping community groups use of the space.  One of the problems community groups have is the cost of the facility while they are doing their set up; they haven’t had to deal with those costs in the past.  Meed Ward thinks the city can provide an amount BPAC would make available to community groups as a sort of set up subsidy.

In our conversation with Meed Ward, whose position on the ask for increased funding is well-known, we asked: What do you do?

“Tough question” she responded.  “I am wondering if the people in place now have the expertise to get the programing right – and it is about programming.  Do the people running the programming side know Burlington’s culture well enough to be able to discern what the community wants” is one question Meed Ward asks.

“Are the price points for the commercial entertainment what this community can pay?  Is the programming mix right?  Meed Ward wants to see data on what the attendance has been and where the people attending these events come from.  “Are we serving our market or are we drawing people from other communities?”, asked Meed Ward.

Meed Ward admits that the task of running a cultural operation in its second year is a challenge and says the solution can’t be to keep coming to the city for more money: “ If the skills needed to program the place are not at hand, then we need to find those skills elsewhere”.

Meed Ward’s issues however are not just with staff.  She feels the Burlington Theatre Board has let everyone in the city down and tells of an experience she had with the hospital board where she serves as the city representative.

“There was a meeting at which the hospital Board was discussing the agreement the hospital had entered into with the city related to the $60 million Burlington is putting up for the hospital re-build.

Meed Ward, who doesn’t know what a “small measure” is, was ready to get right into the discussion.  You can’t take part in this one she was advised – you sit on city council and ‘you have a conflict of interest’  she was told.

You can imagine how Meed Ward took to that comment – but the chair discussed it with legal counsel and the decision of the chair was that Meed Ward did have a conflict.  “I didn’t agree with the decision but I respected the view of the chair and left the meeting.”

“There were no hard feelings because of the decision.  The chair had a view he was able to substantiate and I respected the chair; that’s what governance is all about.”

Meed Ward discussed the situation with Mayor Goldring who agreed that Meed Ward had a conflict.  He understood the position the hospital board chair had taken.

Ward 1 Councillor Rick Craven – half of what Councilor Meed Wards describes as the Rick and Rick” team – who she thinks have a conflict of interest over the BPAC budget they approved as members of that board and now want to vote on at city council

Mayor Goldring – the second part of the `Rick and Rick`team that Councillor Meed Ward thinks may have a conflict of interest on the BPAC ask for close to a million dollars this year.

Meed Ward now wants “Rick and Rick” which is how she describes the Mayor and Ward 1 Councillor Rick Craven, to be just as mindful as she has had to be.  “They can’t sit on the BPAC board and agree with the budget they want to put forward and then attend a city council and note vote for that budget at city council.  They have a conflict and Meed Ward is waiting to see if they will step outside.

Her view is that the Theatre Board doesn’t operate quite as professionally; that they see themselves as a group of people who go along with each other to get along with each other – and that Meed Ward will quickly tell you is not what Board members are in place to do.

They are there to ask the hard questions on behalf of the community and Meed Ward doesn’t see that happening.  The Board is supposed to ask the tough questions and give tough directions.

Meed Ward doesn’t see very much, if any, cooperation between the Burlington Art Centre and the BPAC people.  Ian Ross, Executive Director of the Art Centre is, according to Meed Ward “one of those guys that can think out of the box.”  There isn’t much in the way of a working relationship between Ross and Brenda Heatherington, Executive Director of BPAC.  The two are in the cultural business, selling what they have to the same audience and many feel there should be both a close bond between the two of them.

Ward 2 Councillor Meed Ward thinks the people working to make the Performing Arts centre work need to remember that part of the purpose was to create a space for local cultural groups and not to subsidize commercial acts.

Meed Ward, whose ward takes in most of the downtown core believes there should be a group of people responsible for creating that cultural centre that is the BPAC and the BAC and to some degree the RBG and the Museum.  “There is a need for all these people to collaborate and create that sense of a district:, said Meed Ward.  She doesn’t believe that is happening and wonders if Ross and Heatherington have gotten together for as much as a cup of coffee.

And where is Tourism Burlington in all this?  They put out the literature and market the city – do they do this in concert with the major cultural institutions in the city or do they hustle for just RibFest and the Sound of Music /

One wonders if anyone has suggested that the two boards, BPAC and BAC,  meet together to share experiences and ideas and look for ways to share resources.  Marketing is marketing and getting people to attend a performance or to take in an art show is fundamentally the same, so why aren’t the two looking for synergies and savings?  When they fund raise they are both looking for the same deep pockets – could they collaborate and have a donour split a donation between the two organizations?

The BAC wants an additional staff member as well – Meed Ward says they should work with what they have. The city has committed to not adding any staff in the 2013 draft budget.  “If the city can hold the line – then the local boards can do it too,”  said Meed Ward.

Return to the Front page